That_Guy's picture
Posts: 17
Joined: 2008-11-20
User is offlineOffline

I'm currently about 800 miles away from my library with limited internet access, or I wouldn't bother posting this here. What was the last common ancestor of both the crockodile and the duck?

Wonderist's picture
Posts: 2479
Joined: 2006-03-19
User is offlineOffline
A quick check of Wikipedia

A quick check of Wikipedia reveals the classification Archosaur, which includes crocodiles, dinosaurs, and (by extension) birds. Here's a useful graphic from the Reptile page: (.svg images don't seem to embed on RRS).

Wonderist on Facebook — Support the idea of wonderism by 'liking' the Wonderism page — or join the open Wonderism group to take part in the discussion!

Gnu Atheism Facebook group — All gnu-friendly RRS members welcome (including Luminon!) — Try something gnu!

That_Guy's picture
Posts: 17
Joined: 2008-11-20
User is offlineOffline

Sadly WIKI is blocked for me, but this site isn't.

High Level DonorRRS CO-FOUNDERRRS Core MemberWebsite Admin
Posts: 7580
Joined: 2006-04-18
User is offlineOffline
That_Guy wrote:Sadly WIKI is

That_Guy wrote:

Sadly WIKI is blocked for me, but this site isn't.


Here's the info....



From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fossil range: Early Triassic - RecentScientific classificationClades
Living archosaurs are crocodilians and birds.Living archosaurs are crocodilians and birds.
(unranked):ArchosauriaCope, 1869

Archosaurs (Greek for 'ruling lizards') are a group of diapsid reptiles represented by modern birds and crocodilians. This group also includes extinct non-avian dinosaurspterosaurs and relatives of crocodiles.

There is some debate about when archosaurs first appeared. Those who classify the Permian reptiles Archosaurus rossicusand/or Protorosaurus speneri as true archosaurs maintain that archosaurs first appeared in the late Permian. Those who classify both Archosaurus rossicus and Protorosaurus speneri as archosauriformes (not true archosaurs but very closely related) maintain that archosaurs first evolved from Archosauriform ancestors during the Olenekian (early Triassic Period).



[edit]Distinguishing characteristics

The simplest and most widely-agreed synapomorphies of archosaurs are:; ">
  • Teeth set in sockets, which makes them less likely to be torn loose during feeding. This feature is responsible for the name "thecodonts" ("socket teeth&quotEye-wink, which paleontologists used to apply to all or most archosaurs. Some archosaurs, such as birds, are secondarily toothless.
  • Antorbital fenestrae (openings in the skull in front of the eyes but behind the nostrils), which reduced the weight of the skull, a useful feature since most early archosaurs had long, heavy skulls, rather like those of modern crocodilians. The preorbital fenestrae (sometimes called anteorbital fenestrae) are often larger than the orbits (eye sockets).
  • Mandibular fenestrae (small openings in the jaw bones), which may have reduced the weight of the jaw slightly.
  • fourth trochanter (ridge for attaching muscles) on the femur. This seemingly insignificant detail may have made the evolution of dinosaurs possible (all early dinosaurs and many later ones were bipeds), and may also be connected with the ability of the archosaurs or their immediate ancestors to survive the catastrophic Permian-Triassic extinction event.

[edit]Archosaur takeover in the Triassic

The Synapsida (informally known as "mammal-like reptiles&quotEye-wink were the dominant land vertebrates throughout the Permian, but most perished in the Permian-Triassic extinction eventLystrosaurus (a herbivorous synapsid) was the only large land animal to survive the event, becoming the most populous land animal on the planet for a time.[1]

