Hacking the Cosmos?

tonyjeffers
tonyjeffers's picture
Posts: 482
Joined: 2012-02-14
User is offlineOffline
Hacking the Cosmos?

Hacking the Cosmos --"Quantum Computers Will Solve Problems that would take Today's Computers Longer than the Age of the Universe"


                  6a00d8341bf7f753ef016763a9fb81970b-800wi


"Quantum computers can efficiently render every physically possible quantum environment, even when vast numbers of universes are interacting. Quantum computation is a qualitatively new way of harnessing nature,"  according to David Deutch, an Israeli-British physicist at the University of Oxford who pioneered the field of quantum computation and is a proponent of the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. Quantum computers, says Deutch, have the potential to solve problems that would take a classical computer longer than the age of the universe.

Ads by GoogleWhat is Quantum Jumping? Discover Why Thousands of People are "Jumping" to Change Their Life www.QuantumJumping.com

Astrophysicist Paul Davies at Arizona State University proposes that information, not mathematics, is the foundation on which physical reality, the laws of nature, are is constructed. Meanwhile at MIT, computer scientist Seth Lloyd, develops Davies assumption, by treating quantum events as "quantum bits," or qubits,  as the way whereby the universe "registers itself."  Lloyd proposes that information is a quantifiable physical value, as much as mass or motion -that any physical system--a river, you, the universe--is a quantum mechanical computer. Lloyd has calculated that "a computer made up of all the energy in the entire known universe (that is, within the visible “horizon” of forty-two billion light-years) can store about 1092 bits of information and can perform 10105 computations/second."

The universe itself is a quantum computer, Lloyd says, and it has made a mind-boggling 10122/sec computations since the Big Bang (for that part of the universe within the “horizon&rdquoEye-wink.

In Year Million: Science at the Far Edge of Knowledge, Leading and up-and-coming scientists and science writers cast their minds one million years into the future to imagine the fate of the human and/or extraterrestrial galaxy. First attempted by H. G. Wells in his 1893 essay “The Man of the Year Million”—is an exploration into a barely conceivable distant future, where the authors confront possibilities facing future generations of Homo Sapiens. How would the galaxy look if it were redesigned for optimal energy use and maximized intelligence? What is a universe bereft of stars?

Lloyd has proposed that a black hole could serve as a quantum computer and data storage bank. In black holes, he says, Hawking radiation, which escapes the black hole, unintentionally carries information about material inside the black hole. This is because the matter falling into the black hole becomes entangled with the radiation leaving its vicinity, and this radiation captures information on nearly all the matter that falls into the black hole. 

“We might be able to figure out a way to essentially program the black hole by putting in the right collection of matter,” he suggests.

There is a supermassive black hole in the center of our galaxy, perhaps the remnant of an ancient quasar. Could the Milky Way's supermassive black hole (in image above) become the mainframe and central file sharing system for galaxy hackers of the Year Million? A swarm of ten thousand or more smaller black holes may be orbiting it. Might they be able to act as distributed computing nodes and a storage network? 

Toward the Year 1,000,000 AD an archival network between stars and between galaxies could develop an Encyclopedia Universica, storing critical information about the universe at multiple redundant locations in those and many other black holes.

Quantum computing per MIT's Lloyd sounds like science fiction -as satellites, moon shots, and the original microprocessor once were.  But the age of computing in not even at the end of the beginning. Traditional computing, with its ever more microscopic circuitry etched in silicon, will soon reach a final barrier: Moore's law, which dictates that the amount of computing power you can squeeze into the same space will double every 18 months, is on course to run smack into a silicon wall by 2015, due to  overheating, caused by electrical charges running through ever more tightly packed circuits.
To leapfrog the silicon wall, we have to figure out how to manipulate the brain-bending rules of the quantum realm - an Alice in Wonderland world of subatomic particles that can be in two places at once. Where a classical computer obeys the well understood laws of classical physics, a quantum computer is a device that harnesses physical phenomenon unique to quantum mechanics (especially quantum interference) to realize a fundamentally new mode of information processing.

The fundamental unit of information in quantum computing (called a quantum bit or qubit), is not binary but rather more quaternary in nature, which differs radically from the laws of classical physics.A qubit can exist not only in a state corresponding to the logical state 0 or 1 as in a classical bit, but also in states corresponding to a blend or superposition of these classical states. In other words, a qubit can exist as a zero, a one, or simultaneously as both 0 and 1, with a numerical coefficient representing the probability for each state.  This may seem counter-intuitive because everyday phenomenon are governed by classical Newtonian physics, not quantum mechanics -- which takes over at the atomic level.  

The reason this is exciting is that it's derived from the massive quantum parallelism achieved through superposition, is the equivalent of performing the same operation on a classical super computer with ~10150 separate processors, which is impossible.

The idea of a computational device based on quantum mechanics was first explored in the 1970's and early 1980's by physicists and computer scientists such as Charles H. Bennett of the IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center,  Paul A. Benioff of Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois, David Deutsch of Oxford, and the late Richard P. Feynman, Nobel laureate of the California Institute of Technology were pondering the fundamental limits of computation.

