EXC's guide to morality, civilized society, and freemarket libertarianism

The Doomed Soul
atheist
The Doomed Soul's picture
Posts: 2148
Joined: 2007-08-31
User is offlineOffline
EXC's guide to morality, civilized society, and freemarket libertarianism

So i had just had an epiphany... and it subsequently led to me discovering "EXC's guide to morality, civilized society, and freemarket libertarianism"

aka "The Rules of Acquisition"

(If you didnt get the joke already, stop reading... actually, even if you did, you may want to stop reading o_O )

 

 

1.  Once you have their money, never give it back

2.  You can't cheat an honest customer, but it never hurts to try

3.  Never spend more for an acquisition than you have to

4.  Sex and profit are the two things that never last long enough

5.  If you can't break a contract, bend it

6.  Never let family stand in the way of opportunity

7.  Always keep you ears open

8.  Keep count of your change

9.  Instinct plus opportunity equals profit

10.  A dead customer can't buy as much as a live one

11.  Latinum isn't the only thing that shines

12.  Anything worth selling is worth selling twice

13.  Anything worth doing is worth doing for money

14.  Anything stolen is pure profit

15.  Acting stupid is often smart

16.  A deal is a deal ... until a better one comes along

17.  A bargain usually isn't

18.  A Ferengi without profit is no Ferengi at all

19.  Don't lie too soon after a promotion

20.  When the customer is sweating, turn up the heat

21.  Never place friend ship before profit

22.  wise men can hear profit in the wind

23.  Never take the last coin, but be sure to get the rest

24.  Never ask when you can take

25.  Fear makes a good business partner

26.  The vast Majority of the rich in this galaxy did not inherit their wealth; they stole it

27.  The most beautiful thing about a tree is what you do with it after you cut it down

28.  Morality is always defined by those in power

29.  When someone says "It's not the money," they're lying

30.  Talk is cheap; synthehol costs money

31.  Never make fun of a Ferengi's mother

32.  Be careful what you sell. It may do exactly what the customer expects

33.  It never hurts to suck up to the boss

34.  Too many Ferengi can't laugh at themselves anymore

35.  Peace is good for business

36.  War is good for business

37.  You can always buy back a lost reputation

38.  Free advertising is cheap

39.  Praise is cheap. Heap it generously on all customers

40.  If you see profit on a journey, take it

41.  Money talks, but having a lots of it gets more attention

42.  Only negotiate when you are certain to profit

43.  Caressing an ear is often more forceful than pointing a weapon

44.  Never argue with a loaded phaser

45.  profit has limits. Loss has none

46.  Labor camps are full of people who trusted the wrong person

47.  Never trust a man wearing a better suit than you own

48.  The bigger the smile, the sharper the knife

49.  Old age and greed will always overcome youth and talent

50.  Never bluff a Klingon

51.  Never admit a mistake if there's someone else to blame

52.  Only Bugsy could have built Las Vegas

53.  Sell first; ask questions later

54.  Never buy anything you can't sell

55.  Always sell at the highest possible profit

56.  Pursue profit; women come later

57.  Good customers are almost as rare as Latinum - treasure them

58.  Friendship is seldom cheap

59.  Fee advice is never cheap

60.  Never use Latinum where your words will do

61.  Never buy what can be stolen

62.  The riskier the road, the greater the profit

63.  power without profit is like a ship without an engine

64.  Don't talk shop; talk shopping

65.  Don't talk ship; talk shipping

66.  Anyone serving in a fleet who is crazy can be relieved, if they ask for it

67.  Enough is never enough

68.  Compassion is no substitute for a profit

69.  You could afford your ship without your government - if it weren't for your government

70.  Get the money first, then let the buyers worry about collecting the merchandise

71.  Gamble and trade have two things in common: risk and Latinum

72.  Never let the competition know, what you're thinking

73.  Never trust advice from a dying Ferengi; listen but don't trust

74.  A Ferengi without profit is no Ferengi at all

75.  Home is where the heart is, but the stars are made of Latinum

76.  Every once in a while, declare peace. It confuses the hell out of your enemies

77.  Go where no Ferengi has gone before; where there is no reputation there is profit

78.  There is a customer born every minute

79.  Beware of the Vulcan greed for knowledge

80.  If it works, sell it. If it works well, sell it for more. If it doesn't work, quadruple the price and sell it as an antique

