What is the difference between an "insipid question" and a "tedious question"?
I am pretty sure this is a continuation of a recent theme of threads. Now, I must admit that English is my primary language but thought it important to ask anyway. I will use your answers to develop an astonishingly astute and perspicuous post later.
"Tis better to rule in Hell than to serve in Heaven." -Lucifer
- Login to post comments
Well played, Nero.
A question that is insipid is one that is lacking anything interesting from the first asking. A tedious question could be one that is initially worth asking but after 500 different people ask the same question it becomes ... well ... tedious.
My Artwork
Thank you.
HIGH FIVE!
I think the difference lies somewhere between 'ineffectual' and 'lame'.
I have been provided an answer in another thread, recently written. It is: Nothing. Both end in the same pathetic line of logic and begin with unsound assumptions. Nice.
"Tis better to rule in Hell than to serve in Heaven." -Lucifer
l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l