Another disturbing Zealot (from youtube)

Kapkao
atheistSuperfan
Kapkao's picture
Posts: 4121
Joined: 2010-01-12
User is offlineOffline
Another disturbing Zealot (from youtube)

(CAUTION: This thread/OP won't be for those whose nerves are easily razzed.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqhKVh3BnMA

tmallow2004 wrote:
"Imagine that you are creating a fabric of human destiny with the object of making men happy in the end, giving them peace and rest at last, but that it was essential and inevitable to torture to death only one tiny creature -- that baby beating its breast with its fist, for instance -- and to found that edifice on its unavenged tears, would you consent to be the architect on those conditions? Tell me, and tell the truth."

~ From Fyodor Dostoyevsky's 'The Brothers Karamazov' on the question of "If achieving world peace required torturing a single baby, would it be worth it?

No, we would not!

Every single American who served in the United States military, in particular those who have seen the killing fields and who have died, know damn well that freedom does come at a price, and more so that such freedom is well deserved to be defended at extreme costs. In this domain there are patriots who serve God, that higher calling above the state. These are men and women who, regardless of who may be in the Whitehouse, serve their country in order to protect the freedoms of all, to include the unborn, and they make that personal sacrifice every single day.

The legacy of this country is not defined by tyrannical or radical thinking. Its own heart races to the beat of what is right in the eyes of God. We do not serve a country that purposes its self to murder infants. Every single paratrooper that jumped into the battlefields of Europe in World War Two did not do so to protect the rights of those who commit infanticide. To think for one fleeting moment that any of us enjoined in the defense of this nation to defend the right to murder a baby is as ludicrous as thinking that it is justified to kill a person on the street in cold blood for a five dollar bill. Just where in hell did anyone get in their mind that murdering a baby through abortion is justified or even smiled upon by God? Just who the hell is anyone to think that an anti-abortionist is a right wing radical? With no due respect whatsoever, its the person who murders a child with extreme prejudice who is the radical. And every American soldier who gave his life for this country did not do it so the shameless can commit the atrocities of infanticide.

I dare anyone to stand before God and state that abortion was justified because they didn't want the child. If such a person were to do so, before God would smite them He would without any doubt point out that once one crosses the line to kill infants, anything goes and any other person regardless of age can then be equally treated as a commodity to be expelled from life on a whim. This is the very reason why many in our nation feel it is now justified to deny medical care for the elderly should they have a chronic condition. This thinking is Orwellian and it is flat out wrong and sinful.

Again, I dare anyone to tell God directly to his face that a woman's right to murder a baby is honored by Him. I dare you!

There is no freedom for the unborn when they are indiscriminately terminated at will, on demand. And I will be damned if I ever buy into that sordid excuse.

Obama and the liberals of this nation have redirected the compass of morality to the extent that now the line between right and wrong has been severely blurred. But, their time is short lived. They do not belong at the helm of this nation and will be removed from power in due time as more people become catalyzed to vote them out of office. This country belongs to God fearing people who know there is an absolute accountability to God, and as defined by our fore fathers and fellow patriots whose blood bathes that American flag who paid the price for liberty for all to include the infant in the womb.

I repeat, paratroopers, soldiers, sailors, airmen, defenders of the US Constitution and all, none of them defend the right to murder an infant. Their sacrifice to defend freedom has been tainted by the notion that one of the freedoms is the right to abort a baby. No, it is not one of those freedoms we defend. The US Paratrooper is in effect an agent of God in that he has accepted the call to duty to defend all those inalienable rights. And when he goes into battle, he had better be right with God because to be otherwise is to waiver in conviction and fall prey to doubt with the result that the fighting force within then loses the reason to defend. This level of lack of confidence is what makes an army ineffectual and prone to defeat.

~A patriot, a Christian, a man with a bleeding heart for the unborn.

Credits:
Videographer/Jumper: Tom Boyle, WW2 Airborne Demonstration Team
Presentation/Jumper: Timothy Mallow, WW2 Airborne Demonstration Team
World War Two Airborne Demonstration Team, Frederick Army Airfield, Oklahoma

      Yay. The "christian warrior" philosophy. I look forward to your face being plastered all over the 6 o'clock news after you shoot some volunteer for escorting a pregnant woman to an abortion clinic, unharassed, simply because you and so many other (millions of) fuckwits think that a woman does not have the right to choose, or that the human race should populate itself to an early extinction. You are no different than Ted Kazynski, Eric Rudolf, or any of the other MALES who think they should be allowed to dictate (religious) terms to women, simply because your pastor/preacher/minister told you to, and you do not value your own, internally-gifted free will enough to separate your feelings from your ability to reason independently of others. You are not a "christian warrior" because the US military indoctrinated you to be, or because you read it out of some sort of sacred text, you are one because you chose to be, and now millions of other Americans will look at you and laugh, because you have a martyrdom complex and a persecution complex.

"The legacy of this country is not defined by tyrannical or radical thinking." Speak for yourself...

(Mods: put this where ever it needs to go) 

“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)


Kapkao
atheistSuperfan
Kapkao's picture
Posts: 4121
Joined: 2010-01-12
User is offlineOffline
Carlin wrote:Well, if a

Carlin wrote:

Well, if a fetus is a human being, how come the census doesn't count them?

If a fetus is a human being, how come when there's a miscarriage they don't have a funeral?

If a fetus is a human being, how come people say 'we have two children and one on the way' instead of saying 'we have three children?'

People say life begins at conception, I say life began about a billion years ago and it's a continuous process. Continuous, just keeps rolling along. Rolling, rolling, rolling along.

Minor note:

“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)