It works for me!

Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
It works for me!

 

Faith in Jesus works for me - it's exciting.  I love the Bible and believe all of it - though there is mystery.  There is mystery everywhere though, right?  I am a incredibly happy believer in Jesus.  I'm not a theologian, I just believe in Jesus.

I understand you can't make anybody believe in Jesus and the Bible, and I don't personally try to do that.  But I highly recommend it from my experience with it.  I can't get enough of the Bible or Jesus.  I can't imagine trying to navigate through life without it at this point in my life. 

I don't think Jesus or God is a thing you can prove to somebody.  I heard about it a large percentage of my life and it didn't mean anything to me until a certain point - then that all changed. 

So do you guys think that I'm fooling myself, not really happy, you don't believe me, or do you really think I can't be as happy or enlightened as you - are you evangelistic in that sense or what?  What is the purpose of this site?   Do you have something better to offer?  If so, what is your gospel? 

 


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
GOD'S - CPR

jcgadfly wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

BobSpence1 wrote:

Scientific 'answer' to death?

Our brain/mind stops functioning, along with the rest of our body, and our consciousness fades into the nothing it came from during our growth in our mother's womb and after.

As the philosopher Bertrand Russell said:

Quote:

I believe that when I die I shall rot, and nothing of my ego will survive. I am not young and I love life. But I should scorn to shiver with terror at the thought of annihilation. Happiness is nonetheless true happiness because it must come to an end, nor do thought and love lose their value because they are not everlasting. Many a man has borne himself proudly on the scaffold; surely the same pride should teach us to think truly about man's place in the world. Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cosy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigour, and the great spaces have a splendour of their own.

What 'experiment' did you have in mind??

 

 

BobSpence1,

That's about as far as science can go with death - it's not something you get much practice at, so the scientific method doesn't bring back any reports about what's beyond it.  It's a fate we will all share, this we know.  The train is rolling down the track, the clock is ticking - I've been alive over 2 3/4 billion seconds, and they are ticking on and becoming less and less a percentage of my whole life. 

Then there's the philosopher who suggests - though he has no hope or answer - let a smile be your umbrella.  Carry your hopeless pride to the grave, don't let them see you sweat - bear yourself proudly on the scaffold so others will be emboldened to die without hope, without answer, keep the lie alive.  Though you are afraid, show no fear proud man.  Think about how real it has been proved by its unreal end.

For many of those 2 billion + seconds I was caught by death, chained by it.  I had an advance payment on it with more to come upon scientific annihilation.  The trap has been broken by Christ and I have escaped.  My spirit soars like a bird.  I am alive in the One Who has tasted Death for every man and Who is the Death of Death for all who have been "born again" in Him.  Death had no claim on Him - our Samson carried the gates, posts and hinges to the top of the hill. 

Death has no sting, no victory for those of us in Christ.  For about 1 1/2 billion seconds now I have been enjoying eternal life, which is knowing Christ alive in me.  I have an earnest of my inheritance now which I don't have to give back, the Gift of the Holy Spirit which I received when "born again" of the water and the Spirit.  My tent is getting a little worn, still portable, waterproof - but my tent is not me.  I am not hiding a lie in my tent with a front of false pride as my seconds tick steadily toward sleep with my fathers - those who shared like faith.  I'm looking forward to that but I'm in the greatest of company and joy now - Christ and the saints. 

I was just reading about the New Jerusalem - the new heaven and new earth (after this one has passed away).  The holy city, the New Jerusalem coming down out of heaven from God, prepared like a bride dressed up for her husband.  Everything is new.  There's no temple - the LORD God Almighty and the Lamb are the Temple.  There's no street lights - the Glory of God is the light.  There's no night.  The gates are never shut.  The river of the water of life, clear as crystal flows through the center street with the tree of life on the sides.  Think how you will regret being kept out by boldly carrying a lie to death.  Outside are the dogs and sorcerers, fornicators, murderers, idolaters and everyone who loves and practices falsehood proudly on the scaffold.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If death has no sting and the grave has no victory over you - why do you still have the fear of them? Why are you so jealous of those who have no fear without resorting to magic?

I hesitate to ask how you've pulled off "eternal life" for the last 47 years - you might tell me that you've been saved since coming from the womb.

 

JcGadfly,

I have been rescued from the fear of death by God's CPR - grace in Christ.  As far as those you mentioned, to whom sin and death are no concern - the dirt is no burden to those in the grave.  It is said a drowning man is asleep - it's when you start to revive him he feels sharp pain.

As for the question you hesitate to ask:  for you eternal life would have to be by definition rather than imagined - like vector calculus.  You couldn't diagram and solve it.  Here it is:  Eternal life is knowing the living Christ. 

Death is being overcome by Life - His Life. My tent is going downhill, but the treasure inside is being renewed and getting brighter.

 

 


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
Atheistextremist

Atheistextremist wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

 

Carry your hopeless pride to the grave, don't let them see you sweat - bear yourself proudly on the scaffold so others will be emboldened to die without hope, without answer, keep the lie alive.  Though you are afraid, show no fear proud man.  Think about how real it has been proved by its unreal end.

For many of those 2 billion + seconds I was caught by death, chained by it.  I had an advance payment on it with more to come upon scientific annihilation.  The trap has been broken by Christ and I have escaped.  My spirit soars like a bird.  I am alive in the One Who has tasted Death for every man and Who is the Death of Death for all who have been "born again" in Him.  Death had no claim on Him - our Samson carried the gates, posts and hinges to the top of the hill. 

