Natural... why so serious? :p

Kapkao's picture

I'm still trying to figure that out, you dirty double liar...

“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)

Kapkao's picture

Shit, it didn't work...

Shit, it didn't work... perhaps another time...

“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)

Answers in Gene Simmons's picture

Step 1: Get religion.  we

Step 1: Get religion.  we really don't care which one.  We will require a notarized letter from your idiot of choice, on church letterhead and postmarked from the relevant zip code though.

 

Step 2: Start posting religious tard stuff.

NoMoreCrazyPeople wrote:
Never ever did I say enything about free, I said "free."

=

Kapkao's picture

Answers in Gene Simmons

Answers in Gene Simmons wrote:

Step 1: Get religion.  we really don't care which one.  We will require a notarized letter from your idiot of choice, on church letterhead and postmarked from the relevant zip code though.

 

Step 2: Start posting religious tard stuff.

 

DAMN YOU!! I can't even breathe now......


Ok, this badge sucks for two reasons: The second part's actually easy

“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)

Wonderist's picture

Not sure what you're

Not sure what you're referring to. I tend not to bother with most of your posts, so if you're going on about some fracas you've involved yourself in, you'll have to bring me up to speed before I can comment on what you mean by RRS being apologetic. RRS is a diverse group of people. I advocate unapologetic atheism, but it's not an official RRS thing by any means.

Are you in one of your manic phases, or something?

Wonderist on Facebook — Support the idea of wonderism by 'liking' the Wonderism page — or join the open Wonderism group to take part in the discussion!

Gnu Atheism Facebook group — All gnu-friendly RRS members welcome (including Luminon!) — Try something gnu!

Cpt_pineapple's picture

natural wrote:Are you in one

natural wrote:

Are you in one of your manic phases, or something?

 

Is he ever not?

 

 

Kapkao's picture

natural wrote:Not sure what

natural wrote:

Not sure what you're referring to. I tend not to bother with most of your posts, so if you're going on about some fracas you've involved yourself in, you'll have to bring me up to speed before I can comment on what you mean by RRS being apologetic. RRS is a diverse group of people. I advocate unapologetic atheism, but it's not an official RRS thing by any means.

Are you in one of your manic phases, or something?

insults, insults, more insults, and...

Quote:
I tend not to bother with most of your post

a quaint jab.

 

“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)

Kapkao's picture

Cpt_pineapple wrote:Is he

Cpt_pineapple wrote:

Is he ever not?

Hi Allison. Do you like band wagon mentalities? You appear to.

“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)

KSMB's picture

In conclusion: taking one's

In conclusion: taking one's medication is preferable.

Kapkao's picture

KSMB wrote:In conclusion:

KSMB wrote:

In conclusion: taking one's medication is preferable.

And? I can be very unapologetic myself. But then, on a good day, ad homs bounce off of my skin.

“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)

Answers in Gene Simmons's picture

(No subject)

NoMoreCrazyPeople wrote:
Never ever did I say enything about free, I said "free."

=

Kapkao's picture

Lol... seen it already...

Lol... seen it already... doesn't even make my skin get goosebumpy any more Laughing out loud

“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)

Kapkao's picture

Cpt_pineapple wrote:natural

Cpt_pineapple wrote:

natural wrote:

Are you in one of your manic phases, or something?

 

Is he ever not?

 

 

 

Let me rephrase my earlier post: Allison... I respect ya, hon. I even admire you (despite being involved with someone else ) and your pov.

I don't care for your attempts to bait me or even (possibly) throw stones at me. Am I the paraiah to you? Some sort of "untouchable"?

“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)

Kapkao's picture

This Blog Post=proof

This Blog Post/Thread=proof positive of a "pack mentality"

Unapologetic actually means little to nothing for me. But now, even atheists can't claim that they do not circle around and attack (needlessly) "those not like them".

“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)

Kapkao's picture

natural wrote:Not sure what

natural wrote:

Not sure what you're referring to. I tend not to bother with most of your posts, so if you're going on about some fracas you've involved yourself in, you'll have to bring me up to speed before I can comment on what you mean by RRS being apologetic. RRS is a diverse group of people. I advocate unapologetic atheism, but it's not an official RRS thing by any means.

Are you in one of your manic phases, or something?

I am now, and have been feeling a little twitchy since July 20th. I imagine this 'chemical flux' will continue until early-to-mid October, peaking in early September.

You may now resume your 'Holier-than-thou' posting style...

“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)