Heh, thanks, I should start transferring the content I've written on other boards over to this one.

Time to organize the electronic library I suppose.

you're scary..hahah..just kiddin'.

your impassioned interest in philosophy/linguistics/logic etc...it's great I think. But I humbly don't understand much of it. so you're scary..hahahah.....

If you want empirical evidence of evolution, just check out Monsanto's research, or any bioengineering institution, in regards to new species and genus.

Evolution is any new life form(species,genus), that did not previously exist, arising from the genetic pool of other like forms(not a special individual creation by an act of a god), or the process of this occuring, is evolution.

Since humans are natural biological creatures, this is evolution as well(not created by a supernatural being), as we become similar to other animals and plants that influence and effect the evolution and change, of even other plants and animals by their selective interaction, or parasitic, or symbiotic relationship. Since a human can create new species, and or causing the conditions for them to occur suddenly, this could be "artificial" evolution, but evolution none the less, since these life forms arose genetically from previously existing life forms, and were not the spontanious result of an act of a god. This would be certain proof of evolution.

Becoming Human

Researchers witness natural selection at work in dramatic comeback of male butterflies. 

http://www.physorg.com/news103469691.html

Researchers discover evidence of very recent human adaptation

http://www.physorg.com/news103381323.html

 Swapping genes to change species.

http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2007/06/28/bacteria_hea.html?category=health 

http://talkorigins.org/indexcc/list.html

A list of several popular creationist claims along with responses for each one.

 

Pulled this article from Natural History. It provides various examples of natural selection in action, including the Galapagos finches. There is also some discussion about speciation in sockeye salmon by way of reproductive isolation.

 

http://files.meetup.com/217965/Jonathan-Weiner.pdf 

Linguistics is Kickass try this simply experiment. Imagine two cavemen sitting around a fire, about 46,000 BCE- give or take a few days, we'll call them Gus and Louie, they're wondering what to call this long stringy stuff growing out of their heads. Louie takes a lock between his thumb and index finger and rubs it over his ear, he grunts out the sound he hears and a new word is invented "seesar", Gus does the same experiment and hears the same result, A scientific test confirming the first result, or plagerisim. Is your hair still as long as in the photo Larry? Try it. CEASER means "hairy", our word hair comes from an early french pronunciation of 'seesar' into 'scheesair' anglo/saxons turned that into 'hair' and also part it of into 'shear' and 'share'. Once upon a time a Roman General named Gaius Julian became so famous his nickname CEASER "hairy man" came to mean Emperor, in German Kaiser in Russian Tsar.

A is both wrong and irrelevant.
B is also wrong and irrelevant.

Links provided in this very topic conveniently refute both arguments before you even presented them, so that's all the effort this foolishness deserves.

Hope it helps.

OK, sorry chaps. My links were a bit unkind and uncalled for.

 

I wish you all the best and I hope you wipe out the "Christian" hatred.

 

God Bless

 

Redsky