Why are people offended by the movie Avatar?

ragdish
atheist
ragdish's picture
Posts: 461
Joined: 2007-12-31
User is offlineOffline
Why are people offended by the movie Avatar?

I read this article on how Avatar is another movie about "white guilt":

http://io9.com/5422666/when-will-white-people-stop-making-movies-like-avatar

WTF is wrong with this bitch? I am an atheist of east Indian originand I loved the flick. My ancestors were hindu and were oppressed by British colonialism. I can make comparisons of the Na'vi to east Indians, their faith to pantheistic hinduism, the evil corporatists as akin to the evil white British rulers and Jake Sully to Rudyard Kipling. And I would then tell myself to fuck right off!!

The story was cliched and formulaic but to make such stupid comparisons totally misses the point of going to these films. It's to walk away fantasizing about fucking a nice large Na'vi chick right? And also the special effects, great battle scenes, etc..

I've seen similar reviews of flicks like Lord of the Rings ie. good guys are white and bad guys are dark skinned orcs. These PC ridden nitwits need to stop writing such self-righteous garbage and simply enjoy life.

 


stuntgibbon
Moderator
stuntgibbon's picture
Posts: 699
Joined: 2007-05-17
User is offlineOffline
 People in that mindset

 People in that mindset would just find something else to be offended by if Avatar wasn't out.


Jormungander
atheistScience Freak
Jormungander's picture
Posts: 938
Joined: 2008-07-15
User is offlineOffline
Quote:This is also the basic

Quote:

This is also the basic story of Dune, where a member of the white royalty flees his posh palace on the planet Dune to become leader of the worm-riding native Fremen (the worm-riding rite of passage has an analog in Avatar, where Jake proves his manhood by riding a giant bird).

Paul and the Duke Leto are described 'olive-skinned.' He wasn't really white. He was a brown-skinned Greek. The bad guys in Dune are all white and the good guys are all brown. The evil Emporer is a red head and the Harkonnens are white. The Sardaukar are described as being blonds. SPOILER:Jessica is white because she is a daughter of one of the senslessly depraved white Harkonnens. One thing that bugged me about the movie and the miniseries was that all of the actors were white Americans and British people. I really don't know how an alegory for the Middle East has an all anglo-saxon cast. Is is really that hard to find brown-skinned actors?

But I suppose that the "Dune" universe doesn't fit into the author's racist whining. So he pretends that Paul is a white hero. As a white man, let me say: brown skinned Greeks aren't really white. I know that they are caucasian. But I think that there is a consensus among real white people that brown skinned caucasians don't qualify as 'white.' Deconstruct that, hippy.

"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."
British General Charles Napier while in India


Cpt_pineapple
atheist
Posts: 5492
Joined: 2007-04-12
User is offlineOffline
You think that's

You think that's stupid??

 

http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/19173

 

 

 

 


Marquis
atheist
Marquis's picture
Posts: 776
Joined: 2009-12-23
User is offlineOffline
ragdish wrote:how Avatar is

ragdish wrote:

how Avatar is another movie about "white guilt"

 

From the article:

Quote:
The humans started to colonize Pandora in order to mine a mineral called unobtainium that can serve as a mega-energy source.

 

I see the point that the author of that article is trying to make. (The quoted line made me laugh. It sums it up. The history where all these atrocities did not happen is indeed unobtainable.) It is a condescending and sentimental type of neo-racism to go around and be "sorry" for what happened to all those fine nature-people and shit like that. Or to be extra nice to black people because they were slaves - when in fact no living black man or woman has been a slave on any plantation; they have different problems - long term consequences of actual, racial segregation that actually happened - to battle with.

But of course... at the end of the day we are all individuals, and the act of assuming (or projecting) a group identity really is an insult to the integrity of the individual. Various permutations of the "us and them" thinking has never really lead to anything good, anywhere, anytime.

 

"The idea of God is the sole wrong for which I cannot forgive mankind." (Alphonse Donatien De Sade)

http://www.kinkspace.com


Thomathy
Superfan
Thomathy's picture
Posts: 1861
Joined: 2007-08-20
User is offlineOffline
I was under the impression

I was under the impression that the movie was a pretty bad retelling of Disney's Pocahontas with very few plot changes.  I wasn't aware that anyone saw the movie for the plot.

BigUniverse wrote,

"Well the things that happen less often are more likely to be the result of the supper natural. A thing like loosing my keys in the morning is not likely supper natural, but finding a thousand dollars or meeting a celebrity might be."


iwbiek
atheistSuperfan
iwbiek's picture
Posts: 4298
Joined: 2008-03-23
User is offlineOffline
Marquis wrote:Quote:The

Marquis wrote:

Quote:
The humans started to colonize Pandora in order to mine a mineral called unobtainium that can serve as a mega-energy source.

(rolls eyes) "unobtainium"???  for real???  jesus christ, was there also a character named "everyman"?

the public is so fuckin' impressed by pretentious, obvious shit.  the same kind of people who are impressed by something like "unobtainium" ten years ago were the people who thought it was "deep" that god was played by alanis morissette in dogma.

