The 'Rational' Fundy Formula for Debate
!. Come up with a word or series of words to describe what it is that you don't understand but wish to 'disprove'.
2. Take rarely used words from philosophy or any other subject that sounds good such as non-paraconsistent logic, phenomenological reduction, Epistemology, Suburethral Calculi, absurdist progressive gradualism.
3. Insert these words into mind numbingly long tirades.
4. Insist that any refutation of your gibberish is an ad hominem attack. Ad hominem makes you sound uber cool and intelligent!
5. Declare victory in an insulting and condescending manner.
6. Copy & paste the next installment.
The end result looks something like this.
A Logical Discombobulation of Atheistic Absurdist Progressive Gradualism
Atheists are inherently absurdist progressive gradualists, as demonstrated by Urey & Geller in their atheist soup mixture which failed to replicate God's creation event. Lacking the enticement of God's Luddite Rapidism, they flounder on the banks of epistemological failure and sexual paraphilia. I shall now demonstrate this using Rosencrantz and Guildenstern's model of phenomenological reduction.
While absurdist progressive gradulists are attempting to prefabricate the protozoan dichotomy of their lexicon, they lavishly reveal the Suburethral Calculi of their dilemma. Grimacing in the externalist bigotry of their self effacing narcisim, their true nature is thus revealed. This non-paraconsistent logic reticulates impulsively in the very heart of their argument, thereby proving a) Orville Redenbacher's theory of Goddidit, b) that atheistic absurdist progressive gradualism is ineffectual and inconsistent with logic, and c) that atheistic absurdist progressive gradualists do indeed consume babies....
Author's Note: Continue on in this manner for a minimum of 58 paragraphs before ending with the word Respectfully.
It takes a village to raise an idiot.
Save a tree, eat a vegetarian.
Sometimes " The Majority " only means that all the fools are on the same side.