My Essay Against Religion for English Class

Alaskan Atheist
Alaskan Atheist's picture
Posts: 34
Joined: 2011-05-11
User is offlineOffline
My Essay Against Religion for English Class

*It's a long read, I know, but in my opinion it's worth it. If you can, try to find anything to make it better or something I can improve on before I turn it in on Monday! Thank you!*

 

Irrationality Abounds

“For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is, than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring” (Carl Sagan). In my early years I was required to go to church. I acquiesced, absentmindedly, and I fumbled about through the Sunday school lessons and the congregations. The one thing I remember vividly about church was the free food they had there. Little did I know is that I was being molded and shaped by the leaders of that church. I was being force fed lies, backed into a wall by the ultimatum of being damned to an eternity of painful fiery hell if I did not conform to the doctrine they placed in front of me, whipped into partaking from it. The ultimatum they gave me, believe or go to hell scares small children. It so happens to scare many adults too, unwilling to give up their irrational, delusion inducing imaginary friend. Some may say I’m crossing a line; upsetting an unwritten, unspoken social taboo. I say that is a steaming pile of feces. It is acceptable, often encouraged to debate and openly discuss sports teams or politics. That’s perfectly fine to talk about those things in society and everyday life. I just replace presidents and linebackers with religion and superstition (those two go hand in hand). Religion, in my opinion, is the worst thing to happen to this world. More people have been killed in the name of God than for any other reason. Isn’t that ironic, because doesn’t the commandments say not to commit murder? Religion has had influence over the most prolific and horrid murderers in history. For example, Adolf Hitler, who eradicated over six million Jews, once said “My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter”. People, mainly bible thumpers, who use Hitler as the opposite of my argument, saying that atheism gives murderers and those who advocate genocide moral support to do so, are ignoring history when they say Hitler was an atheist, when he himself confessed his Christian faith and belief in God. Over the course of the rest of this essay there will be multitudes of illogical, irrational and contradictory questions and observations concerning the nature of God, the belief system of religion, and other aspects which really yank my chain as a logical scientist.  As a critical thinker and as a scientist who can only accept things that come with evidence, I feel it is my job to speak out against this fallacious and totally irrational concept of religion, faith and God.

