It sounds contradictory there is no definition in your response you seam for the most part to substitute the word state with the word government define government.

O and is a team lender a state ? Is Jo Swenson the ledger of the football team a state ? If a definition haze multiple meanings it needs to be abandoned and replaced via more precise definition otherwise its nonsensical.

I have  looked into a dictionary however the definition is ironies and contradictory.

My definition probing is similar to scientific investigation about things like “what is motion” , just like in the philosophical saying there more you know the les you know.

The answer to this question will be quite surprising to every human .

Most words have multiple meanings, some actually have opposite meanings most of philosophy tends to get drawn into which version of a definition you want to use.

I can give you a good example

the word 'republic'

to most of the world this means any nation that doesnt have an inherited head of state ie a monarch, so a brutal dictatorship that turned its children into cheeseburgers every 3rd tuesday to celebrate the glory of the president would be a republic. USA, France, China Syria, Afghanistan pre and post taliban were/are  all republics

Now in America it generally tends to have a different meaning 'a state in which the supreme power rests in the body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by representatives chosen directly or indirectly by them. ' . Lots of nice fluffy things about people power, you couldnt be a nasty country and be a republic.

Both meanings are correct but you try to discuss this with defining which one you are using first then the conversation is completely meaningless

Well I think in the context of your question

State and government are two different things.

State to me is a politically and geographically area which encompasses all materials including all human beings, all mineral resources. all economic activity private (state generally doesnt own the private wealth but still encompasses it) and public, all airspace (up to a non-defined height, the Russians I believe once tried to claim that it went to infinity but that would be a little silly), ie the state is a country.

Government is the part of the state that is dedicated to organising and running it. how of this is left to private hands depends on the state

State is a synonym for the word country yes which you of course are part of

i can totally tell you're not a native speaker.  i've been teaching english in slovakia for 2 years now and you sound like all my other students, who just can't accept that some words have no precise definition.  i've even had a few adult students get hostile with me, i guess because they think i'm keeping some big secret from them.  at that point i usually just make shit up to make them happy.

"state" is defined differently by different theoreticians: rousseau, robespierre, hobbes, locke, hume, swift, mill, smith, marx, lenin--they all define it in the way most convenient for them.  in popular usage, it's usually synonymous with "government."

that's the best anybody can do for you, dude, sorry.  then again, you seem like you already have something specific in mind.  why not just tell us exactly what you want to hear?

Perhaps as Americans we know "instinctively" how to use and interpret "state" within our own language.  Our comprehension may be more idiosyncratic than scientific.     If that is still not clear to you then perhaps you could consume a vast amount of your favorite alcoholic beverage and ponder the concept yet again. The answer may come to you then.  Cheers. 

I comprehend everything however its NOT a language issue.

I do understand the concept of government like I understand the concept of god.

However both concepts  (god and government ) are nonexistent self-contradiction like most of gods attributes are contradictory so the concepts of private person and government are identical in every aspect contradicting a nonexistent distinction .

I understand the words now please

Devise a method of analysis to distinguished between a government and a private person

, Warning this massage will be repeated until answered.

Maybe because the topic is about this ?

Or how about the burden of proof ? You are claming that a fictitious distinction between private persons and the government exists .

Maybe I drop the inquiry bullshit and go on the offensive because you seam to not comprehend my questions.

Lets assume a ideal anarcho capitalist world every government despairs and there are only private persons. Now some private persons start to offer licensing of their land (think hotel stile) with some benefits. The private businesses start to buy out  other land and expand their territory , at a cretin point the individuals start to make rules and of course they charge money for the inhabitances of their lands (in libertarianism you can do everything on your land [restrictions included ] ). Now explain to me how my presentations of this scenario is different from a government ? How do you distinguished between a government and my examples of private businesses that I have described in the absence of government ? The answer you don’t , the government is in fact a private person or more correctly there are no private ownership or government ownership there are only systems.

Now address this !

The distinction is that an individual cannot be 'the state'. An individual can only represent the state.

i'm stupid???  you're the motherfucker who started arguing with me about things i never said.  i know you're trying to play some socratic game here, but all i'm saying by "no" is i'm not interested.  and i think you're nuts because you're trying to show off your logic skills by arguing against assertions i never made.

WHEN DID I EVER SAY THERE WAS SUCH A THING AS A "STATE" OR "GOVERNMENT" APART FROM THE PEOPLE????  PLEASE POINT THIS OUT!!!  GO AHEAD AND "CLASSIFY IT FOR FICTION"!  I DON'T GIVE A FLYING FUCK!  ALL I DID WAS TRY TO TELL YOU WHAT THOSE WORDS MEAN FOR MOST PEOPLE!

let me be clear:

I HAVE NO MOTHERFUCKING OPINION ON THE MATTER.

jesus, there are so many fucking pedants on this sight who can't wait to start an argument, they'll start one about the most trivial shit.  fuck...

A corporation is consider a person silly do you know what you are even talking about ? Corporations are individuals ? LOL I did say private person not individual stick with my exact words. Do you know how silly this sounds especially in the light of the rest of your post ?

Yet they make decisions in their information processing that you can not influence and you are the sum of neurons (neurons are cells if you didn’t know  ) that make thus decisions in a sense your neurons play the game not you. Your personality is nothing more then a sum of processes of neurons so a different sum of processes can be named a individual according to your classification method. If you think you are a individual because you are the result of neurons making decisions for your arms and processing information then so is a board of directors for a corporation its neurons making a corporation a individual and the same applies for the USA . 
However one superstition in one post this is way off topic.

If I make up a classification with the name X1 and give examples of different systems in them and refuse to give the method of classification do you think this is a valid classification method ? You see fictional creatures are not real however they are defined the class government/s is not it’s a meaningless word like X1 its nothing absolutely nothing , fictional creatures are at least defined your right its wasn’t a valid comparison government classification doesn’t meat the standard for something fictional its simply nothing some  meaningless noise .

I don’t believe in the arbitrary classification group named “government” I believe the things in the group exists the classification is simply a nonexistent one. I believe the USA exists its simply inset a government it’s a system like KFC or Microsoft . Did I clarify stuff for you ?
PS: Substitute the word government with the word gods “Gods exist fictional creatures don’t end of story” is this a valid argument ? Use logic before making a statement.

HEHEHE ^.^

Why ?  :D 

I’m simply logical to my bones. What word games ?

OK :

1)      I see no prove for the existence of a classification class named government.

2)      Can someone correct me a and pervade a method of analysis that shows what supposed to be classified for a government ?

3)      I classify the USA , Germany , Poland … for a legal person-private person/ corporation

4)      Is this clear ?