Atheists stance on ghosts.

Death Dragoon
Bronze Member
Death Dragoon's picture
Posts: 62
Joined: 2008-07-24
User is offlineOffline
Atheists stance on ghosts.

Im very new to the atheist movement even tho I have been one for over 10 years. I've always believed it to be common sense. So one of my questions is this, what is the atheists stance on ghosts, and doesn't this prove that there could be life after death? Appreciate any help.

When once asked in the library if I believed in Jesus Christ, I pointed out that zombie novels are in the fiction section.


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2455
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
Atheists' problem with ghost

Atheists' problem with ghost is simply that there's no rational basis for them. There's no concept of 'limbo', 'nimbo', 'bardo', and so on.
These frequencies of existence, and everything inhabiting them must be yet discovered. Then, it will be rational to believe in ghosts, but then it will be no big deal, even small children will know about it from popular science TV programs.
Nikola Tesla discovered a certain aspects of these modes of existence, he managed to make an use of a certain energy source present on one of higher layers of so-called "bardo". On such subtle-material frequencies of existence is no shortage of energy and some laws are a bit different, so this is how a free energy devices can work in future, by taking an energy from there.
But Tesla skipped all the range between that frequency, and our physical world, (or this didn't get to the public) so we today don't have many clues how to fill this gap in knowledge.
If we want to search for ghosts, the nearest ghost is anchored in our body. If it can leave the body after death, it must be in the body (or wrapped around) while we're alive.
Our first body is physical. This physical body has very well known meridians for vital energy, which are precisely documented and easily measurable. When scientists will search for where this vital energy is coming from, they will eventually discover another form of matter, so-called etheric matter, and etheric-material body, which receives, gives away and distributes all sorts of vital (or spiritual if you want) energy. This body is a counterpart of physical.
So, and just as there is material and etheric-material existence, there is also an "astral" form of existence, and astral counterpart of the body. This is the ghost form we're looking for, another layer of body on physical, and etheric, just it's not permanently tied to physical body, like etheric body is. After death this is the seat of consciousness and a vehicle to get away from the rotting body.

As you see from this text, now the glorious good deed which scientists (and biologists in particular) can commit in near future, is a discovery of these vital energy meridians. Trust me, it's a piece of cake. It doesn't even need to think, it's easy money and maybe an easy Nobel prize. This is, because a majority of the work is done, the meridians are mapped for human body, their entry points too, and it's known that they're electrically measurable, and that their electric resistivity is exactly analogic to a physical state of the organs which lies on a particular meridian.
The scientific "discovery" now awaits for those who are brave enough to go and officially discover what is known for millenia, and thus allow the science to push limits one more time.

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


JillSwift
Superfan
JillSwift's picture
Posts: 1758
Joined: 2008-01-13
User is offlineOffline
Luminon wrote:Atheists'

Luminon wrote:
Atheists' problem with ghost is simply that there's no rational basis for them.
Period. Full stop. Do not proceed.

Argh. You went there. Here's your award:

 

"Anyone can repress a woman, but you need 'dictated' scriptures to feel you're really right in repressing her. In the same way, homophobes thrive everywhere. But you must feel you've got scripture on your side to come up with the tedious 'Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve' style arguments instead of just recognising that some people are different." - Douglas Murray


Abu Lahab
Superfan
Abu Lahab's picture
Posts: 628
Joined: 2008-02-29
User is offlineOffline
Death Dragoon

Death Dragoon wrote:

...ghosts, and doesn't this prove that there could be life after death? <SNIP>

There has never been any proven evidence of ghosts. There may be 'something' after life, but 'ghosts' don't substantiate anything.

I like the explanaition of what comes after life as "Remember what it was like before you were born. It'll be like that"

How can not believing in something that is backed up with no empirical evidence be less scientific than believing in something that not only has no empirical evidence but actually goes against the laws of the universe and in many cases actually contradicts itself? - Ricky Gervais


Death Dragoon
Bronze Member
Death Dragoon's picture
Posts: 62
Joined: 2008-07-24
User is offlineOffline
Abu Lahab wrote:Death

Abu Lahab wrote:

Death Dragoon wrote:

...ghosts, and doesn't this prove that there could be life after death? <SNIP>

There has never been any proven evidence of ghosts. There may be 'something' after life, but 'ghosts' don't substantiate anything.

I like the explanaition of what comes after life as "Remember what it was like before you were born. It'll be like that"

Thats why I said "could be" instead of "is." I personally like thunderf00ts video where he states that eternal life is not a gift, but a curse. The first million years might be fun, but what about the billions of years after that, and a billion years after that, eternity after eternity, it will rob you of everything. I like that explanation too, and is the reason I'm not afraid of death, and I find it funny that people generally are. But then again, theists have to be afraid of death because their afterlife includes torture, whether in heaven or hell.

When once asked in the library if I believed in Jesus Christ, I pointed out that zombie novels are in the fiction section.


Abu Lahab
Superfan
Abu Lahab's picture
Posts: 628
Joined: 2008-02-29
User is offlineOffline
Death Dragoon wrote:Abu

Death Dragoon wrote:

Abu Lahab wrote:

Death Dragoon wrote:

...ghosts, and doesn't this prove that there could be life after death? <SNIP>

There has never been any proven evidence of ghosts. There may be 'something' after life, but 'ghosts' don't substantiate anything.

I like the explanation of what comes after life as "Remember what it was like before you were born. It'll be like that"

... eternal life is not a gift, but a curse. The first million years might be fun, but what about the billions of years after that, and a billion years after that, eternity after eternity, it will rob you of everything.

I'd do a lot of reading. Possibly perfect my 'appearing as a shower of gold' at the bedside of random women that take my fancy.

Eternity, eh?

How can not believing in something that is backed up with no empirical evidence be less scientific than believing in something that not only has no empirical evidence but actually goes against the laws of the universe and in many cases actually contradicts itself? - Ricky Gervais


MattShizzle
Posts: 7966
Joined: 2006-03-31
User is offlineOffline
I suspect even getting

I suspect even getting fucked by supermodels and porn stars might get old after a few million years.