81.  There's nothing more dangerous than an honest businessman

82.  A smart customer is not a good customer

83.  Revenge is profitless

84.  She can touch your ears but never your Latinum

85.  Death takes no bribes

86.  A wife is a luxury,  a smart accountant a necessity

87.  Trust is the biggest liability of all

88.  When the boss comes to dinner, it never hurts to have the wife wear something

89.  Latinum lasts longer than lust

90.  Mine is better than ours

91.  He who drinks fast pays slow

92.  Never confuse wisdom with luck

93.  He's a fool who makes his doctor his heir

94.  Beware of small expenses: a small leak will kill a ship

95.  Important, more impotant, Latinum

96.  Faith moves mountains - of inventory

97.  If you would keep a secret from an enemy, don't tell it to a friend

98.  Profit is the better part of valor

99.  Never trust a wise man

100.  Everything that has no owner, needs one

101.  Never do something you can make someone do for you

102.  Nature decays, but Latinum lasts forever

103.  Sleep can interfere with opportunity

104.  Money is never made. It is merely won or lost

105.  Wise men don't lie, they just bend the truth

106.  There is no honor in poverty

107.  Win or lose, there's always Huyperian Beetle Snuff

108.  A woman wearing clothes is like a man without profit

109.  Dignity and an empty sack is worth the sack

110.  Only a fool passes up a business opportunity

111.  Treat people in your debt like family ... exploit them

112.  Never sleep with the boss's wife unless you pay him first

113.  Never sleep with the boss's sister

114.  Small print lead to large risk

115.  Greed is eternal

116.  There's always a way out

117.  If the profit seems too good to be true, it usually is

118.  Never cheat a honest man offering a decent price

119.  Buy, sell, or get out of the way

120.  Even a blind man can recognize the glow of Latinum

121.  Everything is for sale, even friendship

122.  As the customers go, so goes the wise profiteer

123.  A friend is only a friend until you sell him something. Then he is a customer

124.  Friendship is temporary, profit is forever

125.  A lie isn't a lie until someone else knows the truth

126.  A lie isn't a lie, it's just the truth seen from a different point of view

127.  Gratitude can bring on generosity

128.  Ferengi are not responsible for the stupidity of other races

129.  Never trust your customers

130.  Never trust a beneficiary

131.  If it gets you profit, sell your own mother

132.  The flimsier the produce, the higher the price

133.  Never judge a customer by the size of his wallet ... sometimes good things come in small packages

134.  There's always a catch

135.  The only value of a collectible is what you can get somebody else to pay for it

136.  The sharp knife cuts quickly. Act without delay!

137.  Necessity is the mother of invention. Profit is the father

138.  Law makes everyone equal, but justice goes to the highest bidder

139.  Wives serve; brother inherit

140.  The answer to quick and easy profit is: buy for less, sell for more

141.  Competition and fair play are mutually exclusive. Fait play and financial loss go hand-in-hand

142.  A Ferengi waits to bid until his opponents have exhausted themselves

143.  The family of Fools is ancient

144.  There's nothing wrong with charity ... as long as it winds up in your pocket

145.  Always ask for the costs first

146.  If possible sell neither the sizzle nor the steak, but the Elphasian wheat germ

147.  New customers are like razor toothed gree worms. They can be succulent, but sometimes they bite back

148.  Opportunity waits for no one

149.  Females and finances don't mix

150.  Make your shop easy to find

151.  Sometimes, what you get free costs entirely too much

152.  Ask not what your profits can do for you; ask what you can do for your profits

153.  You can't free a fish from water

154.  The difference between manure and Latinum is commerece

155.  What's mine is mine, and what's yours is mine too

156.  Even in the worst of times someone turns a profit

157.  You are surrounded by opportunities; you just have to know where to look

158.  Don't pay until you have the goods

159.  The customer is always right ... until you have their cash

160.  Respect is good, Latinum is better

161.  Never kill a customer, unless you make more profit out of his death than out of his life

162.  His money is only your's when he can't get it back

163.  A thirsty customer is good for profit, a drunk one isn't

164.  Never spend your own money when you can spend someone else's

165.  Never allow one's culture's law to get in the way of a universal goal: profit

166.  Never give away for free what can be sold

167.  If a deal is fairly and lawfully made, then seeking revenge especially unprofitable revenge, is illegal

168.  Beware of relatives bearing gifts

169.  If you're going to have to endure, make yourself comfortable

170.  Never gamble with an empath

171.  Time is Latinum. The early Ferengi get the Latinum

172.  If you can sell it, don't hsitate to steal it

173.  A piece of Latinum in the hand is worth two in a customer's pocket

174.  Share and perish

175.  When everything fails - run

176.  Ferengi's don't give promotional gifts!

177.  Know your enemies ... but do business with them always

178.  The world is a stage - don't forget to demand admission

179.  Whenever you think that things can't get worse, the FCA will be knocking on you door

180.  Never offer a confession when a bribe will do

181.  Even dishonesty can't tarnish the glow of Latinum

182.  Whenever you're being asked if you are god, the right answer is YES

183.  Genius without opportunity is like Latinum in the mine

184.  There are three things you must not talk to aliens: sex, religion and taxes

185.  If you want to ruin yourself there are three known ways: Gambling is the fastest, women are the sweetest, and banks are the most reliable way

