Natural... why so serious? :p

Kapkao's picture

I'm still trying to figure that out, you dirty double liar...

Kapkao's picture

Shit, it didn't work...

Shit, it didn't work... perhaps another time...

Answers in Gene Simmons's picture

Step 1: Get religion.  we

Step 1: Get religion.  we really don't care which one.  We will require a notarized letter from your idiot of choice, on church letterhead and postmarked from the relevant zip code though.

 

Step 2: Start posting religious tard stuff.

Luminon wrote:
The greatest difference is probably the priority, our priority is to effectively help people, and scientists' priority is to have properly reproducible facts under controlled circumstances

So dude, you used a computer which runs on electricity that may well have come from a nuclear reactor to send your message down wires which were put in place by the phone/cable company so that they could make millions of dollars only to use the internet to tell us that you don't believe in science?

Kapkao's picture

Answers in Gene Simmons

Answers in Gene Simmons wrote:

Step 1: Get religion.  we really don't care which one.  We will require a notarized letter from your idiot of choice, on church letterhead and postmarked from the relevant zip code though.

 

Step 2: Start posting religious tard stuff.

 

DAMN YOU!! I can't even breathe now......


Ok, this badge sucks for two reasons: The second part's actually easy

natural's picture

Not sure what you're

Not sure what you're referring to. I tend not to bother with most of your posts, so if you're going on about some fracas you've involved yourself in, you'll have to bring me up to speed before I can comment on what you mean by RRS being apologetic. RRS is a diverse group of people. I advocate unapologetic atheism, but it's not an official RRS thing by any means.

Are you in one of your manic phases, or something?

Q: "Isn't it a miracle that the universe/life/consciousness/myself exists?"
A: "No."
----
For any person P, question Q, and concept X
If the asking of Q depends on the existence of X, and P asks Q
Then X exists, and P should not be surprised of that

Cpt_pineapple's picture

natural wrote:Are you in one

natural wrote:

Are you in one of your manic phases, or something?

 

Is he ever not?

 

 

Kapkao's picture

natural wrote:Not sure what

natural wrote:

Not sure what you're referring to. I tend not to bother with most of your posts, so if you're going on about some fracas you've involved yourself in, you'll have to bring me up to speed before I can comment on what you mean by RRS being apologetic. RRS is a diverse group of people. I advocate unapologetic atheism, but it's not an official RRS thing by any means.

Are you in one of your manic phases, or something?

insults, insults, more insults, and...

Quote:
I tend not to bother with most of your post

a quaint jab.

 

Kapkao's picture

Cpt_pineapple wrote:Is he

Cpt_pineapple wrote:

Is he ever not?

Hi Allison. Do you like band wagon mentalities? You appear to.

KSMB's picture

In conclusion: taking one's

In conclusion: taking one's medication is preferable.

Kapkao's picture

KSMB wrote:In conclusion:

KSMB wrote:

In conclusion: taking one's medication is preferable.

And? I can be very unapologetic myself. But then, on a good day, ad homs bounce off of my skin.

Answers in Gene Simmons's picture

(No subject)

Luminon wrote:
The greatest difference is probably the priority, our priority is to effectively help people, and scientists' priority is to have properly reproducible facts under controlled circumstances

So dude, you used a computer which runs on electricity that may well have come from a nuclear reactor to send your message down wires which were put in place by the phone/cable company so that they could make millions of dollars only to use the internet to tell us that you don't believe in science?

Kapkao's picture

Lol... seen it already...

Lol... seen it already... doesn't even make my skin get goosebumpy any more Laughing out loud

Kapkao's picture

Cpt_pineapple wrote:natural

Cpt_pineapple wrote:

natural wrote:

Are you in one of your manic phases, or something?

 

Is he ever not?

 

 

 

Let me rephrase my earlier post: Allison... I respect ya, hon. I even admire you (despite being involved with someone else ) and your pov.

I don't care for your attempts to bait me or even (possibly) throw stones at me. Am I the paraiah to you? Some sort of "untouchable"?

Kapkao's picture

This Blog Post=proof

This Blog Post/Thread=proof positive of a "pack mentality"

Unapologetic actually means little to nothing for me. But now, even atheists can't claim that they do not circle around and attack (needlessly) "those not like them".

Kapkao's picture

natural wrote:Not sure what

natural wrote:

Not sure what you're referring to. I tend not to bother with most of your posts, so if you're going on about some fracas you've involved yourself in, you'll have to bring me up to speed before I can comment on what you mean by RRS being apologetic. RRS is a diverse group of people. I advocate unapologetic atheism, but it's not an official RRS thing by any means.

Are you in one of your manic phases, or something?

I am now, and have been feeling a little twitchy since July 20th. I imagine this 'chemical flux' will continue until early-to-mid October, peaking in early September.

You may now resume your 'Holier-than-thou' posting style...