Matt Shizzle has been banned from the Rational Response Squad website. This event shall provide an atmosphere more conducive to social growth. - Majority of the mod team


anniet
Silver Member
Posts: 325
Joined: 2008-08-06
User is offlineOffline
Silly_Mommy wrote:anniet

Silly_Mommy wrote:

anniet wrote:

I've never seen a ghost.  I have had the crap scared out of me by a ouija board.  And, no, the other 2 people involved were not moving the thing.  There's no way.  All that tells me is that there are likely forces on Earth that we don't know how to measure yet.  What are they?  Well, somebody needs to figure out how to measure them first.

I would not expect anyone else to hold my same belief in a something out there that has been interpreted as a ghost or whatnot (nice and specific, I know) since I not only can I not really explain very well what I experienced, but I definitely can't prove it.

I was always the one moving the ouija board...

I bet you were!!  You sound like the type.   

These 2 weren't though.  The one took the idea way too seriously (and is a horrible liar).  The other was sure Mozart was trying to give us the notes to finish a symphony.  She wanted to make sure she wrote down everything exactly due to delusions of grandeur.  She was quite disappointed when it became obvious that it wasn't the ghost of Mozart.  I was around and didn't have anything else to do.  It made for an interesting evening both times it was tried.  (NOTE:  I did not say my friends were sane, I just said I'm very sure they didn't move the thing.)

 

 

"I am that I am." - Proof that the writers of the bible were beyond stoned.


MattShizzle
Posts: 7966
Joined: 2006-03-31
User is offlineOffline
Don't you mean you're sure

Don't you mean you're sure they didn't CONSCIOUSLY move it? It's been shown people often do subsconsciously.

Matt Shizzle has been banned from the Rational Response Squad website. This event shall provide an atmosphere more conducive to social growth. - Majority of the mod team


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2455
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
MattShizzle wrote:Don't you

MattShizzle wrote:

Don't you mean you're sure they didn't CONSCIOUSLY move it? It's been shown people often do subsconsciously.

Well, subconscious moving the board is what it's meant for, a ghost is supposed to take care of it and produce some interesting and scary sentences.
But honestly, ouija board is for amateurs. Not only that it's slow to pick letters one by one, it's also unsure who of the people is moving it. A ghost himself certainly isn't. It's better to pick one medium, get it to relaxed state, ask the ghost to speak through the medium, and then proceed as with a normal conversation.


Then, the medium is under a spotlight and we can check if he/she is pulling our leg or not.

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


Abu Lahab
Superfan
Abu Lahab's picture
Posts: 628
Joined: 2008-02-29
User is offlineOffline
I'm willing to take that

I'm willing to take that chance.

 


nigelTheBold
atheist
nigelTheBold's picture
Posts: 1868
Joined: 2008-01-25
User is offlineOffline
Luminon wrote:Then, the

Luminon wrote:

Then, the medium is under a spotlight and we can check if he/she is pulling our leg or not.

There's a simple test: are their lips moving?

If so, they are pulling your leg.

"Yes, I seriously believe that consciousness is a product of a natural process. I find that the neuroscientists, psychologists, and philosophers who proceed from that premise are the ones who are actually making useful contributions to our understanding of the mind." - PZ Myers


Vermilion
Vermilion's picture
Posts: 66
Joined: 2007-05-22
User is offlineOffline
Sorry I didn't all the posts

Sorry I didn't all the posts above, but:

I agree that atheists in general don't have a 'stance on ghosts'... but personally I think the idea of ghosts is bullshit. These ghost sightings seem to happen as often as any weird occurance would by probability. I have also talked to a group of ghost hunters once who said in the couple years they had been doing it, they really hadn't seen anything really convincing.


Rich Woods
Rational VIP!
Rich Woods's picture
Posts: 868
Joined: 2008-02-06
User is offlineOffline
worms

I agree...

Until someone can prove otherwise...this is what we all know happens when you die: Your heart stops beating, your brain stops functioning...after not too much time you begin to smell awful, and you become the main course at the worm buffet...

After the first two, I think I'll avoid the rest by getting cremated...and have some of my ashes sprinkled in every decent strip club in Manhattan.

Ghosts? HA! ...I'll beleive when the nymphomaniac who died in my house 40 years ago gives me an ethereal hummer during the Yankee game.


Death Dragoon
Bronze Member
Death Dragoon's picture
Posts: 62
Joined: 2008-07-24
User is offlineOffline
MattShizzle wrote:I suspect

MattShizzle wrote:

I suspect even getting fucked by supermodels and porn stars might get old after a few million years.

  Pornstars and supermodels eh, I wonder how easy it will be to concentrate while having fire shoved up our asses. Assuming religion is correct of course.

When once asked in the library if I believed in Jesus Christ, I pointed out that zombie novels are in the fiction section.


peppermint
Superfan
peppermint's picture
Posts: 539
Joined: 2006-08-14
User is offlineOffline
People WOULD be scared of

People WOULD be scared of ghosts, we're highly imaginative, prone to causing delusions in ourselves, and very social creatures. Pair that with the fact that dangerous irrational thinking constantly tries to suck the sense out of us in this world, and bingo, you get a recipe for ghosts. It's a delusion, much like the childhood fear of monsters under the bed.

*Our world is far more complex than the rigid structure we want to assign to it, and we will probably never fully understand it.*

"Those believers who are sophisticated enough to understand the paradox have found exciting ways to bend logic into pretzel shapes in order to defend the indefensible." - Hamby


Badwolf
Badwolf's picture
Posts: 4
Joined: 2008-08-25
User is offlineOffline
cells emit light wtf?

a ghost is meant to be a inmaterial dead persons so without a body or cells how can light be ommited?


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2455
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
Badwolf wrote:a ghost is

Badwolf wrote:

a ghost is meant to be a inmaterial dead persons so without a body or cells how can light be ommited?

