A possibly more difficult question than abiogenesis (from an atheist, no less)
My boss always uses two examples to "disprove" atheism. One is the question of abiogenesis as defined in the other thread by Chan (approximately). I didn't see the other question that my boss uses most frequently, so I thought I'd post it and see your thoughts:
How do you explain reproduction with evolution? It seems like it almost can't be done, but I'm super-non-biologist, so I don't know what to say to it.
The best I could think of is that it's possibly an accident of life, not a property, which eventually turned into a property. But it sounds silly. Anyone have any ideas how I could respond?
"Jesus -- the other white Moses" - Me.