Death has no sting, no victory for those of us in Christ.  For about 1 1/2 billion seconds now I have been enjoying eternal life, which is knowing Christ alive in me.  I have an earnest of my inheritance now which I don't have to give back, the Gift of the Holy Spirit which I received when "born again" of the water and the Spirit.  My tent is getting a little worn, still portable, waterproof - but my tent is not me.  I am not hiding a lie in my tent with a front of false pride as my seconds tick steadily toward sleep with my fathers - those who shared like faith.  I'm looking forward to that but I'm in the greatest of company and joy now - Christ and the saints. 

I was just reading about the New Jerusalem - the new heaven and new earth (after this one has passed away).  The holy city, the New Jerusalem coming down out of heaven from God, prepared like a bride dressed up for her husband.  Everything is new.  There's no temple - the LORD God Almighty and the Lamb are the Temple.  There's no street lights - the Glory of God is the light.  There's no night.  The gates are never shut.  The river of the water of life, clear as crystal flows through the center street with the tree of life on the sides.  Think how you will regret being kept out by boldly carrying a lie to death.  Outside are the dogs and sorcerers, fornicators, murderers, idolaters and everyone who loves and practices falsehood proudly on the scaffold. 

 

It amazes me how polite everyone is to you as you point your vile doctrine at us like a tommygun. Fonzie, you can turn your new jerusalem sideways and shove it up your arse. You are going into the ground and the bugs you descended from will snack on what's left of your pea-like brain. I can't imagine they'll get much of a meal.

 

 

 

 

 

Atheistextreemist,

 

I think it's because atheists are different - you can't attribute things one says and does to another.  Like Christians. 

 

 

 


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:jcgadfly

Fonzie wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

BobSpence1 wrote:

Scientific 'answer' to death?

Our brain/mind stops functioning, along with the rest of our body, and our consciousness fades into the nothing it came from during our growth in our mother's womb and after.

As the philosopher Bertrand Russell said:

Quote:

I believe that when I die I shall rot, and nothing of my ego will survive. I am not young and I love life. But I should scorn to shiver with terror at the thought of annihilation. Happiness is nonetheless true happiness because it must come to an end, nor do thought and love lose their value because they are not everlasting. Many a man has borne himself proudly on the scaffold; surely the same pride should teach us to think truly about man's place in the world. Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cosy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigour, and the great spaces have a splendour of their own.

What 'experiment' did you have in mind??

 

 

BobSpence1,

That's about as far as science can go with death - it's not something you get much practice at, so the scientific method doesn't bring back any reports about what's beyond it.  It's a fate we will all share, this we know.  The train is rolling down the track, the clock is ticking - I've been alive over 2 3/4 billion seconds, and they are ticking on and becoming less and less a percentage of my whole life. 

Then there's the philosopher who suggests - though he has no hope or answer - let a smile be your umbrella.  Carry your hopeless pride to the grave, don't let them see you sweat - bear yourself proudly on the scaffold so others will be emboldened to die without hope, without answer, keep the lie alive.  Though you are afraid, show no fear proud man.  Think about how real it has been proved by its unreal end.

For many of those 2 billion + seconds I was caught by death, chained by it.  I had an advance payment on it with more to come upon scientific annihilation.  The trap has been broken by Christ and I have escaped.  My spirit soars like a bird.  I am alive in the One Who has tasted Death for every man and Who is the Death of Death for all who have been "born again" in Him.  Death had no claim on Him - our Samson carried the gates, posts and hinges to the top of the hill. 

Death has no sting, no victory for those of us in Christ.  For about 1 1/2 billion seconds now I have been enjoying eternal life, which is knowing Christ alive in me.  I have an earnest of my inheritance now which I don't have to give back, the Gift of the Holy Spirit which I received when "born again" of the water and the Spirit.  My tent is getting a little worn, still portable, waterproof - but my tent is not me.  I am not hiding a lie in my tent with a front of false pride as my seconds tick steadily toward sleep with my fathers - those who shared like faith.  I'm looking forward to that but I'm in the greatest of company and joy now - Christ and the saints. 

I was just reading about the New Jerusalem - the new heaven and new earth (after this one has passed away).  The holy city, the New Jerusalem coming down out of heaven from God, prepared like a bride dressed up for her husband.  Everything is new.  There's no temple - the LORD God Almighty and the Lamb are the Temple.  There's no street lights - the Glory of God is the light.  There's no night.  The gates are never shut.  The river of the water of life, clear as crystal flows through the center street with the tree of life on the sides.  Think how you will regret being kept out by boldly carrying a lie to death.  Outside are the dogs and sorcerers, fornicators, murderers, idolaters and everyone who loves and practices falsehood proudly on the scaffold.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If death has no sting and the grave has no victory over you - why do you still have the fear of them? Why are you so jealous of those who have no fear without resorting to magic?

I hesitate to ask how you've pulled off "eternal life" for the last 47 years - you might tell me that you've been saved since coming from the womb.

 

JcGadfly,

I have been rescued from the fear of death by God's CPR - grace in Christ.  As far as those you mentioned, to whom sin and death are no concern - the dirt is no burden to those in the grave.  It is said a drowning man is asleep - it's when you start to revive him he feels sharp pain.

As for the question you hesitate to ask:  for you eternal life would have to be by definition rather than imagined - like vector calculus.  You couldn't diagram and solve it.  Here it is:  Eternal life is knowing the living Christ. 

Death is being overcome by Life - His Life. My tent is going downhill, but the treasure inside is being renewed and getting brighter.

 

 

You've been rescued from the fear by what instilled the fear in you to begin with? Isn't that like being rescued from addiction by the pusher who keeps selling you drugs?

Death is a natural part of things - looking at that provides no fear. It is only when the man-made element of religion is added that the fear comes in.

What I was asking you before was when you got saved - I still expect you to tell me that you've been saved for 47 years and you are only 47.

Again, why do you still fear what supposedly has been overcome? Is it doubt or a defense mechanism?

