Frankly, he deserves most of his ego.

Just there is a rare chance of it getting the best of him.

Otherwise, GO TOD!!! 

Yeah, just look at the other stuff he disagrees with. I'll respond to him when I have time.

Actually, I did not misread it as you implying that a Deist is an Athiest somehow, you misread me. I said that you were saying a Agnostic is an Atheist somehow.

Let me point something out. I spend alot of time and energy defending Atheists Against theists, because Atheists ARE the greatest recipients of persecution worldwide and always have been{in temr so belief}- and are right now in North America[U.S. especially}, and this bother sme because Atheism is a supportable and reasonable position to take.

HOWEVER... I'm the ultimate Iconoclast{as my name suggests} I even will debate fellow Deists and Deism- particularly to try and point out lack of reason in beeing a classic deist today{though not during the enlightenment era}. I've spent ALOT of time and Energy defending Atheism and Atheists in the last few years and caught flack for it; but I now go after certain TYPES of Atheist"s" as well for their lack of appreciation, for false double-standarrded arguments they make, etc; I see the most beloved Atheist spokemen in the west currently going to far in their arrogant and hypocritical MILITANT Atheism- especially Dawkins- when he ignorantly and arrogantly and STUPIDLY [obviously without any understanding of deism beyond classic deism, and any understanding of Pantheism beyond the modern sci-pans- and to some degree I can agree with him in their case because sci-pans are NOT PanTHEISTS they are indeed sexed up atheists}  called Deism{in general} "waterred down theism"- my wrath at his utter lack of understanding of Deism today was incurred; This seems to be a trend with modern western Militant Atheists, as is the trend of them downplaying or usurping Agnosticism; the Militant Athiests want to monopolize reason,freethought,evidence,science, secularism, and so on, it seems; they stepped beyond beeing simply Atheists and freethinkers into beeing reverse fundamentalists- and the truly reasonabel freethinkers such as myself are disgusted by their abuse of Atheism- the bad name they are giving this respectable viewpoint. So, I stand as their ideological enemy as I stand as such to ALL Absolutists whom cannot PROVE beyond a shadow of doubt their belief- their 'faith"{yes "faith"}.

Just because Atheists are persecuted, does not give them the right to turn into the same kinda assholes that the fundie monotheists are in their arrogant absolutism without proof.

My 'attacks" have NOTHING to do with insecurity, and everything to do with not wishing to see  reason,freethought,evidence,science, secularism, and so on, monopolized by arrogant absolutists.

In Reason:

Iconoclastithon 

I did indeed. I am not as one member of the freethinkingteens forum accused me of beeing "afraid" to come here.

Best.

In Reason:

Icono

Greetings AA.

How did I ACT it? And HOW and WHY am I making you all suspicious?

 In Reason:

Icono

No, I did not.  You wrote:

An Agnostic, and a Deist, are NOT Athiests in denial whom should just admit their Atheism.

Again, for a second time, my essay has to do with weak atheists who call themselves agnostics, when they are really agnostic atheists. Nothing in my essay claims that all non theists  are atheists.

This is your error. And I believe you make this error because you're a bull in a china shop, charging in where you should tread more carefully...  

It sounds like you haven't even read what I said.

My point is that there are some weak atheists who identify themselves as 'agnostics' when in fact, they  are agnostic atheists.

You however, confused what I wrote, and instead made a rant about deists. You also brought up how deists are not atheists.

Here, look:

I wrote this:

And you responded by misunderstanding my intent, and then attacking me personally:

This could not be further from true.

The attempt of Militant Atheism to undermine Agnosticism and Deism in the current Militant Atheist movement in North America and the western world is arrogant,counter-productive, and ignorant.

Again,this is not my intent. It is an error born of your confusion.

You then wrote:

I FULLY doubt...wait I DISBELIEVE in the claims of Theism, but I am not a Atheist, closet Atheist, or Athiest in denial of my Atheism.

Again, my essay is about weak atheists who mistakenly believe that the proper term for their belief is 'agnostic'

You mistake my post for saying that any non theist is an atheist. I do not ever say any such thing. This is your misreading.

Please keep track of your own words.  

Sounds like denial to me. You rant more than you argue, and you have issues with people you've never even met. Calm down, ask questions, don't assume, and don't attack.