Thread gone, interesting.
Posted on: February 23, 2008 - 1:47pm
Offline
Thread gone, interesting.
Hum, interesting enough my thread is gone (the one named "you ask for it) I am sorry if I got you guys too uncomfortable. Well, I am pretty much sure you guys will say the following:
"no, you copy/pasted, that is why it was deleted"
Am i right?!?!?!?!
Hum, well I am sure that wasn't the reason. But, oh well. that is life is it not?Well, apparently *(even the copy/paste factor) the things I qouted weren't liked, WAY too uncomfortable for atheists. Hum? Well, seeya.
I got no arguments of my own. I plagiarize and steal others work. You should mock me and ridicule me. I am a servant of god, and a thief.
Oh, nice sig, go ahead Atheists! Ridicule me, hate me,
post your hateful comments below, it amuses me! I enjoy it, it is quite entertaining and a laughing fest for me. As this whole site is. Especially since when you guys get uncomfortable instead of saying, "maybe i am wrong" you delete the uncomfortable post. interesting!
I got no arguments of my own. I plagiarize and steal others work. You should mock me and ridicule me. I am a servant of god, and a thief.
You've got a hard time getting things right in life, eh plagiarizer?
Here is your thread
Please become a Patron of Brian Sapient
Support our activism efforts by making your Amazon purchases via this link.
Your thread is still present. As Sapient has pointed out, it is in the above link. Simply click on the link he provided.
For some reason, that thread takes a while to load (about 30 seconds for me), so I would give it a while. It will take even longer for you to read my response, so I would find some free time if I were you.
Before the OP content was removed for copyright infringement, I responded en bloc. I therefore await an intelligent and mature response on your part. I am curious as to why you disabled the Read/Write in this thread (which I have reinstated).
"Physical reality” isn’t some arbitrary demarcation. It is defined in terms of what we can systematically investigate, directly or not, by means of our senses. It is preposterous to assert that the process of systematic scientific reasoning arbitrarily excludes “non-physical explanations” because the very notion of “non-physical explanation” is contradictory.
-Me
Books about atheism
I disabled the comments. Regular users can't do so. I disabled the comments so this thread would go away. It's only purpose was to inform the criminal in the first post where his crimes were moved to.
I'm closing it again.
Please become a Patron of Brian Sapient
Support our activism efforts by making your Amazon purchases via this link.