Typical Christian. He has to pre-approve comments he likes.

What's his number? 

Here's how I responded to him. I'll post again with his response if he gives one:

----------------

Larry,

Thanks for the speedy response.

Regarding your first point that I don't know if EVERYBODY engaging in the challenge knows it's symbolic, you are correct. I must concede that I cannot be absolutely 100% certain of this, but I think you'll agree that this is a moot point. Suppose hypothetically, someone engaging in the challenge actually believes that doing so will send them to hell, since you point out that it's not really accurately committing the unforgivable sin anyway, whether a hell exists or not, the result is the same. So what does it matter and why does it trouble you so much? But you also ask if I can back up the claim, so I turn to the videos themselves, which we'll call Exhibit A: videos of people personally testifying that they lack god-belief. In fact, some of the videos include longer denials that even mention denials of the existence of heaven and hell. All things being equal, I believe it's a somewhat reasonable assertion that these are legitimate confessions of non-belief. Wouldn't you agree?

In your next point, you suggest the challenge should be accurate in its symbolic gesture but claim that the said gesture is impossible to
perform in the modern age. So how would you suggest the symbolic gesture be performed accurately, or in accordance with The Bible, which is itself full of much symbolism?

Then you asked how we know there is no Hell. Aside from the existence of a Hell being just as absurd as the existence of Never Never Land or Willy Wonka's Chocolate Factory, no evidence outside of references in a few 1900-year-old texts, offer evidence that such a place ever existed, and the principles said to govern this Hell violate fundamental laws of science, which have been observed in the natural world, tested, and verified countless times. So again, while agnostic Atheists or weak Atheists (as they're sometimes called) like myself admit we can't claim absolute certainty (as Theists often do), using science and reason, we can be almost as certain such a place does not exist.

As for your final point: while you're hardly the first Christian to
claim this feat is impossible to commit, I think you're the first to
claim the act could only be legitimately committed by people living in
the first century C.E. First of all, this is problematic, considering
the Gospels of Mark and Luke, which refer to the unforgivable sin, were written late in the 1st century, and therefore, why bother even writing them down for all posterity if virtually no one could benefit from them? Second of all, by what definition are you referring to? This time I'm afraid I have to be the one to ask you to back up this interpretation. I've asked two biblical scholars who are far more versed on this topic than I, and none of them have ever heard this interpretation either. Where did it come from?

I did pass along your website info to The Rational Response Squad. But since you didn't provide any other contact info., I suggested they email you from your website as well. Thanks again for your honest response.

-Michael