I'll paraphrase a bit of theory from the books...
All life emits light at least on a cellular level. Cells are tiny lives, so they emits light.
We've got a physical body + etheric body, connected by nadis. Nadis are tracks for light what acupuncturists are trying to hit by their needles, on a special points.
Etheric body can be quite well seen outlined by electric charges on Kirlian's photography. Some people, like me, learned to use their etheric body less or more for sensoric perception.

Besides the etheric body, which participates on some body processes, according to esoteric theory we have one more body, which is again enveloped around us, but which is even more subtle than both solid-material and etheric-material. Both these belong to "material" level of existence, while this body we use for travelling in dreams, and also immediately when we die, belongs to it's own level of existence, called "astral" or "emotional".
According to the theory, it also consists of tiny countless cell-like lives, astral elementals, one might say. And these living equivalents of cells also emits light. According to theory, just as we learn to tame our cells, screaming for sugar or nicotine, so it is with the astral cells, driving our emotional reactions out of control by their own, non-disciplined will.
Anyway, it should be theoretically possible to interact with this level of reality by technical means, and also this is how it might be for some people to see a ghost. More often a ghost is photographed by a camera. (good quality digital camera) Photographing strongly depends on light. When someone takes a series of photographs, presses the trigger frequently, and there is a "misty ball" there, itmay be well visible on the sequence of photographs, how it is moving around the people. Sometimes it even shows a trail behind. It's also notable, that such a "ghost" in many cases has a specific, visible inner structure, it's not just a plain white spot on a photograph. This is how my dad said, he actually managed to take such a pictures a few times, photographing people on their holidays.

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


RickRebel
RickRebel's picture
Posts: 327
Joined: 2007-01-16
User is offlineOffline
Peppermint wrote:People

Peppermint wrote:
People WOULD be scared of ghosts, we're highly imaginative, prone to causing delusions in ourselves, and very social creatures. Pair that with the fact that dangerous irrational thinking constantly tries to suck the sense out of us in this world, and bingo, you get a recipe for ghosts. It's a delusion, much like the childhood fear of monsters under the bed.

I never understood why people are so afraid of ghosts. Of all the stories I've heard about ghosts all my life, I've never heard of one kicking somebody's ass. And they can't hold a gun or a knife or strap dynamite to themselves. All they ever do is float around saying boo to everyone. Oh my god, I'm so scared. If I ever see one, I'm going to suck him up in the vacuum cleaner.

Frosty's coming back someday. Will you be ready?


Yaerav
Bronze Member
Posts: 103
Joined: 2008-02-28
User is offlineOffline
RickRebel wrote:(...) If I

RickRebel wrote:

(...) If I ever see one, I'm going to suck him up in the vacuum cleaner.

I can hear it now... "Who you gonna call... RICK REBEL!" Laughing out loud


mohammed
mohammed's picture
Posts: 119
Joined: 2008-08-20
User is offlineOffline
Brian37 wrote:I hate the

Brian37 wrote:

I hate the fact that the word "atheist" specifically refers to god(s). Superstition is superstition and magic is a word ignorant people use when they don't have an answer.

I would not call someone an atheist if they believe in ghosts and to me if they believe that bullshit they might as well believe that Harry Potter can fly around on a broomstick.

To me an atheist is one who rejects all superstitious claims based on lack of evidence. Ghosts are in the same boat as vampires and Big Foot , Thor and Jesus. All these claims, from god belief to ghosts are merely fictitious whims of lazy minds that easly get spooked into buying garbage.

 

+1 . i was thinking the same thing while i was reading the post in this thread.


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2455
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
RickRebel wrote:Peppermint

RickRebel wrote:

Peppermint wrote:
People WOULD be scared of ghosts, we're highly imaginative, prone to causing delusions in ourselves, and very social creatures. Pair that with the fact that dangerous irrational thinking constantly tries to suck the sense out of us in this world, and bingo, you get a recipe for ghosts. It's a delusion, much like the childhood fear of monsters under the bed.

I never understood why people are so afraid of ghosts. Of all the stories I've heard about ghosts all my life, I've never heard of one kicking somebody's ass. And they can't hold a gun or a knife or strap dynamite to themselves. All they ever do is float around saying boo to everyone. Oh my god, I'm so scared. If I ever see one, I'm going to suck him up in the vacuum cleaner.

Good! As my grandma says, the dead aren't to be feared, the living are.
Maybe the reason why people are so afraid of ghosts, is the emotionality. If the ghosts exists, they're essentially emotional creatures, because they make people be afraid. Emotions has a great power over an emotional people. Imagine, that you have a 1000 people. If you would want them to be your army, you can't do it physically. You can't beat up every single one of them and make them serve you by a fear from your superior strength. This physical principle is weak.
But you can use their emotions. Let their emotions take over, and fight as an army against terror, unbelievers, black rabble, white devils, or, if the leader isn't an asshole, against a poverty and pollution of environment. Emotions are clearly much more powerful.

And how these things goes together? By fear from obsession by ghost, and from people who are thought to be obsessed. I suspect there's a circular logics in there, but it's there to demonstrate the point, emotions doesn't have to be logical.

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


mohammed
mohammed's picture
Posts: 119
Joined: 2008-08-20
User is offlineOffline
Ghost don't exist though. we

Ghost don't exist though. we would have overwhelming evidence by now if they did. there are just to many people alive and dying for us to not to be seeing them left and right. Tons of ghost stories from times when there were hardly any people (compared to now) if ghost were real the stories would have increased at the same rate population has.


RickRebel
RickRebel's picture
Posts: 327
Joined: 2007-01-16
User is offlineOffline
mohammed wrote:Tons of ghost

mohammed wrote:
Tons of ghost stories from times when there were hardly any people (compared to now) if ghost were real the stories would have increased at the same rate population has.

I never thought of it that way but it makes sense. The number of ghosts should reflect the increase in population. If ghost were real, there would be millions of ghosts in the world today. And if there were, they'd probably be having their own conventions and pride parades.

Rick

Frosty's coming back someday. Will you be ready?