            First off, as many Christians who I talk to frequently point out to me, God is omniscient and omnipotent; which means all-knowing and all-powerful respectively. The nature of God is somewhat of a paradox for me. For example, the bible often says “then the Lord saw…”, but he’s omniscient, didn’t he see beforehand? When I get told that I’m going to Hell for being atheist, I retort without a moment’s hesitation, “If God wanted me to love him and worship him, then why did he make me atheist?” They respond, almost one hundred percent of the time, with the fact that “our Father” (so God is male? But I get told by the same people God has no gender) gave us free will. If he gave us free will, that means he does not have a Divine Plan, because we can do exactly the opposite of what God wants. Furthermore, how can God “want” something if he is omnipotent, meaning when he created the Universe, he could have just made it so we do the thing he apparently “wanted”, but if we don’t do that thing he “wants”, then we are damned to Hell for eternity because we are defying God which in turn means we’re sinning. My question is this: why didn’t God just make us do the things he wants so he wouldn’t have to go to all the trouble of punishing us for sinning because we didn’t do the thing he wanted, when in the first place he could have easily made us do the exact thing he wanted us to do! Another thing I have trouble understanding is that God made us in his image. It couldn’t have been a moral or physical one, because God has no morals (because he is perfect) and is not physical. Therefore, one would suspect he made us in his exact image, one that cannot sin and is perfect. Oops, looks like that one didn’t work out (yet if he’s omnipotent how did he mess up that one?). To make it easier for people like me to believe in Him, why didn’t he make something so fantastic and “miraculous” as we would be fools not to believe in Him? For example, instead of the Ten Commandments, why couldn’t he have sent down a message with Moses that went something like this: “Two lines intertwined is the recipe for life”. That hints at deoxyribonucleic acid, the stuff of life. Or: “The fourth world from the fire is rusty”. That indicates Mars, which is a scientific fact is covered with rust. Instead, he sends down ambiguous details that if you asked someone who’s never heard of religion would scoff in amusement. Another flaw in the nature of God is the whole idea of him flooding the earth to remove evil. Evil came right back, in the event that Noah got drunk immediately after finding land, then shouldn’t God have known this since he is omniscient? So why did he bother flooding the earth when he could have just not created evil in the first place? Speaking of Noah, how did he fit all the animals on the Ark? Every insect, every bug, every mammal, every fish and every plant he fit on the Ark? How did it not sink into the water? Some say God used his divine powers to hold it up. Why couldn’t God just fashion Noah an Ark out of metal, some tough, sturdy metal, which is found on earth by the way, and whip up some contraption to keep it safe instead of working all that time for 40 days and nights keeping it aloft, because afterall, he made us out of dirt (but why is there still dirt on the earth then?), and I suppose since he is omnipotent he could just whip up something for Noah? To add to that, how did God kill sea creatures during the flood? How does one go about drowning fish? And did Noah even bring fish onto the Ark? If he didn’t, how could they still be alive now? So I guess he did bring them on, but were they salt or fresh, because a salt water fish would die in fresh, and fresh would die in salt, so it had to be one or the other, but yet both are still alive and kicking (swimming) today. Speaking of the flood, the highest rainfall ever recorded was in 1947 in the Reunion Islands during a severe tropical storm in a 24 hour period and that was only 47 inches. To cover the mountain tops (5.6 miles is Mount Everest) it would need to rain at a rate of 372 inches per hour over the entire surface of the earth. Where would all that water come from? And where did it all go? And wouldn’t the tides and dynamics of the earth be so out of equilibrium that the globe would be unstable and just topple off into the rest of the cosmos like a basketball falling off a unskilled player’s finger? While we’re still on the subject of death, what happens when we die? To those living before 5000 BC, before reading and writing were invented, how were ones able to worship God and get into heaven? I guess they’re all burning in Hell… The opposite of death is life, and God created man to “Rule over fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living creature that moves on the ground” (Gen 1:28). Then how is it possible, if our omniscient and omnipotent God created man to rule over every living thing that moves (I guess this is how some back up their reasons to kill in the name of God, even if it is over other humans, they move after all), that some animals are able to devour humans, such as a bear or a shark? That’s just another illogical aspect of religion and the nature of God which irks me. In addition, what is this talk of Jesus making the ultimate sacrifice? If Jesus is a part of God, that makes him both omniscient and omnipotent, thus making him aware that he would be resurrected from the dead and going and leading the Kingdom of Heaven. Where is the sacrifice?   If there are any Christians reading this, they will probably be telling me to go read the bible and try to believe and accept God for who he is. You know there are people out there like that. Okay, I agree, and this is what I will do. Take a close listen to what I’m about to say. In 1 John 4:8, it reads “God is love”. In 1 Corinthians 13:4 it reads, “Love is not jealous”. But in Exodus 20:5 it says “I, the Lord thy God, am a jealous God”. Follow those in that order and it takes you on a one way ticket to Hell because that just logically proved God does not exist. How can God be jealous when love is not jealous and God is love? God equals love, love does not equal jealousy, yet God equals jealous? It just does not logically follow. I guess those bible thumpers didn’t want me to read it after all. Talk about your own medicine…

            The way some people use religion to get ahead in life disgusts me, for example, they consider Leviticus to be “old law” therefore they don’t obey it any more. Then why is it, when they say homosexuality as an “abomination”, they use Leviticus to defend that belief? Another irrational way they think is that they love to defend God’s “love”, is that they say baby’s who die go to Heaven. Then why are they so against abortion? All God is depriving them of is the chance to sin and the opportunity to go to Hell. Either that or God expects unborn fetuses to worship Jesus… In an attempt to inject a little humor into this humbling and logic inducing essay, I will continue on. “Atheism is a non-prophet organization” (George Carlin). Also, ten to twenty percent of all women who find out they are pregnant suffer a miscarriage. It is also estimated that all pregnancies end in a miscarriage about fourteen to fifty percent of the time. Take into account that this is all according to God’s Plan, doesn’t this make God the world’s number one provider of abortions? Another example of faith thinkers in the world today happens to be when they say “God bless America”, especially after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. But seeing as how Bin Laden and the terrorists were just carrying out God’s Plan (he after all, did make one), then if God did bless America, why would those attacks happen in the first place? This is a logical conundrum, somewhat like how athletes who win give thanks to God, as if they think he picked them when he could have easily given the loser the same equal opportunity to win.

            I think a good way to wrap up this essay is to have another few examples of religion’s irrationality. Jesus loved doing this, so I’m willing to bet religious people will enjoy this too! Many people tell me I will “burn in Hell”. That’s all fine and dandy, but how can my soul burn seeing as how it is not a physical entity? It’s important to note that some Christians will say we are given new bodies after death, which urges the question: what is the point of a soul or spirit at all then?  Another irrational hazard imposed on us is that in the “Last Days” Jesus is supposed to appear to us in the clouds. How are the people at the other end of the world supposed to see him? Or the people who work underground or those in deep space? Are there going to be millions of Jesus’ all staring down at us in the clouds? What about those in places where there are no clouds, and the sky is all blue for as far as the eye can see? The biggest thing that irks me about religion is that it is usually always anti science. If it were not for science, the world would still be overcome with polio, and children would be dying off one by one. Science is the best tool ever devised for understanding how the world works. We interrogate nature using it. It has helped improve our lives so much; it’s laughable to say the world would be better without it. If anything, science humbles us. Carl Sagan once said “If we long to believe the sun rises and sets for us, that we are the reason there is a Universe, does science do us a disservice in deflating our conceits?” I don’t think it does, because it humbles us on the deepest of scales. We are so small compared to the vastness of the Cosmos; it’s almost a disrespect to think that a God who created it only cares about us.

