Do virtual particles require space?

100percentAtheist
atheist
100percentAtheist's picture
Posts: 679
Joined: 2010-05-02
User is offlineOffline
Do virtual particles require space?

As some proposed, the origin of the Big Bang was a fluctuation similar to those that create observable particles out of virtual particles.  But virtual particles have been proposed as an explanation of fields, and these particles normally occupy physical vacuum (which possesses the property of space).  So, do virtual particles need space for their description?  As an example of a spaceless "environment" I would think of a universe of a length scale smaller than the Plank's length.

 

Anyone .... with a PhD in particle physics or QFT maybe ....?

 


Answers in Gene...
High Level Donor
Answers in Gene Simmons's picture
Posts: 4214
Joined: 2008-11-11
User is offlineOffline
p { margin-bottom: 0.08in; }

p { margin-bottom: 0.08in; }

OK, that is going to depend on what you mean by space. There are several definitions which are all internally consistent mathematically. However, each one describes space differently. We do not have enough data to sort the situation out fully and some versions are of a nature that we can never possibly hope to sort them out.

 

Bearing that in mind, there are a few ways in which space could have existed before the big bang. For one point, it sounds like you are trying to get to a different idea altogether, specifically what went bang in the first place and where was it located?

 

A few theories do support the idea that the universe is embedded in some other “place” but that we could never escape to that place even with anything unmanned to take measurements. However, if we stretch the idea to say that we did just that, we could look back and see our universe as an expanding but finite four dimensional sphere. That would be the view from the outside but back at home, the view from the inside might still be of infinite space time. The thing is that there is no compelling reason for the universe to be infinite when viewed from the inside but at our current state of understanding, we have not ruled that out either.

 

Now depending on what the actual case is for an outside stage where the universe is, there may be another way to do a similar experiment if we could build a big enough super collider.

 

There is one model of that outside place where it could be described sort of like a mountain range (the theory actually uses the term landscape but I think mountain range might offer a clearer mental picture). Anyway the idea is that there would be plateaus, ledges and valleys each at a different basic “height” and those are the places where universes can rest in a stable condition. For each of those places, the various constants such as the strength of gravity and the speed of light would be different from what we have in our universe.

 

So, with a powerful enough machine, we might be able to bridge the gap from one place to another and we would see a baby universe form in the machine. In fact, there is a sense in which we may already be doing just that. The RHIC can be run in such a way that it makes tiny black holes that evaporate quickly. So in that sense, our universe could be the stage in which other universes are built. That is, of course, only if the outside place is really like that.

NoMoreCrazyPeople wrote:
Never ever did I say enything about free, I said "free."

=


BobSpence
High Level DonorRational VIP!ScientistWebsite Admin
BobSpence's picture
Posts: 5810
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
Another way to look at it is

Another way to look at it is that from the 'outside', our Universe may still be a particle, in terms of the 'space' it occupies.

It may be like a photon, since it has zero intrinsic net mass...

Multi-dimensionality is funny that way...

Favorite oxymorons: Gospel Truth, Rational Supernaturalist, Business Ethics, Christian Morality

"Theology is now little more than a branch of human ignorance. Indeed, it is ignorance with wings." - Sam Harris

The path to Truth lies via careful study of reality, not the dreams of our fallible minds - me

From the sublime to the ridiculous: Science -> Philosophy -> Theology