Right click, Copy, Paste, Done...

Yes, no, maybe?

It's not graphical talent, but rather basic computing skills that you lack. The steps were just given to you, yet you still can't manage?

At least you know how to open a browser window to share this ineptitude with the rest of us. Bravo!

Hey, there are a lot of twats on the forum, but a lot of people are OK. Just give someone with a badge a chance to respond.

Here is your picture with the RRS badge. Let me know if you want to have it arranged in a different way.

No, I'd say you explained things properly. I just failed to comprehend what you wanted. Apologies. 

I'm quick to be condescending, but I'm no twat. Them's fightin' words, stranger! 

Thanks.  I might use that one.  I have at least one more on the way from someone else.  I'll take a look at the final products and make a decision then. 

I see why you're a "Rational V.I.P." Your well-reasoned retort to my apology has certainly put me in my place. Most rational people don't clumsily lash out at those who apologize for their mistakes, but I suppose you must know something the rest of us don't. Care to share that wisdom with the forum at large?

Well said, Sapient.  This fellow always has a sandy vagina.  Should the Mods be short of time, I would be happy to collect the evidence of an air tight case against him.

Double post. Please ignore or delete. Thanks.

 Yet people accuse me of trolling. How is this a useful contribution to the thread?

It is useful in this thread because you just got a spanking for the founder of the movement.  I am merely suggesting to my fellow RRS members that we ignore you so you'll go away. 

You've consistently been a douchebag across the forum.  Further, I think that your personum indicates signs that are often associated with someone worth ignoring.  You attack others on vacuous issues, such as spelling.  The tone of your speech is much like any person of inferior education and bearing who hopes to disguise those deficits.  Finally, you seem to be bellicose for no reason, which indicates that you are a juvenile. 

With all of that in mind, I am suggesting that you are ignored until you gather enough experience to know how to behave in public.  It is a cogent post for all of those reasons.

I believe the word troll perfectly describes your actions, however two mods have stepped up behind the scenes, cooled me down and have suggested a letter to you. Please heed whatever the mods say in the letter, as I don't like having people with your attitude around. We're here to work, not to indulge trolls.

Users can determine for themselves how trollish your posts have been:

From http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/sapient/atheist_vs_theist/10166

new The "sickest" Bible verses?

 

The "sickest" Bible verses? Are you people serious, or is this a poor attempt at humor?

 

Regardless, would someone please explain the purpose of this exercise? I fail to see how this qualifies as rational response.

Yes, I am serious. Yes, I am familiar with the Bible. I don't know where you got the idea that I "haven't read, or dont read all of the bible," but that simply isn't the case.

Perhaps you'd benefit from having a look at both the title of this subforum and the name of this website. "GUYS LOOK WUT TEH BIBLE SEZ LOL SO GROSS EW" is neither a rational response, nor does it qualify as "Atheist vs. Theist." That there are acts in the Bible which you find morally repugnant does not constitute a valid argument in favor of atheism.

Hope no more: threads like this are pointless. This "exorsize" is absolutely without merit in terms of your stated intent.

Here's a slightly off-topic tip for you, Brian: Go get yourself a copy of Strunk & White and learn how to proofread. Your constant abuse of the English language makes your posts difficult to read.

Basically, after this, you got into a long battle over Brian37's lack of language skills. Please don't waste time debating someones usage of language around here, get under the surface of what they're saying.

From http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/general_conversation_introductions_and_humor/10238

"our generation, both young and old."

 

She's a complete idiot, but that was clearly a seizure. Don't worry, I think people with disabilities are hilarious too. Would anyone like a link to the video of the paraplegic trying to negotiate an escalator?

I don't think you've been paying attention. Theism is considered a mental illness around here. Clearly all her problems are directly related to faith.

Her poor speaking and writing skills might qualify as exceptions, however.

From http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/sapient/atheist_vs_theist/8487?page=1

MattShizzle wrote:

How exactly is the God of the Bible merciful when he created hell in the first place? As far as most sane people are concerned, eternal torture is excessive even for Hitler, let alone for everyone. Wouldn't true mercy involve forgiving unconditionally rather than "sacraficing himself to himself in order to save us from rules he created?"

This is a no bullshit zone by the way.

I wouldn't normally be this blunt, but this is a "no bullshit zone."

God is merciful in that he allows you to continue to post ancient "conundrums" without fear of divine reprisal.

On second thought, watch out for lightning.

From http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/the_rational_response_squad_radio_show/general_conversation_introductions_and_humor/8377

Scientology doesn't even technically qualify as a "cult" in Germany. The German government, as I understand it, doesn't consider the organization a religion, but rather a for-profit business.

All that aside, I see no problem with Germany's refusal to allow access to their sites. I doubt very much that Germany guarantees access to Ministry sites to actors of any belief system. Those who react as if the Germans (or "Krauts." Try to spell your slurs correctly at the very least, Brian37.) are firing up the ovens are overreacting to a total non-issue.

You seem to be a prick who doesn't actually contribute much to any debate you enter, and you have a propensity for bashing people over spelling, grammar, and anything else that isn't especially relevant.  In this thread you were exposed for being a dipshit as you arrogantly tried to expose someone elses flaws, that you had completely miscalculated.

Drop the troll act.  Get to the heart of the matter.  You believe in God?  You can't defend it so you bring up grammar?  You attempt to waste our time by making us engage in worthless battles over grammar?  You tell us, what's your deal and who are you?

Believe me, you are wanted here.  You just had the misfortune to run into an Internet douchebag.  Unfortunately, they are quite common.  The anonymity of the Internets™  allows some people to act the way they would act all the time, if they could get away with it; therefore, you see a lot of complete wankers on Internet forums. 

I've participated on forums for many years and even though the advice "just ignore them" is good advice, the ubiquitousness of Internet douchebags still makes me cringe.   If you can manage to overlook the cowardly little twats who hide behind a computer screen, it can be a worthwhile experience.

Thanks everyone.  Yeah, I was probably harsher than I needed to be in my reply, but I'm required to deal with enough twats in my day-to-day life that I have very little tolerance for twattish behavior I'm not required to deal with.  I'm sure I'm not the only one who feels that way.

Anyway, thanks to everyone who offered assistance, but I think I've decided on something else entirely.  As much as I love my "Smile, you're on Dork TV" pic (it's my favorite picture of myself), I've decided to go with a boxing-themed avatar to match the boxing-themed username.

 And surprise surprise, I made it myself, and it actually turned out pretty good.  Maybe I'm not as graphically inept as I thought:

Well he/she/it is either an atheist asshole or a theist asshole.  Sapient has a 50% chance of being right. *shrug*  

My point was be careful. I googled my name and found accounts named 'Cpt_pineapple' that didn't belong to me. 

I googled 'pineapple rational responders' a couple times for fun, (to see any gossip about me >_>.) but NOT 468 times.