As for what you told AE - you are correct. We are responsible for what we say and do. We can't pass it off on a God or a devil as the Christians do. It must be nice to not have to take responsibility for one's actions.

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie

Fonzie wrote:

 Atheistextreemist,

 

I think it's because atheists are different - you can't attribute things one says and does to another.  Like Christians. 

 

But he didn't attribute anything another christian said to you. He was talking about your post, which he summed up quite accurately.


mellestad
Moderator
Posts: 2929
Joined: 2009-08-19
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:jcgadfly

Fonzie wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

BobSpence1 wrote:

Scientific 'answer' to death?

Our brain/mind stops functioning, along with the rest of our body, and our consciousness fades into the nothing it came from during our growth in our mother's womb and after.

As the philosopher Bertrand Russell said:

Quote:

I believe that when I die I shall rot, and nothing of my ego will survive. I am not young and I love life. But I should scorn to shiver with terror at the thought of annihilation. Happiness is nonetheless true happiness because it must come to an end, nor do thought and love lose their value because they are not everlasting. Many a man has borne himself proudly on the scaffold; surely the same pride should teach us to think truly about man's place in the world. Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cosy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigour, and the great spaces have a splendour of their own.

What 'experiment' did you have in mind??

 

 

BobSpence1,

That's about as far as science can go with death - it's not something you get much practice at, so the scientific method doesn't bring back any reports about what's beyond it.  It's a fate we will all share, this we know.  The train is rolling down the track, the clock is ticking - I've been alive over 2 3/4 billion seconds, and they are ticking on and becoming less and less a percentage of my whole life. 

Then there's the philosopher who suggests - though he has no hope or answer - let a smile be your umbrella.  Carry your hopeless pride to the grave, don't let them see you sweat - bear yourself proudly on the scaffold so others will be emboldened to die without hope, without answer, keep the lie alive.  Though you are afraid, show no fear proud man.  Think about how real it has been proved by its unreal end.

For many of those 2 billion + seconds I was caught by death, chained by it.  I had an advance payment on it with more to come upon scientific annihilation.  The trap has been broken by Christ and I have escaped.  My spirit soars like a bird.  I am alive in the One Who has tasted Death for every man and Who is the Death of Death for all who have been "born again" in Him.  Death had no claim on Him - our Samson carried the gates, posts and hinges to the top of the hill. 

Death has no sting, no victory for those of us in Christ.  For about 1 1/2 billion seconds now I have been enjoying eternal life, which is knowing Christ alive in me.  I have an earnest of my inheritance now which I don't have to give back, the Gift of the Holy Spirit which I received when "born again" of the water and the Spirit.  My tent is getting a little worn, still portable, waterproof - but my tent is not me.  I am not hiding a lie in my tent with a front of false pride as my seconds tick steadily toward sleep with my fathers - those who shared like faith.  I'm looking forward to that but I'm in the greatest of company and joy now - Christ and the saints. 

I was just reading about the New Jerusalem - the new heaven and new earth (after this one has passed away).  The holy city, the New Jerusalem coming down out of heaven from God, prepared like a bride dressed up for her husband.  Everything is new.  There's no temple - the LORD God Almighty and the Lamb are the Temple.  There's no street lights - the Glory of God is the light.  There's no night.  The gates are never shut.  The river of the water of life, clear as crystal flows through the center street with the tree of life on the sides.  Think how you will regret being kept out by boldly carrying a lie to death.  Outside are the dogs and sorcerers, fornicators, murderers, idolaters and everyone who loves and practices falsehood proudly on the scaffold.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If death has no sting and the grave has no victory over you - why do you still have the fear of them? Why are you so jealous of those who have no fear without resorting to magic?

I hesitate to ask how you've pulled off "eternal life" for the last 47 years - you might tell me that you've been saved since coming from the womb.

 

JcGadfly,

I have been rescued from the fear of death by God's CPR - grace in Christ.  As far as those you mentioned, to whom sin and death are no concern - the dirt is no burden to those in the grave.  It is said a drowning man is asleep - it's when you start to revive him he feels sharp pain.

As for the question you hesitate to ask:  for you eternal life would have to be by definition rather than imagined - like vector calculus.  You couldn't diagram and solve it.  Here it is:  Eternal life is knowing the living Christ. 

Death is being overcome by Life - His Life. My tent is going downhill, but the treasure inside is being renewed and getting brighter.

 

 

Lol.  That is a shining example of what I was complaining about earlier.  Our little Chic tract.

Everything makes more sense now that I've stopped believing.


Fonzie
TheistardTroll
Fonzie's picture
Posts: 1152
Joined: 2008-08-31
User is offlineOffline
GIVE IT A THINK

 

 

Hi BobSpence1,

I just enjoyed a little science - thought of you: 


   http://www.flixxy.com/hubble-ultra-deep-field-3d.htm

 

 

 


robj101
atheist
robj101's picture
Posts: 2481
Joined: 2010-02-20
User is offlineOffline
This thread reminds me of

This thread reminds me of this, right down to all the lovely unctuousness.

 


BobSpence
High Level DonorRational VIP!ScientistWebsite Admin
BobSpence's picture
Posts: 5939
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:  Hi

Fonzie wrote:

 

 

Hi BobSpence1,

I just enjoyed a little science - thought of you: 
 
  http://www.flixxy.com/hubble-ultra-deep-field-3d.htm

Fascinating, isn't it. All those things that don't even get mentioned in Genesis, IOW, the bulk of the Universe. They don't even qualify as things to light the heavens, since they are totally invisible to the eye.

