How is this response to refute the Bible?
In another forum some nutcase claims the bible is more real than other religions so how is this response to refute that? I also included the link to that forum:
Morpheus, you show your IGNORANCE as a ChristNUT! There is NO difference between the stories of the bible and the stories of Greek religion. Remember at one point Greek religion was much bigger than Christianity is now. Zeus was much bigger than Jesus is now. Ancient Greece was basically a Greek theocracy and Christian theocracies no longer exist!
Citing bible characters is just like citing characters in Greek religion or any other religion to support that religion. It means NOTHING. You need historical references outside the bible to corroborate the crazy stories in it and that doesn't exist!
Look at the lack of archaeological evidence below:
It's why the MYTHICAL Jesus won't ever appear like PROMISED and why no a single supernatural claim in the bible has EVER come true! The very HATEFUL and INTOLERANT Christian religion will continue to die out in the west where we repect ALL beliefs! The bible does just the opposite!
In summing up the significance of these recent findings, Finkelstein and Silberman maintain that "the historical saga contained in the Bible . . . was not a miraculous revelation, but a brilliant product of human imagination
Scholarly findings in archeology, textual analysis, history, and newly translated ancient documents all point to a reality which may be difficult for many traditional and fundamentalist believers to reconcile