Rational precepts - Holistic healing
Offline As a fan of the show, I felt compelled to write something about the content that was featured in the premiere episode.
I agree with everyone of the rational precepts except one. The holistic medicine aspect.
Holistic is not defined as a supernatural form of medicine. It's a concept based on the relationship of parts and wholes.
I am a massage therapist and there is nothing supernatural about massage (massage is considered a holistic approach).
Massage doesn't replace mainstream medicinal therapies, but it is used as a complimentary form of medicine.
Many doctors and chiropractors utilize the use of massage therapists as well as many professional sports teams for the facilitation of treatment of damaged muscle tissue.
Massage can help repair adhesions in muscle tissue, it can help rid the body of toxins by moving tissue around. It also helps bring blood to tissue that is running dry and aids in better circulation overall.
There are some massage therapists that utilize "spiritual" aspects to their work and many work on a totally physical and clinical level.
There is allot of diversity in that profession and I don't want people to cast a blanket judgement over the field of massage therapy. Sure, some practicioners utilize irrational practices and there are also some people who pose themselves off as massage therapists (even though they haven't been formally schooled and tend to sell sexual favors).
There are some holistic practices that do help (in my opinion). Special herbal teas and a diet of natural foods (without dangerous chemical preservatives) seem to have a positive effect on the body and helps prevent an accumulation of many uneccessary toxins.
I am not saying this is supposed to replace or supercede standard medical help. Any massage therapist or holistic healer that tells you to avoid western medicine, then run fifty feet in the other direction.
I just don't think any of it hurts (as long as the particular modality has been proven to be effective upon application)
I just wanted to bring in another aspect when it comes to those precepts.
I love the show and all the other precepts were great. That was the only one I guess I froze up a little bit (being that this is my career.
God bless the squad! (all of that's true except for the god part).
- Login to post comments
I'm probably going to come across as anal, but I think this part of your argument would be stronger if you omitted the reference to chiropractic medicine, which is a pseudoscience.
What toxins? What do you mean by tissue that is running dry?
Opinion or not, your suggestion that so-called natural foods lack "dangerous chemical preservatives" would benefit from some evidentiary support. It would probably be a good idea if you further clarified your statement regarding the accumulation of unnecessary toxins. Are there necessary toxins?
That precept was contributed by Yellow#5 so I'll let him defend it, as I am learning from him. However I'm inclined to state that if you give us free massages for life, we'll remove the precept. You in?
Please become a Patron of Brian Sapient
Support our activism efforts by making your Amazon purchases via this link.
Chiropratic IS a pseudoscience: http://skepdic.com/chiro.html
And holistic medicine: http://skepdic.com/holistic.html
And, at least in some forms, massage therapy: http://skepdic.com/massage.html
Matt Shizzle has been banned from the Rational Response Squad website. This event shall provide an atmosphere more conducive to social growth. - Majority of the mod team
Some other resources:
Massage Therapy: Riddled with Quackery
Chirobase: Your Skeptical Guide to Chiropractic History, Theories, and Practices
I didn't know if I made my point clear or not (probably the later).
I wasn't saying that the whole field of massage is reputable. In fact, I mentioned above that if people offer anything beyond the scope of practice (supernatural therapies) should run fifty miles away from that person. I also said that people should avoid a massage therapist that tries to replace mainstream medicine. For example, if a ball player is hurt, this person will see an MD and massage will be a part of the rehabilitation process. Massage would not "replace" the MD.
It's a diverse field where you will see greatness and on the other end of the spectrum you will see svengali-style deceit.
As far as working with atheletes with range of motion stretching exercises, providing theraputic rubs which induce heat to vasodilate the blood vessels or to simply make someone feel good is a part of massage therapy.
I'll quote from one of the links that was provided on the post above:
-------------------------
"Ordinary massage and the legitimate practice of massage therapy should not be categorized as quackery. Massage can help people relax, relieve aching muscles, and temporarily lift a person's mood. However, many therapists make claims that go far beyond what massage can accomplish. And even worse, massage therapy schools, publications, and professional groups are an integral part of the deception."
-----------------------
There is nothing I said that contradicted any of that. If my post lacked clarity, then I apologize.
I'm not trying to cause an argument. I'm a freethinking athiest and I'm on your team. Even like-minded people are going to disagree on some factors here and there.
This was more of a baby with the bathwater point of view.
We didn't, and we wouldn't. You seemed to infer that. I have personal experience with massage, it cant cure broken legs, but it can certainly make muscles feel better.
Please become a Patron of Brian Sapient
Support our activism efforts by making your Amazon purchases via this link.
You made some comments that weakened your defense of legitimate massage therapy, which is why you didn't receive our explicit agreement.
Please don't shy away from argument. It's an important part of effective reasoning, not to mention a learning tool. Just because we don't add smiley faces to all of our posts doesn't mean that we're attacking you.
Hey, trulybornagain, thanks for your reply.
Let me expain my thinking here. What I am calling irrational is trust in medicine that is not scientifically proven to work - herbal supplements, magnets, faith healing, chiropracty and massage therapy (save for very specific instances where it is applied as proven sports and rehabilitation medicince and similar avenues).
What I'm calling irrational is belief without evidence, without clinical double blind study, without peer review.
I DON'T make the claim that such therapies hold absolutely no promise, I DO claim that it is irrational to trust your well-being to an unproven treatment when other avenues are available.
If you can think of a better way to word the precept that reflects that, let me know and I'll consider it.
I am against religion because it teaches us to be satisfied with not understanding the world. - Richard Dawkins
Atheist Books, purchases on Amazon support the Rational Response Squad server.
You are right. I just left Christianity a couple of years ago and they all turned on me, so i might have natural defenses up.
I want to ask a question to everyone out there. I was hearing so much all my life about people who avoid medicine and go on macro-biotic diets and stick to natural foods cure themselves. What do you think about that? I haven't really examined the evidence (if there is any).
Also, I read online that additives like aspartame and sodium nitrates are poisonous and can contribute to many diseases.
I'm not fluent in that area, so I would like anyone who knows about this stuff to chime in.
I know urban legends can be created about food too. I remember my grandmother telling me when she was younger that people in her small town were convinced licorice was poison (one kid died and happened to have licorice in his mouth at the time or something goofy like that).
Hope everyone has a good weekend.
They cure themselves of what, exactly?
Without clinical studies, there is NO specific evidence for anything. It doesn't take a genious to know that diet can and does affect health, but we need to examine SPECIFIC claims and results.
The problem with such diets over the course of a lifetime is that is is difficult to seperate diet from the affects of the lifestyles that often accompany that diet. A person who is health concious enough to only eat such foods is obviously concerned about thier health and diet, which means they probably take care of themselves in other ways as well, such as exercising and not smoking and drinking to excess. A guy who eats a bag of cheese doodles everynight on the other hand probably doesn't spend much time at the gym.
Oxygen is poisonous in sufficient quantities as well. I'm not aware of any studies on the deleterious affects of the chemicals you mentioned, but that's really beside the point of holistic medicine being one of the precepts.
Still, to be on the safe side I wouldn't recommend eating more than a pound of sweet'n'low per day.
Tell me about it, I've heard the jokes about my choice of screen names
I am against religion because it teaches us to be satisfied with not understanding the world. - Richard Dawkins
Atheist Books, purchases on Amazon support the Rational Response Squad server.
I started doing my own research when I found out that a relative was taking his five year old son to a naturopath. Quackwatch is an excellent resource for health fraud, and one of its websites, Naturowatch, provides information about naturopathic practices.
I've located some articles that may interest you, and I've included an excerpt from each if you just want the relevant conclusions.