            My point is religion is an irrational and illogical way of thinking. If you think deeply, you’ll find there is no proof for God. God is nothing without faith, and faith is the belief without evidence. So if any Christian or any other religious person for that matter says there is proof for God, you can look them straight in the eye and without blinking tell them you just proved God does not exist. Douglas Adams, author of the esteemed Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy series, once said “’I refuse to prove I exist,’ says God, ‘for proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing.’” As a child, I was too immature and my critical mind was not developed enough to understand the lies I was being fed, and the ultimatum I was given to either believe, or spend an eternity in Hell. This is why if I ever have children, they will not go anywhere near a church until they are old enough to think for themselves, and if that is what they want to do, then so be it, it’s their choice and they’re accountable for it. But if one grows up with the lies, it is hard to break out of it and come to the realization that life with religion is a life full of lies and irrationality. Religion suppresses any type of thinking, critical and logical, and promotes a life of anti-knowledge (Adam and Eve were prohibited from eating off the Tree of “Knowledge” ). This world would be a better place if it wasn’t for religion and the irrational thinking it promotes. Dogma is the worst thing that has ever happened to this world. As Richard Dawkins so duly noted “Be thankful you have a life, and forsake your vain and presumptuous desire for a second one.” In my opinion, the belief in God is irrational and illogical, and to be so irrational leads to delusion; which I think the belief in God purely is. The Christian God can’t make up his mind on anything, and the fact that he is both omniscient and omnipotent leads us down a path of irrationality and illogic, and the contradictions in the bible clearly show that. “Isn’t it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies living at the bottom of it too?” (Douglas Adams). I sincerely believe the world would be a better place if religion was not existent. The religion of today will be the myth of tomorrow. Religion is nothing more than the story by which scared and ignorant historians gauged the universe to console them. Science has uncovered things in physics that back then, people would see as miracles. The hypothesis that Jesus was an extraterrestrial using advanced technology to pull of these miracles has the same odds that Jesus was the son of God. Religion, specifically Christianity, in my opinion, is nothing more than a fairy tale and has no place in today’s society. It is the root of all the world’s problems, because the two billion people who make up the two greatest religions on earth think they can tell the other four billion people of the world what to do. They threaten us with eternal damnation for “straying” off the divine path. They frequently tell me I need to find Jesus. I didn’t know he was lost.

"Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to known." - Carl Sagan

"Atheism is a non-prophet organization." – George Carlin

"We are all atheists about most of the gods that societies have ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further." – Richard Dawkins


roseweeed
Superfan
roseweeed's picture
Posts: 47
Joined: 2011-01-02
User is offlineOffline
 uh, huh -- well I'm sure

 

uh, huh -- well I'm sure he'd remember if the article was based upon someone else's research, someone with whom he consulted.  Maybe you should email him as well, to ask that he post a confirmation of your claim here -- just to clear things up.  I'll bet he'd do it -- you know, for a good friend.  Looking forward to seeing his response on this thread.

roseweed

_______________________________________________

Everything that happens, happens somehow.


Vastet
atheistBloggerSuperfan
Vastet's picture
Posts: 13234
Joined: 2006-12-25
User is offlineOffline
Poor Jean. He's projecting

Poor Jean. He's projecting his own faults and insecurities onto us. I can only hope it means he's having problems reconciling all the bullshit with reality. His closed little mind really needs a breath of air to wash out all the religious cobwebs that have tangled his synapses.

Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.


iwbiek
atheistSuperfan
iwbiek's picture
Posts: 4298
Joined: 2008-03-23
User is offlineOffline
Jean Chauvin wrote:Since

Jean Chauvin wrote:

Since atheism uses the absurd method of empiricism as a way to know, and they even admit that the known is really not the known, but is probable, but address the probable as the known with no reference to ratio of error of the probable, then logically speaking, what I say IS TRUE.

nope, sorry.  you can come here (i.e., to my home) and present your arguments, meet the business end of my club, and then you will see clearly that what I say is TRUE.  you will freely admit it, logic be damned.  you will cry and ask me, much as pilate did, "what is truth?"  then i'll tell you and you'll repeat it back to me.  how 'bout it?  would you really like to meet god?  i can arrange it (and no, you won't have to die, but you will meet god). 

