Ignosticism and Positive Ontology
I have no formal background in logic or philosophy, so excuse my rambling and please correct me if I'm wrong. I'm trying to get a handle on the ignostic position. I'll go through what I have so far.
1. "To exist is to exist as something." - Todangst2. To exist as something, something must have properties that differentiate it from nothing.3. "God," as most people describe it, is defined only by what it is not: not natural/supernatural.4. Anything observable would be called natural.5. "God" isn't observable, and to say it is supernatural is admitting the same.6. Supernatural things don't exist, by definition.