Jesus Lives, and He Loves.
Jesus still loves all people. And you can still be saved. Why would you not want to believe in God? There's so much bad in the world that it's amazing to know He is there to protect and love. And after life, I love knowing that I'm going to be in an amazing place called Heaven with all my loved ones that have passed on before me, instead of just going in the ground.
I am praying for each and everyone one of you hoping that you will come to know Christ as your personal savior.
Any questions about Christ? Contact me at email@example.com
I love it when atheists resort to mere assertions which are so easily rebutted.
I love it when theists say things like this then fail to follow through.
Quote me anything in Shannon's thesis which explicitly excludes the requirement of an information source.
Irrelevance. Prove DNA is a code containing information, and not an assemblage of chemicals.
I suggest that the motivation behind its design was simple efficiency rather than to foil efforts to decode.
And yet it is not efficient. You can't tell me that all the useless chemicals in DNA have efficiency. It's the opposite of efficient.
you must know that, despite entropy, it remains, statistically, remarkably efficient
Clearly your ignorance of both DNA and evolution have lead you to some remarkably wrong conclusions.
Once-Proud Canadian, Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.
This is the fantasy of the evolutionary position. In fact, the above statement is a complete non sequitur.
No, but yours is.
but you can't say why.
Note how you put "code" in inverted commas.
DNA is not a code. You don't find instructions when you pull it apart, you find chemicals. Chemicals which interact with other chemicals. At it's most base, that is all DNA is.
RRS would be so much less appealing were it not for the amusement one gets from this sort of thing. If one didn't find "instructions" one wouldn't be able to decode it! Furthermore, the assertion that it is "just chemicals" highlights the unadulterated absurdity of the materialist position far better than I could ever hope to! Were it "just chemicals" ie unselected to fulfil a specific role, clearly the result wouild be total chaos. It is this inability of the materialist to distinguish between hardware and software which gives the lie to his oft professed profundity and claim to the rational high ground. The whole thing is a joke. You should occasionally ask who perpetrated it on you.
This is how it ends up for atheists.
do you mean that I'm not keeping up?- fine, demonstrate it.
do you mean that I lack knowledge of the facts? There's nothiing clever about obtaining knowledge but the ability to discern what constitutes knowledge and to use it effectively is another matter.
and as a result you don't even know what the definitions of words used to describe processes are in the first place.
aaaah semantics! The constant refuge of the atheist. You'll stand before God and claim you didn't understand him. I'll ask to be there just to see it! Correct terminology will save your soul........not. Did you have a specific point or was it just a generalised flailing about?
In fact, theists get their definitions SO wrong that even common words like truth and belief escape them.
oh, this is irresistable! I ask atheists so may questions which get ignored....please define 'truth'
but atheists hold that nothing is impossible with evolution...
That is simple bs. Even a theist should know better. But then, you don't know what evolution actually is...
yes, the presumed ignorance of the deist is yet another refuge - so much for empiricism.
1] DNA corresponds with Shannon's definition of a "code".
when all else fails resort to blind denial
'It appeareth in nothing more, that atheism is rather in the lip than in the heart of man, than by this: that atheists will ever be talking of that their opinion, as if they fainted it within themselves and would be glad to be strengthened by the consent of others.' Francis Bacon.