Luminon
SuperfanTheist
Luminon's picture
Posts: 2455
Joined: 2008-02-17
User is offlineOffline
RickRebel wrote:mohammed

RickRebel wrote:

mohammed wrote:
Tons of ghost stories from times when there were hardly any people (compared to now) if ghost were real the stories would have increased at the same rate population has.

I never thought of it that way but it makes sense. The number of ghosts should reflect the increase in population. If ghost were real, there would be millions of ghosts in the world today. And if there were, they'd probably be having their own conventions and pride parades.

Rick

There is an explanation for that. Do you really want to know it?

 

 

Beings who deserve worship don't demand it. Beings who demand worship don't deserve it.


Nordmann
atheist
Nordmann's picture
Posts: 904
Joined: 2008-04-02
User is offlineOffline
Thomas Edison, or whoever is

Thomas Edison, or whoever is currently accredited with the achievement, should be a recognised icon of rationalism with statues of the curmudgeonly slave-driver on every town square (preferably right outside the church).

 

The invention of the electric light bulb did it in for 99.99% of ghosts - they didn't stand a chance once the little filaments flickered into electronic excitement.

 

The .01% which remain stand as testament to human imagination, or more correctly, human vanity. Just like religion (equally shrivelled when cold light of reason is applied) or any other fantasist crapology (such as luminon's usual stuff here), ghosts were a hamfisted and irrational alternative to admitting ignorance. In societies with light bulbs they are now well on the way of the weather gods and pixies before them, consigned to badly scripted fiction and children's stories.

 

Organised religion will follow suit. Egotistical crap such as luminon's will take a little longer, but at least will be recognised for the debilitating sickness of the human mind that it is before it too is cured.

 

This website - and other such forums of reason - help enormously.

I would rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy


funknotik
atheist
funknotik's picture
Posts: 159
Joined: 2007-12-10
User is offlineOffline
Did you just say "National

Did you just say "National Geographic did a ghost special'? Are you seriuos? Thats fucking terrible!!! I don't have a tv in my room or cable, so I would never know. Can you link me I have to see that with my own eyes, why would  they do a special on ghosts?


Jason Dark
Jason Dark's picture
Posts: 1
Joined: 2008-09-07
User is offlineOffline
Religion, Superstition and Myths

Religion, Superstition and Myths are all the same to me because I am a Bright.  So I would group ghosts in with supernatural nonsense, I have never seen a ghost even though I have been in many supposedly haunted houses.  Every story I have ever heard about a ghost usually involve someone mentally unstable, intoxicated on some substance or on the edge of sleep paralysis.

 


RickRebel
RickRebel's picture
Posts: 327
Joined: 2007-01-16
User is offlineOffline
A ghost cannot have abstract

A ghost cannot have abstract thought unless it has a brain. A brain can only survive inside a living body. Once the heart stops beating and supplying blood to the brain, the brain dies. Thoughts, emotions, and personality come from cells and neurons inside the living brain and CANNOT SURVIVE outside the body after the brain is dead.

So, chances are, ghosts exist only in the imagination.

 

Rick

 

Frosty's coming back someday. Will you be ready?


JillSwift
Superfan
JillSwift's picture
Posts: 1758
Joined: 2008-01-13
User is offlineOffline
Jason Dark wrote:Religion,

Jason Dark wrote:
Religion, Superstition and Myths are all the same to me because I am a Bright.
Eh? Whazzat?

Jason Dark wrote:
  So I would group ghosts in with supernatural nonsense, I have never seen a ghost even though I have been in many supposedly haunted houses.  Every story I have ever heard about a ghost usually involve someone mentally unstable, intoxicated on some substance or on the edge of sleep paralysis.
And a welcome to the RRS forums, where you may well find folks in any combination of the above states. Eye-wink

"Anyone can repress a woman, but you need 'dictated' scriptures to feel you're really right in repressing her. In the same way, homophobes thrive everywhere. But you must feel you've got scripture on your side to come up with the tedious 'Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve' style arguments instead of just recognising that some people are different." - Douglas Murray


tj671
Posts: 5
Joined: 2008-05-18
User is offlineOffline
I'm glad you posted this. My

I'm glad you posted this. My fathers brother had past away on Halloween and since then everyone in my family including cousins and aunts etc. all claimed that they were visited by my uncle. This was the case with my aunt who passed away in April. I was behind my aunts house with my cousin and we were having a few drinks and it so happened that my cousin was standing near me and I has burped and he then said "whoa, does anyone smell that?... its a strong alcohol smell" no one responded including me. He then declared that his mom was with us drinking as well. I didn't inform him that it was just me. A few days later my cousins wife was sitting having dinner and a wok that I had stacked, very carelessly, had moved. She then screamed and said did you guys see that. I then jumped quickly and said that I stacked it on the table but it was not leveled with the rest of the pots/pans. Overall I think that if ghosts are real and would be able to show their presence then they would not spend time knocking stuff down or spraying us with aromas.

If this was a Guam/Taotaomo'na argument then I would elaborate a hell of a lot more.

 

Here is a brief "wiki" smmary on Taotaomo'na just so you can have an idea. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taotao_Mona


MattShizzle
Posts: 7966
Joined: 2006-03-31
User is offlineOffline
JillSwift wrote:Jason Dark

JillSwift wrote:

Jason Dark wrote:
Religion, Superstition and Myths are all the same to me because I am a Bright.
Eh? Whazzat?

 

A "bright" is a new term for atheist/freethinker someone came up with a while ago.

Matt Shizzle has been banned from the Rational Response Squad website. This event shall provide an atmosphere more conducive to social growth. - Majority of the mod team


spin
spin's picture
Posts: 188
Joined: 2008-10-29
User is offlineOffline
Before dealing with the idea

Before dealing with the idea of ghosts, let me ask, what is the essence that you carry around with you that is you? Where does it reside? I think these days, nearly all non-religionists will accept the notion that what makes you you is the interplay between brain and body. All those thoughts that form your background to how you approach the world are stored in your brain. Your view of the world comes through your eyes to your brain. Your attitudes and sentiments are functions of your brain. A person, who is in a coma, no longer has access to those functions of the brain to allow the you inside to function in the outside world. And when your brain stops functioning too long the you in there has gone bye-bye, you are "brain-dead".

