|
Navigation
The Rational Response Squad is a group of atheist activists who impact society by changing the way we view god belief. This site is a haven for those who are pushing back against the norm, and a place for believers of gods to have their beliefs exposed as false should they want to try their hand at confronting us. Buy any item on AMAZON, and we'll use the small commission to help improve critical thinking. Buy a Laptop -- Apple
|
Proof god exist
Posted on: February 26, 2009 - 8:26pm
  Offline
Proof god exist
( a + bn )/n = x
Just came out in Annales Acta Mathematica. It's not electronic, so don't bother asking for a link.
|
|
Copyright Rational Response Squad 2006-2021.
|
I don't get it. How does this prove that God exists? Which variable is God? Lol.
Our revels now are ended. These our actors, | As I foretold you, were all spirits, and | Are melted into air, into thin air; | And, like the baseless fabric of this vision, | The cloud-capped towers, the gorgeous palaces, | The solemn temples, the great globe itself, - Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve, | And, like this insubstantial pageant faded, | Leave not a rack behind. We are such stuff | As dreams are made on, and our little life | Is rounded with a sleep. - Shakespeare
That's an awesome proof. It's really a QED.
God really IS made of invisible Cheetos. I'm so glad we settled this.
Saint Will: no gyration without funkstification.
fabulae! nil satis firmi video quam ob rem accipere hunc mi expediat metum. - Terence
exp[i*pi]=-1
After discovering that Euler, thought it was evidence for God.
It's evidence for awesome, that's what it is. I love that equation.
Saint Will: no gyration without funkstification.
fabulae! nil satis firmi video quam ob rem accipere hunc mi expediat metum. - Terence
I noticed it was your first post so welcome to the forums.
Did you know that 2 + 2 = 4, and if you add on letters and symbels it will still equal 4. It does not equal a god. Now could you elaborate upon why your equation does equal some kind of a god?
"Very funny Scotty; now beam down our clothes."
VEGETARIAN: Ancient Hindu word for "lousy hunter"
If man was formed from dirt, why is there still dirt?
http://www.anecdotage.com/index.php?aid=14079
The infinite power of google.
My good sir:
Let me here present you with definitive evidence that God does not exist:
"Gud eksisterer ikke fordi jeg siger det"
Now, since this will likely render you speechless, unless you speak Danish, then I will consider this a win.
You might counter, " well how can I argue against it, if I don't understand it? "
Well, Danish, unlike mathematics is not a universal language, so it is not reasonable to ask you to accept what I say, when you can't understand it, but then again I could just counter: "well specific languages are not universal, but language is universal: we all speak. You could just learn Danish, if you want to understand my argument. My words in Danish above correspond to words in English that you do understand, so you have the capasity to understand it, if only you'd bother to learn Danish."
But just to maybe help me along just everso slightly, might I ask you:
What is a?
What is bn?
What is n?
What is x?
If you are indeed serious in your presentation of this argument, then please provide that context.
Otherwise, how can you propose to have argued anything?
I am not well schooled in mathematics, and it is possible, perhaps even likely that I won't understand the above equation if you provide the context, but even so do you not think that it is rather unreasonable of you, to expect me to say: "I don't understand that, so therefore it must be true" ?
By that logic, you ought to accept my argument, because you don't understand it, even though if you bother to check you'll find that it means: "God does not exist because I say so".
Well I was born an original sinner
I was spawned from original sin
And if I had a dollar bill for all the things I've done
There'd be a mountain of money piled up to my chin
Oh, hahaha.
Our revels now are ended. These our actors, | As I foretold you, were all spirits, and | Are melted into air, into thin air; | And, like the baseless fabric of this vision, | The cloud-capped towers, the gorgeous palaces, | The solemn temples, the great globe itself, - Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve, | And, like this insubstantial pageant faded, | Leave not a rack behind. We are such stuff | As dreams are made on, and our little life | Is rounded with a sleep. - Shakespeare
Easy to counter.
g+L=A
Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.
Where G, O, and D are unassigned variables of unknown value.
GxOxD = DxOxG everytime
therefore
God is a dog.
I used spot remover on him.
Now he is gone.
Who would want to finish what they have said with the same thing everytime?
Ct x g=Elves
Cookies taste good so therefore Elves make cookies in trees. You got a problem with that logic? BTW, I telepathically knocked up a Japanese woman last night, she was in Japan and I was in bed dreaming of her and my dream sperm got her pregnant.
"We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus -- and nonbelievers."Obama
Check out my poetry here on Rational Responders Like my poetry thread on Facebook under Brian James Rational Poet, @Brianrrs37 on Twitter and my blog at www.brianjamesrationalpoet.blog
For all those such as Nikolaj who have commited fingers to keyboard in a serious response to the OP, you got fooled. This is a joke. As someone else has already pointed out, this was an anecdotal exchange between Euler (the man in the OP's avatar) and Diderot, in which Euler declared that (a+bn)/n=x, therefore God exists, and Diderot could not. Of course, (a+bn)/n=x means nothing until the equation's constants and variables are stated and the domain is specified, not that this has anything to do with the existence of God.
"Physical reality” isn’t some arbitrary demarcation. It is defined in terms of what we can systematically investigate, directly or not, by means of our senses. It is preposterous to assert that the process of systematic scientific reasoning arbitrarily excludes “non-physical explanations” because the very notion of “non-physical explanation” is contradictory.
-Me
Books about atheism