(it was awesome, however, that lady aberlin from mister rogers played a nun who renounces her faith.)

"I have never felt comfortable around people who talk about their feelings for Jesus, or any other deity for that matter, because they are usually none too bright. . . . Or maybe 'stupid' is a better way of saying it; but I have never seen much point in getting heavy with either stupid people or Jesus freaks, just as long as they don't bother me. In a world as weird and cruel as this one we have made for ourselves, I figure anybody who can find peace and personal happiness without ripping off somebody else deserves to be left alone. They will not inherit the earth, but then neither will I. . . . And I have learned to live, as it were, with the idea that I will never find peace and happiness, either. But as long as I know there's a pretty good chance I can get my hands on either one of them every once in a while, I do the best I can between high spots."
--Hunter S. Thompson


BobSpence
High Level DonorRational VIP!ScientistWebsite Admin
BobSpence's picture
Posts: 5939
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
One can pick holes in

One can pick holes in virtually any narrative, individuals can and will react in different ways to various plot points and devices.

What matters to me is whether it takes much conscious effort to get into the 'world' of the story and experience it for the duration, or do I get drawn in, how many times does some setting or event tend to take you out of it because it doesn't quite 'work', and so on. I try to go into such things with minimum expectations or pre-conceptions, to give it its best chance to wrk on me.

As a story, I found it comfortably engaging.

With a movie, there is the visual experience itself in addition to the story, and hopefully complementing it, and this was very impressive.

I never saw 'Pocahontas', as I am not in general attracted to Disney style story-telling or animation, at least the older traditions. You could make such somewhat pointless comparisons about any story, there are after all only so many broad story outlines possible. It is the details that count.

You can react to the name of the mineral various ways. There is nothing particularly unusual to me in fanciful names for new elements, especially in such a context.

Favorite oxymorons: Gospel Truth, Rational Supernaturalist, Business Ethics, Christian Morality

"Theology is now little more than a branch of human ignorance. Indeed, it is ignorance with wings." - Sam Harris

The path to Truth lies via careful study of reality, not the dreams of our fallible minds - me

From the sublime to the ridiculous: Science -> Philosophy -> Theology


Di66en6ion
Di66en6ion's picture
Posts: 106
Joined: 2009-01-03
User is offlineOffline
 Most of the storyline did

 Most of the storyline did seem pretty shallow but the part that kept drawing me in was the neural-networked style ecosystem. To be able to tap into a planetary network of an almost infinitesimal amount of shared memories would be a god of sorts.


The Doomed Soul
atheist
The Doomed Soul's picture
Posts: 2148
Joined: 2007-08-31
User is offlineOffline
Di66en6ion wrote: Most of

Di66en6ion wrote:

 Most of the storyline did seem pretty shallow but the part that kept drawing me in was the neural-networked style ecosystem. To be able to tap into a planetary network of an almost infinitesimal amount of shared memories would be a god of sorts.

 

The internet would like a word with you...

 

What Would Kharn Do?


Di66en6ion
Di66en6ion's picture
Posts: 106
Joined: 2009-01-03
User is offlineOffline
The Doomed Soul

The Doomed Soul wrote:

Di66en6ion wrote:

 Most of the storyline did seem pretty shallow but the part that kept drawing me in was the neural-networked style ecosystem. To be able to tap into a planetary network of an almost infinitesimal amount of shared memories would be a god of sorts.

 

The internet would like a word with you...

 

 

Yeah yeah, but you'd have to admit that that's not quite the same thing. The internet may one day approach something like that in the movie but the possibilities it presented extend way beyond what we have today. Although bypassing the optic nerve for a more direct connection sounds a lot like the matrix I guess. I think it was the idea of linking living things together as in almost one mind that got me.


ClockCat
ClockCat's picture
Posts: 2265
Joined: 2009-03-26
User is offlineOffline
:o

 Did people make this kind of outrage over Dances with Wolves too?


Peppermint42
atheistSuperfan
Peppermint42's picture
Posts: 170
Joined: 2009-11-15
User is offlineOffline
ClockCat wrote: Did people

ClockCat wrote:

 Did people make this kind of outrage over Dances with Wolves too?

 

Haha my roommate actually made that comparison on our way out of the theatre after seeing Avatar.  He said it was a modern day Dances With Wolves, including the length of the film.  Sticking out tongue

 

I don't understand why people get so upset over these things.  It's a movie!  Go, eat some popcorn, enjoy the special effects, come home and GO ON WITH YOUR LIVES!!! 


iwbiek
atheistSuperfan
iwbiek's picture
Posts: 4298
Joined: 2008-03-23
User is offlineOffline
Gallowsbait wrote:ClockCat

Gallowsbait wrote:

ClockCat wrote:

 Did people make this kind of outrage over Dances with Wolves too?