But archosaurs quickly became the dominant land vertebrates in the early Triassic. The two most commonly-suggested explanations[citation needed] for this are:; ">
  • Archosaurs made quicker progress than mammal-like reptiles towards erect limbs, and this gave them greater stamina by avoiding Carrier's constraint. This is unconvincing since Archosaurs became dominant while they still had sprawling or semi-erect limbs, similar to those of Lystrosaurus and other mammal-like reptiles.
  • The early Triassic was predominantly arid, because most of the earth's land was concentrated in the supercontinent Pangaea. Archosaurs were probably better at conserving water than early synapsids because:; ">
  • Modern diapsids (lizards, snakes, crocodilians, birds) excrete uric acid, which can be excreted as a paste. It is reasonable to suppose that archosaurs (diapsids and ancestors of crocodilians, dinosaurs and birds) also excreted uric acid, and therefore were good at conserving water. The aglandular (glandless) skins of diapsids would also have helped to conserve water.
  • Modern mammals excrete urea, which requires a lot of water to keep it dissolved. Their skins also contain many glands, which also lose water. Assuming that early synapsids had similar features, e.g., as argued in Palaeos; background-repeat: no-repeat; background-attachment: initial; -webkit-background-clip: initial; -webkit-background-origin: initial; background-color: initial; padding-right: 13px; color: rgb(51, 102, 187); background-position: 100% 50%; " href="">[1], they were at a disadvantage in a mainly arid world. The same well-respected site points out that "for much of Australia's Plio-Pleistocene history, where conditions were probably similar, the largest terrestrial predators were not mammals but gigantic varanid lizards (Megalania) and land crocs."

It has also been suggested that the Triassic was low on oxygen and archosaurs had a more advanced respiratory system.[2]

[edit]Main types of archosaurs

Archosaur ankle types: Adapted with permission from; background-repeat: no-repeat; background-attachment: initial; -webkit-background-clip: initial; -webkit-background-origin: initial; background-color: initial; padding-right: 13px; color: rgb(51, 102, 187); background-position: 100% 50%; " href="">Palaeos     Tibia           Fibula           Astragalus           Calcaneum
Primitive mesotarsal ankle.Crocodilian form of crurotarsal ankle.
Reversed crurotarsal ankle."Advanced" mesotarsal ankle.

Since the 1970s scientists have classified archosaurs mainly on the basis of their ankles.[3] The earliest archosaurs had "primitive mesotarsal" ankles: theastragalus and calcaneum were fixed to the tibia and fibula by sutures and the joint bent about the contact between these bones and the foot.

The Crurotarsi appeared early in the Triassic. In their ankles the astragalus was joined to the tibia by a suture and the joint rotated round a peg on the astragalus which fitted into a socket in the calcaneum. Early "crurotarsans" still walked with sprawling limbs, but some later "crurotarsans" developed fully erect limbs (most notably the Rauisuchia). And modern crocodilians are "crurotarsans" which can walk with their limbs sprawling or erect depending on how much of a hurry they are in.

Euparkeria and the Ornithosuchidae had "reversed crurotarsal" ankles, with a peg on the calcaneum and socket on the astragalus.

The earliest fossils of Ornithodira ("bird necks&quotEye-wink appear in the Carnian age of the late Triassic, but it is hard to see how they could have evolved from the "crurotarsans" — possibly they actually evolved much earlier, or perhaps they evolved from the last of the "primitive mesotarsal" archosaurs. Ornithodires' "advanced mesotarsal" ankle had a very large astragalus and very small calcaneum, and could only move in one plane, like a simple hinge. This arrangement was only suitable for animals with erect limbs, but provided more stability when the animals were running. The ornithodires differed from other archosaurs in other ways: they were lightly-built and usually small, their necks were long and had an S-shaped curve, their skulls were much more lightly built, and many ornithodires were completely bipedal. The archosaurian fourth trochanter on the femur may have made it easier for ornithodires to become bipeds, because it provided more leverage for the thigh muscles. In the late Triassic the ornithodires diversified to produce pterosaurs and dinosaurs.[4]

[edit]Hip joints and locomotion

Hip joints and hindlimb postures.

Like the early tetrapods, early archosaurs had a sprawling gait because their hip sockets faced sideways, and the knobs at the tops of their femurs were in line with the femur.

In the early to mid Triassic, some archosaur groups developed hip joints which allowed (or required) a more erect gait. This gave them greater stamina, because it avoided Carrier's constraint, i.e., they could run and breathe easily at the same time. There were two main types of joint which allowed erect legs:; ">
  • The hip sockets faced sideways but the knobs on the femurs were at right angles to the rest of the femur, which therefore pointed downwards. Dinosaurs evolved from archosaurs with this hip arrangement.
  • The hip sockets faced downwards and the knobs on the femurs were in line with the femur. This "pillar-erect" arrangement appears to have evolved more than once independently in various archosaur lineages, for example it was common in Rauisuchia and also appeared in some aetosaurs.

[edit]Extinction and survival

Crocodilians, pterosaurs, dinosaurs, and champsosaurs survived the Triassic-Jurassic extinction event about 195 million years ago, but other archosaurs became extinct.