186.  There are two things that will catch up with you for sure: death and taxes

187.  If your dancing partner wants to lead at all costs, let her have her own way and ask another one to dance

188.  Never bet on a race you haven't fixed

189.  Borrow on a handshake; lend in writing

190.  Drive your business or it will drive you

191.  Let other keep their reputation. You keep their money

192.  If the flushing isn't strong enough, use your brain and try the brush

193.  Klingon women don't dance tango

194.  It's always good business to know about new customers before they walk in your door

195.  Wounds heal, but debt is forever

196.  Only give money to people you know you can steal from

197.  Never trust your customers, especially if they are your relatives

198.  Employees are the rungs on your ladder to success - don't hesitate to step on them

199.  The secret of one person is another person's opportunity

200.  A madman with Latinum means profit without return

201.  The justification for profit is profit

202.  a)  A friend in need is a customer in the making

      b)  A friend in need means three times the profit

203.  A Ferengi in need, will never do anything for free

204.  When the Grand Nagus arrives to offer you a business opportunity, it's time to leave town until he's gone

205.  When the customer dies, the money stops a-comin'

206.  Fighting with Klingons is like gambling with Cardassians - it's good to have a friend around when you lose

207.  Never trust a hardworking employee

208.  Give someone a fish, you feed him for one day.  Teach him how to fish, and you lose a steady customer

209.  Tell them what they want to hear

210.  A wife, who is able to clean, saves the cleaning lady

211.  In business deals, a disruptor can be almost as important as a calculator

212.  If they accept your first offer, you either asked too little or offered too much

213.  Stay neutral in conflicts so that you can sell supplies to both sides

214.  Never begin a business transaction on an empty stomach

215.  Instinct without opportunity is useless

216.  Never take hospitality from someone worse off than yourself

217.  Only pay for it, if you are confronted with loaded phaser

218.  Always know what you're buying

219.  A friend is not a friend if he asks for a discount

220.  Profit is like a bed of roses - a few thorns are inevitable

221.  Beware of any man who thinks with his lobes

222.  Knowledge is Latinum

223.  Rich men don't come to buy; they come to take

224.  Never throw anything away: It may be worht a lot of Latinum some Stardate

225.  Pride comes before a loss

226.  Don't take your family for granted, only their Latinum

227.  Loyalty can be bought ... and sold

228.  All things come to those who wait, even Latinum

229.  Beware the man who doesn't make time for oo-mox

230.  Manipulation may be a Ferengi's greatest tool, and liability

231.  If you steal it, make sure it has a warranty

232.  Life's no fair (How else would you turn a profit?)

233.  Every dark cloud has a Latinum lining

234.  Never deal with beggars; it's bad for profits

235.  Don't trust anyone who trusts you

236.  You can't buy fate

237.  There's a sucker born every minute.  Be sure you're the first to find each one

238.  The truth will cost

239.  Ambition knows no family

240.  The higher you bid, the more customers you drive away

241.  Never underestimate the inportance of the fist impression

242.  More is good, all is better

243.  If you got something nice to say, then SHOUT

244.  If you can't sell it, sit on it, but never give it away

245.  A warranty is valid only if they can find you

246.  He that speaks ill of the wares will buy them

247.  Never question luck

248.  Celebrate when you are paid, not, when you are promised

249.  Respect other culture's beliefs; they'll be more likely to give you money

250.  A dead vendor doesn't demand money

251.  Satisfaction is not guaranteed

252.  Let the buyer beware

253.  A contract without fine print is a fool's document

254.  Anyone who can't tell a fake doesn't deserve the real thing

255.  A warranty without loop-holes is a liability

256.  Synthehol is the lubricant of choice for a customer's stuck purse

257.  Only fools negotiate with their own money

258.  A Ferengi is only as important as the amount of Latinum he carries in his pockets

259.  A lie is a way to tell the truth to someone who doesn't know

260.  Gambling is like the way to power: The only way to win is to cheat, but don't get caught in the process

261.  A wealthy man can afford everything except a conscience

262.  No lobes, no profit

263.  Never let a female in clothes cloud your sense of profit

264.  It's not the size of your planet, but it's income, that matters

265.  The fear of loss may be your greatest enemy or your best friend - choose wisely

266.  A pair of good ears will ring dry a hundred tongues

267.  Wish not so much to live Long, as to live well

268.  a) When in doubt, lie 

      b) When in doubt, buy 

      c) When in doubt, demand more money

      d) When in doubt, shoot them, take their money, run and blame someone else

269.  Never purchase anything that has been promised to be valuable or go up in value

270.  It's better to have gambled and lost than to never have gambled at all

271.  There's many witty men whose brains can't line their pockets

272.  The way to a Ferengi's heart is through his wallet

273.  Always count their Latinum before selling anything

274.  There is no profit in love; however, a strong heart is worth a few bars of Latinum on the open market. Keep it on ice

275.  Latinum can't buy happiness, but you can sure have a blast renting it

276.  If at first you don't succeed, try to acquire again

277.  Diamonds may be girl's best friend, but you can only buy the girl with Latinum

278.  It's better to swallow your pride than to lose your profit

279.  Never close a deal too soon after a female strokes your lobes

280.  An empty bag can not stand upright

281.  Blood is thicker than water, but harder to sell

282.  Business is like war; it's important to recognize the winner

283.  Rules are always subject to change

284.  Rules are always subject to interpretation

285.  No good deed ever goes unpunished

286.  When Morn leaves it is all over

 


Gauche
atheist
Gauche's picture
Posts: 1565
Joined: 2007-01-18
User is offlineOffline
Is this a debate between you

Is this a debate between you and EXC?


Marquis
atheist
Marquis's picture
Posts: 776
Joined: 2009-12-23
User is offlineOffline
The Doomed Soul

The Doomed Soul wrote:

morality, civilized society, and freemarket libertarianism

 

Okay... the headache comes not so much from reading through all those rather obvious advices for running a healthy business as trying to expand my stereotypes from the simple dichotomous oxymoronisms I am used to... to accepting that there can be THREE mutually hostile phenomenons within one and the same collision of phenomenae; such as the ones that are mentioned. Any two of them will mutually exclude the other... but all three together seems strangely stable... like quarks in a proton?

"The idea of God is the sole wrong for which I cannot forgive mankind." (Alphonse Donatien De Sade)

http://www.kinkspace.com


Jeffrick
High Level DonorRational VIP!SuperfanGold Member
Jeffrick's picture
Posts: 2446
Joined: 2008-03-25
User is offlineOffline
Buisness ethics?

 

 

 

               Doomy the next time you get an epiphany,  try a little penicilian, it should clear up in a couple of days or so. And remember to stay out of those places unless you have real protection.

"Very funny Scotty; now beam down our clothes."

VEGETARIAN: Ancient Hindu word for "lousy hunter"

If man was formed from dirt, why is there still dirt?


Vastet
atheistBloggerSuperfan
Vastet's picture
Posts: 13234
Joined: 2006-12-25
User is offlineOffline
It's been some time since I

It's been some time since I watched Star Trek, but that looks suspiciously like the Rules of Aquisition...

Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.


Cpt_pineapple
atheist
Posts: 5492
Joined: 2007-04-12
User is offlineOffline
Gauche wrote:Is this a

Gauche wrote:
Is this a debate between you and EXC?

 

I'd love to see Doomy and EXC debate morality

 

 

 


The Doomed Soul
atheist
The Doomed Soul's picture
Posts: 2148
Joined: 2007-08-31
User is offlineOffline
Vastet wrote:but that looks

Vastet wrote:
but that looks suspiciously like the Rules of Aquisition...

... second sentence down...

 

 

 

What Would Kharn Do?


The Doomed Soul
atheist
The Doomed Soul's picture
Posts: 2148
Joined: 2007-08-31
User is offlineOffline
Cpt_pineapple wrote:I'd love

Cpt_pineapple wrote:
I'd love to see Doomy and EXC debate morality

 

That... would most certainly be interesting, but im not certain how it would even work

 

What Would Kharn Do?


Waiting for Oblivion
Waiting for Oblivion's picture
Posts: 229
Joined: 2007-10-22
User is offlineOffline
how about a tl;dr version?

how about a tl;dr version?


Vastet
atheistBloggerSuperfan
Vastet's picture
Posts: 13234
Joined: 2006-12-25
User is offlineOffline
The Doomed Soul wrote:Vastet

The Doomed Soul wrote:

Vastet wrote:
but that looks suspiciously like the Rules of Aquisition...

... second sentence down...

 

 

 

Ah yes. I must have skipped over that.

Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.


atomicdogg34
atheist
atomicdogg34's picture
Posts: 367
Joined: 2009-12-26
User is offlineOffline
the ferengi are a fine people

the ferengi are a fine people


butterbattle
ModeratorSuperfan
butterbattle's picture
Posts: 3945
Joined: 2008-09-12
User is offlineOffline
Cpt_pineapple wrote:I'd love

Cpt_pineapple wrote:
I'd love to see Doomy and EXC debate morality

Omg, that would be the most entertaining debate ever. 

 

Our revels now are ended. These our actors, | As I foretold you, were all spirits, and | Are melted into air, into thin air; | And, like the baseless fabric of this vision, | The cloud-capped towers, the gorgeous palaces, | The solemn temples, the great globe itself, - Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve, | And, like this insubstantial pageant faded, | Leave not a rack behind. We are such stuff | As dreams are made on, and our little life | Is rounded with a sleep. - Shakespeare


nutxaq
nutxaq's picture
Posts: 399
Joined: 2008-04-06
User is offlineOffline
The Doomed Soul

The Doomed Soul wrote:

Cpt_pineapple wrote:
I'd love to see Doomy and EXC debate morality

 

That... would most certainly be interesting, but im not certain how it would even work

 

You would win. Anyone who clings so desperately to the capitalist model like EXC does is without morals.

"Faith, Faith is an island in the setting sun,
but proof, proof is the bottom line for everyone."
Proof, Paul Simon

Nothing this hard should taste so beefy.


The Doomed Soul
atheist
The Doomed Soul's picture
Posts: 2148
Joined: 2007-08-31
User is offlineOffline
nutxaq wrote:You would win.

nutxaq wrote:

You would win. Anyone who clings so desperately to the capitalist model like EXC does is without morals.

 

Doomy; LETS KILL BABIES!