 

Haha my roommate actually made that comparison on our way out of the theatre after seeing Avatar.  He said it was a modern day Dances With Wolves, including the length of the film.  Sticking out tongue

 

I don't understand why people get so upset over these things.  It's a movie!  Go, eat some popcorn, enjoy the special effects, come home and GO ON WITH YOUR LIVES!!! 

that was precisely my reaction to the da vinci code when it came out (i mean the novel).  i was actually a christian at the time, though a pretty liberal one.  my fellow believers would waste whole evenings giving seminars on why the da vinci code is wrong, and i always said, "it's just a freakin' NOVEL, and not a terribly well-written one at that.  if you ignore it, and not tell your congregation not to read it under any circumstances, it will go away!"

"I have never felt comfortable around people who talk about their feelings for Jesus, or any other deity for that matter, because they are usually none too bright. . . . Or maybe 'stupid' is a better way of saying it; but I have never seen much point in getting heavy with either stupid people or Jesus freaks, just as long as they don't bother me. In a world as weird and cruel as this one we have made for ourselves, I figure anybody who can find peace and personal happiness without ripping off somebody else deserves to be left alone. They will not inherit the earth, but then neither will I. . . . And I have learned to live, as it were, with the idea that I will never find peace and happiness, either. But as long as I know there's a pretty good chance I can get my hands on either one of them every once in a while, I do the best I can between high spots."
--Hunter S. Thompson


Adventfred
atheist
Adventfred's picture
Posts: 298
Joined: 2009-09-12
User is offlineOffline
well everyone can see my pic

well everyone can see my pic im african indian and i see no problem with the movie

i did not even know that people made a scene on Lord of the rings too

also what race aren't we all humans what white race are they talking about ? 


The Doomed Soul
atheist
The Doomed Soul's picture
Posts: 2148
Joined: 2007-08-31
User is offlineOffline
Adventfred wrote:well

Adventfred wrote:

well everyone can see my pic im african indian and i see no problem with the movie

i did not even know that people made a scene on Lord of the rings too

also what race aren't we all humans what white race are they talking about ? 

 

 

What Would Kharn Do?


Adventfred
atheist
Adventfred's picture
Posts: 298
Joined: 2009-09-12
User is offlineOffline
The Doomed Soul


The Doomed Soul wrote:

Adventfred wrote:

well everyone can see my pic im african indian and i see no problem with the movie

i did not even know that people made a scene on Lord of the rings too

also what race aren't we all humans what white race are they talking about ? 

 

 

the pic is funny but why do people quick to jump on the racist band wagon 

same thing with resident evil 5 the game 

boy are people stupid 


The Doomed Soul
atheist
The Doomed Soul's picture
Posts: 2148
Joined: 2007-08-31
User is offlineOffline
Adventfred wrote:same thing

Adventfred wrote:


same thing with resident evil 5 the game 

 

Actually... thats precisely what that photo was created for.

 edit;

Im like Steven Colbert, i dont see race... i dont see a white man killing a black zombie... i see something killing something else, and thats all that really matters...

What Would Kharn Do?


EXC
atheist
EXC's picture
Posts: 4108
Joined: 2008-01-17
User is offlineOffline
The movie was pretty

The movie was pretty blatantly anti-military, anti-American, anti-capitalist. Ironically made with American capitalist money and technology.

What was really wrong was how they portrayed one side as good(the natives) and one side as bad(the invading capitalists) and tried to say this the same as our present situation.

Islamic militants are not peace loving people living in harmony with nature that just want to be left alone, so this comparison is completely false.

There is no ecosystem or species that does not seek to expand at the expense of other ecosystems and species. There has never been some group that lives in harmony with nature. Suffering, death, poverty, hunger, disease and conflict are the means by which all species do population control, until this changes, this living in harmony with nature is a bunch of crap.

Taxation is the price we pay for failing to build a civilized society. The higher the tax level, the greater the failure. A centrally planned totalitarian state represents a complete defeat for the civilized world, while a totally voluntary society represents its ultimate success. --Mark Skousen


Abu Lahab
Superfan
Abu Lahab's picture
Posts: 628
Joined: 2008-02-29
User is offlineOffline
EXC wrote:The movie was

EXC wrote:

The movie was pretty blatantly anti-military, anti-American, anti-capitalist. Ironically made with American capitalist money and technology.

And that is precisely why it's a bad thing.

 

Sure, you could go and watch the movie (I'm going this weekend and intend to keep an open mind) and just enjoy the spectacle but how many mouth-breathers are subliminally accepting the broad statement that whitey is bad?

 

 

How can not believing in something that is backed up with no empirical evidence be less scientific than believing in something that not only has no empirical evidence but actually goes against the laws of the universe and in many cases actually contradicts itself? - Ricky Gervais


Atheistextremist
atheist
Atheistextremist's picture
Posts: 5134
Joined: 2009-09-17
User is offlineOffline
Don't disagree

EXC wrote:

The movie was pretty blatantly anti-military, anti-American, anti-capitalist. Ironically made with American capitalist money and technology.

What was really wrong was how they portrayed one side as good(the natives) and one side as bad(the invading capitalists) and tried to say this the same as our present situation.