Non-avian dinosaurs and pterosaurs perished in the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction event, but crocodilians, champsosaurs, and birds (last surviving dinosaur group) survived. Birds are descendants of archosaurs, and are therefore archosaurs themselves under phylogenetic taxonomy.

Champsosaurs became extinct in the Early Miocene.

Crocodilians (which include all modern crocodilesalligators, and gharials) and birds flourish today, and it is generally agreed that birds have the most species of all terrestrial vertebrates.

[edit]Archosaur lifestyle


Most were large predators, but members of various lines diversified into other niches. Aetosaurs were herbivores and some developed spectacular armor. A few crocodilians were herbivores, e.g., SimosuchusPhyllodontosuchus. The large crocodilian Stomatosuchus may have been a filter feederSauropodomorphs and ornithischian dinosaurs were herbivores with diverse adaptations for feeding biomechanics.

[edit]Land, water and air

Archosaurs are mainly portrayed as land animals, but:


The metabolism of archosaurs is still a controversial topic. They certainly evolved from cold-blooded ancestors, and the surviving non-dinosaurian archosaurs, crocodilians, are cold-blooded. But crocodilians have some features which are normally associated with a warm-blooded metabolism because they improve the animal's oxygen supply:; ">
  • 4-chambered hearts. Mammals and birds have 4-chambered hearts. Non-crocodilian reptiles have 3-chambered hearts, which are less efficient because they allow oxygenated and de-oxygenated blood to mix and therefore send some de-oxygenated blood out to the body instead of to the lungs. Modern crocodilians' hearts are 4-chambered, but are smaller relative to body size and run at lower pressure than those of modern mammals and birds. They also have a bypass which makes them functionally 3-chambered when under water, conserving oxygen.
  • secondary palate, which allows the animal to eat and breathe at the same time.
  • hepatic piston mechanism for pumping the lungs. This is different from the lung-pumping mechanisms of mammals and birds but similar to what some researchers claim to have found in some dinosaurs.[5][6]

So, why did natural selection favour the development of these features, which are very important for active warm-blooded creatures but of little apparent use to cold-blooded aquatic ambush predators which spend the vast majority of their time floating in water or lying on river banks?

Some experts believe that crocodilians were originally active, warm-blooded predators and that their archosaur ancestors were warm-blooded. Developmental studies indicate that crocodilian embryos develop fully 4-chambered hearts first and then develop the modifications which make their hearts function as 3-chambered under water. Using the principle that ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny, the researchers concluded that the original crocodilians had fully 4-chambered hearts and were therefore warm-blooded and that later crocodilians developed the bypass as they reverted to being cold-blooded aquatic ambush predators. [7][8]

If the original crocodilians were warm-blooded and other Triassic archosaurs were also warm-blooded, this would help to resolve some evolutionary puzzles:

Terrestrisuchus; ">
  • The earliest crocodilians, e.g., Terrestrisuchus, were slim, leggy terrestrial predators whose build suggests a fairly active lifestyle, which requires a fairly fast metabolism. And some other "crurotarsan" archosaurs appear to have had erect limbs, while those of rauisuchiansare very poorly adapted for any other posture. Erect limbs are advantageous for active animals because they avoid Carrier's constraint, but disavantageous for more sluggish animals because they increase the energy costs of standing up and lying down.
  • If early archosaurs were completely cold-blooded and (as seems most likely) dinosaurs were at least fairly warm-blooded, dinosaurs would have had to evolve warm-blooded metabolisms in less than half the time it took for mammal-like reptiles to do the same.


Please donate to one of these highly rated charities to help impede the GOP attack on America 2017-2020.

Support our activism efforts by making your Amazon purchases via this link.

That_Guy's picture
Posts: 17
Joined: 2008-11-20
User is offlineOffline
Sweet. Even cooler looking

Sweet. Even cooler looking than Kirks Crocoduck!

Conor Wilson
Posts: 451
Joined: 2008-01-07
User is offlineOffline
That_Guy wrote:

"Sweet. Even cooler looking than Kirks Crocoduck!"


Me: Well...of course.  Then again, I cringed when I watched Kirk bring out his pictures of the hypothetical creatures he mentioned.  (And to think: I actually thought that Archeopterix (sp?) would have been a half-decent response.  But this one is better.)