 

EXC; ... and sell them on EBAY!

 

I dont think theres a clear winner...

 

What Would Kharn Do?


nutxaq
nutxaq's picture
Posts: 399
Joined: 2008-04-06
User is offlineOffline
The Doomed Soul wrote:nutxaq

The Doomed Soul wrote:

nutxaq wrote:

You would win. Anyone who clings so desperately to the capitalist model like EXC does is without morals.

 

Doomy; LETS KILL BABIES!

 

EXC; ... and sell them on EBAY!

 

I dont think theres a clear winner...

 

Define kill? Do you mean abortions? And are you talking about slow and excruciating deaths similar to what capitalism imposes on billions of people around the world?

"Faith, Faith is an island in the setting sun,
but proof, proof is the bottom line for everyone."
Proof, Paul Simon

Nothing this hard should taste so beefy.


EXC
atheist
EXC's picture
Posts: 4109
Joined: 2008-01-17
User is offlineOffline
nutxaq wrote:The Doomed Soul

nutxaq wrote:

The Doomed Soul wrote:

Cpt_pineapple wrote:
I'd love to see Doomy and EXC debate morality

 

That... would most certainly be interesting, but im not certain how it would even work

 

You would win. Anyone who clings so desperately to the capitalist model like EXC does is without morals.

Everyone is without morals. It's a complete BS concept. What have you ever done that doesn't demonstrate you're a completely self centered being?

In fact you love socialism because it allows you to feel compassionate without and sacrifice. It allows you take other people's wealth without any punishment. Socialism is a hedonists dream, survival and comfort with any work or sacrifice. So your love of getting something for nothing of compassion without sacrifice only proves how amoral you really are.

The debate about morality we could have is me proving you're a bunch of self-serving bastards that continually lie to yourselves about being otherwise. I'm an unabashed hedonist, you're all living out this delusion of moral superiority.

"Morality is herd instict in the individual" Nietzsche

 

Taxation is the price we pay for failing to build a civilized society. The higher the tax level, the greater the failure. A centrally planned totalitarian state represents a complete defeat for the civilized world, while a totally voluntary society represents its ultimate success. --Mark Skousen


nigelTheBold
atheist
nigelTheBold's picture
Posts: 1868
Joined: 2008-01-25
User is offlineOffline
EXC wrote:In fact you love

EXC wrote:
In fact you love socialism because it allows you to feel compassionate without and sacrifice. It allows you take other people's wealth without any punishment. Socialism is a hedonists dream, survival and comfort with any work or sacrifice. So your love of getting something for nothing of compassion without sacrifice only proves how amoral you really are.

Socialism: stealing from the rich to feed the poor.

Libertarianism: stealing from the poor to enrich the rich.

"Yes, I seriously believe that consciousness is a product of a natural process. I find that the neuroscientists, psychologists, and philosophers who proceed from that premise are the ones who are actually making useful contributions to our understanding of the mind." - PZ Myers


EXC
atheist
EXC's picture
Posts: 4109
Joined: 2008-01-17
User is offlineOffline
nigelTheBold

nigelTheBold wrote:

Socialism: stealing from the rich to feed the poor.

Libertarianism: stealing from the poor to enrich the rich.

Socialism: stealing from the productive to enrich politicians, and the politically connected.

Libertarianism: Stealing the earth's natural resources to enrich yourself.

Taxation is the price we pay for failing to build a civilized society. The higher the tax level, the greater the failure. A centrally planned totalitarian state represents a complete defeat for the civilized world, while a totally voluntary society represents its ultimate success. --Mark Skousen


ClockCat
ClockCat's picture
Posts: 2265
Joined: 2009-03-26
User is offlineOffline
:o

nigelTheBold wrote:

EXC wrote:
In fact you love socialism because it allows you to feel compassionate without and sacrifice. It allows you take other people's wealth without any punishment. Socialism is a hedonists dream, survival and comfort with any work or sacrifice. So your love of getting something for nothing of compassion without sacrifice only proves how amoral you really are.

Socialism: stealing from the rich to feed the poor.

Libertarianism: stealing from the poor to enrich the rich.

 

I'm with nigel on this with the exception that both of these assume the originating circumstances were fair in the first place. If someone owns all the food that is available to you, they can dictate the price of that food and have you at a disadvantage. This is true for every commodity. 

 

In the same fashion the monopolies and oligopolies the free market creates cause this unfair situation by it's very nature. Which is why some kind of regulation, or balance, is needed. Without that it is the have's holding the have-nots at perpetual gunpoint, as EXC likes to say. Otherwise it is a reversion to feudalism. 

Theism is why we can't have nice things.


EXC
atheist
EXC's picture
Posts: 4109
Joined: 2008-01-17
User is offlineOffline
ClockCat wrote:If someone

ClockCat wrote:

If someone owns all the food that is available to you, they can dictate the price of that food and have you at a disadvantage. This is true for every commodity.

Only true for commodities that are natural resources or depend on natural resources for their production. If someone owns all the land and water they can created these monopolies of food. However, monopolies of technology(e.g. software) do not last. That is why wealth generated via use of natural resources needs to be treated differently than wealth produced through work, investment and innovation.

If you tax food growers according to how much land and water they use, you get efficiency of their use. But socialists want to tax the engineer and company that develops technology to grow food with less land and water at a very high rates to pay for people's healthcare and food stamps for doing nothing.

ClockCat wrote:

In the same fashion the monopolies and oligopolies the free market creates cause this unfair situation by it's very nature.

Oh, like the labor unions, government workers, politicians and the political parties? Because those are the only entities that are legally allowed to operate as monopolies and keep out the competition.

Taxation is the price we pay for failing to build a civilized society. The higher the tax level, the greater the failure. A centrally planned totalitarian state represents a complete defeat for the civilized world, while a totally voluntary society represents its ultimate success. --Mark Skousen


nigelTheBold
atheist
nigelTheBold's picture
Posts: 1868
Joined: 2008-01-25
User is offlineOffline
EXC wrote:Socialism:

EXC wrote:
Socialism: stealing from the productive to enrich politicians, and the politically connected.

Libertarianism: Stealing the earth's natural resources to enrich yourself.

While I am not a strict socialist (I do believe regulated capitalism is the best economic system, coupled with limited socialism -- basically, anything that benefits society, such as a road system, health care system, etc), I believe you are incorrect if you assume those who are getting rich aren't doing so at the expense of those with less social or economic power. If that were not so, then Wal*Mart employees would make a decent wage, rather than a wage that doesn't allow them to live even while shopping at Wal*Mart.