Islamic militants are not peace loving people living in harmony with nature that just want to be left alone, so this comparison is completely false.

There is no ecosystem or species that does not seek to expand at the expense of other ecosystems and species. There has never been some group that lives in harmony with nature. Suffering, death, poverty, hunger, disease and conflict are the means by which all species do population control, until this changes, this living in harmony with nature is a bunch of crap.

 

With your call here, EXC, but I did wonder if those troops were mercenaries rather than a sovereign force. I also wondered what a colonel was doing in charge of an invasion of a whole planet. WIth a lot of U.S. troops in the field in wars they did not start, dying for causes that are ill understood, I thought targeting troops and exalting in their deaths was a bit hard to take, given there is no pandora and no aliens - just us on this little blue ball. I'd be speaking japanese if it weren't for US troops and my dad supported the US Marines at Guadalcanal in the second war flying out of henderson field. Not too keen on blurry insults of grunts while the govt behind it is ignored. I liked the movie though and had a pretty strong crush on the blue rake by the end of it. One thing I wondered was why the blue folks didn't link their ponytails when shagging. That could have led to some seriously cool shit.

 

 

 

 

"Experiments are the only means of knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." Max Planck


Jormungander
atheistScience Freak
Jormungander's picture
Posts: 938
Joined: 2008-07-15
User is offlineOffline
So I read my school

So I read my school newspaper today during a break in between classes. There was a two-page long rant about how racist "Avatar" is. It wasn't an op-ed piece. It was the school newspaper's official review of "Avatar." People need to settle the hell down. It is just a movie. It isn't a proclamation of how great imperialism or white people are. The character that these whiners claim is the symbol of white privelege is an uneducated, poor and crippled man. That's hardly a fantasy about how perfect the whites are. But they'll misinterpret it intenitionally; just for an excuse to declare their opposition to (imagined) racism.

"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."
British General Charles Napier while in India


ClockCat
ClockCat's picture
Posts: 2265
Joined: 2009-03-26
User is offlineOffline
:o

EXC wrote:

The movie was pretty blatantly anti-military, anti-American, anti-capitalist. Ironically made with American capitalist money and technology.

What was really wrong was how they portrayed one side as good(the natives) and one side as bad(the invading capitalists) and tried to say this the same as our present situation.

Islamic militants are not peace loving people living in harmony with nature that just want to be left alone, so this comparison is completely false.

There is no ecosystem or species that does not seek to expand at the expense of other ecosystems and species. There has never been some group that lives in harmony with nature. Suffering, death, poverty, hunger, disease and conflict are the means by which all species do population control, until this changes, this living in harmony with nature is a bunch of crap.

 

Theism is why we can't have nice things.


ClockCat
ClockCat's picture
Posts: 2265
Joined: 2009-03-26
User is offlineOffline
:3

Atheistextremist wrote:

EXC wrote:

The movie was pretty blatantly anti-military, anti-American, anti-capitalist. Ironically made with American capitalist money and technology.

What was really wrong was how they portrayed one side as good(the natives) and one side as bad(the invading capitalists) and tried to say this the same as our present situation.

Islamic militants are not peace loving people living in harmony with nature that just want to be left alone, so this comparison is completely false.

There is no ecosystem or species that does not seek to expand at the expense of other ecosystems and species. There has never been some group that lives in harmony with nature. Suffering, death, poverty, hunger, disease and conflict are the means by which all species do population control, until this changes, this living in harmony with nature is a bunch of crap.

 

With your call here, EXC, but I did wonder if those troops were mercenaries rather than a sovereign force. I also wondered what a colonel was doing in charge of an invasion of a whole planet. WIth a lot of U.S. troops in the field in wars they did not start, dying for causes that are ill understood, I thought targeting troops and exalting in their deaths was a bit hard to take, given there is no pandora and no aliens - just us on this little blue ball. I'd be speaking japanese if it weren't for US troops and my dad supported the US Marines at Guadalcanal in the second war flying out of henderson field. Not too keen on blurry insults of grunts while the govt behind it is ignored. I liked the movie though and had a pretty strong crush on the blue rake by the end of it. One thing I wondered was why the blue folks didn't link their ponytails when shagging. That could have led to some seriously cool shit.

 

 

 

It wasn't invasion of a planet. It was a company looking for a desirable resource. Think about what a mining company will do in a low-tech ill-equipped nation sitting on billions of dollars of gold. It happens very often on THIS planet. Mercenary groups are hired to remove people from the land, and kill stragglers. Sometimes they don't even try to move them, they just kill and take.

 

By the way, this is obligatory in this thread:

Theism is why we can't have nice things.


Gauche
atheist
Gauche's picture
Posts: 1565
Joined: 2007-01-18
User is offlineOffline
Who would think about

Who would think about fucking a massive blue pussy? That doesn't sound appealing at all to me, and I love variety.