Jean Chauvin wrote:

Be consistent.

absolutely not.  never in a million fucking years.  go fuck your mother.  that's what all you christians want to do anyway.  you're the ultimate oedipus cult.

jesus christ, i'm sorry, there i go again.  really, reeeaaally, it's all outta respect.

respectfully,

iwbiek (ju don' know wha' 4)

 

"I have never felt comfortable around people who talk about their feelings for Jesus, or any other deity for that matter, because they are usually none too bright. . . . Or maybe 'stupid' is a better way of saying it; but I have never seen much point in getting heavy with either stupid people or Jesus freaks, just as long as they don't bother me. In a world as weird and cruel as this one we have made for ourselves, I figure anybody who can find peace and personal happiness without ripping off somebody else deserves to be left alone. They will not inherit the earth, but then neither will I. . . . And I have learned to live, as it were, with the idea that I will never find peace and happiness, either. But as long as I know there's a pretty good chance I can get my hands on either one of them every once in a while, I do the best I can between high spots."
--Hunter S. Thompson


redneF
atheistRational VIP!
redneF's picture
Posts: 1970
Joined: 2011-01-04
User is offlineOffline
Jean Chauvin wrote: Within a

Jean Chauvin wrote:
Within a specific field of expertise that I have yet to enclose fully, and my background in research, I've been used for this type of work for a while.

Background in research? lol.

A few days ago you were giving lessons to a piano player on how to interpret Bach's keyboard works, yet you didn't even know that Bach never composed or edited his keyboard works for piano.

Jean Chauvin wrote:

No No. He consulted me with some of my previous work. And used my research for his paper. So it is my research, his writing. We are good friends.

He needs help on astrophysics from you?? 

He can't be all that good, then...

I keep asking myself " Are they just playin' stupid, or are they just plain stupid?..."

"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy" : David Brooks

" Only on the subject of God can smart people still imagine that they reap the fruits of human intelligence even as they plow them under." : Sam Harris


TGBaker
atheist
TGBaker's picture
Posts: 1367
Joined: 2011-02-06
User is offlineOffline
roseweeed wrote:Jean Chauvin

roseweeed wrote:

Jean Chauvin wrote:

No No. He consulted me with some of my previous work. And used my research for his paper. So it is my research, his writing. We are good friends.

 

Ok, well -- I've left a comment on the page of his article, and also emailed him with a link to this thread to ask if he would confirm your claim.  Looking forward to hearing his response. 

any response?????

 

 

"You can't write a chord ugly enough to say what you want to say sometimes, so you have to rely on a giraffe filled with whip cream."--Frank Zappa

http://atheisticgod.blogspot.com/ Books on atheism


roseweeed
Superfan
roseweeed's picture
Posts: 47
Joined: 2011-01-02
User is offlineOffline
TGBaker wrote:any

TGBaker wrote:

any response?????

 

None yet.  He's a busy guy, no doubt -- we'll see . . . I'll keep looking for it.

roseweed

_______________________________________________

Everything that happens, happens somehow.


TGBaker
atheist
TGBaker's picture
Posts: 1367
Joined: 2011-02-06
User is offlineOffline
roseweeed wrote:Jean Chauvin

roseweeed wrote:

Jean Chauvin wrote:

No No. He consulted me with some of my previous work. And used my research for his paper. So it is my research, his writing. We are good friends.

 

Ok, well -- I've left a comment on the page of his article, and also emailed him with a link to this thread to ask if he would confirm your claim.  Looking forward to hearing his response. 

Heard anything yet


 

"You can't write a chord ugly enough to say what you want to say sometimes, so you have to rely on a giraffe filled with whip cream."--Frank Zappa

http://atheisticgod.blogspot.com/ Books on atheism


Vastet
atheistBloggerSuperfan
Vastet's picture
Posts: 13234
Joined: 2006-12-25
User is offlineOffline
Impatient are we?

Impatient are we? Sticking out tongue

Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.


smartypants
Superfan
smartypants's picture
Posts: 597
Joined: 2009-03-20
User is offlineOffline
Plenty of other people here

Plenty of other people here are better suited to critique of the concepts. As a writer and the son of an English teacher and one of the best proof-readers I've ever encountered, just thought I could clean up some of the text, in case that would be helpful.

