Japanese Earthquake created by God Almighty
Offline Hello My Agnostic Friends,
The Japanese earthquake was the wrath of God. You see, Amos 3:6 tells us that God creates evil. The verse says that God created evil on a specific city. Just like He did in Japan.
God is the Cause of All
Japanese earthquake was a cause
Thus, God was the Cause of the Japanese Earthquake
If there are any agnostics who would like to volunteer to clean up the effect of God's wrath please do so. Perhaps an ounce of sanity will penetrate your absurdity in knowing that you're next.
Since agnostics (there no such thing as an atheist), since Agnostics are very evil people, I doubt this is physically possible.
Respectfully,
Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).
A Rational Christian of Intelligence (rare)with a valid and sound justification for my epistemology and a logical refutation for those with logical fallacies and false worldviews upon their normative of thinking in retrospect to objective normative(s). This is only understood via the imago dei in which we all are.
Respectfully,
Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).
- Login to post comments
Signature ? How ?
I don't care if Jean (Fido)as a human hates me, I know his god cant hate me because disembodied brains are absurd claims, by any name. Hate is a normal emotion. HOW one acts determines the morality of the person displaying the emotion, not the fact they have normal emotions.
SO, lets compare his god claim in terms of what he claims his god will do to us, vs what I would do to him.
The morality of claimed god.
1. Uses threats to get people to follow him.
2. Will use torture to get people to follow him.
3. Will hold others hostage to get to others
4. Will allow harm to come to babies and children if it suits his needs
5. All humans belong to god, like property.
My morality by comparison:
1. Don't give a shit what you claim as long as I have the same freedom to challenge your claims. Will not use threats of violence because you make claims I find absurd. Will not follow you or threaten you if you try to leave my presence.
2. The only way I would have someone detained by law is if they violate the common law WE as a society agree to. I will not physically harm you merely over disagreement. If someone does physically harm me, I call the cops and when they go to prison, they still have rights and should not be tortured because they are detained.
3. I would not shoot someone else to get at Jean(Fido).
4. Would call the cops if I knew someone was harming a kid.
5. Other human beings are not my property, even the people I hate.
So between the god he claims exists, and me. I would treat him far better as my enemy than he claims his god would do to me.
How does it feel to be property Fido? I am going to try to remember to put that in every post to Jean(Fido) as a sarcastic retort to his faux "respectfully".
How does it feel to be property Fido?
"We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and nonbelievers."Obama
Check out my poetry here on Rational Responders Like my poetry thread on Facebook under Brian James Rational Poet, @Brianrrs37 on Twitter and my blog at www.brianjamesrationalpoet.blog
I'm not concerned about Jean's hatred. I'd just like him to own it.
I am not concerned with him on a personal level and I really don't care about him "owning it" either.
He won't because he is has his head up his god's ass too far to see it is all in his head.
I am fine with using him as a display to other wannabe childish bullies who think threats work in a civil society.
"We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and nonbelievers."Obama
Check out my poetry here on Rational Responders Like my poetry thread on Facebook under Brian James Rational Poet, @Brianrrs37 on Twitter and my blog at www.brianjamesrationalpoet.blog
You have a stronger tolerance for dishonesty than I, sir.
"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin
Don't get me wrong, when he pulled the Japan thread crap, I was all ready to ask for him to be banned. That was a bit hasty on my part and looking back, it would have been a mistake. Let s put him on display, like he thinks he is doing with us. He wants a verbal fight, I am willing to give it to him. He will lose.
No I don't think he is being dishonest in his mind. It is scary that humans can be this deluded. I do think he will, because of his delusion take a "by any means" approach including dishonesty.
Two different subjects. In his mind he thinks he is giving(whom he falsely thinks are the the alcoholic) near beer and will lie to claim it really is beer because of his real delusion.
Humans in regards to god beliefs can and do lie, deliberately because they are not lying when they say they do believe. The ends justifies the means to them.
When people become this far gone, like Fido here is, it becomes almost impossible to pull them out. I think with Fido here, the best we can do is let him make a fool of himself.