There are twists of time and space, of vision and reality, which only a dreamer can divine
H.P. Lovecraft


Atheistextremist
atheist
Atheistextremist's picture
Posts: 5134
Joined: 2009-09-17
User is offlineOffline
Don't worry mate

Gauche wrote:

Who would think about fucking a massive blue pussy? That doesn't sound appealing at all to me, and I love variety.

 

Your avatar will be hung like a mallee bull...

 

"Experiments are the only means of knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." Max Planck


Thomathy
Superfan
Thomathy's picture
Posts: 1861
Joined: 2007-08-20
User is offlineOffline
ClockCat

ClockCat wrote:

Atheistextremist wrote:

EXC wrote:

The movie was pretty blatantly anti-military, anti-American, anti-capitalist. Ironically made with American capitalist money and technology.

What was really wrong was how they portrayed one side as good(the natives) and one side as bad(the invading capitalists) and tried to say this the same as our present situation.

Islamic militants are not peace loving people living in harmony with nature that just want to be left alone, so this comparison is completely false.

There is no ecosystem or species that does not seek to expand at the expense of other ecosystems and species. There has never been some group that lives in harmony with nature. Suffering, death, poverty, hunger, disease and conflict are the means by which all species do population control, until this changes, this living in harmony with nature is a bunch of crap.

 

With your call here, EXC, but I did wonder if those troops were mercenaries rather than a sovereign force. I also wondered what a colonel was doing in charge of an invasion of a whole planet. WIth a lot of U.S. troops in the field in wars they did not start, dying for causes that are ill understood, I thought targeting troops and exalting in their deaths was a bit hard to take, given there is no pandora and no aliens - just us on this little blue ball. I'd be speaking japanese if it weren't for US troops and my dad supported the US Marines at Guadalcanal in the second war flying out of henderson field. Not too keen on blurry insults of grunts while the govt behind it is ignored. I liked the movie though and had a pretty strong crush on the blue rake by the end of it. One thing I wondered was why the blue folks didn't link their ponytails when shagging. That could have led to some seriously cool shit.

 

 

 

It wasn't invasion of a planet. It was a company looking for a desirable resource. Think about what a mining company will do in a low-tech ill-equipped nation sitting on billions of dollars of gold. It happens very often on THIS planet. Mercenary groups are hired to remove people from the land, and kill stragglers. Sometimes they don't even try to move them, they just kill and take.

 

By the way, this is obligatory in this thread:

I said it here first. :D  (I love the internet.)


 

BigUniverse wrote,

"Well the things that happen less often are more likely to be the result of the supper natural. A thing like loosing my keys in the morning is not likely supper natural, but finding a thousand dollars or meeting a celebrity might be."


Sterculius
Sterculius's picture
Posts: 161
Joined: 2010-01-05
User is offlineOffline
ClockCat wrote: Did people

ClockCat wrote:

 Did people make this kind of outrage over Dances with Wolves too?

 

That's funny because that's exactly what I thought of leaving the Imax...

 

dances with wolves in space..

"Lisa, if the Bible has taught us nothing else, and it hasn't, it's that girls should stick to girls sports, such as hot oil wrestling and foxy boxing and such."
Homer Simpson


butterbattle
ModeratorSuperfan
butterbattle's picture
Posts: 3945
Joined: 2008-09-12
User is offlineOffline
Gauche wrote:Who would think

Gauche wrote:

Who would think about fucking a massive blue pussy? That doesn't sound appealing at all to me, and I love variety.

Doesn't sound that bad to me. We already have sex with people of different skin colors anyways.

Essentially, they're just humans with blue skin, big ears, and a tail, right? And I bet we could do kinky stuff with those tails.  

 

Our revels now are ended. These our actors, | As I foretold you, were all spirits, and | Are melted into air, into thin air; | And, like the baseless fabric of this vision, | The cloud-capped towers, the gorgeous palaces, | The solemn temples, the great globe itself, - Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve, | And, like this insubstantial pageant faded, | Leave not a rack behind. We are such stuff | As dreams are made on, and our little life | Is rounded with a sleep. - Shakespeare


Conor Wilson
Posts: 451
Joined: 2008-01-07
User is offlineOffline
For what it's worth...

...I went to see Avatar, and I was mostly just unimpressed.  The effects were good as far as it goes, but the 3-D, in my humble opinion, was wasted on the equivalent of snowflakes.  As for gays being represented, ehh...that would have been nice in some respects, but I'm not going to get up in arms about it.  The same applies to the ham-fisted technologically-advanced-society-as villains-and-technologically-disadvantaged-society-as heroes plotline.

 

I can see where there certainly was spectacle in the movie; I just didn't see anything that screamed "the wave of the future in movies" to me.

 

Conor


Adventfred
atheist
Adventfred's picture
Posts: 298
Joined: 2009-09-12
User is offlineOffline
The Doomed Soul

The Doomed Soul wrote:

Adventfred wrote:


same thing with resident evil 5 the game 

 

Actually... thats precisely what that photo was created for.

 edit;

Im like Steven Colbert, i dont see race... i dont see a white man killing a black zombie... i see something killing something else, and thats all that really matters...

