Why pick on Kent Hovind?
Not that I like the guy or anything, but he seems to be the whipping boy for numerous websites. Even RRS has a top level link for him.
I know for certain that atheists think he has bad arguments, but that not all. Many Christians, even a large number of young earthers, think his arguments are bad. Answers in Genesis released a statement listing arguments not to use, many of which Kent Hovind uses.
Would it not be more profitable to discuss things written by WL Craig, NT Wright, or Doug Geivit, Paul Copan, or Alister McGrath? Anydanyway...whether I agree with these guys are not, there writings are certainly more stimulating.
“Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid.”