"We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and nonbelievers."Obama
Check out my poetry here on Rational Responders Like my poetry thread on Facebook under Brian James Rational Poet, @Brianrrs37 on Twitter and my blog at www.brianjamesrationalpoet.blog
Signature ? How ?
Bully for you.
I know things you do not.
Pot meet kettle.
What does what he knows/doesn't know prove?
Other than what he knows/doesn't know?
Nothing...
They are what they are, and are not... what they are not.
That's neither here, nor there.
They are what they are, and are not... what they are not.
What does what he knows/doesn't know, prove?
Other than what he knows/doesn't know?
Nothing...
I gave you a definition, that is universally applicable to anything you can imagine, and things that you cannot.
You just don't understand why the law of parsimony is critical.
The need to add anything superfluous to a model, is an emotional and foolish one, that's typical of 'Flat Earth Creationists', and emotionally and mentally dysfunctional individuals.
Only in the case of people that are as emotionally and mentally dysfunctional as you.
Which is why you people think and behave, as irrationally and immaturely, as you do.
And why it would be counterproductive that any dysfunctional people like you ever have absolute power and control, and absolutely critical, that you never do.
There is no debate, over this, among the most intelligent, logical, pragmatic, practical, multi faceted thinkers.
Those who qualify as human luminaries.
I keep asking myself " Are they just playin' stupid, or are they just plain stupid?..."
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy" : David Brooks
" Only on the subject of God can smart people still imagine that they reap the fruits of human intelligence even as they plow them under." : Sam Harris
I meant to say I persoanlly think that things are contingent on previous events and I only used the word free will cause i didnt know what other word to use and no I dont think we have it.
Everybody on the whole Cell bloc ..dancing to the Jailhouse Rock
Thank You, Thank You very much.
Submitted By ~ danatemporary
:
I would just like to say that Jean Chauvin is a low-life, Jesus penis blowing asshole. That is all.
I think you have truly apprehended his sublime assholery, AA.
Favorite oxymorons: Gospel Truth, Rational Supernaturalist, Business Ethics, Christian Morality
"Theology is now little more than a branch of human ignorance. Indeed, it is ignorance with wings." - Sam Harris
The path to Truth lies via careful study of reality, not the dreams of our fallible minds - me
From the sublime to the ridiculous: Science -> Philosophy -> Theology
I sometimes wonder how funny it would be to see all the real crazies who've come here over the years thrown into a book. It would make for wonderful comedy. It would also be cool history, something for people to look at in a hundred years and wonder how the species continued to exist. And it could raise revenue. > >
Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.
Are you Asperger? You sound like it.
Optimism is reality, pessimism is the fantasy that you know enough to be cynical
so how come when a disaster happends USUALLY christians say something completely stupid like "wow the church burned down but it didn't kill anyone inside. guess that was god looking out." when what they may want to think about (if they're in that mode of ridiculous thought anyway) is "wow god really took out that church! maybe we as followers are making him unhappy by doing something wrong". haha. you know? course ALL the good shit gets attributed to a god, just couldn't be blind luck or circumstance or heaven forbid you got a promotion at work cause you fucking worked for it.
and i've learned long ago not to argue with christians. i just fucking walk away. they'll start that circular razor dance, kinda like AA does, and fill it will bad cliches and just plain wrong "facts". and hey, everybody's got the right to worship damned ferrets if they're so inclined but DO. NOT. SHOVE. RELIGION. UP. MY. ASS. EVER. i also have the right not to be tormented with lunatic babblings of jeesus. or any god. or some allah cat. (or his buddies, jeesus didn't write a fucking thing. the bible: most influential work of fiction ever. which is very sad.) last time someone said they'd pray for me i told them to "knock yourself out, or just get a hobby". i hate religion i really do.
and then there's this...
well don't know how to post a picture. damn. 
"Fear is the parent of cruelty, and therefore it is no wonder if cruelty and religion have gone hand in hand."
Bertrand Russell
http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/profile.php?id=1572636949
Thats a great Idea
The Big Book of Crazies
What are the laws on quoting people? Can you publish their username or name if listed without consent?