When a computer is turned off all the "memories" it has in RAM are lost. Don't we expect this when the brain stops after your body is turned off, when the brain isn't kept supplied with blood after death?

Can you see any existence beyond the physical nature of your body? You can understand every aspect of you through that body and its interrelations with the world. And your brain is the repository of you-ness. What else is there and how can you conceive of that else?

We have the notion of ghosts because of ideas that come to us from an unscientific past. Ghosts are the remnants of religious ideas of a body/soul separation. That these are wrongly believed to be two separate entities allows one to have a soul without a body and therefore ghosts, rather than a body which houses you in its very essence.

The belief in ghosts is a consequence of religious thought, thought that is incoherent and promoted unanalysed in popular media. Ghosts make money for the media, because they tap into remnants of very old traditions from our religious past, traditions that have always manipulated us, the notions of loved ones who are not really gone, of evil ones who are the cause of our woes. But gone is gone. And not gone somewhere: where does the flame go after the candle has burnt out?

 

 

spin

Trust the evidence, Luke


Archeopteryx
Superfan
Archeopteryx's picture
Posts: 1037
Joined: 2007-09-09
User is offlineOffline
 I once saw an interview

 

I once saw an interview with Dan Akroyd concerning the rerelease of Ghostbusters, and in the interview he indicated that he is a long-time believer and "researcher" (?) in ghosts, and he went on to encourage children to "really look at the science" claiming that they would no doubt discover that there is plenty of evidence that ghosts are among us.

 

It made me sad... I like Dan Akroyd and I like Ghostbusters. Now everytime I watch Ghostbusters, I'll start laughing and then I'll have to stop and go "Oh, Dan Akroyd wrote this because he really believes it... now I'm sad... " =(

You know, like watching The Passion or something!

Schade...

A place common to all will be maintained by none. A religion common to all is perhaps not much different.


Desdenova
atheist
Desdenova's picture
Posts: 410
Joined: 2008-11-14
User is offlineOffline
Brian37 wrote:I hate the

Brian37 wrote:

I hate the fact that the word "atheist" specifically refers to god(s). Superstition is superstition and magic is a word ignorant people use when they don't have an answer.

I would not call someone an atheist if they believe in ghosts and to me if they believe that bullshit they might as well believe that Harry Potter can fly around on a broomstick.

To me an atheist is one who rejects all superstitious claims based on lack of evidence. Ghosts are in the same boat as vampires and Big Foot , Thor and Jesus. All these claims, from god belief to ghosts are merely fictitious whims of lazy minds that easly get spooked into buying garbage.

My thoughts on the matter are much like Brian's. A large part of my atheism stems from my skepticism. I do not believe in god for the same reason that I do not believe in ghosts, bigfoot, the Loch Ness monster, redneck abducting anal probling aliens, leprechauns, unicorns, ESP, communicating with the dead, and honest politicians....lack of evidence. I apply the same criteria to all claims, giving no special regard for the supernatural. I have in fact used this positon against theists in debate at times when I discovered that they shared my lack of belief in say, bigfoot.  In that regard, said theist and myself share a common need for evidence. The problem is that the theist rejects that need when it comes to their religion.

 

It takes a village to raise an idiot.

Save a tree, eat a vegetarian.

Sometimes " The Majority " only means that all the fools are on the same side.


Answers in Gene...
High Level Donor
Answers in Gene Simmons's picture
Posts: 4214
Joined: 2008-11-11
User is offlineOffline
OK, I don't see why we

OK, I don't see why we need to have a position on ghosts. A couple of people have already worked this angle a bit but it is a pretty simple idea. Ghosts and God are different. While I don't think that you will find many among us who believe in ghosts, it is certainly possible to conceive that a person can believe in ghosts but not believe in god.

 

Along the same line, as a former theist, I can tell you that the idea of disembodied dead guys floating around is inconsistent with the teachings of any of the several churches that I tried before realizing that they were all creating lots of trouble and offering no solutions.

 

Michael Shermer has an interesting breakdown on how irrational ideas might develop and take hold of us. Basically, when confronted with the unknown, humans have evolved to guess what might be out there. Follow how this works:

 

Given the possibility of an unknown potential danger (is there a tiger on the hunt in the woods near my cave?), one might guess either yes or no. This will result in one of four outcomes.

 

No, there is no tiger. Assume there is and stay safe in the cave. Well gee, you live another day.

 

No, there is no tiger. Assume that there is no tiger and go do some night hunting yourself. You live another day and have a full belly.

 

Yes, there is a tiger. Assume there is and stay safe in the cave. Well gee, you live another day. You may be hungry but you are alive.

 

Yes, there is a tiger. Assume that there is no tiger and go do some night hunting yourself. Chomp on your head sucker!

 

So back when we lived in caves, the guessing strategy worked out well for us because only a quarter of the time is the guess so wrong that we get killed for it. Where this is really interesting though is in the fact that staying in the cave always works even though you will go hungry for the choice. You may well be wrong half the time but you are alive to pass your genes on to future generations. So guessing can be seen as a survival strategy. Also, as a story telling species, we tend to add up the wrong guesses that actually worked for us, layer after layer until we have religion to deal with.

 

NoMoreCrazyPeople wrote:
Never ever did I say enything about free, I said "free."

=


peppermint
Superfan
peppermint's picture
Posts: 539
Joined: 2006-08-14
User is offlineOffline
Desdenova wrote:Brian37

Desdenova wrote:

Brian37 wrote:

I hate the fact that the word "atheist" specifically refers to god(s). Superstition is superstition and magic is a word ignorant people use when they don't have an answer.

I would not call someone an atheist if they believe in ghosts and to me if they believe that bullshit they might as well believe that Harry Potter can fly around on a broomstick.

