A very complete video/creationism vs evolution

digitalbeachbum
atheistRational VIP!
digitalbeachbum's picture
Posts: 4888
Joined: 2007-10-15
User is offlineOffline
A very complete video/creationism vs evolution

The most complete and well rounded video I've ever seen concerning creationism vs evolution.

It is so complete that it will be my new go to video to send theists to when discussing the subject

https://youtu.be/HhMn0Pt_Otk

 


Old Seer
Theist
Posts: 1520
Joined: 2011-11-12
User is offlineOffline
Ditto

Outstanding video. If one looks at biblical creation as a psychological construct rather then a the creation of a universe, it can easiy be understood that the creationists are wrong. Christianity in it's true form has no interest in material concepts unless one is going to study material concepts as a seperate subject. Rightful Christianity is not a religion, but rather a specific kind (manner) of person, and person is a psychological fact not a material fact. This then renders Biblical creation as a discription of that specific person in symbolisms. Material items are used in place of psychological labels and explain a mental concept. Sorry to say but---the Pope/religions are wrong.  Biblical creation is the construct of that "specific Person" that is a proper Christian/Human.

The only possible thing the world needs saving from are those running it.

https://sites.google.com/site/oldseers

Knowledge trumps faith

Lies are nothing more then falsehoods searching for the truth


digitalbeachbum
atheistRational VIP!
digitalbeachbum's picture
Posts: 4888
Joined: 2007-10-15
User is offlineOffline
Old Seer wrote: Outstanding

Old Seer wrote:

Outstanding video. If one looks at biblical creation as a psychological construct rather then a the creation of a universe, it can easiy be understood that the creationists are wrong. Christianity in it's true form has no interest in material concepts unless one is going to study material concepts as a seperate subject. Rightful Christianity is not a religion, but rather a specific kind (manner) of person, and person is a psychological fact not a material fact. This then renders Biblical creation as a discription of that specific person in symbolisms. Material items are used in place of psychological labels and explain a mental concept. Sorry to say but---the Pope/religions are wrong.  Biblical creation is the construct of that "specific Person" that is a proper Christian/Human.

Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people. -Karl Marx


digitalbeachbum
atheistRational VIP!
digitalbeachbum's picture
Posts: 4888
Joined: 2007-10-15
User is offlineOffline
Old Seer wrote:Outstanding

Old Seer wrote:

Outstanding video. If one looks at biblical creation as a psychological construct rather then a the creation of a universe, it can easiy be understood that the creationists are wrong. Christianity in it's true form has no interest in material concepts unless one is going to study material concepts as a seperate subject. Rightful Christianity is not a religion, but rather a specific kind (manner) of person, and person is a psychological fact not a material fact. This then renders Biblical creation as a discription of that specific person in symbolisms. Material items are used in place of psychological labels and explain a mental concept. Sorry to say but---the Pope/religions are wrong.  Biblical creation is the construct of that "specific Person" that is a proper Christian/Human.

One thing in the video which I have brought up before in discussion is that there are no fossils of current animals. The only fossils found are animals which are ancient. And by this it means they have had enough time and the right conditions to be converted from bone to stone. Since fossilization takes a long time and it requires specific conditions, flat earth believers are crushed with their idea that the Earth is 6,000 years old


Old Seer
Theist
Posts: 1520
Joined: 2011-11-12
User is offlineOffline
It won't make any difference

digitalbeachbum wrote:

Old Seer wrote:

Outstanding video. If one looks at biblical creation as a psychological construct rather then a the creation of a universe, it can easiy be understood that the creationists are wrong. Christianity in it's true form has no interest in material concepts unless one is going to study material concepts as a seperate subject. Rightful Christianity is not a religion, but rather a specific kind (manner) of person, and person is a psychological fact not a material fact. This then renders Biblical creation as a discription of that specific person in symbolisms. Material items are used in place of psychological labels and explain a mental concept. Sorry to say but---the Pope/religions are wrong.  Biblical creation is the construct of that "specific Person" that is a proper Christian/Human.

One thing in the video which I have brought up before in discussion is that there are no fossils of current animals. The only fossils found are animals which are ancient. And by this it means they have had enough time and the right conditions to be converted from bone to stone. Since fossilization takes a long time and it requires specific conditions, flat earth believers are crushed with their idea that the Earth is 6,000 years old

what they're told or what the information is, Religious floks will hang on to beliefs. I don't converse with them any more. You can't convince a brick it's part of a wall.

The only possible thing the world needs saving from are those running it.

https://sites.google.com/site/oldseers

Knowledge trumps faith

Lies are nothing more then falsehoods searching for the truth