Alaskan Atheist wrote:

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE











































































































































/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin-top:0in;
mso-para-margin-right:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
mso-para-margin-left:0in;
line-height:115%;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}

*It's a long read, I know, but in my opinion it's worth it. If you can, try to find anything to make it better or something I can improve on before I turn it in on Monday! Thank you!*

 

Irrationality Abounds

“For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is [no comma] than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring” (Carl Sagan). In my early years I was required to go to church. I acquiesced, absentmindedly, and I fumbled about through the Sunday school lessons and the congregations. The one thing I remember vividly about church was the free food they had there. Little did I know, [comma] I was being molded and shaped by the leaders of that church. I was being force-fed [hyphen] lies, backed into a wall by the ultimatum of being damned to an eternity of painful, [comma] fiery hell if I did not conform to the doctrine they placed in front of me, whipped into partaking [of] it [but if it were me, I would be less formal and say "whipped into accepting it."]. The ultimatum they gave me, "believe or go to hell," [quotes, comma] scares small children. It [delete "so"] happens to scare many adults too, ["adults who are"] unwilling to give up their irrational [no comma] delusion-inducing [hyphenated when used as an adjective] imaginary friend. Some may say I’m crossing a line, [comma, semi-colon only when separating two full statements connected by theme] upsetting an unwritten, unspoken social taboo. I say that is a steaming pile of feces [funny, but might be unnecessarily adversarial]. It is acceptable--often encouraged--[dashes is my personal preference for this construction, your choice] to debate and openly discuss sports teams or politics. ["It's"] perfectly fine to talk about those things in society and everyday life. I just replace presidents and linebackers with religion and superstition (those two go hand-in-hand) [hyphens, and why do they go hand-in-hand?].

[I like a new paragraph here] Religion, in my opinion, is the worst thing to happen to this world [this might justify the paper, but you might be well-served to stick to facts rather than personal opinion]. More people have been killed in the name of God than for any other reason. Isn’t that ironic["?" Two separate questions. "Don't" plural] the commandments say not to commit murder? Religion has had influence over the most prolific and horrid murderers in history. For example, Adolf Hitler, who [I'd use an even stronger word, like "massacred"] over six-million Jews [the number is adjectival: hyphenated], once said “My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter[." period first, quote second] People, mainly bible-thumpers [hyphen], who use Hitler as the opposite of my argument--saying that atheism gives murderers and those who advocate genocide moral support to do so--[dashes again a personal preference, parentheses would work, also] are ignoring history when they say Hitler was an atheist["." This sentence is getting too long. "H]e himself confessed his Christian faith and belief in God. Over the course of the rest of this essay there will be multitudes of illogical, irrational and contradictory questions and observations concerning the nature of God, the belief system of religion, and other aspects which really yank my chain as a logical scientist.  As a critical thinker and as a scientist who can only accept things that come with evidence, I feel it is my job ["job" is a bit too casual, I would say "duty," but it's your call] to speak out against this fallacious and totally irrational concept of religion, faith and God [there's an ambiguity here as to whether you mean "concept of religion: faith and God," or "concept of religion, faith, and God."].

            First off, as many Christians who I talk to frequently point out to me, God is omniscient and omnipotent; which means all-knowing and all-powerful respectively. The nature of God is somewhat of a paradox for me. For example, the bible often says “then the Lord saw…”, but he’s omniscient, didn’t he see [that/ it] beforehand? [Also, either lowercase "god" or uppercase "He" for consistency one way or the other.] When ["I'm"] told that I’m going to Hell [you lowercased "hell" elsewhere, so here, too. I think the tone of your paper asks for lowercasing it.] for being atheist, I retort without a moment’s hesitation, “If God wanted me to love him and worship him, then why did he make me ["an"?] atheist?” They respond, almost one-hundred [hyphen] percent of the time, with the fact that “our Father” ["gave us free will." You're weakening your argument by chopping it up with another idea.] (so God is male? [this is good enough to be without parentheses as a subsequent sentence, but remember that you have already used the male pronoun above.] But I get told by the same people God has no gender) gave us free will. If he gave us free will, that means he does not have a Divine Plan, because we can do exactly the opposite of what God wants. Furthermore, how can God “want” [it might be more effective to italicize these then put them in quotes, but that's your call] something if he is omnipotent, meaning ["that"] when he created the universe [lowercase], he could have just made it so we do the thing he apparently “wanted.[" Too long. "I]f we don’t do that thing he “wants”, then we are damned to Hell for eternity because we are defying God which, in turn, [commas] means we’re sinning. My question is this: why didn’t God just make us do the things he wants so he wouldn’t have to go to all the trouble of punishing us for sinning ["when"] we didn’t do the thing he wanted ["because" creates a new clause]. [Too long and complicated, "H]e could have easily made us do the exact thing he wanted us to do!

