User loginNavigationNext Show!3 days 23 hours until the next show!
![]() ![]() Why you should help. ![]() Add it to your site! ![]() Kelly, Rook, and Sapient blog
The Atheist ResponseMargaretDowney.com
|
Introduction to Biblical Errancy |
![]() Copyright Rational Response Squad 2006-2008.
|
Hello and all that,
My name is Rook Hawkins, and this is your introduction/rule sheet for this particular forum. The Biblical Errancy (commonly refered to as BE) Forum is in many ways not the same as the Atheist vs Theist Forum, as the whole point of this forum is to discuss only the bible and it's errors within.
BE focuses on several types of errors; contradictions, fallacies and bold faced lies. Where as in AvT, you can discuss the concepts, ideals and general philosophies relating to or partaining to matters of the existence of Gods and failure's in theistic beliefs, BE will mainly function as a forward hub against apologetics, and supply easy-to-access biblical information to anybody in need.
We will allow some extra-biblical subjects, that relate to the credit of the Bible itself, such as biblical science (contradiction in terms), Jesus' existence, matters of historicity dealing with the times and places of the Bible, and also apologetical works which aim to subdue or explain away the errors as much as possible.
You will also find letters posted by me, from time to time, from apologetics, apologists and biblicists (or wanna-be biblicists) who write to BE (Dennis McKinsey's group of Panel Members) with my responses, and possibly others from the group. Because we get mail frequently through Dennis, the arguments which they state will no doubtedly be repeated here time and time again. Because of that I leave them for easy reference in case anybody finds themselves in a similar situation in need of quick arguments and biblical quotes.
Now on to the good stuff...listed below are a mix of rules and some debating guidelines, although they are not strictly enforced unless they are taken advantage of.
The best,
Rook Hawkins
----------------------------------------

Please help me get my resources so I can finish my book more quickly.
My wish list.
Et suppositio nil ponit in esse.
"You act ridiculously," said Ion, "to doubt everything. For my part, I should like to ask you what you say to those who free possessed men from their terrors by exorcising the spirits so manifestly. I need not discuss this: everyone knows about the Syrian from Palestine, the adept in it, how many he takes in hand who fall down in the light of the moon and roll their eyes and fill their mouths with foam; nevertheless, he restores them to health and sends them away normal in mind, delivering them from their straits for a large fee. When he stands beside them as they lie there and asks : 'Whence came you into his body?' the patient himself is silent, but the spirit answers in Greek or in the language of whatever foreign country he comes from, telling how and whence he entered into the man; whereupon, by adjuring the spirit and if he does not obey, threatening him, he drives him out. Indeed, I actually saw one coming out, black and smoky in color." "It is nothing much," I remarked," for you, Ion, to see that kind of sight, when even the 'forms' that the father of your school, Plato, points out are plain to you, a hazy object of vision to the rest of us, whose eyes are weak." - Lucian, Lover of Lies