Cameron and O'Reilly
Posted on: May 13, 2007 - 1:53pm
Offline
Cameron and O'Reilly
I don't know if this has been posted yet but it's a pathetic look at how deluded Kirk and Billo think they are. They can't understand scientific concepts so their position must be right. Kirk thinks he proved god and debunked evolution, Bill thinks he debunked the Big Bang Theory and outdebated Richard Dawkins.
There's something more intelligent on a different channel, I think it involves people in costumes with televisions on their bellies.
- Login to post comments
Thanks for posting this, I was actually going to try looking it up in a little while. Now I do not have to look for it.
kirk has such a poor understanding of the basic concepts of big bang and evolution, it's almost as if he never even heard of them until ray came along and fed him a heavily diluted, 60 second explanation. my teenage son can even rip apart kirk's argument.
www.derekneibarger.com http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=djneibarger "all postures of submission and surrender should be part of our prehistory." -christopher hitchens
These guys are crazy, its like well since science cant explain something so lets say some "god" did it so we can feel all gewwy inside. It's really dumb.
i wonder if anyone has ever done any kind of research to confirm whether kirk actually was an atheist, previously? because, despite what he says, he seems to actually to have very little understanding of what atheism is, or how atheists think. perhaps it's the "i'm not an atheist, but i played one on TV" thing?
www.derekneibarger.com http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=djneibarger "all postures of submission and surrender should be part of our prehistory." -christopher hitchens
Bill O'Reilly is a dumbass.
bill o'reilly is a lying liar
(thank you al franken!)
In the debate Kirk said, "I was an atheist; an evolutionist." Given his lack of knowledge about evolution it's safe to say he was never one so it wouldn't be a stretch to conclude that he wasn't an Atheist since his reasoning for conversion, I kid you not, "I asked myself, 'What if I'm wrong?'"
At most he was probably just apathetic about religion. He probably thinks that if you aren't born again and go to church every weekend then you are an Atheist as defined by the phony former Atheist, Dr. Paul Vitz.
I saw this earlier, and almost exploded when O'Reilly said that he beat Dawkins. What a fucking arrogant bastard.
Look at my blog! It's awesome!
I'm also on this Twitter thing
Then again, a "win" for O'Reilly means he gets to scream "Shut up!' a lot and gets his opponent's mic cut.
"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin
Seriously, that "debate" with Dawkins was a 3-4 (MAYBE 5) minute interview, where O'Reilly tossed a bunch of fallacious theistic arguments at Dawkins, Dawkins answered politely, got about 30% of the speaking time O'Reilly did, and then ended when Dawkins was about to blow the "Argument from Stalin" away. O'Reilly was basically like "We have to go to commercial, but if you can't disprove god, I'm throwing my lot with him".
Honestly, I think converting O'Reilly to atheism would be a loss to us. Cameron could turn intelligent, but O'Reilly and Comfort...yeah.
Look at my blog! It's awesome!
I'm also on this Twitter thing
Please become a Patron of Brian Sapient
Support our activism efforts by making your Amazon purchases via this link.
If Brian Sapient were a pirate then the Flying Spaghetti Monster would be true. But since Brian is a ninja that's proof that God exists. How can people possibly deny the existence of Brian Sapient?