[Definitely a new paragraph] Another thing I have trouble understanding is that God made us in his image. It couldn’t have been a moral or physical one, because God has no morals (because he is perfect) and is not physical. Therefore, one would suspect he made us in his exact image, one that cannot sin and is perfect. Oops, looks like that one didn’t work out (yet if he’s omnipotent how did he mess up that one?). To make it easier for people like me to believe in Him, why didn’t he make something so fantastic and “miraculous” as we would be fools not to believe in Him? For example, instead of the Ten Commandments, why couldn’t he have sent down a message with Moses that went something like this: “Two lines intertwined is the recipe for life["?] That hints at deoxyribonucleic acid, the stuff of life. Or [this]: “The fourth world from the fire is rusty["? this is a sentence fragment, but I would do it, too.] That indicates Mars, which [is covered with rust as a scientific fact]. Instead, he sends down ambiguous details [not many details, I'd think mere "information"] that if you asked someone who’s never heard of religion[, they] would scoff in amusement [this is a little awkward and I don't think as biting as you want. I'd say something like "would be perplexed or amused by the ridiculousness of it all."].

[Again, new paragraph] Another flaw in the nature of God is the whole idea of him flooding the earth to remove evil. Evil came right back[. period. nothing wrong with a short tight sentence. "If it were true"] that Noah got drunk immediately after finding land, [delete] shouldn’t God have known this since he is omniscient? [delete "W]hy did he bother flooding the earth when he could have just not created evil in the first place? Speaking of Noah, how did he fit all the animals on the Ark[, e]very insect, every bug, every mammal, every fish, [comma] and every plant [delete]? How did it not sink [delete, redundant]? Some say God used [H]is [consistent capitalization] divine powers to ["keep it afloat"]. Why couldn’t God just fashion Noah an Ark out of metal, some tough, sturdy metal--which is found on earth, [comma] by the way--[dashes mine again] and whip up some contraption to keep it safe instead of working all that time for ["forty" any number under 100 spelled out] days and nights keeping it ["afloat," aloft denotes air flight], because after all [two words], he made us out of dirt (but why is there still dirt on the earth then?) [this is getting very confusing], and I suppose since he is omnipotent he could just whip up something for Noah? To add to that, how did God kill sea creatures during the flood? [did he?] How does one go about drowning fish? And did Noah even bring fish onto the Ark? If he didn’t, how could they still be alive now? So I guess he did bring them on, but were they salt or fresh, because a salt water fish would die in fresh, and fresh would die in salt, so it had to be one or the other, but yet both are still alive and kicking (swimming) today. [I think this whole line of reasoning is confusing your argument unnecessarily.]

[New paragraph] Speaking of [careful about "Speaking of..." it keeps appearing.] the flood, the highest rainfall ever recorded was in 1947 in the Reunion Islands during a severe tropical storm in a 24 hour period and that was only 47 inches. To cover the mountain tops (5.6 miles is Mount Everest) it would need to rain at a rate of 372 inches per hour over the entire surface of the earth. Where would all that water come from? And where did it all go? And wouldn’t the tides and dynamics of the earth be so out of equilibrium that the globe would be unstable and just topple off into the rest of the cosmos like a basketball falling off a[n] unskilled player’s finger? While we’re still on the subject of death [were we on that subject?], what happens when we die? To those living before 5000 BC [wait, what subject are we on now?], before reading and writing were invented, how were ones able to worship God and get into heaven? I guess they’re all burning in Hell… The opposite of death is life, and God created man to “Rule over fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living creature that moves on the ground” (Gen 1:28). Then how is it possible, if our omniscient and omnipotent God created man to rule over every living thing that moves (I guess this is how some back up their reasons to kill in the name of God, even if it is over other humans, they move after all [this can be in a separate sentence]), that some animals are able to devour humans, such as a bear or a shark? That’s just another illogical aspect of religion and the nature of God which irks me. In addition, what is this talk of Jesus making the ultimate sacrifice? [completely new thought, again] If Jesus is a part of God, that makes him both omniscient and omnipotent, thus making him aware that he would be resurrected from the dead and going and leading the Kingdom of Heaven. Where is the sacrifice?  

[new paragraph] If there are any Christians reading this, they will probably [tell] me to go read the bible and try to believe and accept God for who he [capitilization] is. You know there are people out there like that. Okay, I agree, and this is what I will do. Take a close listen to what I’m about to say [unnecessary sentence, IMO]. In 1 John 4:8, it reads “God is love”. In 1 Corinthians 13:4 it reads, “Love is not jealous”. But in Exodus 20:5 it says “I, the Lord thy God, am a jealous God”. Follow those in that order and it takes you on a one way ticket to Hell because that just logically proved God does not exist [does it?]. How can God be jealous when love is not jealous and God is love? God equals love, love does not equal jealousy, yet God equals jealous? It just does not logically follow. I guess those bible thumpers didn’t want me to read it after all. Talk about your own medicine…[what about my own medicine?]

