First, let me congratulate the responders on their unflinching win in the debate. The responses given by the dynamic duo fell very short of defending or proving anything(Cameron and the other guy). This brings me to my next question: Was it a fair debate? It seemed a bit of a turkey shoot. The theist voice was an anemic at best. Being a christian myself I found myself agreeing with your side of things in the context of the debate. They do represent everything that you loathe about theistic beliefs, but would it not be a bit more constructive to find opponents that challenge your views as well as genuinely being challenged by yours. What I saw was a forum of talking past each other. That would be my explanation for their lack of response on a point or two put forward. At the same time they set themselves up for it. So no pity here. My final question: What was proven in the debate, in your eyes? On your side or on both.
People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use. ---S.K.