Answers in #%#@$ Genesis?!?
Some of you may know that I've been trying to find the common source for all this nonsense about "worldview" that Paisley, AtheismIsNonsense, caposkia, truden, et al have been peddling. They use the same words to express the same ideas, and often defeat arguments that nobody has raised (strangely, they all use the same ones).
So I decided to Google "materialistic worldview", as they all use that as a phrase, and "worldview" as a compound word, which is unusual in English.
Look what I #@#*$^&#$ found:
Yeah. That's right, we've been arguing with a gentleman named Jason Lisle through what can only be described as random minions.
Reviews of Mr. Lisle's works are often more entertaining than the original work:
But I can't help but feel a little let down. I admit that my arguments are often not as good as, say, nigel's, Bob's, Hamby's, todangst's, deludedgod's (actually, I could just keep going, so let's stop there), so I'll borrow ideas from those guys, and re-work them in a way that makes sense to me. But using someone else's stuff verbatim? That's just embarrassing.
If I've been arguing with Jason Lisle this whole time, could you guys please pick up another book? Maybe two? If your victory is so obviously assured, then maybe you can do some research yourselves. Y'know, start at Plato. Because that's where Dr. Lisle started, and who knows? You might come up with something good.
Saint Will: no gyration without funkstification.
fabulae! nil satis firmi video quam ob rem accipere hunc mi expediat metum. - Terence