|
Navigation
The Rational Response Squad is a group of atheist activists who impact society by changing the way we view god belief. This site is a haven for those who are pushing back against the norm, and a place for believers of gods to have their beliefs exposed as false should they want to try their hand at confronting us. Buy any item on AMAZON, and we'll use the small commission to help improve critical thinking. Buy a Laptop -- Apple
|
What kind of atheist are you?
Posted on: February 2, 2013 - 12:09am
  Offline
What kind of atheist are you?
Indisputable 100% accurate and scientific accurate quiz. I'm a scientific atheist http://www.quizfarm.com/quizzes/quiz/ReverendAcid/what-kind-of-atheist-are-you/
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright Rational Response Squad 2006-2021.
|
I just took it for the fun of it, and here is what I came up with : You Scored as Scientific Atheist
These guys rule. I'm not one of them myself, although I play one online. They know the rules of debate, the Laws of Thermodynamics, and can explain evolution in fifty words or less. More concerned with how things ARE than how they should be, these are the people who will bring us into the future.
“It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.”
― Giordano Bruno
"Experiments are the only means of knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." Max Planck
I actually wonder how they came up with these questions and what decides the results. I mean, some of the ones that involved getting deliberately angry, or the ones about provoking people seemed to smack of trick questions. I wonder how one would fare with a set of different questions and answers ? Not that it really makes much difference to me, I just found that the content of some of the questions was rather interesting in their semantics.
“It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.”
― Giordano Bruno
This is me on two glasses of wine
"Don't seek these laws to understand. Only the mad can comprehend..." -- George Cosbuc
This reminds me of a bayes' theorem podcast I was listening to today.
Basically bayes's theorem (I think there was an attempted explanation by Natural at one time) is a statistical theory regarding probabilities. It attempts to work out mathematically what the probability of... let's say a light in the sky being a UFO, is.
The reason this reminds me of that is because, in order to calculate probability, you have to consider your knowledge base on the subject. Also, you need to be ready to question your assumptions if new evidence arises...
To answer you question, the answer arrived at is only as accurate as the the initial base of knowledge. In this case, 40 questions carrying subjectively assigned value...
I strongly recommend (only because I'm drunk
) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDMgnzoLjo4
and Bayes' theorem research in general. Warning, may actually cause you to question your beliefs.
"Don't seek these laws to understand. Only the mad can comprehend..." -- George Cosbuc
They gave me a tie breaker question between would I explode and then calmly explain "evolution is just a theory" or that creations are not human. Choose the former.
I thought AE would have been a bit more angry too. At least more angrier than me. Well, that just makes me angry
I apparently still have a touch of the theism. I said if god did exist I still would not worship him - he doed need to earn my respect after all this. But if he gave me evidence he existed I would believe in him. Guess that was the touch or rather I am touched or touche of theism - bleh.
Religion Kills !!!
Numbers 31:17-18 - Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man, but save for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man.
http://jesus-needs-money.blogspot.com/
This is interesting. I'll check it out when I get the opportunity.
Here's a question that we might can use the Bayes Theorem on ?
Should I get drunk, smoke marijuana, or be straight when viewing the video ?
I am going to say, since this is a new concept, it would probably be preferable to be stoned or just sober. However, being stoned has had it's benefits when being introduced to new concepts.
But, I'll probably have a few if it is later on at night.
“It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.”
― Giordano Bruno
I never liked these tests much. Might do them for the fuck of it, but I can't give it any credibility. There's always a bunch of questions that depend on my mood. And a bunch of others that can be misinterpreted. Case in point, I answered questions dealing with believing god as if it were a scientific question, thereby not absolutely rejecting the possibility of a god, and the stupid test says I'm 4% theist because I'm too scientific for it to make sense of my responses.
Scientific Atheist
75%
Agnostic
54%
Meditative Atheist
50%
Militant Atheist
42%
Apathetic Atheist
42%
Angry Atheist
38%
Theist
4%
Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.
Look - I answered rationally. Would I have been so rational in the heat of an argument? Probably not. I did answer 'totally agree' to the question "Has religion hurt you in a way you will never forgive" so there must have been some other questions that related to it. I generally agreed religion should not be banned, I didn't agree it was the worst thing the world had ever seen, I thought it had done some good, that not all theists were idiots.
"Experiments are the only means of knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." Max Planck
yeah, I don't know where this 4% theist came from.
And I'm angrier than AE
"not absolutely rejecting the possibility of a God". While there's no God separate or disconnected from material the term is normally related to people or a person and natural occuring phenomenon. People normally think there are separate forces to consider, but in the study of the book we concluded that the "one God" application means that all force is God and force is used as a singular. What the book mostly and intends dealing with is forces in the connectivity between people or individuals as the social forces and consequences. The "I" in the book is the same as force.
The only possible thing the world needs saving from are those running it.
https://sites.google.com/site/oldseers
Knowledge trumps faith and I'm not a Theist
Lies are nothing more then falsehoods searching for the truth