Debate on ID: Need help
Having a debate with ID proponent could use tips. Here is debate so far.
Me-1.Do you feel it should be taught in science classes along side
2.If so, what would be taught? For example what would the lesson plan
3.If teaching ID in science class how do you teach the theory
4.What scientific discoveries has ID given us?
5.If ID is the explanation for anything Evolution cannot explain,
whatis the point of investigating? What mysteries about the way
life cameto be should be explored in light of ID? In other words: What's the point of Science if god did it?
ID- 1. In my opinion i beleave that evolution shouldn't be taught at all because its a false teaching that takes away all the credit from God creating life My answer as a whole may sound harsh and i dont intend it to be, but what i said is pretty much the oppisite of what it is today with evolution being taught and ID not bein gallowed what so ever in the classroom. So yes i
beleave ID should be taught in the classroom but no i don't think it should be taught along side evolution because i dont think evolution should be taught.
2. Seeing that evolution has all ready been taught in our culture
one of the
main points of the lesson plan should be how ID is what really
what they were taught about evolution. (i hope i chose the right
there) You can use bibically reasons along with scientific reasons
can just stick with scientific reasons with this lesson. One
point that comes to mind is that evolution explains the natural
life evolving, but there is no sound theory that life came out of
and was made by chance.
3. This can be a tricky one because to learn about ID one must
there is a God or else it is pointless for that person to be in
they would refuse to learn. Also as Christians we are not supose
things on people, God wants us to have faith in him with free will
forced into it. So maybe those who dont't beleave if they choose
can take a
class where a teacher train in apologetiucs or theology or the
like can help
them find evidence for a God if they so choose, if they choose not
their free will not to, thats fine but options were made to help
they so choose. on that note i have more to add to this one just
me a day or so to add more.
4. Well ID is the teaching of God creating everything. Throu God
are possible, even thou i tmay be a gerneric answer i would have
to say God
has given us everything.
5. If for some reason evolution can explain something then it is
because The Lord did not use evolution he created. Just because yo
in the picture doesn't take away mystery, Genises never said how
the universe in existence but we have learn its very posisble he
may of been
the Creator of the Big Bang. its important to remember that
just one part of science. By evolution being wrong doesn't destroy
science is still there, theres medical science, bioligy,
and much much more. Removing evolution is not destroying science
as a whole
it would just be what science has allways done. Witch is get rid
and such that dont add up. In close im not starting a debate over
evolution more saying if evolution was taken out of science it would not
destroy it but it would do what it normaly does witch is maintains itself with checks and balances.
ME- >I agree, I will not argue for evolution since this is about ID.
>1.It surprises me that you don't think a scientific theory such as
>evolution should be taught in a science class. I know you think it's
>wrong, but I guess I don't understand how that means no one should
>learn about it.
>2.I will again evade the argument from evolution here in favor of
>something about your answer that disturbs me greatly. Doesn't it seem
>like you propose a complete breakdown of separation of church and state
>when you say teach biblical reasons? In a science class? And I don't
>understand the something from nothing reference. Isn't that how God
>created the universe? From nothing? It seems dubious the argument works
>only in aggreance with your point of view no?
>3.I'll refrain until more is added as you've noted.
>4.Very generic indeed, but maybe I should have phrased the question
>more specifically. What scientific discoveries has ID made since the
>theory came into light?
>5.In concordance with your answer as ID being a scientific theory that
>should be taught instead of evolution, how is ID falsifiable? And I'm
>not arguing for evolution here, but since you mention its use and it
>being removed from science, you know you'd have to remove other fields
>of science then too right? For example you mention medical science
>which is due in great part to evolution.(can explain further if you
>like)Again not arguing the validity of evolution but the application as
>you brought up.(don't want any confusion of our agreement not to debate
1 Like i stated this is just my opinion, pretty much dreaming how I
Me- >1.What other theories have been throwing out of science because they
ME- I Don't really know much about the protein stuff here and any helping hand would be great. Thanks.
I suck at signatures.