Canadian Lawyer Group Starts Proceedings To Ban Bush From Canada
Posted on: March 12, 2009 - 10:51am
Offline
Canadian Lawyer Group Starts Proceedings To Ban Bush From Canada
LAW claims that (George W.)Bush is "inadmissable to Canada under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act...because of overwhelming evidence that he has committed, outside Canada, torture and other offences referred to in sections 4 to 7 of the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act".
Enlightened Atheist, Gaming God.
- Login to post comments
heheh... as if Bush can ever leave the country anyway. Talk about building your own prison.
Anyway, kudos to the Canucks. I hope the rest of the world follows suit.
Atheism isn't a lot like religion at all. Unless by "religion" you mean "not religion". --Ciarin
http://hambydammit.wordpress.com/
Books about atheism
OK, I am confused. Is he trying to buy a house there? If not, then why use an immigration law against him?
=
Umm... AIG, they're using laws from the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act in order to prevent him entry into Canada. Entry into Canada would be covered under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. It's the only law that would apply... far as I know. Specifically, Division 4, paragraph 35 of the Immigration and Refugree Protection Act where it references the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act. The Act (Immigration...) is not specifically limited to people seeking to immigrate permanetly or to those seeking refugee status.
Anyhow, while I doubt this is being taken quite seriously, it certainly sends a paticular message regarding Mr. Bush.
BigUniverse wrote,
"Well the things that happen less often are more likely to be the result of the supper natural. A thing like loosing my keys in the morning is not likely supper natural, but finding a thousand dollars or meeting a celebrity might be."
Bush can't leave the U.S. anyway. He would be taken to the World Court for his crimes.
For years, the world court and/or congress has had ample evidence of the committance of war crimes and human rights violations within the 43rd administration. The fact that these outrageously arrogant and heinous individuals have gone uncharged by the above groups is itself an outrage. Hang 'em high!
Do process can be such a pain in the ass!!!!!!!!!!!!
For the World Court to charge: they need a plaintiff. To my knowlege no one has complained about G.W.Bush or his favorite ass kissers yet, at least in legal written complaints, yet!!!!!!!!!!!!
G.W.Bush has come already; made his speach (and money) and left (or in his case--RIGHT). Why bitch about it?
Bitch and complain all you want about ANY country's legal system; up untill you are the one charged with a crime, then your bitching and complaining will rotate 180 degrees.
"Very funny Scotty; now beam down our clothes."
VEGETARIAN: Ancient Hindu word for "lousy hunter"
If man was formed from dirt, why is there still dirt?