Is this argument logical?
Not my argument:
Believing in X is a rationally justifiable action if believing in X has positive consequences - i.e. a positive effect on the person's psychology. Whether X is true or false is irrelevant.
Let X be a religious claim, such as god exists, or Jesus rose from the dead, or an angel supports me, etc.
"It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring" -- Carl Sagan