Simple 6 points,,,

Louis_Cypher's picture

Yes, We’ve read your Holy Books and no, we still don’t believe them.

Yes, We are Moral creatures, it derives from our cultural upbringing and no, it doesn’t come from a supernatural source.

Yes, We have purpose in our lives that we define for ourselves and no, it doesn’t center on being a meat puppet for a cosmic puppeteer.

Yes, We believe a lot of things and no, none of it requires magic to work.

Yes, We can give a layman’s explanation of ‘how we got here’ and no, We don’t choose to do so because you should have stayed awake in school.

Yes, We are Atheists, we do not believe that god or gods exist and no, you don’t get to redefine what We are for the sake of some silly semantic argument.

Christianity: A disgusting middle eastern blood cult, based in human sacrifice, with sacraments of cannibalism and vampirism, whose highest icon is of a near naked man hanging in torment from a device of torture.

tonyjeffers's picture

I enjoy your writing Mr.

I enjoy your writing Mr. Cypher.  However, I do have a problem with your viewpoints. We don't get to hear enough of them.

"...but truth is a point of view, and so it is changeable. And to rule by fettering the mind through fear of punishment in another world is just as base as to use force." -Hypatia

Louis_Cypher's picture

Mucho Gracias...

 Thank you...

Part of the problem is, one of my blog ideas has turned into a book.... (or rather is in the process of turning into a book...)

[Bill]

 

Christianity: A disgusting middle eastern blood cult, based in human sacrifice, with sacraments of cannibalism and vampirism, whose highest icon is of a near naked man hanging in torment from a device of torture.

harleysportster's picture

Louis_Cypher wrote: Thank

Louis_Cypher wrote:

 Thank you...

Part of the problem is, one of my blog ideas has turned into a book.... (or rather is in the process of turning into a book...)

[Bill]

 

 

I definitely want to read that book when you put it together. I like your posts. Always direct and to the point, 

“It is proof of a base and low mind for one to wish to think with the masses or majority, merely because the majority is the majority. Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people.”
― Giordano Bruno

Jean Chauvin's picture

Hi Louis

Louis,

You're writing a book? Another waste of paper. I thought atheists were suppose to save the trees or something. Louis, you are murdering trees lol.

Louis, my angry friend, now onto your "points."

1) Have you read the Bible straight through from Genesis to Revelation? I doubt it. But you will not understand that which you read since you are a natural fool (I Corinthaisn 1:14, Psalm 14:1). Fools don't know what they are reading and cannot comprehend that of the reality.

2) How does moral creatures fit in with survival of the fittest. So if you have bigger bullets then me, bang bang, i'm dead. Atheism cannot define morality. It cannot define anything. Atheism is a self refutation since it is impossible to acheived the status of an atheist, rather atheism is the goal for every agnostic under the banner of atheism since they are under false dilussions and wish to dream that which they are not.

3) If you do not know that you exist, what atheism is, or that the color pink is existent, that you cannot know your purpose. And even if you could, consistently speaking atheism has absolutely no purpose but to: "do what thou wilt, is the whole of the law." Along with Satanists.

4) Define belief? Your belief system is that of blind faith and outside of the category of reason unlike Christinaity

5) You did not define your own atheism correctly. According to Sapient and the weak atheism, you do not say that you do not believe that God exists, you are suppose to say that you have a lack of faith in God's existence.

Apparently, I know more about your atheism then you do, plus you have the wrong definition. Oh what a waste of a tree.

Respectfully,

Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

 

A Rational Christian of Intelligence (rare)with a valid and sound justification for my epistemology and a logical refutation for those with logical fallacies and false worldviews upon their normative of thinking in retrospect to objective normative(s). This is only understood via the imago dei in which we all are.

Respectfully,

Jean Chauvin (Jude 3).

ProzacDeathWish's picture

Jean Chauvin wrote:.... Oh

Jean Chauvin wrote:

.... Oh what a waste of a tree.

 

 

 

                                           Oh Jean ( you pompous asshole ) you are a waste of human flesh.

 

 

 

I'm a right wing atheist because I enjoy being hated by everyone.