It is the usual BS. It shows the Judeans who did not convert to Islam and who have been in Palestine since Roman times are related to the Judeans who did convert to Islam. Thus proving religion does not change genes. A surprise to the superstitious but not to the rest of us.

Another study shows ONLY those who carry the so-called cohenim gene variant on the Y-chromosome are also related to the Palestinians of either religion. This supports the Khazar story of importing rabbis to teach Judaism when it was adopted as the official cultural religion. Further it demonstrates rabbis only appeared, along with synagogues, after priests were put out of work by the destruction of the temple. It shoots down the recently invented myth that there were always rabbis and synagogues even when the temple was functioning.

We have two legitimate studies being systematically misrepresented by self-proclaimed jews to support the malicious claims of the murderous zionists.

For the record I made the same correction to furry/pussy a couple months back when she dumped it on me. I am not surprised to see the propaganda gets repeated no matter how many times refuted.

So has everyone. It excuses nothing. No one has to "understand" tyranny.

If you don't like Mein Kampf don't use its concept of race.

ALL criminal dictatorships must end. I raise the issue of the Jewish one to show you any and all killing of the oppressors is both morally and legally justified.

You do not appear to like the idea of killing off the jewish/israeli criminals. Lots of children were killed in Dresen and Hiroshima. There is no difference.

Friend and part-time mentor, consider and answer me this... how many lives has our Cold War alliance with Israel costed us? Why are we so debt-friendly with them? How many wars have they directly or indirectly led us into?

I don't know the exact answer, either, BUT... I think the answer could be considered "TOO DAMN MUCH FOR A KNOWN LIAR". Yes, I lie sometimes. I don't create eternal vendettas over it.

Are you referring to the izziehuggers who say Israel has never defaulted on a loan while the realists observe Israel has never repaid a loan?

You mean like the year we lost the second Shuttle NASA got an extra $500 million and Israel got an extra $14 billion?

 
 

What is a palestinian? Be specific please. As far as I can tell you are simply being obtuse in order to avoid giving your arguments coherent structure. 

In a stunning reprise to linking to anonymous sources on wikipedia we have a link to a modestly popular magazine which misrepresents a paper which does not address the subject we have been discussing.

There used to be a game show, Can you top this? I do not think it possible in this case.

Specifically it takes self-declaration of "Ashkenazi jewishness" without defining it and compares it to the population of the US INSTEAD OF comparing them to non-delared jewishness from the same geographic region of Europe. One expects the same result comparing any group of immigrants from from a specific geographic region to the average US population. In fact it is not clear how the same result could not be achieved. Consider simply averaging British, Irish, German, Latin ancestry. Would not all individual groups stand out from the average? That is what averaging is all about.

All the paper is showing, regardless of any selective quotation in the popular magazine, is that people from Eastern Europe differ from the US average. Surprise! Surprise! as Gomer Pyle used to say. Ashkenazis are the only significant immigrant group from eastern Europe in the US.

The formal "surprising" conclusion is.

Conclusions

Here we show that within Americans of European ancestry there is a perfect genetic corollary of Jewish ancestry which, in principle, would permit near perfect genetic inference of Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry. In fact, even subjects with a single Jewish grandparent can be statistically distinguished from those without Jewish ancestry. We also found that subjects with Jewish ancestry were slightly more heterozygous than the subjects with no Jewish ancestry, suggesting that the genetic distinction between Jews and non-Jews may be more attributable to a Near-Eastern origin for Jewish populations than to population bottlenecks.

For those who want to try to run with the second sentence, "suggesting" and "may be" are no where near the word IS in the English language.

It is also a false statement.  It should read "We also found that subject with SELF-REPORTED Jewish ancestry..." That is unforgivable in a scientific paper.

You have accusee me of moral inconsistency. And I have pointed out the superior morality of killing oppressors is always superior and is sanctioned in international law.

Again you attack me for what I have not said. Many times I have said they, in the Nazi sense, are the same. In fact I did in fact say that in this post. Perhaps you did not understand the Dresden reference. Perhaps if you were to research it you would understand I consider them the same.

My writing style is a bit odd I agree. But I do not understand how you could honestly think I was suggesting there was any difference between killing Nazis and killing Israelis be they adults or children. It is the same response to the same actions for the same reasons.

Why is it you do not see them as the same?

I have to ask how you think you get there from here. Yes a distance from the AVERAGE american caucasians. So are ALL the groups, such as Italians, Latinos, Irish, Scots, Germans. That is what averaging is all about. If you want to show there is something genetically "interesting" about eastern Europeans of the jewish persuasion then you have to compare them to eastern Europeans of the non-jewish persuasion.

I have the opinion of a jewish Israeli judge stating Jews are composed of many "ethnicities" although I know that will not make the least impression upon believers. Nor will they ever describe which ethnic characteristics are shared by Jews from Russia, New York, Alabama, Yemen, India and Ethiopia among other places. Do Tunisian Jews really do Russia circle dances, sing Hava Negilah to the tune of Irving Berlin and think they invented potato pancakes?

There is nothing in common for Jews but the religion. Atheists cannot be Jews by definition. See The Invention of the Jewish People by Sand for further details.

You will find quite amazingly or unsurprisingly scientific standards of both authors and journal referees defers to the political claims of Zionism. The first paper in this area showed the Palestinians and Sephardim were genetically indistinguishable. There was such a political stinks that the editor wrote to all the subscribers apologizing for the paper and requesting it be cut out of the journal. And people wonder why it is so hard to find. It is as though all subsequent papers have been massaged by a zionist political officer prior to publication.

In this paper its major conclusion that members of an average differ from the average would seem to be within the capabilities of high school student and not necessarily a notable bright one. Yet it was published. What scientific value is there is a case example of averaging?

In a publish or perish world one could read between the lines and conclude there was no significant genetic difference between non-jew and jews from the same geographic region and this paper was produced to salvage the wasted time.