The problem with all economic systems is simple: those who control the money control the economy. That's it. Microsoft has set the computer industry back over a decade because they had the economic clout to viciously control the market. (IBM did the same thing forty years ago.) Wal*Mart is able to destroy the profits of its suppliers in an effort to maximize its own profits. And so on. Those with economic power are able to regulate the industry, and they are completely unaccountable.

Further, they are able to maintain their economic status due to the stability of society. They partake of the benefits of society. They get more from society than someone who is poor. So why should they not be required to help sustain society?

Basically, libertarianism moves political and social power from the government to industrialists. In a well-managed democratic government*, the government would be responsible to the people. In any libertarian society, the corporations are not responsible to the people in any way. There is no invisible hand to keep them in check. That's just as much hogwash as an invisible god, used to keep people from asking too many questions, keep them from demanding too much accountability. The invisible hand, like the cake, is a lie.

I've seen too many companies in mostly-unregulated sectors get away with too much to ever believe in the invisible hand. It's a nice myth, pleasant to think about, but really, it's just a myth that describes what an ideal might look like, if people in power didn't abuse their power to maintain and increase power.

And finally, there's that stickler about "earth's natural resources." Who gets to decide who gets those resources? It sure ain't the poor. It's not even the middle class. It's the top 5%, which controls over 80% of the wealth, those with real economic or political power. Do you imagine they're going to give the poor the same rights to access as they are going to give themselves?

There's a huge difference between "liberty" and "freedom." Warren Buffet and I have the same liberties, but he has far more freedom than I do. An ideal libertarian society is predicated by equal freedom, not equal liberty, which will not happen. Not in our lifetimes. The tragedy of the commons pretty much guarantees it.

 

* Yes, I know there's no such thing as a well-managed government. It's easier to influence a democratic government than it is an unfettered corporation, though. Of course, then there's the problem with the rule of the least-common-denominator.

"Yes, I seriously believe that consciousness is a product of a natural process. I find that the neuroscientists, psychologists, and philosophers who proceed from that premise are the ones who are actually making useful contributions to our understanding of the mind." - PZ Myers


Magus
High Level DonorModerator
Magus's picture
Posts: 592
Joined: 2007-04-11
User is offlineOffline
EXC wrote:Everyone is

EXC wrote:

Everyone is without morals. It's a complete BS concept. What have you ever done that doesn't demonstrate you're a completely self centered being?

In fact you love socialism because it allows you to feel compassionate without and sacrifice. It allows you take other people's wealth without any punishment. Socialism is a hedonists dream, survival and comfort with any work or sacrifice. So your love of getting something for nothing of compassion without sacrifice only proves how amoral you really are.

The debate about morality we could have is me proving you're a bunch of self-serving bastards that continually lie to yourselves about being otherwise. I'm an unabashed hedonist, you're all living out this delusion of moral superiority.

"Morality is herd instict in the individual" Nietzsche

 

 

So... your a socialist? or you wish you were?

"Socialism is a hedonists dream"

"I'm an unabashed hedonist"

Sounds made up...
Agnostic Atheist
No, I am not angry at your imaginary friends or enemies.


Marquis
atheist
Marquis's picture
Posts: 776
Joined: 2009-12-23
User is offlineOffline
Oh FFS....Believeing in

Oh FFS....

Believeing in riches as magic principle is like believing in gods.

Think about it. How many hours are there in a year?

My calculator has gone wonky but I think, upon quick calculation, that it is 8,760. That's all the time you've got. How are you going to play that if, say, you wanted to make a million dollars a year? You'd have to work around the clock at about 105 dollars or so an hour. Which is a handsome hourly wage - but it is also the reason why you will never get rich through any other means than that of finding a way to tax other people's activities.

So... this means extorsion, of course. Tell the suckers that you can protect them! Fuck them up if they don't believe you. Give them a flag and some shiny things to hold on to. The more people you fuck up, the more people will believe in you. Whatever you tell them will serve as "the truth".

Tax them every time they take a dump by manufacturing and selling toilet paper.

Tax them every time they eat by manufacturing and selling milk, butter, meats, vegetables and sauces.

Tax them every time they go anywhere by selling them petrol (gasoline).

Tax them for speaking to eachother by selling them air wave time on telephones.

Tax them for wanting to forget about all this by making them pay for TV.

Tax them for dying by making their grieving relatives collect cash for a proper burial.

Tax their income and all that they own so that you can have an army and a navy that can go to other countries and fuck them up.

 

Then make all taxes available to private citizens of no scruples. This is called efficiency.

The less morals you have, the beter you will fare in the extorsionist economy. Praise the Lord!

At least it isn't something evil... such as socialism.

"The idea of God is the sole wrong for which I cannot forgive mankind." (Alphonse Donatien De Sade)

http://www.kinkspace.com


nutxaq
nutxaq's picture
Posts: 399
Joined: 2008-04-06
User is offlineOffline
EXC wrote:Everyone is

EXC wrote:

Everyone is without morals. It's a complete BS concept. What have you ever done that doesn't demonstrate you're a completely self centered being?

In fact you love socialism because it allows you to feel compassionate without and sacrifice. It allows you take other people's wealth without any punishment. Socialism is a hedonists dream, survival and comfort with any work or sacrifice. So your love of getting something for nothing of compassion without sacrifice only proves how amoral you really are.

The debate about morality we could have is me proving you're a bunch of self-serving bastards that continually lie to yourselves about being otherwise. I'm an unabashed hedonist, you're all living out this delusion of moral superiority.

"Morality is herd instict in the individual" Nietzsche

 

I never said I wasn't self serving. The difference between you and I though, is that I support a system that is more equitable by orders of magnitude. Yes, my needs will be met, but so will the needs of millions of overworked and underpaid Americans. On the other hand, you support a system in which a small group of people enjoy comfort far beyond what is necessary while many of their employees and customer base constantly live one catastrophic moment away from ruin and many more don't even know what it's like to get to live on that edge, spending most of their lives at the bottom of the pile.

Yes, I want a system that benefits me, but only if it's fair.

 

"Faith, Faith is an island in the setting sun,
but proof, proof is the bottom line for everyone."
Proof, Paul Simon

Nothing this hard should taste so beefy.


EXC
atheist
EXC's picture
Posts: 4109
Joined: 2008-01-17
User is offlineOffline
nigelTheBold wrote:While I

nigelTheBold wrote:

While I am not a strict socialist (I do believe regulated capitalism is the best economic system, coupled with limited socialism -- basically, anything that benefits society, such as a road system, health care system, etc),

I agree in regulating capitalism to the extend they are not allowed to commit fraud or buy up and monopolize natural resources. I don't think you can come up with a rational justification for any more.

nigelTheBold wrote:
 

I believe you are incorrect if you assume those who are getting rich aren't doing so at the expense of those with less social or economic power. If that were not so, then Wal*Mart employees would make a decent wage, rather than a wage that doesn't allow them to live even while shopping at Wal*Mart.