To me an atheist is one who rejects all superstitious claims based on lack of evidence. Ghosts are in the same boat as vampires and Big Foot , Thor and Jesus. All these claims, from god belief to ghosts are merely fictitious whims of lazy minds that easly get spooked into buying garbage.

My thoughts on the matter are much like Brian's. A large part of my atheism stems from my skepticism. I do not believe in god for the same reason that I do not believe in ghosts, bigfoot, the Loch Ness monster, redneck abducting anal probling aliens, leprechauns, unicorns, ESP, communicating with the dead, and honest politicians....lack of evidence. I apply the same criteria to all claims, giving no special regard for the supernatural. I have in fact used this positon against theists in debate at times when I discovered that they shared my lack of belief in say, bigfoot.  In that regard, said theist and myself share a common need for evidence. The problem is that the theist rejects that need when it comes to their religion.

 

 

Your icon makes me want to cry.

*Our world is far more complex than the rigid structure we want to assign to it, and we will probably never fully understand it.*

"Those believers who are sophisticated enough to understand the paradox have found exciting ways to bend logic into pretzel shapes in order to defend the indefensible." - Hamby


Desdenova
atheist
Desdenova's picture
Posts: 410
Joined: 2008-11-14
User is offlineOffline
peppermint wrote:Your icon

peppermint wrote:

Your icon makes me want to cry.

That's the goal I was aiming for. Glad to know it works. Smiling

It takes a village to raise an idiot.

Save a tree, eat a vegetarian.

Sometimes " The Majority " only means that all the fools are on the same side.


Josh Clarke
Superfan
Josh Clarke's picture
Posts: 107
Joined: 2008-01-27
User is offlineOffline
"Quantum physics leaves no

"Quantum physics leaves no room for cold fusion, astrology, teleportation, telekinesis,
supernatural phenomena, multiple universes, or faster than light phenomena – the EPR
paradox notwithstanding.*" - Motion Mountain 21st ed. pg. 1216

 

*An informative account of the world of psychokinesis and the paranormal is given by the
famous professional magician JZ“u« RZ•o†, Flim-žam!, Prometheus Books, Bušffalo, as well as in several of his other books. See also the www.randi.org website.

 

 

We pop theist like Orville Redenbacher!


Empirical Infidel
Empirical Infidel's picture
Posts: 18
Joined: 2008-09-28
User is offlineOffline
 I have trouble addressing

 

I have trouble addressing this after reading the comments, but I believe in ghosts. I do Not mean to suggest that I profess to know exactly what they are, nor do I suggest that they are proof of afterlife or souls or heaven, but I have had experiences that I can only explain as ghosts, and some of these seem to be sentient beings that represent other time periods, but are interacting with people in the present.I had a few experiences that seemed like evidence of haunting, but I always viewed them very skeptically. Then, I was in Gettysburg, doing some Civil War research, and got bored in the evening so I drove around the battlefield at about 10 pm. Near Culp’s Hill an empty Union army uniform walked up to my car. The uniform was so solid that I could see the weave of the cloth, but when it got about 2 ft. from my car I freaked out and hit the gas. The uniform just disappeared. This happened on a clear night with a full moon, so there was plenty of light. The east side of the road was open field and the west side had trees about 10 ft. from the road. When I spotted the apparition, as I rounded a corner, it was to the front and left of the car standing facing the road but as I slowed to a stop it turned directly toward my open driver’s window and started walking diagonally across the road toward me. It was just pants and a sack coat filled out as if on an invisible body and walked about 2 in. above the ground. I cannot think how it could have been faked. It looked completely solid and opaque and was close enough to touch by the time I drove away. I’m sure it wasn’t my imagination; I was wide awake, the light was good and the form the ghost took was something I had never heard of.I still think that most claims of ghost sightings are just people’s imagination or wishful thinking. Most of the antic dotes I’ve heard and “evidence” I’ve seen can easily be explained by something mundane and the I-want-this-to-be-a-ghost attitude of some people make skeptical folks even more doubtful and inclined to dismiss all claims out of hand. I can’t provide any evidence to go with this story so I can’t expect you to believe any of this, but having a ghost walk to your car can change your attitude.

 


Desdenova
atheist
Desdenova's picture
Posts: 410
Joined: 2008-11-14
User is offlineOffline
My own ghost story.

Ages ago, back when I first began my career as a nurse, I worked at a nursing home in north central Texas as a weekend supervisor. They were short of staff, and so I started doing sort of double duty by working the night shift to help cover for their lack of a second weekend night nurse. The facility consisted of a central rotunda containing the nurses station and 6 halls radiating evenly out from this point. The principle being that the staff can view the activity on each hall from the desk.

Only a couple of nights into this, one of the nurse aids told me about the ghost of hall 2. She told me that a gowned woman could be seen floating from one room to the other down the hall, but when you went to investigate, nothing could be found. Now I wasn't an atheist at this time, and the thought creeped me out a little, but I must have had a grain of skepticism even then, because I had my doubts.

About a month later I got to see the ghost for myself. I had finished my paperwork and was kicked back at the nurses station with my feet on the desk, halfheartedly flirting with one of the cute nurse aids. I was facing mostly toward hall 2, and caught a glance of something blue and mobile floating across the hall, maybe 2 doors from the exit. It looked like a woman in a blue gown, hovering maybe a foot off the floor, floating from one side of the hall to the other.

I bolted upright and asked if anyone saw it. An older nurse aid said " That's the ghost we told you about. ". It had looked too much like a person to me, and so I went to investigate, finding nothing but sleeping residents and empty rooms. The hairs were standing up on the back of my neck.

It was some months later that I found myself working the night of a town festival. Much of the nursing home staff had left their vehicles in the parking lot and had carpooled to the festival grounds. As a result, I had to park at the far side of the building. A little after midnight, I had to return to my car to get something. I noticed a gravel truck pulling into a quarry site on a hill next to the facility, but thought nothing of it until I turned around and saw the trucks headlight reflecting off of the blue and green stained glass windows that circled top of the rotunda of the nursing home.