So what did he do to make you a pessimistic asshole.
Faith is the word but next to that snugged up closely "lie's" the want.
"By simple common sense I don't believe in god, in none."-Charlie Chaplin
LUK3 Ch. 13 "And what about the eighteen people who died when the tower in Siloam fell on them? Were they the worst sinners in Jerusalem?I tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish”
This is a moot point by this time. HOWEVER! My question is "why" would you subscribe to this idea that a natural disaster is in all likelihood a "Judgment from the Almighty" (and to suggest that so matter-a-factly) ? You have read about other 'religions' ? Correct? IMHO, We encountered a similar thought with the early Etruscans' 'Omens' or in Greco-Roman belief that the "gods" must be displeased. You re given the impression that the flood didnt quite do the job. Isnt that it? Your wimpy fellows are probably putting some distance from those remarks. You've got to be a big frustration for those who'd never presume such a thing, especially on a 'hostile' board (See: Ken G. remark),.
~ (Bel-khidhdh1)
You know dude, when you think that 99% of people are ignorant and don't understand your intellect, and somehow you're the only one who has his head on straight - that should tell you that it's you who's crazy.
Do you ever even think about this? What makes you think you're the enlightened one here? What have you accomplished in your life that makes you think you've learned so much more than the 1000s of other people who think you're crazy? They've all come from different educational backgrounds, religious backgrounds, different families, friends, and different walks of life - and they all think you're wrong. What have you done in your life that's given you all this "secret" insight that no one but you is smart enough to appreciate?
Do you ever even wonder about WHY you believe this is? Or do you just decide that you're right, then debate from there and look for "evidence" that supports the conclusion you've already DECIDED you "know" is correct - without any proof - of course none of your "evidence" DOES actually support your nonsensical beliefs, but as long as you feel like you've "won", you don't let the facts get in the way. It sounds like the latter to me.
No dude, you just WANT to believe you're right. If you actually took the time to THINK about what you claim to believe (about the earthquake, evolution, etc) then you'd see how absurd it is. But your ego is too big - you'd rather keep making a fool of yourself than be forced to swallow your phony pride and admit that you don't know much at all. And that requires too much maturity for you - you feel more comfortable just living in denial and telling yourself "I'm right! I'm right" than manning up and deciding to improve your understanding. You really don't care about the truth, and you don't want to bear the responsibility of having to admit to yourself that you're just a legend in your own mind - you just want to keep telling yourself you're smarter than everyone because pretending to be smart takes way less effort than actually learning something.
Optimism is reality, pessimism is the fantasy that you know enough to be cynical
No, I think you have made unsupported statements and logical fallacies but as yet no valid arguments of evidence.
Where are your proofs?
In the beginning god created the universe out of string...
I stopped reading terms & conditions in the 90's once I realised that most corporations don't acknowledge Canada's existence, let alone our laws, but I am pretty sure that Sapient has ownership of anything posted on his site(s), and can do whatever he wants to with it. Including usernames and even real names, provided he can prove the real name is associated with the alias.
Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.
Well, truth be known vastet, many corporations are headquartered (on paper anyway) in Minnesota because the laws there don't even recognize the rest of the United States.
That being said, I did the 2600 thing on this web site and both the server and Brian Sapient happen to be in the USA. So that is the law that is most probable to apply. How that affects people from other countries, well that I do not claim to know. Taking Canadian law as an example, my admittedly poor knowledge of that really doesn't help you all that much.
Even so, I have read the entire copyright law and a bunch of case law from the USA. According to that, copyright is vested in the individual poster under the assumption that copyright begins once an idea is “fixed in tangible form”. I would have to look it up specifically but there is a case regarding the specific definition. Apparently, if your post is in the buffer memory of your computer, that is legally identical to being saved on a floppy disk.
=
Yes, but all Sapient needs to bypass that is a terms and conditions which includes terminology stating that anything posted on the site becomes property of the RRS and can be used in any fashion. Many corporations if not most or all contain such terms for their forums.
Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.