Home » Forums » The Rational Response Squad Radio Show » The Rational Response Squad

References for all videos related to the RRS v WOTM debate

Posted on: May 11, 2007 - 3:08pm
Pile
Pile's picture
Posts: 210
Joined: 2006-04-26
User is offlineOffline
References for all videos related to the RRS v WOTM debate

Debate Part 1

Debate part 2

{FIXED}

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • Magnoliacom
  • Newsvine
  • Furl
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Yahoo
‹ Hypocritical Response Squad? Ask questions of Liberty University President ›

Posted on: May 11, 2007 - 4:57pm #1
BGH
BGH's picture
Posts: 2773
Joined: 2006-09-28
User is offlineOffline
Thank you very, very much

Thank you very, very much for compiling all this and putting it all in one location.


Posted on: May 11, 2007 - 8:52pm #2
mindspread
Moderator
mindspread's picture
Posts: 357
Joined: 2007-02-18
User is offlineOffline
Thanks.

Thanks.


Posted on: May 16, 2007 - 11:57am #3
Pile
Pile's picture
Posts: 210
Joined: 2006-04-26
User is offlineOffline
Did someone wipe out the

Did someone wipe out the original message?  Or was there a database error?

 

Debate Part 1

Debate part 2 


Posted on: May 23, 2007 - 8:13pm #4
BenfromCanada
BenfromCanada's picture
Posts: 711
Joined: 2006-08-31
User is offlineOffline
I can't download from

I can't download from liveleak. Can you put them all on YouTube?


Posted on: May 23, 2007 - 10:21pm #5
Pile
Pile's picture
Posts: 210
Joined: 2006-04-26
User is offlineOffline
Some of the clips are too

Some of the clips are too larget for YouTube to host : (


Posted on: May 24, 2007 - 11:27am #6
BenfromCanada
BenfromCanada's picture
Posts: 711
Joined: 2006-08-31
User is offlineOffline
Pile wrote:

Pile wrote:
Some of the clips are too larget for YouTube to host : (
Damn...can't zip them and host them yourself? For download, I mean.

Talking to Theists
CLICK HERE FOR THE TRUTH!


Posted on: May 24, 2007 - 1:00pm #7
serotonin_wraith
serotonin_wraith's picture
Posts: 119
Joined: 2007-03-10
User is offlineOffline
I found the entire debate

I found the entire debate in one MP4 file here. (600 MB)

The quality isn't the best I've seen though.


Posted on: May 28, 2007 - 9:35pm #8
StandardCitizen
StandardCitizen's picture
Posts: 9
Joined: 2007-05-19
User is offlineOffline
Great showing! Bad reviews of course

Did you guys see CBN's spinning of the debate? :

 

http://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/154223.aspx

 

"The hardest thing in life to do is to see things as they are, not as you want them to be."

"I do not despise believers. I find then neither rediculous nor pathetic, but I lose all hope when I see that they prefer the comforthing fairy tales of children to the cruel hard facts of adults. Better the faith that brings peace of mind than the rationality that brings worry - even at the price of perpetual mental infantilism."
~Michel Onfray in Atheist Manifesto


Posted on: July 16, 2007 - 4:26am #9
friendlyagnostic
Posts: 51
Joined: 2007-07-07
User is offlineOffline
question

the way of the master website is claiming that they gave Sapient an "outline" of what they would be saying ahead of time, and that Sapient knew they would be using the ten commandments, so they don't get why he was so shocked.  while I find this hard to believe, I wanted to ask, did they give you (Sapient) any sort of "outline" at all ahead of time?


Posted on: July 19, 2007 - 2:48pm #10
Slimm
Superfan
Slimm's picture
Posts: 167
Joined: 2007-03-15
User is offlineOffline
WOTM is really delusional.

WOTM is really delusional. You ask them to prove that their "personal god" exists and what do they do....? They'll pick up the closest object of human engineering, point to it, and say this is creation and it proves my god exists, I really don't see their logic...

Slimm,

Quote:
"When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called Insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion, it is called Religion." - Robert M. Pirsig,


Posted on: August 8, 2007 - 2:59pm #11
robakerson
robakerson's picture
Posts: 94
Joined: 2007-08-07
User is offlineOffline
friendlyagnostic wrote: the

friendlyagnostic wrote:
the way of the master website is claiming that they gave Sapient an "outline" of what they would be saying ahead of time, and that Sapient knew they would be using the ten commandments, so they don't get why he was so shocked. while I find this hard to believe, I wanted to ask, did they give you (Sapient) any sort of "outline" at all ahead of time?


This becomes sort of a he-said-she-said issue. BUT, there is clear video of Ray and Kirk getting ready claiming that they will provide their case without appealing to the bible or faith. The mere claim that they are going to use "science and logic" to "prove god 100%"(?) means they shouldn't use the bible or faith, anyway.

Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.
George Orwell.


Posted on: August 8, 2007 - 3:53pm #12
friendlyagnostic
Posts: 51
Joined: 2007-07-07
User is offlineOffline
robakerson

robakerson wrote:
friendlyagnostic wrote:
the way of the master website is claiming that they gave Sapient an "outline" of what they would be saying ahead of time, and that Sapient knew they would be using the ten commandments, so they don't get why he was so shocked. while I find this hard to believe, I wanted to ask, did they give you (Sapient) any sort of "outline" at all ahead of time?


This becomes sort of a he-said-she-said issue. BUT, there is clear video of Ray and Kirk getting ready claiming that they will provide their case without appealing to the bible or faith. The mere claim that they are going to use "science and logic" to "prove god 100%"(?) means they shouldn't use the bible or faith, anyway.

I agree


Posted on: August 23, 2007 - 12:45am #13
Kylsport
Kylsport's picture
Posts: 5
Joined: 2007-08-20
User is offlineOffline
Ray Comfort/Sapient Debate

Sapient, I am glad that you mentioned the 3rd Law of Thermodynamics.  However, you should have mentioned the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, which contradicts Darwin's theory of Evolution.  Which is more plausible?


Posted on: August 23, 2007 - 12:48am #14
Kylsport
Kylsport's picture
Posts: 5
Joined: 2007-08-20
User is offlineOffline
Sapient/Comfort Debate

[MOD EDIT - duplicate post removed]


Posted on: August 23, 2007 - 4:06am #15
MrRage
Posts: 896
Joined: 2006-12-22
User is offlineOffline
Kylsport wrote: Sapient, I

Kylsport wrote:
Sapient, I am glad that you mentioned the 3rd Law of Thermodynamics.

I'm curious. Why are you glad about that?

Kylsport wrote:
However, you should have mentioned the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, which contradicts Darwin's theory of Evolution.

No, it doesn't. If you care to know why, read this.

Kylsport wrote:
Which is more plausible?

I hope you're not saying Genesis Ch. 1 is plausible.

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” -- George Orwell


Posted on: January 2, 2008 - 11:19pm #16
dave805
dave805's picture
Posts: 78
Joined: 2007-12-27
User is offlineOffline
Could somone provide links

Could somone provide links to the FULL unedited version of this debate.

The link goes to the site and the majority of the video's have been removed.

 

It would seem .. That someone doesn't want the entire debate to be shown.

 

Edit.. i found it. http://www.archive.org/details/MartinBashirRRSvsWOTM

Btw.... Sapient.... How did you resist punching that douchbag reporter in the face for being so blaitently stupid ?

Seriusly .. You have a hell of a lot of patience with people.