They understood that if technology continued to abide by Moore's Law, then the continually shrinking size of circuitry packed onto silicon chips would eventually reach a point where individual elements would be no larger than a few atoms.  Here a problem arose because at the atomic scale the physical laws that govern the behavior and properties of the circuit are inherently quantum mechanical in nature, not classical. 

This then raised the question of whether a new kind of computer could be devised based on the principles of quantum physics.

Feynman was among the first to attempt to provide an answer to this question by producing an abstract model in 1982 that showed how a quantum system could be used to do computations.  He also explained how such a machine would be able to act as a simulator for quantum physics.  In other words, a physicist would have the ability to carry out experiments in quantum physics inside a quantum mechanical computer.

In 1985, Deutsch realized that Feynman's assertion could eventually lead to a general purpose quantum computer and published a crucial theoretical paper showing that any physical process, in principle, could be modeled perfectly by a quantum computer.  Thus, a quantum computer would have capabilities far beyond those of any traditional classical computer.  After Deutsch published this paper, the search began to find interesting applications for such a machine.

The breakthrough occurred in 1994 when Shor circulated a preprint of a paper in which he set out a method for using quantum computers to crack an important problem in number theory, namely factorization.  He showed how an ensemble of mathematical operations, designed specifically for a quantum computer, could be organized to enable a such a machine to factor huge numbers extremely rapidly, much faster than is possible on conventional computers. 

With Shor's breakthrough, quantum computing transformed from a mere academic curiosity directly into a national and world interest. Quantum hardware, on the other hand, remains an emerging field, but the work done thus far suggests that it will only be a matter time before we have devices large enough to test Shor's and other quantum algorithms. 

Beyond the actual creation of a quantum computer, our chief limitations are the imaginations of software engineers. This will be the major challenge of the Google whiz kids of tomorrow: to take computing and networking power that is effectively infinite and create interfaces that are simple enough for mere humans to understand.

Recent breakthroughs pioneered by Stuart Wolff of the University of Virginia  allow us to take electricity out of the equation, and get rid of the overheating problem that is undercutting Moore's law. Single electrons have been made to adjust their spin. Subatomic circuitry is within our grasp.

The Daily Galaxy

"...but truth is a point of view, and so it is changeable. And to rule by fettering the mind through fear of punishment in another world is just as base as to use force." -Hypatia


jamescbrown
Posts: 1
Joined: 2012-04-07
User is offlineOffline
nice article. thanks for

nice article. thanks for sharing

 



Interested in Spring Roofing


digitalbeachbum
atheistRational VIP!
digitalbeachbum's picture
Posts: 3255
Joined: 2007-10-15
User is offlineOffline
I've got a nephew working on

I've got a nephew working on this stuff. He's going for his PhD and has several universities after him to do his research at their school.

He told me that the idea is to have televisions, phones, etc which will work inside the human body since the energy requirements are so small that the human body will supply the power.

 

 

Free will is an illusion. People always choose the perceived path of greatest pleasure.

-Scott Adams


Sage_Override
atheistBlogger
Sage_Override's picture
Posts: 582
Joined: 2008-10-14
User is offlineOffline
Quote:He told me that the

Quote:
He told me that the idea is to have televisions, phones, etc which will work inside the human body since the energy requirements are so small that the human body will supply the power.

 

As awesome as that sounds, I prefer to have that type of shit on the OUTSIDE of my body just in case, ohhh, you know, THE ELECTRONIC DEVICE MALFUNCTIONS.  Emergency surgery anyone?  Damn, that sounds so bad; it's too early in the morning for that... 

"When the majority believes in what is false, the truth becomes a quest." - Me


digitalbeachbum
atheistRational VIP!
digitalbeachbum's picture
Posts: 3255
Joined: 2007-10-15
User is offlineOffline
Sage_Override wrote:Quote:He

Sage_Override wrote:

Quote:
He told me that the idea is to have televisions, phones, etc which will work inside the human body since the energy requirements are so small that the human body will supply the power.

 

As awesome as that sounds, I prefer to have that type of shit on the OUTSIDE of my body just in case, ohhh, you know, THE ELECTRONIC DEVICE MALFUNCTIONS.  Emergency surgery anyone?  Damn, that sounds so bad; it's too early in the morning for that... 

Think of it this way, you lose your sight.. they create an artificial eyeball, you see again... nothing wrong with that... it would also be cool to be able to have a heads-up display in that new eye... so you can track stuff, ect... the possibilities are amazing.

 

Free will is an illusion. People always choose the perceived path of greatest pleasure.

-Scott Adams


ax
Theist
ax's picture
Posts: 86
Joined: 2012-02-10
User is offlineOffline
re: "quantum jumping"I

re: "quantum jumping"

I regularly practice meditation techniques and thought experiments where I contemplate decisions I have made and the outcome of a specific series of events. This kind of self reflection is generally good to your well being in my opinion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decision_tree


Philosophicus
Philosophicus's picture
Posts: 362
Joined: 2009-12-16
User is offlineOffline
~~~~

I read Seth Lloyd's Programming the Universe a few years ago.  It was pretty cool.  I forgot most of it, but I remember being interested by it.  I vaguely remember him explaining binary code and then translating John 1:1 into it.  What's the smallest unit of information?  The bit!