My arguments against religions
I posted these on a website because people where really getting "all up in the face" of the blogger.
The blogger had posted some information trying to explain that DNA wasn't code and the description given was for laymen purposes.
Anyway... here are my arguments
P1 - Code is created by a humans
P2 - Humans perfect their code by checking for errors in the code
P3 - Code that has no errors has been perfected
C1 - Perfect code can be created by humans
P1 - DNA is said to be a code
P2 - DNA has errors
P3 - DNA is not perfected
C2 - DNA is not created code
P1 - There is a theory which was called "The Big Bang" for non-scientific individuals
P2 - Big bangs make loud noises
P3 - There was no loud noises during "The Big Bang"
C3 - "The Big Bang" is not an explosion
P1 - DNA was explained to non-scientific individuals as being code
P2 - The term code is used by "creationists" has proof their god exists
P3 - Needing proof of anything means you don't have faith in it.
C4 - "Creationists" who need proof of their god's existence have no faith in their god
P1 - "Creationists" want DNA to be code so they can prove their god exists.
P2 - If DNA is code that was created then it must be from a "god" or a "creator"
P3 - "Creationists" have not provided proof it was their "god"
C5 - Their "god" did not create DNA because they have not provided proof that their god exists.