Obama 42%, Ron Paul 41%!
Posted on: April 19, 2010 - 2:10pm
Obama 42%, Ron Paul 41%!
libertarians rejoice!
- Login to post comments
Navigation
The Rational Response Squad is a group of atheist activists who impact society by changing the way we view god belief. This site is a haven for those who are pushing back against the norm, and a place for believers of gods to have their beliefs exposed as false should they want to try their hand at confronting us. Buy any item on AMAZON, and we'll use the small commission to help improve critical thinking. Buy a Laptop -- Apple |
Obama 42%, Ron Paul 41%!
Posted on: April 19, 2010 - 2:10pm
Obama 42%, Ron Paul 41%!
libertarians rejoice!
|
Copyright Rational Response Squad 2006-2021.
|
healthcare bill = unconstitutional, period, and outside of that, it wont do shit to fix the healthcare problem, thats why he voted against it, and alot of what he does want could be implemented immediately
the federal govt has no say on stem cell research, paul has said the states could fund it
income tax = unconstitutional, plus there are myriad other ways in which the govt is funded, he wants to restore to govt to its proper constitutional role by cutting taxes AND spending
youd have to point out the exact piece of hate crimes legislation he voted against for me to make a proper comment, for the most part crime is taken care of at the state level, and from my POV hate crime legislation is basically a form of thought crime, its not enough to punish them for the crime itself (which they should) but also to punish them for their motivation for the crime
so?
paul wants the market to figure out which sources of energy we should be using, not politicians dictating what we should be using, which hasnt turned out all that well, he wants to legalize hemp, which is a possible source of alternative fuel, as for the environment, hes a fierce supporter of private property, the climate bills now wont do jack shit for the environment and are a corporations wet dream (even naomi klein, not some right wing corporatist by any stretch, doesnt like the idea of carbon credits or any of that)
and WHO on fox news, outside of judge napolitano (hardly a corporatist if you know anything about him) has endorsed him?
i doubt youve actually read anything hes written or listened to anything hes actually said, since your giving ridiculous accounts of his actual positions while ignoring the explanation for his position entirely
edit: http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2010/04/congress-voting-to-freeze-its-own-pay/1
Another supporter of the legislation, Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, thinks Congress should go even further. "Maybe we should be taking a pay cut," he said.
the thread is so stupid that youve taken the time to post in it several times, so yeah nice try but failure
i dont give a shit about your opinion of paul, whats at issue is the ridiculous idea that since i cant disprove it that its somehow a valid argument, its how you came to that conclusion more than the conclusion itself
yet another post,
i can post pictures too, after all, pictures make you look witty