            The way some people use religion to get ahead in life disgusts me, for example, they consider Leviticus to be “old law” therefore they don’t obey it any more. Then why is it, when they say homosexuality as an “abomination[,"] they use Leviticus to defend that belief? Another irrational way they think [talking about "they" is accusative and dangerous, puts people immediately on the defensive. Best to put it more in terms of "it is irrational to believe that"] God [i]s “love[." T"]hey say bab[ies] who die go to Heaven [do they say that? all I've heard about doctrine is how important baptism is because until babies are baptized, they are not "saved."]. Then why are they so against abortion? All God is depriving them of is the chance to sin and the opportunity to go to Hell. Either that or God expects unborn fetuses to worship Jesus… In an attempt to inject a little humor into this humbling and logic-inducing essay [careful, that sounds arrogant and off-putting], I will continue on. “Atheism is a non-prophet organization” (George Carlin). Also, ten to twenty percent of all women who find out they are pregnant suffer a miscarriage. [Also be careful about who will read this. It sounds like you think a woman miscarrying her baby is "injecting humor" into the discussion. If any woman read that, particularly one who had suffered the tragedy of miscarrying a child, she would find it incredibly insulting and offensive, and I don't think that was your intention.] It is also estimated that all pregnancies end in a miscarriage about fourteen to fifty percent of the time. Take into account that this is all according to God’s Plan, doesn’t this make God the world’s number one provider of abortions? [Abortion is also a very, VERY sticky subject that I'm not sure you want to get yourself into.] Another example of faith thinkers in the world today happens to be when they say “God bless America[,"] especially after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. But seeing as how Bin Laden and the terrorists were just carrying out God’s Plan (he[,] after all, did make one), then if God did bless America, why would those attacks happen in the first place? This is a logical conundrum, somewhat like how athletes who win give thanks to God, as if they think he picked them when he could have easily given the loser the same equal opportunity to win.

            I think a good way to wrap up this essay is to ["provide a few more"] examples of religion’s irrationality. Jesus loved doing this, so I’m willing to bet religious people will enjoy this too! Many people tell me I will “burn in Hell[."] That’s all fine and dandy, but how can my soul burn seeing as how it is not a physical entity? It’s important to note that some Christians will say we are given new bodies after death, which urges the question: what is the point of a soul or spirit at all then?  Another irrational hazard imposed on us is that in the “Last Days” Jesus is supposed to appear to us in the clouds. How are the people at the other end of the world supposed to see him? Or the people who work underground or those in deep space? Are there going to be millions of Jesus’ all staring down at us in the clouds? What about those in places where there are no clouds, and the sky is all blue for as far as the eye can see? The biggest thing that irks me about religion is that it is usually always anti-science [hyphen]. If it were not for science, the world would still be overcome with polio [no comma, not a list of three or more] and children would be dying off one-by-one [hyphens]. Science is the best tool ever devised for understanding how the world works. We interrogate nature using it. It has helped improve our lives so much; it’s laughable [this word has unattractive contempt in it, I would prefer something like "it's unimaginable"] to say the world would be better without it. If anything, science humbles us. Carl Sagan once said “If we long to believe the sun rises and sets for us, that we are the reason there is a Universe, does science do us a disservice in deflating our conceits?” I don’t think it does, because it humbles us on the deepest of scales [scales can't be "deep," but they can be "large"]. We are so small compared to the vastness of the Cosmos; it’s almost a disrespect to think that a God who created it only cares about us [the argument that we should respect science as an extension for a respect for god is confusing in an essay refuting the existence of god].

