It's a sad truth, in a world, where America = power and financial interests, not people. In such a world, caring about people's lives is a mutiny against the corporate good. So let's revolt.

By the way, redistribution of wealth is what I am all for, except for it must be a wealth of big corporations, or whole nations and branches of industries, their capitalistically arising excessive resources. This is also why do we need capitalism, we need those excesses, so we can distribute them.

 

 

 

Stop global whining.

 

 

 

 

Well, yeah. Actually, I wrote an article to local version of Uncyclopedia, about a hair, and it was immediately picked among good articles.
According to my research, the hair is a parasitic plant, feeding on victim's blood and nutrients, and protecting it in return from cold, so it actually became a symbiosis over the years. The most oxygenated blood is in the brain, this is why the hair grows mainly on the head. According to my research, the hair stimulated a size of the brain on humans, because the bigger brain requires more blood, oxygen, nutrients and so on, and so the hair can feed better on it. So the hair organism actually stands behind a human evolution and intelligence. 
In times of hunger, the hair didn't have much nutrients, this is why they grew it's roots a bit down, around people's mouth, to catch the remains of host's food. We call these hair roots a beard and mustache. Women were historically fed by men, this is why this feature didn't develop on them.
The hair symbiont affects the host's behavior to a form supporting a survival. People with long hair are rare to be seen at war or under a regular army drill, because the long hair stimulates an intelligence and no clever person would ever spend a time under a sergeant's yelling, or bullets flying around. Also, hippies and women are usually long-haired and rare to be seen on battlegrounds. Long-haired people often calls for a ban on nuclear weapons, stopping wars, and solving a pollution, because their hair symbionts wants to live and thrive in this world.

This is why people with long hair are strong individualities with significant intellect and strong feeling for peace, a true hope of humanity. This is the overall summary of the article.
Mine's like well over a half meter, and I hope it works

I have prepared a next article about a paranormal building of univerity college I lived in for a semester. It was like there would be  poltergeists, a wine puddles, smoke, bottles, and traffic signs mysteriously materialized every night on the corridors, accompanied by a great noise, screams and crazy laughter. Poltergeists are really dangerous. Also, our fridge violated a laws of physics, things in there often disappeared from there into another dimension. Maybe the spirit of the fridge, which freezes the things in there by his power, took some food as an offering. He took my butter and salami and someone else's yoghurts.  It was a true paradise for a paranormal investigator.
Well actually one really mysterious thing happened there. I was out of my room and my keys disappeared and later I found them in my locked room. (a roommate did let me in)

I am a long hair , like way long! ... whatever ....  

Anyway, allowing rich dynasties is wrong, as they are the enemy of we the common people. EAT THE RICH.

  EXC, I don't get you ????

george carlin nails it

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KReZyAZLI0

 

Yes children, can you say "risk your life on a death raft in the open ocean to get the fuck away from Fidel and communism"?

I would hope that most parents would act normally while you did it, and then after you left they would explain to their kids what a horrible dictator Castro is. An explanation of how people risk everything to flee Cuba should do the trick. Oddly I remember being around five years old and my mother explaining to me who Saddam Hussein was and what it means to be a dictator.

see, this is the american parent.  isn't this a tad knee-jerk?  all i did was point to a picture of a historical figure and tell the kid his name.  i was hardly teaching him slogans.

there's more takes on who flees cuba, why, and how easily they can do it than the US media gives.  you should at least check into it before making judgments or teaching a child about it.  two good places to start are tad szulc's balanced (or even leaning towards unsympathetic) biography fidel: a critical portrait, though it's now pretty outdated, and the new fidel autobiography i mentioned.  the autobiography is actually one long interview with ignacio ramon, a french journalist.  even if you don't trust him, fidel gives his side of the whole refugee and highjacker situation with very little rhetoric and a lot of case-by-case facts, which is more than i can say for CNN or fox news.  there are also A LOT of endnotes in that book that provide even more facts.  while he may not always be the benevolent dictator he styles himself as, you can at least see that it's hardly as simplistic as the jingoists would like us to believe.

what exactly does it mean to be a "dictator"?  is it some species of animal?  can we really paint a broad stroke and lump fidel in with saddam, ho chi minh in with pol pot, tito in with ceausescu, alexander dubcek in with stalin?  they all possessed what most americans would call "dictatorial" powers, even though they left very different legacies.  shit, if it's just in terms of body count, shouldn't we put abraham lincoln in there somewhere, since he was more than a little responsible for the deaths of untold numbers of his own people, and possessed some pretty extraordinary powers at the time (he took the unprecedented step of suspending habeas corpus without consulting congress)?  or does he get off easy because it was a "civil war"?  well, then why malign lenin, trotsky, or the cheka, since they saw their situation as a "civil war"?  the same thing goes with kim il sung, who saw south korea as nothing more than a rebellious population.  or janos kadar in hungary, who is usually demonized in western history books for stamping out the 1956 democratic revolution: to him it was nothing more than a rebellion threatening the established order.