Favorite oxymorons: Gospel Truth, Rational Supernaturalist, Business Ethics, Christian Morality

"Theology is now little more than a branch of human ignorance. Indeed, it is ignorance with wings." - Sam Harris

The path to Truth lies via careful study of reality, not the dreams of our fallible minds - me

From the sublime to the ridiculous: Science -> Philosophy -> Theology


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
Fonzie wrote:   

 

"Give it a think", you say ? Yes ! Please do !

 


Musicdude
Theist
Musicdude's picture
Posts: 239
Joined: 2007-05-18
User is offlineOffline
BobSpence1 wrote:Musicdude,

BobSpence1 wrote:

Musicdude, you were joking there, weren't you?

Yes, I was.

Quote:
All that was being said that all those individual beliefs are in the category of being held by various individuals based purely on personal experience or conviction, in the absence of objective evidence, as is your particular bunch of crap.

I didn't fully realize just how absurd the Bible could be until I read Revelation.

Why is it so absurd?

 

Is it that it's so bold as to predict the future with a lot of detail?

If that's all, then all it would take is for the predictions to come true (including all the details) and it would no longer be absurd, right?

 

Or is it all the colorful symbolism, the four-headed creatures with 10 horns and all that stuff? You do realize those were not real, don't you? They were just a vision that God put in John's head, and God explained to him what they all meant in the literal sense. Not everything in Revelation is allegorical though. Only the parts that are explained as allegory.

 

"For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God." 1Cor 1:18


BobSpence
High Level DonorRational VIP!ScientistWebsite Admin
BobSpence's picture
Posts: 5939
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
Musicdude wrote:BobSpence1

Musicdude wrote:

BobSpence1 wrote:

Musicdude, you were joking there, weren't you?

Yes, I was.

Quote:
All that was being said that all those individual beliefs are in the category of being held by various individuals based purely on personal experience or conviction, in the absence of objective evidence, as is your particular bunch of crap.

I didn't fully realize just how absurd the Bible could be until I read Revelation.

Why is it so absurd?

 

Is it that it's so bold as to predict the future with a lot of detail?

If that's all, then all it would take is for the predictions to come true (including all the details) and it would no longer be absurd, right?

 

Or is it all the colorful symbolism, the four-headed creatures with 10 horns and all that stuff? You do realize those were not real, don't you? They were just a vision that God put in John's head, and God explained to him what they all meant in the literal sense. Not everything in Revelation is allegorical though. Only the parts that are explained as allegory.

 

Of course all the fanciful imagery doesn't help give it credibility, reinforces the suspicion it was all dreamed up in some sort of drug-induced fantasy.

Then where various more specific things are mentioned, such as numbers of people involved, they are so clearly based on the population sizes in that region at that time, and totally out of whack with the population levels of today.

Other parts are just so obscure , without any obvious reference, they lend themselves to after-the-fact matching to a whole range of possible actual events, like most such 'predictions', such as those of Nostradamus.

It was a few years ago now that I heard it read, so I can't remember all the details that had me face-palming, but my final impression was that it was far more pathetic than I had assumed.

The basic problem with all such 'predictions' in the Bible is they clearly envisaged the return etc to be something that was expected within the lifetimes of many of Jesus' followers:

Mark 9:1: " And he said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That there be some of them that stand here, which shall not taste of death, till they have seen the kingdom of God come with power."

There are many passages which convey this same impression, including Revelation itself:

Rev 1.1: The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass;

Rev 1.3: for the time is at hand.

And yes I have heard many of the attempts to redefine the words in such passages to try and make them credible, but the simplest explanation is most likely correct - they really believed this, and they were wrong, just as has every 'the end is nigh' prediction since.

 

I'm sorry, only a committed (and naive) believer could read that stuff without a continuous LOL.

Favorite oxymorons: Gospel Truth, Rational Supernaturalist, Business Ethics, Christian Morality

"Theology is now little more than a branch of human ignorance. Indeed, it is ignorance with wings." - Sam Harris

The path to Truth lies via careful study of reality, not the dreams of our fallible minds - me

From the sublime to the ridiculous: Science -> Philosophy -> Theology


Musicdude
Theist
Musicdude's picture
Posts: 239
Joined: 2007-05-18
User is offlineOffline
BobSpence1 wrote:Quote:Then

BobSpence1 wrote:

Then where various more specific things are mentioned, such as numbers of people involved, they are so clearly based on the population sizes in that region at that time, and totally out of whack with the population levels of today.

I know you said it's been a while and you don't remember all the details. But I'd like to hear specifically what numbers you are referring to here.

Quote:
Other parts are just so obscure , without any obvious reference, they lend themselves to after-the-fact matching to a whole range of possible actual events, like most such 'predictions', such as those of Nostradamus.

There are enough parts that are extremely specific, and since this is not a random bunch of predictions as Nostradamus', but an entire revelation to be taken as a whole, the specific and obscure taken together, and if they all are fulfilled, they would prove their own validity.

If everything in that book were to come true in your lifetime, would it change your mind about Jesus Christ?

Quote:
It was a few years ago now that I heard it read, so I can't remember all the details that had me face-palming, but my final impression was that it was far more pathetic than I had assumed.

Were you ever a Christian before? Because revelation requires some understanding about Christianity to really be fully understood. It's no coincidence that it's the last book in the bible. It needs to be read in context with the rest of the bible.

Quote:
The basic problem with all such 'predictions' in the Bible is they clearly envisaged the return etc to be something that was expected within the lifetimes of many of Jesus' followers:

Mark 9:1: " And he said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That there be some of them that stand here, which shall not taste of death, till they have seen the kingdom of God come with power."

There are many passages which convey this same impression, including Revelation itself:

Rev 1.1: The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass;

Rev 1.3: for the time is at hand.

And yes I have heard many of the attempts to redefine the words in such passages to try and make them credible, but the simplest explanation is most likely correct - they really believed this, and they were wrong, just as has every 'the end is nigh' prediction since.