            My point is religion is an irrational and illogical way of thinking. If you think deeply, you’ll find there is no proof for God. God is nothing without faith, and faith is the belief without evidence. So if any Christian, [comma] or any other religious person for that matter, [comma] says there is proof for God, you can look them straight in the eye and without blinking tell them you just proved God does not exist [big claim]. Douglas Adams, [esteemed] author of the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy series, [wrote] “’I refuse to prove I exist,’ says God, ‘for proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing.’” [I would put this quote at the beginning of the paragraph.] As a child, I was too immature and my critical mind was not developed enough to understand the lies I was being fed, [or] the ultimatum I was given to either believe [no comma] or spend an eternity in Hell. This is why if I ever have children, they will not go anywhere near a church until they are old enough to think for themselves. [new thought, "I]f that is what they want to do, then so be it[. new thought, "I]t’s their choice and they’re accountable for it. But if one grows up with the lies, it is hard to break out of it and come to the realization that life with religion is a life full of lies and irrationality. Religion suppresses any type of thinking, critical [or] logical, and promotes a life of anti-knowledge (Adam and Eve were prohibited from eating "fruit from the Tree of Knowledge]). This world would be a better place if it [weren't (when following "if&quotEye-wink] for religion and the irrational thinking it promotes. Dogma is the worst thing that has ever happened to this world. As Richard Dawkins so duly noted[,] “Be thankful you have a life, and forsake your vain and presumptuous desire for a second one.” In my opinion, the belief in God is irrational and illogical [you're being redundant], and to be so irrational leads to delusion[, comma] which I think the belief in God purely is. The Christian God can’t make up his mind on anything, and the fact that he is both omniscient and omnipotent leads us down a path of irrationality and illogic[ality, but more redundancy], and the contradictions in the bible clearly show that. “Isn’t it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies living at the bottom of it too?” (Douglas Adams). I sincerely believe the world would be a better place if religion was not existent [redundant, the entire essay proves this]. The religion of today will be the myth of tomorrow. Religion is nothing more than the story by which scared [theologians interpreted] the universe to console them[selves]. Science has uncovered things in physics that back then, people would see as miracles. The hypothesis that Jesus was an extraterrestrial using advanced technology to pull of[f] these miracles has the same odds that Jesus was the son of God. Religion, specifically Christianity, in my opinion, is nothing more than a fairy tale and has no place in today’s society [again, a bit redundant]. It is the root of all the world’s problems [possible, but maybe irresponsibly overreaching], because the two billion people who make up the two greatest religions on earth think they can tell the other four billion people of the world what to do. They threaten us with eternal damnation for “straying” off the divine path. They frequently tell me I need to find Jesus. I didn’t know he was lost.

Hope my input helps. Not trying to criticize, just help make it the essay you want it to be.

Good luck,

Ryan

[EDIT: Looking at this now, each of those paragraphs needs to be broken up into at least two or three smaller ones. They're way, way too long, as in TL;DR. Also, my formatting created a disaster, sorry about that.]


Justsaying (not verified)
Posts: 4294964976
Joined: 1969-12-31
User is offlineOffline
Um...

 I know that I'm a little late to join this conversation, however I can't help but speak up about this. My personal beliefs aside, this essay is full of flawed logic and, in some cases, just plain ignorance of actual christian teaching.


iwbiek
atheistSuperfan
iwbiek's picture
Posts: 4298
Joined: 2008-03-23
User is offlineOffline
Justsaying wrote:just plain

Justsaying wrote:

just plain ignorance of actual christian teaching.

what a beautiful idea!  what a beautiful state to be in!

if only the whole world were in "just plain ignorance of actual christian teaching"...

"I have never felt comfortable around people who talk about their feelings for Jesus, or any other deity for that matter, because they are usually none too bright. . . . Or maybe 'stupid' is a better way of saying it; but I have never seen much point in getting heavy with either stupid people or Jesus freaks, just as long as they don't bother me. In a world as weird and cruel as this one we have made for ourselves, I figure anybody who can find peace and personal happiness without ripping off somebody else deserves to be left alone. They will not inherit the earth, but then neither will I. . . . And I have learned to live, as it were, with the idea that I will never find peace and happiness, either. But as long as I know there's a pretty good chance I can get my hands on either one of them every once in a while, I do the best I can between high spots."
--Hunter S. Thompson


butterbattle
ModeratorSuperfan
butterbattle's picture
Posts: 3945
Joined: 2008-09-12
User is offlineOffline
Justsaying wrote: I know

Justsaying wrote:

 I know that I'm a little late to join this conversation, however I can't help but speak up about this. My personal beliefs aside, this essay is full of flawed logic and, in some cases, just plain ignorance of actual christian teaching.

Wow, that is such an informative and constructive critique of the OP. I'm in shock.  

 

Our revels now are ended. These our actors, | As I foretold you, were all spirits, and | Are melted into air, into thin air; | And, like the baseless fabric of this vision, | The cloud-capped towers, the gorgeous palaces, | The solemn temples, the great globe itself, - Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve, | And, like this insubstantial pageant faded, | Leave not a rack behind. We are such stuff | As dreams are made on, and our little life | Is rounded with a sleep. - Shakespeare


Vastet
atheistBloggerSuperfan
Vastet's picture
Posts: 13234
Joined: 2006-12-25
User is offlineOffline
Justsaying wrote: I know

Justsaying wrote:

 I know that I'm a little late to join this conversation, however I can't help but speak up about this. My personal beliefs aside, this essay is full of flawed logic and, in some cases, just plain ignorance of actual christian teaching.

This response is full of flawed logic and ignorance of actual christian teaching.

See how that works?

Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.