I ran back inside and asked if anyone had just seen the ghost. Sure enough, they had. I didn't bother explaining how I knew this, but I made a plan.

The next night, I brought a friend to work with me. He was a night owl that I had met through other friends, and we had hit it off well. Turns out that he was also an atheist, but I didn't know that at the time. We had brought a pair of headphone walkie talkies so he could notify me the moment a truck pulled through the gate at the quarry. Other than that, he just sat in his car listening to music and smoking.

Sure enough, right at 12:30, the headphones squawk. The static is too bad for me to hear him, but I know to look down hall 2. Within seconds I caught sight of the ' ghost ', and glanced up at the stained glass above and behind me. It was brightly illuminated from the headlights of the truck. The turn that the truck made at the top of the hill caused the light to shift and made the ' ghost ' move from one side of the hall to the other.

I planned on explaining this to the staff next weekend, but got the opportunity to demonstrate it that same night as another truck pulled in. My friend had pulled his car closer after some of the evening staff left, and I could hear him clearly over the headphones. Better still, he now knew what the gravel trucks looked like, and was able to give us a full minute notice.

When I got the notice, I had the staff, another nurse and three aids, look down the hall at the right time. Then I had them look up at the stained glass windows to see what was happening there. Adding to this, I drug my friend out of his car and had him explain what was going on from his view.

You would think that this would have been the end of it. You would also be wrong to think that. The very same older nurse aid that had first told me about the ghost stood by, shaking her head and pursing her lips through the whole explanation. When we were done, she said " But what about the call lights that come on by theirself? And the laundry barrels that roll when nobody is around them? What about... what about.... what about...?

She was not only unwilling to accept the explanation that was demonstrated for her to be the cause, but she insisted on recounting numerous previously unreported phenomena. The other 2 aids and nurse soon began to chime in their own experiences, most of which could be explained by uneven floors, ancient wiring, and practical jokes. They didn't want a rational, natural, mundane explanation. They wanted their ghosts.

Years later my baby brother introduced me to one of his new girlfriends. Turned out that she was working as a nurse aid at the same nursing home. When she learned that I had worked there before, the first thing out of her mouth was, naturally " Did you ever see the ghost of hall 2? ".  I just rolled my eyes.

It takes a village to raise an idiot.

Save a tree, eat a vegetarian.

Sometimes " The Majority " only means that all the fools are on the same side.


Kevin R Brown
Superfan
Kevin R Brown's picture
Posts: 3142
Joined: 2007-06-24
User is offlineOffline
I don't consider ghosts,

I don't consider ghosts, alien abduction stories, sasquatch encounters, etc to be the same as deity worship (which I dismiss out of hand with a yawn) for the following reason:

At least the other claims are (usually) dealing with entities that are fairly well-defined (thus, in some ways, falsifiable) and coherent.

Take the 'ghost' in the hospital, for example. It was a phenomena you were actually able to observe and explain (thus falsifying the hypothesis that it was an intelligent agent of some form). Now, some stories are so incredulous that I simply shake my head at without further inquiry, but I do try and be reasonable with less sketchy 'sightings' of the unusual (I do think that there is some merit in this arena to the claims that, on some occassions, an unreasonable amount of evidence is demanded from a claimant). Some sasquatch proponents (I'm still currently a skeptic) do have interesting evidence (if not at all conclusive), some extraterrestrial abduction accounts (again, I remain skeptical of their existence) have likewise interesting evidence.

These are qualities that are just jaw-droppingly lacking when it comes to deity worship. There's nothing to examine at all. Ever. And on top of that, whereas most proponents of the varied phenomena above will typically admit their ignorance and say that they cannot explain what has happened and that they don't absolutely know the details of their experiences, theists contrast this by claiming absolute knowledge that their deity must exist.

 

That said, I've yet to see anything convincing from a ghost proponent. Nothing but stories and facepalm-inducing video footage. We know that any apparition that may be there isn't a dead person at the very least, and typically it's found to be a trick of the light or an air-pressure related phenomenon. There are a few interesting footage pieces and collected bits of evidence in one case or another, but 'interesting' isn't nearly the same as 'compelling'.

Quote:
"Natasha has just come up to the window from the courtyard and opened it wider so that the air may enter more freely into my room. I can see the bright green strip of grass beneath the wall, and the clear blue sky above the wall, and sunlight everywhere. Life is beautiful. Let the future generations cleanse it of all evil, oppression and violence, and enjoy it to the full."

- Leon Trotsky, Last Will & Testament
February 27, 1940


JanCham
Posts: 102
Joined: 2007-09-21
User is offlineOffline
Well, first let me wrap my

Well, first let me wrap my mind around quantum physics.. then I'll get back to you on ghosts.  But seriously, just think of how different the world would be if Ghosts were a fact of reality?  Until Casper has a seat in the U.N. I'll hold my conclusion that Ghosts are just an extention of animistic beliefs.

 

 

To go beyond your limits you must first find them.


A_Nony_Mouse
atheist
A_Nony_Mouse's picture
Posts: 2880
Joined: 2008-04-23
User is offlineOffline
Death Dragoon wrote:Im very

Death Dragoon wrote:

Im very new to the atheist movement even tho I have been one for over 10 years. I've always believed it to be common sense. So one of my questions is this, what is the atheists stance on ghosts, and doesn't this prove that there could be life after death? Appreciate any help.

If you are looking for the atheist dogma on ghosts you are looking for a replacement for religious dogma. What is the point of trading dogmas?

 

Jews stole the land. The owners want it back. That is all anyone needs to know about Israel. That is all there is to know about Israel.

www.ussliberty.org

www.giwersworld.org/made-in-alexandria/index.html

www.giwersworld.org/00_files/zion-hit-points.phtml


spin
spin's picture
Posts: 188
Joined: 2008-10-29
User is offlineOffline
A_Nony_Mouse wrote:Death

A_Nony_Mouse wrote:

Death Dragoon wrote:

Im very new to the atheist movement even tho I have been one for over 10 years. I've always believed it to be common sense. So one of my questions is this, what is the atheists stance on ghosts, and doesn't this prove that there could be life after death? Appreciate any help.

