My debate continues of course, and now somebody has brought up entropy:
OLD) Posted By: Brink on Thu Apr 19 19:19:26 CEST 2007
phooney i posted tons early on only to stop when u didnt disprove but dodged...here is the evidence now disprove....
the world is constantly moving closer and closer to total entropy...how than if something is constantly moving towards a chaotic state can it be originally organized if organization is the antithesis of nature's natural state as it requires much more energy to sustain than chaos?
Second, if energy can neither be created nor destroyed...how does it exist....
both of these are laws LIKE GRAVITY...so either you go get a chem/physic major and meet up with issac...or you wow me with some damn good math.
(OLD) Posted By: Ratiodecendi on Thu Apr 19 19:22:34 CEST 2007
Go on and link that to God somehow and I'll have something to start disproving.
(NEW) Posted By: Brink on Thu Apr 19 19:25:34 CEST 2007
...phooney if you cant see why that links to god than i think we have an issue already
nature seeks to most efficient way to exist....hence entropy...why would it evolve to less efficient means....especially if as everything breaks down and everything moves to chaos...you would have to force something into that position...
Now.... can anybody actually see how he has linked this to God? I can't. Also his broken english is making it difficult to see what he means. However, I have clarified that by "world" he does mean the entire universe. Anybody have any thoughts on this?