That's what I figured. I would have been honestly surprised (but heavily amused) if you were to respond with something like, "actually, I just stay in my house living off the residuals of a land deal I made once, questioning reality". I'm also of the "it could happen" school, in that case.

See, to me, that's a relaxed (and frankly reasonable) solipsism, rather than the one where your life spirals into a hellish uncertainty by slippery slope, like I've read in a couple of places on the site. Some people figure that doubting their perception to such a degree sucks them immediately into a vortex of paralysis. Not so! Behold our friend BMcD.

Uh ... just asking an' all, but your friend wouldn't happen to have the ultimate question handy, would he?

Heh. Eloise and I had this discussion, too. I can't really say it's solipsism, though, because I can't be sure I'm the source of any falsity in my perceptions. For all I know, I'm being fed all this by external agencies.

I thought we learned that at the end of The Restaurant at the End of the Universe? "What do you get if you multiply six by nine?"

BTW, if you work in base thirteen, 6x9 =42 (with 42 representing the same amount as the decimal 54. 40 = 4x13 (52) +2 = 42)

OP question, "Can someone please give me a list of every single reason that they don't believe in a god/ gods."  /////

      BUT I AM GOD

            oh, I get it , you mean religion gods .    ummmm ???????????  

.... well,  every word of religion god shit. 

That ain't god ..... I AM GOD , as you  

    geezzZZZZZ 

get real ........  < -------  !@#$%^&UIOP ()         <---- see god , explain ? 

Well, my reason (excluding those that have been previously posted here)

Is that i cannot, and will not, worship any inferior entity

Which god? Zeus, Allah, Jesus, etc...

You can do it yourself. Come up with a list of why you don't believe in other gods from other traditions. Then just replace the name of your god. This should pretty much match my list.

Good, we aren't delving into solipsism, which I consider the only offense truely worthy of death.

This is where the argument breaks down. It is possible for things to NEVER have existed. The (often abused) principles of Thermodynamics show us clearly that energy can not be created or destroyed. Einstien showed us that Energy and Matter are equivolent. Thus all things that exist have always existed, and will always exist in some form.

The rest of the argument disolves because of this fundamental flaw.

As to my own reasons for disbelief, they echo the majority of posters, no evidence for, thus no reason to presuppose the existence of a god or gods.

LC >;-}>

In addition to what sandwiches is saying (welcome to the board, BTW, sandwiches), there are ambiguities in what's meant by bringing something into existence. Must a cause be deliberate? If not, then the cause has a cause; or it's a really simple and mindless event that comes from nothing. If it must be deliberate, then the uncaused cause would have to be at least as complex as the thing it causes, so it only moves the "something from nothing" idea one step back, and up another level of complexity. We also have no example of a deliberate agency bringing something into existence ex nihilo; rather all agencies hitherto known have only reconfigured existing things. Theists tend to confuse the convoluted internal logic of their arguments with explanations supported by data.

The Cosmo argument is nothing more than:

Everything that begins to exist has a cause for its existence... except something, which I will declare is God.

Theists arbitrarily determine their God is the cause. They often add that something created can't be more complex than the Creator. This is absurd on many levels.

One, it isn't true by any Actual example.

Two, it would mean that God would have had a more complex creator.. and that creator would have had to have had a more complex creator... It's a Ponzi scheme, made to ultimately extract money from morans.

Oh, but Theists declare that God is the Uncaused Cause...

However, as I mentioned, this is just an arbitrary stopping point.

Plus, it ignores a very crucial problem.

1. Assume God existed uncaused.

2. If God decided to create the universe, then he did so either arbitrarily, or by his will.

3a. If arbitrarily, than it was be some "natural" law that already existed that compelled him to do it.  He was ruled by a larger law (this makes God not god by most definitions).

3b. If God created the universe because of his will, then 1)there would have had to been in place, laws that allow his will to "take hold".  "Let there be light" - there would have to be a pre-existing logic that would make sense of the command, or else it would have just been gibberish "Lit  ebth ere et ghl" (not the words but the thought, or idea). 2)if he were "born" with his free will to decide to make the universe or not, then the universe is Contingent. This means that the laws of logic are contingent. This, one, is obviously not likely to be true (can anyone imagine A not being A?), and two, makes the possibility of using logic to create an argument that god exists in the first place, impossible.

It goes back to that absurd argument: Nothing can be proven, therefore this proves there is a God (oh, and you can only believe in God through Faith).

Plus, if God created the universe because of his FW, then you have the problem of evil, and other impossible hurdles.

BTW, since I am breezing through all of this too quickly, I might as well rant.

Why do the Theists on this board spend so much time trying to convince people that there is a God? They will offer all kinds of explanations and ultimatley revert to "you have to have Faith" and then they will proceed to tell you how deeply and truly they have Faith that God exists.

Then, when you ask them if they sin, they'll say "oh, well I'm not a very good (insert religion here)"

The thing is, I believe gravity exists but I don't jump off buildings to test its limits.  If you believe God exists, wouldn't you do everything in your power to honor and worship that god instead of sinning and then asking for forgiveness? 

I submit that they really don't believe God exists but only want to be assholes, since nothing is more asshole-ish than to keep saying something exists and then "you can't prove it doesn't, nah, nah, nah."

blah, blah, blah.