If you are looking for the atheist dogma on ghosts you are looking for a replacement for religious dogma. What is the point of trading dogmas?

That's something I've been trying to get out of you. You've replaced one dogma with another.

 

 

spin

Trust the evidence, Luke


A_Nony_Mouse
atheist
A_Nony_Mouse's picture
Posts: 2880
Joined: 2008-04-23
User is offlineOffline
MattShizzle wrote:I suspect

MattShizzle wrote:

I suspect even getting fucked by supermodels and porn stars might get old after a few million years.

Given they are not even 0.0001% of the population and if it takes a few million years for that category then there are millions of millions of years to exhaust all the other categories at which time you can start over.

Jews stole the land. The owners want it back. That is all anyone needs to know about Israel. That is all there is to know about Israel.

www.ussliberty.org

www.giwersworld.org/made-in-alexandria/index.html

www.giwersworld.org/00_files/zion-hit-points.phtml


A_Nony_Mouse
atheist
A_Nony_Mouse's picture
Posts: 2880
Joined: 2008-04-23
User is offlineOffline
spin wrote:A_Nony_Mouse

spin wrote:

A_Nony_Mouse wrote:

Death Dragoon wrote:

Im very new to the atheist movement even tho I have been one for over 10 years. I've always believed it to be common sense. So one of my questions is this, what is the atheists stance on ghosts, and doesn't this prove that there could be life after death? Appreciate any help.

If you are looking for the atheist dogma on ghosts you are looking for a replacement for religious dogma. What is the point of trading dogmas?

That's something I've been trying to get out of you. You've replaced one dogma with another. 

spin

You have progressed far enough to realize you are defending dogma. That is good.

Jews stole the land. The owners want it back. That is all anyone needs to know about Israel. That is all there is to know about Israel.

www.ussliberty.org

www.giwersworld.org/made-in-alexandria/index.html

www.giwersworld.org/00_files/zion-hit-points.phtml


Zaq
atheist
Zaq's picture
Posts: 269
Joined: 2008-12-24
User is offlineOffline
No

I don't believe in the supernatural at all.

Ergo, no ghosts for me.

Though I did love the show "Danny Phantom"

Questions for Theists:
http://silverskeptic.blogspot.com/2011/03/consistent-standards.html

I'm a bit of a lurker. Every now and then I will come out of my cave with a flurry of activity. Then the Ph.D. program calls and I must fall back to the shadows.


vdancer
Posts: 1
Joined: 2008-12-24
User is offlineOffline
Rich Woods wrote:Until

Rich Woods wrote:

Until someone can prove otherwise...this is what we all know happens when you die: Your heart stops beating, your brain stops functioning...after not too much time you begin to smell awful, and you become the main course at the worm buffet...

For my first post.....

I think this is only a discussion because some brains stop functioning while thier host is still living (i.e. Living Brain Donors).

Let's first define Ghost n.

  1. The spirit of a dead person, especially one believed to appear in bodily likeness to living persons or to haunt former habitats.
  2. The center of spiritual life; the soul.
  3. A demon or spirit.
  4. A returning or haunting memory or image.
    1. A slight or faint trace: just a ghost of a smile.
    2. The tiniest bit: not a ghost of a chance.
  5. A faint, false image, as:
    1. A secondary image on a television or radar screen caused by reflected waves.
    2. A displaced image in a photograph caused by the optical system of the camera.
    3. A false spectral line caused by imperfections in the diffraction grating.
    4. A displaced image in a mirror caused by reflection from the front of the glass.
  6. Informal. A ghostwriter.
    1. A nonexistent publication listed in bibliographies.
    2. A fictitious employee or business.
  7. Physiology. A red blood cell having no hemoglobin.

Assuming we are working with definition 1 or 2 here we are saying that humans have souls which are imparted exclusively by a higher power I believe.

Since (I think) we agree that since there is no higher power, there cannot be a soul and therefor no ghosts.

Happy Belated Winter Solstice everyone!

 


pablotar
pablotar's picture
Posts: 117
Joined: 2008-10-23
User is offlineOffline
  My own ghost story:  

 

My own ghost story:

 

The sordid and chilling tale of dangling parrot head man!

 

It was a dark and windy night!  All the trees on third street in Philly seemed to be alive as I was walking home after a rockin' band practice(no drugs or alcohol by the way, as that makes me not rock out as hard).

 

As I was making my way past friends of Independence? building  which is a large glass structure with exposed metal beams, I caught a glimpse of a large figure inside hanging from one of the beams. It was rocking back and forth slightly and looking at me.It looked like a human that was wearing a flight suit and white tennis sneakers but it had an enormous grotesque parrot head! It's mouth was half open and it had an obscene leer on it's face as it dangled there, hanging by it's arms, looking at me! Doh!

 

I stood there frozen trying to figure out what this was. All the alarms in my head were going off. It was clearly alive and it looked pissed! That's no mask! Should I run? Should I get closer to investigate? This is truly the most astonishing thing I've ever seen in my life!

 

I guess a full forty seconds passed while we just sat there staring at each other and then I realized that it was the reflection of the trees on the glass!  It was just a case of pareidolia.

 

After having a good laugh I thought about it and it struck me that if I had fled the scene, to this day I would swear on my mother's grave that I saw this thing as it was so clearly defined and alive! 

 

And that happens all the time; people think they see something, get scared, take off and that perceived image will always be there because they didn't investigate.

 

So, kids, next time you think you see a ghost, stick around! 

 

 

 

Eden had a 25% murder rate and incest was rampant.


scole665
Posts: 67
Joined: 2008-06-27
User is offlineOffline
You were the one.

Silly_Mommy wrote:

I was always the one moving the ouija board...

 

I KNEW IT was someone! 

 

Not a believer in ghosts, except you should see me in shorts, I'm easily mistaken for Casper!

god -- I tried you on for size.... you were a little long in the crotch, loose in the waist, short in the length and you made my butt look extra flat. I had to take you back for an exchange.