If it is so easy for WalMart or Aetna to make money 'exploiting' workers, why don't more capitalist create a competing business until every unemployed person finds a job being 'exploited'? The fundamental problem is limited natural resources and human overpopulation. Even if socialism could make things 'fair', human population would increase to a level where misery limits any more growth.

nigelTheBold wrote:
 

The problem with all economic systems is simple: those who control the money control the economy.

Right, but if you have a good business plan, you can get a loan. The socialists here keep telling me how massive the health insurance companies profits are but the don't just go to a bank and get a loan to start a competing business that has the coverage rules they want, Why? Every business starts from zero, so this is just lame excuses. If there is a better way, they free market can find a way to make it happen. But what they want isn't about a better economic model, it's about theft.

nigelTheBold wrote:
 

That's it. Microsoft has set the computer industry back over a decade because they had the economic clout to viciously control the market. (IBM did the same thing forty years ago.)

When IBM  and Microsoft had a monopoly, it didn't last. By the time the government pressed it case and the appeals were heard, these monopolies no longer existed. Just a bunch of lawyers got rich. We got the Dell, Compaq, etc... in response to IBMs domination. Then we got Linux in response to Microsofts monopoly. In a free market, monopolies are not going to last except when we allow people to monopolize natural resources.

And why don't you complain about the monopoly created by labor unions and government workers?

nigelTheBold wrote:
 

Wal*Mart is able to destroy the profits of its suppliers in an effort to maximize its own profits. And so on. Those with economic power are able to regulate the industry, and they are completely unaccountable.

Isn't Target and Costco able to do the same? Can't the suppliers sell direct to the consumer now via the Internet? If the suppliers make huge profits, doesn't that just get passed on to the consumer, many of whom are poor and lower middle class?

nigelTheBold wrote:
 

Further, they are able to maintain their economic status due to the stability of society. They partake of the benefits of society. They get more from society than someone who is poor. So why should they not be required to help sustain society?

Some things the rich buy are zero sum(natural resources), others are not. If a rich person buy a huge plot of land, that resource is no longer available to others. If they build a yacht out of renewable materials, it is not zero sum. We have pleanty of laborers available to build things. So if someone builds a yacht it doesn't necessary deprive someone else of anything. In fact it often provides someone with a job they wouldn't otherwise have.

nigelTheBold wrote:
 

And finally, there's that stickler about "earth's natural resources." Who gets to decide who gets those resources? It sure ain't the poor. It's not even the middle class. It's the top 5%, which controls over 80% of the wealth, those with real economic or political power. Do you imagine they're going to give the poor the same rights to access as they are going to give themselves?

This is where people's attitudes have to change. Libertarians and conservatives decry welfare for being wealth without work. But ownership and so-called rights to natural resources amounts to wealth without work, welfare for the rich. Taking advantage of a commodity with limited supply that we all depend on for our survival. It needs to be treated as a privilege. So you have access, you must pay for this privilege. And this is how to finance education and rehabilitation programs that work.

nigelTheBold wrote:
 

There's a huge difference between "liberty" and "freedom." Warren Buffet and I have the same liberties, but he has far more freedom than I do. An ideal libertarian society is predicated by equal freedom, not equal liberty, which will not happen. Not in our lifetimes. The tragedy of the commons pretty much guarantees it.

When does Warren Buffet's wealth ever negatively impact you? If he buys up a bunch of land and puts up a no trespassing sign, this makes this resource unavailable to you. Or he could invest in new businesses, thus reducing the unemployed and creating a product you would want to have.  But the socialists just want to tax him just for having wealth, not for what he does with the wealth. 

And if we decided he needs to be taxed at 80% or more, would he have even been an investor in the first place? So then this tax revenue is not available in any case.

 

Taxation is the price we pay for failing to build a civilized society. The higher the tax level, the greater the failure. A centrally planned totalitarian state represents a complete defeat for the civilized world, while a totally voluntary society represents its ultimate success. --Mark Skousen


nigelTheBold
atheist
nigelTheBold's picture
Posts: 1868
Joined: 2008-01-25
User is offlineOffline
Sorry, not much time at the

Sorry, not much time at the moment. I'll try to get back to this, as I find these conversations interesting. At least, with you they are interesting. Many other libertarians make them tedious and painful. I appreciate your intelligence and even-temper. Anyway, there are a couple of things I wanted to point out.

EXC wrote:

If it is so easy for WalMart or Aetna to make money 'exploiting' workers, why don't more capitalist create a competing business until every unemployed person finds a job being 'exploited'? The fundamental problem is limited natural resources and human overpopulation. Even if socialism could make things 'fair', human population would increase to a level where misery limits any more growth.

Many companies do exploit their workers to the extent of Wal*Mart. My point is, companies can and do exploit their workers. It's just that Wal*Mart is one of the biggest companies in the world, and they don't pay their employees a living wage. This is how large corporations have much more economic clout than the actual workers.

Quote:

nigelTheBold wrote:
 

The problem with all economic systems is simple: those who control the money control the economy.

Right, but if you have a good business plan, you can get a loan. The socialists here keep telling me how massive the health insurance companies profits are but the don't just go to a bank and get a loan to start a competing business that has the coverage rules they want, Why? Every business starts from zero, so this is just lame excuses. If there is a better way, they free market can find a way to make it happen. But what they want isn't about a better economic model, it's about theft.

There's no way in hell I could get a loan to start an insurance company. There's no way you could, either. There's a start-up cost that is impossible to overcome, unless you already have money. This is true of hospitals, credit card companies, and even just a local supermarket. I doubt I could even get a loan to start up a restaurant, let alone start a chain like McDonald's.

Warren Buffet sure could, though.

Quote:

When IBM  and Microsoft had a monopoly, it didn't last. By the time the government pressed it case and the appeals were heard, these monopolies no longer existed. Just a bunch of lawyers got rich. We got the Dell, Compaq, etc... in response to IBMs domination. Then we got Linux in response to Microsofts monopoly. In a free market, monopolies are not going to last except when we allow people to monopolize natural resources.

IBM's monopoly didn't last because of government intervention. The fact of the anti-trust case against IBM altered public perception of IBM. Also, it wasn't Dell or Compaq that ruined IBM's monopoly. This was long before IBM got in the PC game. IBM was a johnny-come-lately to the PC market, well after the Apple ][ started finding its way into corporate offices. (This was paralleled by Microsoft's late entry into the internet, though they turned around in time to force their way into it.)

Microsoft still has a monopoly, though it is finally crumbling. The end is in sight, and maybe they can stop fucking up the industry.