 

Ahhh me too because to be honest i enjoyed killing those Africans 


EXC
atheist
EXC's picture
Posts: 4108
Joined: 2008-01-17
User is offlineOffline
ClockCat wrote: It wasn't

ClockCat wrote:

 

It wasn't invasion of a planet. It was a company looking for a desirable resource. Think about what a mining company will do in a low-tech ill-equipped nation sitting on billions of dollars of gold. It happens very often on THIS planet. Mercenary groups are hired to remove people from the land, and kill stragglers. Sometimes they don't even try to move them, they just kill and take.

 

They were just trying to make some extra money to make up for the higher taxes required to pay for universal health care.

I agree some capitalist behave this way. We don't tax natural resource usage, we tax hard work, innovation and investment. So these people see a way to get wealth without work. The right wing bitches about welfare being wealth without work, then support land and mining rights that enable this to occur.

While the left want to tax the shit out of anyone that has money. Ignorantly grouping all investors and investment as greedy exploiters. Some capitalist could invest in the development of 'unobtanium' alternatives that are not as environmentally damaging. But these 'capitalist pigs' are discouraged from doing this through high taxes on income and profit. Plus they want to give welfare to people with giant families so we have population increases resulting in even higher demand for resources such as 'unobtainium'.

So there is pleanty of blame on both the left and right. They all just want something for nothing. Everyone's got their 'rights' at other people's expense.

Taxation is the price we pay for failing to build a civilized society. The higher the tax level, the greater the failure. A centrally planned totalitarian state represents a complete defeat for the civilized world, while a totally voluntary society represents its ultimate success. --Mark Skousen


MichaelMcF
Science Freak
MichaelMcF's picture
Posts: 525
Joined: 2008-01-22
User is offlineOffline
 I for one enjoyed the

 I for one enjoyed the movie.  Of course the plot was transparent, but just because you know the ending of a story it doesn't mean you can't be entertained by the telling of it.

 

Technologically I thought it was a masterstroke.  The 3D wasn't over-used at all and was most expertly put into giving depth of perception to the viewer of Pandora rather than bothering with "IT'S RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOUR EYES" trickery (although those touches were also nice).  What I found most impressive was the ease with which the actor's natural faces were put onto the cgi.  I sat for a few minutes entranced thinking "christ on a pogo stick that's actually sigourney weaver, but blue and tall (and also younger)".

 

Visually the film is a treat and the story is enjoyable if you're willing to go along and just enjoy the experience rather than demand some high literary, genre defining moment.

 

Also the racist tags are bullshit.

 

EDIT:  Colonel Hardass, or whatever his name actually was, was by far my favourite thing in the entire movie.

Forget Jesus, the stars died so that you could be here
- Lawrence Krauss


Adventfred
atheist
Adventfred's picture
Posts: 298
Joined: 2009-09-12
User is offlineOffline
MichaelMcF wrote: I for one


MichaelMcF wrote:

 I for one enjoyed the movie.  Of course the plot was transparent, but just because you know the ending of a story it doesn't mean you can't be entertained by the telling of it.

 

Technologically I thought it was a masterstroke.  The 3D wasn't over-used at all and was most expertly put into giving depth of perception to the viewer of Pandora rather than bothering with "IT'S RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOUR EYES" trickery (although those touches were also nice).  What I found most impressive was the ease with which the actor's natural faces were put onto the cgi.  I sat for a few minutes entranced thinking "christ on a pogo stick that's actually sigourney weaver, but blue and tall (and also younger)".

 

Visually the film is a treat and the story is enjoyable if you're willing to go along and just enjoy the experience rather than demand some high literary, genre defining moment.

 

Also the racist tags are bullshit.  agreed 

 

EDIT:  Colonel Hardass, or whatever his name actually was, was by far my favourite thing in the entire movie.  i also like him the most especially the end where he jumps out the plane with the suit 


Inferno
Posts: 39
Joined: 2009-11-22
User is offlineOffline
 Me too, where you from

 Me too, where you from exactly? And where do you live now?


neptewn
neptewn's picture
Posts: 296
Joined: 2007-06-25
User is offlineOffline
Thomathy wrote: I was under

Thomathy wrote:

I was under the impression that the movie was a pretty bad retelling of Disney's Pocahontas with very few plot changes.  I wasn't aware that anyone saw the movie for the plot.

Actually they are claiming it stole from a 1957 story called "Call Me Joe".

  • Main character is a paraplegic
  • Telepathically connects to an artificial life form to explore the planet
  • Is also blue
  • Is strong and powerful
  • Fights the native lifeforms
  • and eventually goes native

I'm just regurgitating what I have heard, I haven't actually read this story, and also Pocahantas was based upon an actual historical figure, and the legends and historical events that surrounded her. Although Disney did take some liberties with the original telling, she actually went Christian in the end.