Yeah, I'm looking into the verses in gospels, I don't really have an answer for that right now. I do know that the "kingdom of God" is not heaven. It's the body of believers. And that exists now. But that probably is not sufficient to convince an atheist. As far as the verses in Revelation are concerned, I would ask this question. What is "soon" or "near" to God? With regard to eternity, if His return was in a 1000 years, that would be soon, wouldn't it?

 

Quote:
I'm sorry, only a committed (and naive) believer could read that stuff without a continuous LOL.

Not to invoke Mr. Pascal, but you'd better hope you're right. It's gonna suck for you if you're wrong.

You'd better be truly convinced that there is no Yahweh, and not just on the popular bandwagon. Because your friends who all agree with you aren't responsible for the decisions you make. You are, and if anyone is ever held accountable for your decisions (which I know you don't believe) it will be you. So YOU had better be sure. How sure are you? With the knowledge you have right now, are you willing to bet your life? If there is an eternal state, are you willing to gamble that as well? If you are, so be it. If not, then maybe you have some more research to do, and I don't mean re-reading The God Delusion for the 10th time.

 

 

"For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God." 1Cor 1:18


Musicdude
Theist
Musicdude's picture
Posts: 239
Joined: 2007-05-18
User is offlineOffline
robj101 wrote:Fonzie

robj101 wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

 

Faith in Jesus works for me - it's exciting.  I love the Bible and believe all of it - though there is mystery.  There is mystery everywhere though, right?  I am a incredibly happy believer in Jesus.  I'm not a theologian, I just believe in Jesus.

I understand you can't make anybody believe in Jesus and the Bible, and I don't personally try to do that.  But I highly recommend it from my experience with it.  I can't get enough of the Bible or Jesus.  I can't imagine trying to navigate through life without it at this point in my life. 

I don't think Jesus or God is a thing you can prove to somebody.  I heard about it a large percentage of my life and it didn't mean anything to me until a certain point - then that all changed. 

So do you guys think that I'm fooling myself, not really happy, you don't believe me, or do you really think I can't be as happy or enlightened as you - are you evangelistic in that sense or what?  What is the purpose of this site?   Do you have something better to offer?  If so, what is your gospel? 

 

Getting up in the moring, taking a shower, going to work, comming back home, watching a movie, playing a video game, walking my dogs, hanging out with friends etc etc, works for me.

One would have to be pretty weak minded to require an imaginary friend to help them through life.

The only thing a god does is give you answers for questions you can't answer with certainty yourself. Will you look for water or wait for someone to come along and give you an empty glass so you can smile as you tip it up.

 

Wrong. God does not do for us, what we are too lazy to do for ourselves. He does what we are incapable of. And helping us with our daily routine is the least of it, (though I agree it seems to be the emphasis of modern Christian preaching.)

"For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God." 1Cor 1:18


mellestad
Moderator
Posts: 2929
Joined: 2009-08-19
User is offlineOffline
Musicdude wrote:BobSpence1

Musicdude wrote:

BobSpence1 wrote:

Musicdude, you were joking there, weren't you?

Yes, I was.

I can't tell when a theist is benig ironic.  My irony meter is broken.

Everything makes more sense now that I've stopped believing.


Musicdude
Theist
Musicdude's picture
Posts: 239
Joined: 2007-05-18
User is offlineOffline
mellestad wrote:I don't get

mellestad wrote:

I don't get it Fonz.  We have no data about any kind of afterlife.  Why would we assume that it exists just because the Bible says so?

 

But that attitude that you are displaying right in this post, "why assume anything will happen after death?" is extremely rare.

 

First you assume there is no evidence. If that is true, then the majority of the people on this earth are highly irrational people. Which means you are probably irrational like the rest of humanity, and really shouldn't leave matters of eternal life or death up to your own lacking rationality. Pssst....This is where the arrogance of atheism comes in. They really do think they are the exception to the rule, and smarter and more rational than everybody else.

Second, the fact that the majority of mankind believes in life after death is evidence enough to pursue an answer. Also creation it'self is evidence.

 

And you say God did nothing for us? He put in us the inclination that there is life after death, and only a few (like yourself) deny it over and over again until you can ignore your natural intuition. But it still testifies to a Creator. You just don't listen to it anymore. It is very unnatural for humans to believe in nothing. That's why this whole fascade that there is no reason whatsoever to even consider the possibility of a Creator, is nothing more than a debate tactic that doesn't work.

Inside this very small roped off area of cyber-space where Atheism rules, and Theism is the very unpopular second choice at best, you can create the illusion that the idea of God is preposterous. But anywhere else in the world, the tables would be turned, and your assertions would be the preposterous ones. And the burden of proof would be on you. A burden you can't carry, by the way. Evidence for God abounds, if you simply open your eyes and your mind. It's not my job to prove it to anyone. It's my job to tell you the truth about what God has taught me. After you have been informed of who Jesus Christ is, and what He did for you, and what you must do, you must then make a decision. I can't make it for you. If I could, I would.  That is the end of my responsibility to you as a fellow human. It is not required or expected or even possible for me to convince you by arguing. It doesn't work that way.

 

"For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God." 1Cor 1:18


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Musicdude wrote:robj101

Musicdude wrote:

robj101 wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

 

Faith in Jesus works for me - it's exciting.  I love the Bible and believe all of it - though there is mystery.  There is mystery everywhere though, right?  I am a incredibly happy believer in Jesus.  I'm not a theologian, I just believe in Jesus.

I understand you can't make anybody believe in Jesus and the Bible, and I don't personally try to do that.  But I highly recommend it from my experience with it.  I can't get enough of the Bible or Jesus.  I can't imagine trying to navigate through life without it at this point in my life. 

