Why are all transhumanists mentally retarded ?
This is something that comes up again and again and again transhumanism requires 2 things that you are ignorant of all technical subject and completely childlike in your understanding of every subject.
Lets analyze some transhumanists here :
This is priceless
skip to 16:00
Brilliant we don’t use empirical criteria to determine what deserves rights (the question then is how she knows something to be a AI if she uses empiricism to determine it ? Or dose she ? Maybe she determines that AI is everything that her subjective emotions tell her HAHAHAHA) and what dose not ? This is priceless I especially like how utterly mentally challenged this whore is and I especially like the fact that she dose not bring up the obvious solution to the problem humans are defined to be the species homo sapience that is characterized by the genetic code <insert DNA>.
I especially like how reductionisms she is and her straw man are brilliant for instance instead of using a composite argument of mental capability and other characteristics (made of carbon ) she brings up the most silly definition of personhood everyone ever invented.
UPEDATE : She contradicts herself later in 17:00 with 15:00 saying being human is biological making her even more of a stupid bubbling whore since before she asserted that the definition of humanity is impossible since it would exclude humans by definition.
Yes she thinks there are people who think that the ability to smell constitutes personhood !
Wow this is ether the biggest straw men I have ever seen or she is retarded.
Besides she immediately dismisses the notion of cognitive personhood ! And a lot of philosophers would disagree with her for instance my self where I actually argue that the ability to think makes someone a person and if they are retarded or a child then they are not a person.
BTW she babbles on that we should allow society to determine personhood and this is so funny since most if not all of society would use empirical means of determining this ! If we used emotions then how exactly is this accomplished ? Would we bring things hidden in a box to a personhood determining dictator that without knowing what is in the box or even having the possibility for ever getting any empirical data from it determine if that what is in the box is a person or not ? This would lead to random judgments and eventually the declaration of most humans for non persons and the declaration of rocks , air or fire to be persons since they where determined non empirically to be persons.
how exactly would a non empirical measure be conducted ? Really I don’t won’t to make a straw man however how the fuck do you even construct a non empirical criteria for personhood ?
This is even the most insane thing I have ever seen ! If she takes the ability to move even unconsciously to mean that this thing is a person then she is using a empirical criteria !
If she wants society to make the decision then it is completely illogical ! Since people subconsciously would make empirical measurements ! For a empiricists like my self this is absolutely the most ridicules thing I have ever heard of !
And the dude is even better see how before this he argues that bombs and rockets explode do to their own will and after he tells that calculators have intelligence despite the fact that they have no empirical or physical way of doing any real life tasks for being intelligent just blows my mind ! What then do we put the exploded bomb shells on trial ? Do we trial nonfunctioning PC ? Despite the fact that we perfectly know why they are not functioning since we have designed them and their working is exactly determined by the arrangement of atoms in them and every deviation is simply do to a different arrangement of atoms and the result follows logically from the lows of physics ?!
Even more silly if this would not be true then we could not possibly build computers based on the lows of physics. however we do and it works therefore he is so insane that it is not even funny.
Thereby every change in the atomic structure can be traced to a manufacturing error , damage in transportation or the assembly or use in a way that would create this.
Ageing these people are clearly insane and the word intelligence in their definition is completely mingles.
I even don’t know how to express my thoughts their "thinking" and "arguments" are so wrong its even impossible to begin to count their errors.
Well what are your thoughts on this ? Lets remember that Practically every argument from transhumanist is idiotic and they actually require to believe in some super crazy creationism like believe system about biology and the universe to actually accept the singularity.
Warning I’m not a native English speaker.
http://downloads.khinsider.com/?u=281515 DDR and game sound track download