Your mind will answer most questions if you learn to relax and wait for the answer. - William S. Burroughs


Thomathy
Superfan
Thomathy's picture
Posts: 1861
Joined: 2007-08-20
User is offlineOffline
neptewn wrote: Thomathy

neptewn wrote:

Thomathy wrote:

I was under the impression that the movie was a pretty bad retelling of Disney's Pocahontas with very few plot changes.  I wasn't aware that anyone saw the movie for the plot.

Actually they are claiming it stole from a 1957 story called "Call Me Joe".

  • Main character is a paraplegic
  • Telepathically connects to an artificial life form to explore the planet
  • Is also blue
  • Is strong and powerful
  • Fights the native lifeforms
  • and eventually goes native

I'm just regurgitating what I have heard, I haven't actually read this story, and also Pocahantas was based upon an actual historical figure, and the legends and historical events that surrounded her. Although Disney did take some liberties with the original telling, she actually went Christian in the end.

Perhaps you're right, but the ClockCat posted this:

 And it seems pretty accurate to me.  I'm guessing that they stole from a bunch of different sources.

BigUniverse wrote,

"Well the things that happen less often are more likely to be the result of the supper natural. A thing like loosing my keys in the morning is not likely supper natural, but finding a thousand dollars or meeting a celebrity might be."


Jeffrick
High Level DonorRational VIP!SuperfanGold Member
Jeffrick's picture
Posts: 2446
Joined: 2008-03-25
User is offlineOffline
Wow!!!!!!!!

Thomathy wrote:

neptewn wrote:

Thomathy wrote:

I was under the impression that the movie was a pretty bad retelling of Disney's Pocahontas with very few plot changes.  I wasn't aware that anyone saw the movie for the plot.

Actually they are claiming it stole from a 1957 story called "Call Me Joe".

  • Main character is a paraplegic
  • Telepathically connects to an artificial life form to explore the planet
  • Is also blue
  • Is strong and powerful
  • Fights the native lifeforms
  • and eventually goes native

I'm just regurgitating what I have heard, I haven't actually read this story, and also Pocahantas was based upon an actual historical figure, and the legends and historical events that surrounded her. Although Disney did take some liberties with the original telling, she actually went Christian in the end.

Perhaps you're right, but the ClockCat posted this:

 And it seems pretty accurate to me.  I'm guessing that they stole from a bunch of different sources.

 

 

 

 

            " Stole from a whole bunch of different sources" ;..   gee whiz  that sounds like the bible.  do yeah think it ?

"Very funny Scotty; now beam down our clothes."

VEGETARIAN: Ancient Hindu word for "lousy hunter"

If man was formed from dirt, why is there still dirt?


Wonderist
atheist
Wonderist's picture
Posts: 2479
Joined: 2006-03-19
User is offlineOffline
neptewn wrote:Thomathy

neptewn wrote:

Thomathy wrote:

I was under the impression that the movie was a pretty bad retelling of Disney's Pocahontas with very few plot changes.  I wasn't aware that anyone saw the movie for the plot.

Actually they are claiming it stole from a 1957 story called "Call Me Joe".

  • Main character is a paraplegic
  • Telepathically connects to an artificial life form to explore the planet
  • Is also blue
  • Is strong and powerful
  • Fights the native lifeforms
  • and eventually goes native

I'm just regurgitating what I have heard, I haven't actually read this story, and also Pocahantas was based upon an actual historical figure, and the legends and historical events that surrounded her. Although Disney did take some liberties with the original telling, she actually went Christian in the end.

It wouldn't surprise me in the least. James Cameron stole the idea for Terminator from Harlan Ellison, and settled a court case about it. When Cameron later failed to give credit to Ellison in the ending credits of a version that aired on TV, which was a condition of the settlement, he violated the settlement, and Ellison was no longer bound to keep quiet about it. I saw an interview with Ellison about it on Prisoners of Gravity years back, where he described his contempt for Cameron in his usual acerbic manner.

Cameron's a hack deep down. A very successful hack, but a hack nonetheless.

Wonderist on Facebook — Support the idea of wonderism by 'liking' the Wonderism page — or join the open Wonderism group to take part in the discussion!

Gnu Atheism Facebook group — All gnu-friendly RRS members welcome (including Luminon!) — Try something gnu!


Abu Lahab
Superfan
Abu Lahab's picture
Posts: 628
Joined: 2008-02-29
User is offlineOffline
Visually impressive

Saw it at the IMX in Universal Studios Hollywood

 

Visually impressive 8/10

 

Script/acting 3/10

 

Get there early, the line started forming over an hour before the picture was slated to start. You really need to be in the middle of the theater for the best 3D effect.

How can not believing in something that is backed up with no empirical evidence be less scientific than believing in something that not only has no empirical evidence but actually goes against the laws of the universe and in many cases actually contradicts itself? - Ricky Gervais


Atheistextremist
atheist
Atheistextremist's picture
Posts: 5134
Joined: 2009-09-17
User is offlineOffline
It's true

MichaelMcF wrote:

 I for one enjoyed the movie.  Of course the plot was transparent, but just because you know the ending of a story it doesn't mean you can't be entertained by the telling of it.