I don't think Jesus or God is a thing you can prove to somebody.  I heard about it a large percentage of my life and it didn't mean anything to me until a certain point - then that all changed. 

So do you guys think that I'm fooling myself, not really happy, you don't believe me, or do you really think I can't be as happy or enlightened as you - are you evangelistic in that sense or what?  What is the purpose of this site?   Do you have something better to offer?  If so, what is your gospel? 

 

Getting up in the moring, taking a shower, going to work, comming back home, watching a movie, playing a video game, walking my dogs, hanging out with friends etc etc, works for me.

One would have to be pretty weak minded to require an imaginary friend to help them through life.

The only thing a god does is give you answers for questions you can't answer with certainty yourself. Will you look for water or wait for someone to come along and give you an empty glass so you can smile as you tip it up.

 

Wrong. God does not do for us, what we are too lazy to do for ourselves. He does what we are incapable of. And helping us with our daily routine is the least of it, (though I agree it seems to be the emphasis of modern Christian preaching.)

What are humans incapable of? After all, they created the god under discussion (along with many others).

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


Musicdude
Theist
Musicdude's picture
Posts: 239
Joined: 2007-05-18
User is offlineOffline
jcgadfly wrote:Musicdude

jcgadfly wrote:

Musicdude wrote:

robj101 wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

 

Faith in Jesus works for me - it's exciting.  I love the Bible and believe all of it - though there is mystery.  There is mystery everywhere though, right?  I am a incredibly happy believer in Jesus.  I'm not a theologian, I just believe in Jesus.

I understand you can't make anybody believe in Jesus and the Bible, and I don't personally try to do that.  But I highly recommend it from my experience with it.  I can't get enough of the Bible or Jesus.  I can't imagine trying to navigate through life without it at this point in my life. 

I don't think Jesus or God is a thing you can prove to somebody.  I heard about it a large percentage of my life and it didn't mean anything to me until a certain point - then that all changed. 

So do you guys think that I'm fooling myself, not really happy, you don't believe me, or do you really think I can't be as happy or enlightened as you - are you evangelistic in that sense or what?  What is the purpose of this site?   Do you have something better to offer?  If so, what is your gospel? 

 

Getting up in the moring, taking a shower, going to work, comming back home, watching a movie, playing a video game, walking my dogs, hanging out with friends etc etc, works for me.

One would have to be pretty weak minded to require an imaginary friend to help them through life.

The only thing a god does is give you answers for questions you can't answer with certainty yourself. Will you look for water or wait for someone to come along and give you an empty glass so you can smile as you tip it up.

 

Wrong. God does not do for us, what we are too lazy to do for ourselves. He does what we are incapable of. And helping us with our daily routine is the least of it, (though I agree it seems to be the emphasis of modern Christian preaching.)

What are humans incapable of? After all, they created the god under discussion (along with many others).

 

Paying the debt they owe their Creator for blatently breaking His laws.

 

"For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God." 1Cor 1:18


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Musicdude wrote:jcgadfly

Musicdude wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

Musicdude wrote:

robj101 wrote:

Fonzie wrote:

 

Faith in Jesus works for me - it's exciting.  I love the Bible and believe all of it - though there is mystery.  There is mystery everywhere though, right?  I am a incredibly happy believer in Jesus.  I'm not a theologian, I just believe in Jesus.

I understand you can't make anybody believe in Jesus and the Bible, and I don't personally try to do that.  But I highly recommend it from my experience with it.  I can't get enough of the Bible or Jesus.  I can't imagine trying to navigate through life without it at this point in my life. 

I don't think Jesus or God is a thing you can prove to somebody.  I heard about it a large percentage of my life and it didn't mean anything to me until a certain point - then that all changed. 

So do you guys think that I'm fooling myself, not really happy, you don't believe me, or do you really think I can't be as happy or enlightened as you - are you evangelistic in that sense or what?  What is the purpose of this site?   Do you have something better to offer?  If so, what is your gospel? 

 

Getting up in the moring, taking a shower, going to work, comming back home, watching a movie, playing a video game, walking my dogs, hanging out with friends etc etc, works for me.

One would have to be pretty weak minded to require an imaginary friend to help them through life.

The only thing a god does is give you answers for questions you can't answer with certainty yourself. Will you look for water or wait for someone to come along and give you an empty glass so you can smile as you tip it up.

 

Wrong. God does not do for us, what we are too lazy to do for ourselves. He does what we are incapable of. And helping us with our daily routine is the least of it, (though I agree it seems to be the emphasis of modern Christian preaching.)

What are humans incapable of? After all, they created the god under discussion (along with many others).

 

Paying the debt they owe their Creator for blatently breaking His laws.

 

You mean the laws they wrote and attributed to him (that being they created)? Or did we break laws against natural selection (I don't think we have yet)?

Also, in the chrinicle that they wrote about the being they created, said being breaks those laws with impunity. Why should I be held accountable for laws he's incpable of keeping?

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


BobSpence
High Level DonorRational VIP!ScientistWebsite Admin
BobSpence's picture
Posts: 5939
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
Musicdude wrote:BobSpence1

Musicdude wrote:

BobSpence1 wrote:

Then where various more specific things are mentioned, such as numbers of people involved, they are so clearly based on the population sizes in that region at that time, and totally out of whack with the population levels of today.

I know you said it's been a while and you don't remember all the details. But I'd like to hear specifically what numbers you are referring to here.

The only numbers which I can find now which could possibly match what I remembered are in 7:1-8, about the 12000 from each of the 12 tribes. I amy have read something in another part of the Bible,

Quote:

Quote:
Other parts are just so obscure , without any obvious reference, they lend themselves to after-the-fact matching to a whole range of possible actual events, like most such 'predictions', such as those of Nostradamus.