I'd like to point out that the Microsoft foe you mentioned, Linux, had to be created in a communist-like fashion. It had to be created from the ground up by volunteers. The only credible capitalist competitor to Microsoft has been Apple, and it seems that Microsoft has avoided destroying Apple (even to the point of loaning them millions of dollars to help them stay afloat). What happened to DR DOS? Microsoft used its superior market position to destroy it. What happened to BeOS? Microsoft used its superior market position to destroy it. What happened to OS/2? IBM fucked up the marketing so badly, it felt like they were intentionally stabbing it in the back.

What happened to the ODF push? It suffered a great setback when Microsoft used its market clout to push OOXML through IEEE and ISO standards body (showing that a single corporation can even warp consortium standards bodies).

Money isn't everything, of course. Microsoft has still failed to produce an MP3 device worth a damn, and Apple really has the market wrapped up on that one (though is not in a monopoly position, mostly due to the fact that MP3 is essentially an open, though encumbered, standard).

Linux has been around for 18 years. No other OS company could survive 18 years while suffering from poor market share. The only reason Linux has survived is because it is essentially a public trust. Like socialism. Like communism. Very much not like capitalism.

Quote:

And why don't you complain about the monopoly created by labor unions and government workers?

Actually, I do complain about labor unions. They were started for a good cause (so that producers could take some control out of the hands of the corporations, and workers could make a living wage). Now they are just as bad as the corporations they fight against. The workers are caught between the two, and are usually the losers. (Though unions sometimes come through for workers. Corporations seldom do.)

Anyway, I apologize for not addressing everything EXC. I'll try to come back to this later, but I make no promises. I just wanted to respond to the IBM/Microsoft stuff, since that is really were I'm most knowledgeable, and most of my experiences is rooted.

"Yes, I seriously believe that consciousness is a product of a natural process. I find that the neuroscientists, psychologists, and philosophers who proceed from that premise are the ones who are actually making useful contributions to our understanding of the mind." - PZ Myers


Kapkao
atheistSuperfan
Kapkao's picture
Posts: 4121
Joined: 2010-01-12
User is offlineOffline
The Doomed Soul

The Doomed Soul wrote:

Cpt_pineapple wrote:
I'd love to see Doomy and EXC debate morality

 

That... would most certainly be interesting, but im not certain how it would even work

 

Because of....?

“A meritocratic society is one in which inequalities of wealth and social position solely reflect the unequal distribution of merit or skills amongst human beings, or are based upon factors beyond human control, for example luck or chance. Such a society is socially just because individuals are judged not by their gender, the colour of their skin or their religion, but according to their talents and willingness to work, or on what Martin Luther King called 'the content of their character'. By extension, social equality is unjust because it treats unequal individuals equally.” "Political Ideologies" by Andrew Heywood (2003)


Kapkao
atheistSuperfan
Kapkao's picture
Posts: 4121
Joined: 2010-01-12
User is offlineOffline
The Doomed Soul

weeeeee

Double post.


EXC
atheist
EXC's picture
Posts: 4109
Joined: 2008-01-17
User is offlineOffline
nigelTheBold wrote:Many

nigelTheBold wrote:

Many companies do exploit their workers to the extent of Wal*Mart. My point is, companies can and do exploit their workers. It's just that Wal*Mart is one of the biggest companies in the world, and they don't pay their employees a living wage. This is how large corporations have much more economic clout than the actual workers.

And the problem is an oversupply of unskilled labor. Why? A limited supply of natural resources while humans still breed like wild animals. We breed until human misery is the only restraining force. So if you force corporation to pay more for workers, they hire less and pass the costs onto consumers. It doesn't come out of the bottom line because there must be a profit comparable to the risk in starting and running the business.

So the only way out is worker training to increase their value in market and mandatory birth control. Malthus rules until we do this.

nigelTheBold wrote:

There's no way in hell I could get a loan to start an insurance company. There's no way you could, either. There's a start-up cost that is impossible to overcome, unless you already have money. This is true of hospitals, credit card companies, and even just a local supermarket. I doubt I could even get a loan to start up a restaurant, let alone start a chain like McDonald's.

I disagree. All the socialist here have to do is post an add on a leftist web site saying "Screw the insurance companies, let's start a coop for insurance". Just get about 100 people to agree to pay each others medical bill. Everyone's covered, no pre-existing conditions, you can't be dropped. So no corporation  would make any profit, all the money that comes in goes to medical bills. So they'd have their socialized medicine. Farmers start health insurance coops all the time.

They don't do this because they don't want to pay the high expense of good medical coverage. They want to shake down other people. The want something for nothing. The government has men with guns that can take wealth from people so that's why they got to do it that way.

nigelTheBold wrote:

Microsoft still has a monopoly, though it is finally crumbling. The end is in sight, and maybe they can stop fucking up the industry.

Some would say they provided a standardization to an infant industry, otherwise there would have been complete chaos. With their monopoly, we might have to buy 5 different OSs to run all the software we want. Kind of like the model T was to cars, it wasn't great but at least it was accessible to everyone. But in the free market, people invented better ways to get around it.

nigelTheBold wrote:

I'd like to point out that the Microsoft foe you mentioned, Linux, had to be created in a communist-like fashion.

Not at all. Communism is all about putting a gun to people's heads to force them to do what the powerful want.

That's my point if something is rational and makes sense, why do we need to go around having men with guns force it on people?

nigelTheBold wrote:

Actually, I do complain about labor unions. They were started for a good cause (so that producers could take some control out of the hands of the corporations, and workers could make a living wage). Now they are just as bad as the corporations they fight against. The workers are caught between the two, and are usually the losers. (Though unions sometimes come through for workers. Corporations seldom do.)

It always works this way, you become what you hate. The unions became as corrupt as the corporations they fight against. One political party becomes as bad as the one it replaces. The communist party bosses become the new bourgeoisie. The socialists steal because that's what the capitalists do.

In the long run the unions don't do jack. They shook down the auto industry with irrational pay and pensions benefits. All they did was bankrupt the auto companies.

 

Taxation is the price we pay for failing to build a civilized society. The higher the tax level, the greater the failure. A centrally planned totalitarian state represents a complete defeat for the civilized world, while a totally voluntary society represents its ultimate success. --Mark Skousen


EXC
atheist
EXC's picture
Posts: 4109
Joined: 2008-01-17
User is offlineOffline
Magus wrote:So... your a

Magus wrote:

So... your a socialist? or you wish you were?

"Socialism is a hedonists dream"

"I'm an unabashed hedonist"

Well ignorance is bliss, so I probably would be happier living out a life of delusion. But I don't have the ability force myself to believe something that seems so obviously illogical. Or perhaps living out a life of delusion doesn't bring me any continuous pleasure as it obviously does our religious and socialist compadres.