 

Technologically I thought it was a masterstroke.  The 3D wasn't over-used at all and was most expertly put into giving depth of perception to the viewer of Pandora rather than bothering with "IT'S RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOUR EYES" trickery (although those touches were also nice).  What I found most impressive was the ease with which the actor's natural faces were put onto the cgi.  I sat for a few minutes entranced thinking "christ on a pogo stick that's actually sigourney weaver, but blue and tall (and also younger)".

 

Visually the film is a treat and the story is enjoyable if you're willing to go along and just enjoy the experience rather than demand some high literary, genre defining moment.

 

Also the racist tags are bullshit.

 

EDIT:  Colonel Hardass, or whatever his name actually was, was by far my favourite thing in the entire movie.

 

Colonel Hardass was great.

 

 

 

"Experiments are the only means of knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." Max Planck


ClockCat
ClockCat's picture
Posts: 2265
Joined: 2009-03-26
User is offlineOffline
:3

 The cup of coffee with his genocide was brilliant, in my opinion.


Atheistextremist
atheist
Atheistextremist's picture
Posts: 5134
Joined: 2009-09-17
User is offlineOffline
I saw this movie

ClockCat wrote:

 The cup of coffee with his genocide was brilliant, in my opinion.

 

At the Broadway cinema and it was chocka (the air conditioning seemed to have failed lending realism to the sweaty jungle scenes) and what was interesting was how quiet the full house was - kids and all. By the end of the movie Colonel Hardass was getting laughs. He was unstoppable. The cuppa scene in the chopper was classic.

"Experiments are the only means of knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." Max Planck


Cpt_pineapple
atheist
Posts: 5492
Joined: 2007-04-12
User is offlineOffline
Apparently people are

Apparently people are getting suicidal too

 

http://www.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/Movies/01/11/avatar.movie.blues/index.html

 

 

 


ClockCat
ClockCat's picture
Posts: 2265
Joined: 2009-03-26
User is offlineOffline
:3

Cpt_pineapple wrote:

Apparently people are getting suicidal too

 

http://www.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/Movies/01/11/avatar.movie.blues/index.html

 

 

 

 

Yeah, I'd question that.

 

They say they are suicidal because they want to "experience Pandora" after watching it?

 

I want to see some proof. Show me mass suicide attempts caused by their longing for a fictional world.

 

Also, lol about people looking for a "rebound" movie.

Theism is why we can't have nice things.


Cpt_pineapple
atheist
Posts: 5492
Joined: 2007-04-12
User is offlineOffline
ClockCat wrote: Yeah, I'd

ClockCat wrote:

 

Yeah, I'd question that.

 

They say they are suicidal because they want to "experience Pandora" after watching it?

 

I want to see some proof. Show me mass suicide attempts caused by their longing for a fictional world.

 

Also, lol about people looking for a "rebound" movie.

 

 

 

 

 


ClockCat
ClockCat's picture
Posts: 2265
Joined: 2009-03-26
User is offlineOffline
:o

Cpt_pineapple wrote:

ClockCat wrote:

 

Yeah, I'd question that.

 

They say they are suicidal because they want to "experience Pandora" after watching it?

 

I want to see some proof. Show me mass suicide attempts caused by their longing for a fictional world.

 

Also, lol about people looking for a "rebound" movie.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Theism is why we can't have nice things.


Wonderist
atheist
Wonderist's picture
Posts: 2479
Joined: 2006-03-19
User is offlineOffline
ClockCat wrote:I want to see

ClockCat wrote:

I want to see some proof. Show me mass suicide attempts caused by their longing for a fictional world.

Ya know...It's surprisingly common these days.

Wonderist on Facebook — Support the idea of wonderism by 'liking' the Wonderism page — or join the open Wonderism group to take part in the discussion!

Gnu Atheism Facebook group — All gnu-friendly RRS members welcome (including Luminon!) — Try something gnu!


Kapkao
atheistSuperfan
Kapkao's picture
Posts: 4121
Joined: 2010-01-12
User is offlineOffline
ragdish wrote:I read this

ragdish wrote:

I read this article on how Avatar is another movie about "white guilt":

http://io9.com/5422666/when-will-white-people-stop-making-movies-like-avatar

WTF is wrong with this bitch? I am an atheist of east Indian originand I loved the flick. My ancestors were hindu and were oppressed by British colonialism. I can make comparisons of the Na'vi to east Indians, their faith to pantheistic hinduism, the evil corporatists as akin to the evil white British rulers and Jake Sully to Rudyard Kipling. And I would then tell myself to fuck right off!!

The story was cliched and formulaic but to make such stupid comparisons totally misses the point of going to these films. It's to walk away fantasizing about fucking a nice large Na'vi chick right? And also the special effects, great battle scenes, etc..

I've seen similar reviews of flicks like Lord of the Rings ie. good guys are white and bad guys are dark skinned orcs. These PC ridden nitwits need to stop writing such self-righteous garbage and simply enjoy life.

 

"Human Nature"

.... which is, of course, somewhat over-rated.

“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)