There are enough parts that are extremely specific, and since this is not a random bunch of predictions as Nostradamus', but an entire revelation to be taken as a whole, the specific and obscure taken together, and if they all are fulfilled, they would prove their own validity.

If everything in that book were to come true in your lifetime, would it change your mind about Jesus Christ?

Well of course. If Jesus appeared in front of me riding a flaming horse and the Earth erupting around him, or anything like that, sure I would have to rethink. But the real question is there any reason whatsoever to take that sort of thing seriously??

Skimming thru it just then looking for those numbers just reminded me how much of it is like that.

Then when you realize all this action is taking place within a tiny fraction of the Earth around the Middle East, they even refer to the Euphrates as a 'great river' - these guys had no idea about the Amazon, obviously.

They continually refer to cities that no longer exist, like Babylon, which were important in that time.

You put it all together and it is clearly written by people who had no concept of the true scale of the Earth, let alone the Universe and what the stars really were, that only a naive dumbass could take this crap seriously.

Quote:

Quote:
It was a few years ago now that I heard it read, so I can't remember all the details that had me face-palming, but my final impression was that it was far more pathetic than I had assumed.

Were you ever a Christian before? Because revelation requires some understanding about Christianity to really be fully understood. It's no coincidence that it's the last book in the bible. It needs to be read in context with the rest of the bible.

Never took any of that stuff seriously.

Of course it can only begin to 'make sesne' within the context of the rest of the Bible. But since the rest of the Bible is mostly nonsense, that doesn't lend it any credibility.

Quote:

Quote:
The basic problem with all such 'predictions' in the Bible is they clearly envisaged the return etc to be something that was expected within the lifetimes of many of Jesus' followers:

Mark 9:1: " And he said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That there be some of them that stand here, which shall not taste of death, till they have seen the kingdom of God come with power."

There are many passages which convey this same impression, including Revelation itself:

Rev 1.1: The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass;

Rev 1.3: for the time is at hand.

And yes I have heard many of the attempts to redefine the words in such passages to try and make them credible, but the simplest explanation is most likely correct - they really believed this, and they were wrong, just as has every 'the end is nigh' prediction since.

Yeah, I'm looking into the verses in gospels, I don't really have an answer for that right now. I do know that the "kingdom of God" is not heaven. It's the body of believers. And that exists now. But that probably is not sufficient to convince an atheist. As far as the verses in Revelation are concerned, I would ask this question. What is "soon" or "near" to God? With regard to eternity, if His return was in a 1000 years, that would be soon, wouldn't it?

 

Quote:
I'm sorry, only a committed (and naive) believer could read that stuff without a continuous LOL.

Not to invoke Mr. Pascal, but you'd better hope you're right. It's gonna suck for you if you're wrong.

You'd better be truly convinced that there is no Yahweh, and not just on the popular bandwagon. Because your friends who all agree with you aren't responsible for the decisions you make. You are, and if anyone is ever held accountable for your decisions (which I know you don't believe) it will be you. So YOU had better be sure. How sure are you? With the knowledge you have right now, are you willing to bet your life? If there is an eternal state, are you willing to gamble that as well? If you are, so be it. If not, then maybe you have some more research to do, and I don't mean re-reading The God Delusion for the 10th time.

 

Oh Puh-lease, what if you should have been following Shiva all this time? What if God was just stringing us along and he's gonna say "Ha ha! Fooled Ya!!"

You have absolutely no way to know what is true once you buy into the idea of a being with that much power.

Favorite oxymorons: Gospel Truth, Rational Supernaturalist, Business Ethics, Christian Morality

"Theology is now little more than a branch of human ignorance. Indeed, it is ignorance with wings." - Sam Harris

The path to Truth lies via careful study of reality, not the dreams of our fallible minds - me

From the sublime to the ridiculous: Science -> Philosophy -> Theology


Musicdude
Theist
Musicdude's picture
Posts: 239
Joined: 2007-05-18
User is offlineOffline
jcgadfly wrote:You mean the

jcgadfly wrote:

You mean the laws they wrote and attributed to him (that being they created)? Or did we break laws against natural selection (I don't think we have yet)?

Also, in the chrinicle that they wrote about the being they created, said being breaks those laws with impunity. Why should I be held accountable for laws he's incpable of keeping?

 

He exists or He doesn't.

You start your argument with the assumption that He does exist, and you attempt to refute my answer under the assumption that He doesn't exist. That doesn't work from a rational or theological perspective.

 

If God doesn't exist, then of course my answer is not only false, but completely irrelevant. I thought we were arguing logically from the assumption that He does exist.

 

"For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God." 1Cor 1:18


mellestad
Moderator
Posts: 2929
Joined: 2009-08-19
User is offlineOffline
Musicdude wrote:mellestad

Musicdude wrote:

mellestad wrote:

I don't get it Fonz.  We have no data about any kind of afterlife.  Why would we assume that it exists just because the Bible says so?

 

But that attitude that you are displaying right in this post, "why assume anything will happen after death?" is extremely rare.

 

First you assume there is no evidence. If that is true, then the majority of the people on this earth are highly irrational people. Which means you are probably irrational like the rest of humanity, and really shouldn't leave matters of eternal life or death up to your own lacking rationality. Pssst....This is where the arrogance of atheism comes in. They really do think they are the exception to the rule, and smarter and more rational than everybody else.

Second, the fact that the majority of mankind believes in life after death is evidence enough to pursue an answer. Also creation it'self is evidence.