 

Taxation is the price we pay for failing to build a civilized society. The higher the tax level, the greater the failure. A centrally planned totalitarian state represents a complete defeat for the civilized world, while a totally voluntary society represents its ultimate success. --Mark Skousen


EXC
atheist
EXC's picture
Posts: 4109
Joined: 2008-01-17
User is offlineOffline
Kapkao wrote:The Doomed Soul

Kapkao wrote:

The Doomed Soul wrote:

Cpt_pineapple wrote:
I'd love to see Doomy and EXC debate morality

 

That... would most certainly be interesting, but im not certain how it would even work

 

Because of....?

How about it Doomy? You want to tell us what you've ever done or an opionion you have that doesn't demonstrate you're a 100% self-serving amoral bastard? (Just like me).

Taxation is the price we pay for failing to build a civilized society. The higher the tax level, the greater the failure. A centrally planned totalitarian state represents a complete defeat for the civilized world, while a totally voluntary society represents its ultimate success. --Mark Skousen


The Doomed Soul
atheist
The Doomed Soul's picture
Posts: 2148
Joined: 2007-08-31
User is offlineOffline
EXC wrote:How about it

EXC wrote:

How about it Doomy? You want to tell us what you've ever done or an opionion you have that doesn't demonstrate you're a 100% self-serving amoral bastard? (Just like me).

 

... i've decided to let alot of random people live, for no real reason at all... does that count?

 

See, this is really why such a debate between us will do no good... we're too alike in this field

Im not a 100% self-serving amoral bastard... but im pretty fucking close, most of the time

Maybe, if we changed the premise a little bit? or altered the topic to something a smig more specific?

What Would Kharn Do?


nigelTheBold
atheist
nigelTheBold's picture
Posts: 1868
Joined: 2008-01-25
User is offlineOffline
I had a big ol' response

I had a big ol' response about how Microsoft gamed the system and destroyed the economic viability of other companies (and the economic growth that would've been associated with those companies), but I realized that we really do agree on most things here, so I'm not sure what we're really arguing about anymore. Here's the bit that caused this realization:

EXC wrote:

It always works this way, you become what you hate. The unions became as corrupt as the corporations they fight against. One political party becomes as bad as the one it replaces. The communist party bosses become the new bourgeoisie. The socialists steal because that's what the capitalists do.

In the long run the unions don't do jack. They shook down the auto industry with irrational pay and pensions benefits. All they did was bankrupt the auto companies.

This is always the case when I argue politics with conservative friends -- we discover we really do agree on the goals, and on the problems associated with different systems.

BTW: I do believe capitalism is the most efficient economic system. Look at any city in the US, and you can see that it works. Granted, there's socialism there, too, what with roads, power, water,  and waste disposal usually managed by public agencies (though often implemented by private firms). I think that just shows that capitalism and socialism are not mutually exclusive.

Anyway, thanks for the conversation, EXC. I have enjoyed it.

"Yes, I seriously believe that consciousness is a product of a natural process. I find that the neuroscientists, psychologists, and philosophers who proceed from that premise are the ones who are actually making useful contributions to our understanding of the mind." - PZ Myers


EXC
atheist
EXC's picture
Posts: 4109
Joined: 2008-01-17
User is offlineOffline
The Doomed Soul wrote: ...

The Doomed Soul wrote:

 

... i've decided to let alot of random people live, for no real reason at all... does that count?

 

Obviously it didn't bring you much pleasure. You saved the cost of the ammo to do this. Or more likely you didn't want to risk being fresh meat in the penitentiary shower stalls. Sorry but it still demonstrates your true amoral nature.

 

The Doomed Soul wrote:

Im not a 100% self-serving amoral bastard... but im pretty fucking close, most of the time

When it's convenient for you to not appear selfish, you can put on the act, right? You're so good at putting on the act, you even convince yourself your unselfish and compassionate. Oh to be human.

The Doomed Soul wrote:

Maybe, if we changed the premise a little bit? or altered the topic to something a smig more specific?

Something along the lines of rationality should lead us to master morality, slave morality or something entirely different.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master-slave_morality

 

 

Taxation is the price we pay for failing to build a civilized society. The higher the tax level, the greater the failure. A centrally planned totalitarian state represents a complete defeat for the civilized world, while a totally voluntary society represents its ultimate success. --Mark Skousen


atomicdogg34
atheist
atomicdogg34's picture
Posts: 367
Joined: 2009-12-26
User is offlineOffline
"economics in one lesson" by

"economics in one lesson" by henry hazlitt

 

read it


The Doomed Soul
atheist
The Doomed Soul's picture
Posts: 2148
Joined: 2007-08-31
User is offlineOffline
EXC wrote:The Doomed Soul

EXC wrote:

The Doomed Soul wrote:

 

... i've decided to let alot of random people live, for no real reason at all... does that count?

 

Obviously it didn't bring you much pleasure. You saved the cost of the ammo to do this. Or more likely you didn't want to risk being fresh meat in the penitentiary shower stalls. Sorry but it still demonstrates your true amoral nature.

 

None of which ever stopped me before *cough* >.>

IF anything its showing that i tend to be lazy...

 

EXC wrote:

When it's convenient for you to not appear selfish, you can put on the act, right?

Among otherthings... yes

EXC wrote:

You're so good at putting on the act, you even convince yourself your unselfish and compassionate. Oh to be human.

... hey now, thems fightin words, boy...

What Would Kharn Do?


EXC
atheist
EXC's picture
Posts: 4109
Joined: 2008-01-17
User is offlineOffline
The Doomed Soul wrote: ...

The Doomed Soul wrote:

 ... hey now, thems fightin words, boy...

But you're to lazy to fight, remember?

Taxation is the price we pay for failing to build a civilized society. The higher the tax level, the greater the failure. A centrally planned totalitarian state represents a complete defeat for the civilized world, while a totally voluntary society represents its ultimate success. --Mark Skousen


The Doomed Soul
atheist
The Doomed Soul's picture
Posts: 2148
Joined: 2007-08-31
User is offlineOffline
EXC wrote:The Doomed Soul

EXC wrote:

The Doomed Soul wrote:

 ... hey now, thems fightin words, boy...

But you're to lazy to fight, remember?

 

no no, it was "I was possibly to lazy to kill a bunch of random people for unknown reasons"

 

... I know you, and im sure i could think up a reason or 12 to put an end to you...

Ya, thats right... im moral enough to need a REASON to kill you, albeit a "Doomy reason"  , but a reason none the less!

What Would Kharn Do?