Evolution pretends to be biology but it plays us for fools because it has no successful experiment.

Most biology textbooks show a glass apparatus in which the precursors for amino acids are boiled and electrically sparked and after a week sure enough there are trace amounts of a few amino acids.

The implication is that if the boiling and sparking were continued, then a living cell would evolve.

Such logic is like stating that automobiles evolved billions of years ago by means of rubber sap, sand, iron ore, and coal falling into a volcano. The iron ore and the carbon in the coal made steel, the sand melted and made glass, and the sap vulcanized and made rubber. Then after billions and billions of trials and errors, the text may say, there evolved spontaneously better and better pistons, cylinders, whole engines with spark plugs and transmissions, axles on four wheels with rubber tires under bodies of steel with glass windows, windshield wipers, headlights, and tanks full of gasoline.

Scientists note that such a tall tale is a fantasy of a peculiar type.

If someone said he had bought a brand-new car the night before and in the morning found it rusted and rotted to a pile of powder, then we would note that his story described correctly the direction of the laws of physics but rust and rot do not occur that fast. Contrarily, if he says that a pile of sand and iron ore evolved into a brand-new car, then we recognize this as an inverted fantasy because it is the exact opposite of the way reality works.

They are not the cow-jumped-over-the-moon kind of tall tale because cows can jump a low fence. They are the grass-ate-the-cow kind of tall tale, the inverted, upside-down kind of fantasy.

One way that scientists reject tall tales is with observation. Scientists are persuaded by observing cars coming off the assembly lines in Detroit and note that no one has ever seen one spontaneously, nor purposefully, evolved in or out of a volcano.

Scientists therefore unequivocally conclude that all cars were created intelligently and by the similar observations so were all life forms.

But is biology sufficient to explain life or must it be supplemented by inverted evolutionary concepts to fully describe the biological world? Let us pursue this answer by examining the life cycle of a representative life form.

Quotes from the  celebrated Christian Saint, Martin Luther,

"Reason should be destroyed in all Christians."

"Whoever wants to be a Christian should tear the eyes out of his Reason."

"To be a Christian, you must "pluck out the eye of reason."

         Isn't that just dandy ?!!!!