 

And you say God did nothing for us? He put in us the inclination that there is life after death, and only a few (like yourself) deny it over and over again until you can ignore your natural intuition. But it still testifies to a Creator. You just don't listen to it anymore. It is very unnatural for humans to believe in nothing. That's why this whole fascade that there is no reason whatsoever to even consider the possibility of a Creator, is nothing more than a debate tactic that doesn't work.

Inside this very small roped off area of cyber-space where Atheism rules, and Theism is the very unpopular second choice at best, you can create the illusion that the idea of God is preposterous. But anywhere else in the world, the tables would be turned, and your assertions would be the preposterous ones. And the burden of proof would be on you. A burden you can't carry, by the way. Evidence for God abounds, if you simply open your eyes and your mind. It's not my job to prove it to anyone. It's my job to tell you the truth about what God has taught me. After you have been informed of who Jesus Christ is, and what He did for you, and what you must do, you must then make a decision. I can't make it for you. If I could, I would.  That is the end of my responsibility to you as a fellow human. It is not required or expected or even possible for me to convince you by arguing. It doesn't work that way.

 

Your entire point is "my worldview is popular, so you are wrong...even though my worldview has no actual evidence."

I don't know what to say to you.  Lots of stupid ideas are popular, but that doesn't make them true.  In Africa female circumcision is popular...does that mean we should all start doing it to uor daughters?  After all, it seems preposterous to us, and they think evidence abounds for the practice!  Someday you will understand and convert to female circumsicion, I have faith.

Besides, are all of those Japanese people denying their natural tendancies?  Or maybe the Swedes, they must just be ignoring their inner selves.  Actually, by your metric I could use that as a 'proof' that atheism is true!  Most Japanese people don't believe in God, therefore God isn't real!  Or at least, he isn't real when you are in Japan?  As belief in the afterlife decreases, does that mean God is dying?  I a geographical area where belief in an afterlife is < 50% does that mean it doesn't exist?

Music, you don't even have an argument.  You aren't even trying.

I asked you before, I'll ask again:  Pretend, for a minute, that not everyone believes and feels what you believe and feel (It might hurt, but try!).  With that 'assumption', how can you show that your beliefs are correct?  All I ever get is, "my brand of protestant Christianity is popular within my social group" and "I 'feel' that it is correct" and "you really believe what I believe, you just don't know it!".

The only way humans have to figure out what is real and what isn't real is evidence.  So, show me why we should believe what you believe.  For extra credit, tell me why your argument is better than all the other theists who also make magic claims, but think you are wrong an will be sent to their hell.

Everything makes more sense now that I've stopped believing.


mellestad
Moderator
Posts: 2929
Joined: 2009-08-19
User is offlineOffline
Musicdude wrote:jcgadfly

Musicdude wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

You mean the laws they wrote and attributed to him (that being they created)? Or did we break laws against natural selection (I don't think we have yet)?

Also, in the chrinicle that they wrote about the being they created, said being breaks those laws with impunity. Why should I be held accountable for laws he's incpable of keeping?

 

He exists or He doesn't.

You start your argument with the assumption that He does exist, and you attempt to refute my answer under the assumption that He doesn't exist. That doesn't work from a rational or theological perspective.

 

If God doesn't exist, then of course my answer is not only false, but completely irrelevant. I thought we were arguing logically from the assumption that He does exist.

 

 

Lol.  Usually it makes sense to assume something doesn't exist until there is evidence to be shown that it exists.  Otherwise, you have to believe in Warflboogeryipkikies.  After all, no-one has shown they don't eixst, right?

Oh, and for Revelation numbers how about the 144,000 that will be taken to heaven?  Rev 7:3-8, Rev 14:1, Rev 14:3-5.  That is why the Jehova Witnesses believe only 144,000 people get to go to the main part of heaven.  Revelation specifically says so.

Like Bib (Edit: haha, Bob) said, it makes more sense when you put it into context of population numbers of the time.  Now, 144,000 is nothing.

Everything makes more sense now that I've stopped believing.


Musicdude
Theist
Musicdude's picture
Posts: 239
Joined: 2007-05-18
User is offlineOffline
BobSpence1 wrote:Well of

BobSpence1 wrote:

Well of course. If Jesus appeared in front of me riding a flaming horse and the Earth erupting around him, or anything like that, sure I would have to rethink. But the real question is there any reason whatsoever to take that sort of thing seriously??

Obviously I believe there is good reason to believe it, or I wouldn't believe it. Was that rhetorical?

Quote:
Skimming thru it just then looking for those numbers just reminded me how much of it is like that.

Then when you realize all this action is taking place within a tiny fraction of the Earth around the Middle East, they even refer to the Euphrates as a 'great river' - these guys had no idea about the Amazon, obviously.

Did it say that the Euphrates was the biggest river in the world? No.

Quote:
They continually refer to cities that no longer exist, like Babylon, which were important in that time.

Did Babylon exist even when it was written? I don't believe so. The consensus is that ancient Babylon will be reborn.

Quote:
You put it all together and it is clearly written by people who had no concept of the true scale of the Earth, let alone the Universe and what the stars really were, that only a naive dumbass could take this crap seriously.

Thanks for the compliment.

Quote:
Yeah, I'm looking into the verses in gospels, I don't really have an answer for that right now. I do know that the "kingdom of God" is not heaven. It's the body of believers. And that exists now. But that probably is not sufficient to convince an atheist. As far as the verses in Revelation are concerned, I would ask this question. What is "soon" or "near" to God? With regard to eternity, if His return was in a 1000 years, that would be soon, wouldn't it?

Did I miss something, or did you not answer this?

Quote:
Oh Puh-lease, what if you should have been following Shiva all this time? What if God was just stringing us along and he's gonna say "Ha ha! Fooled Ya!!"

Then I'll be screwed too. But that doesn't get you off the hook.

Quote:
You have absolutely no way to know what is true once you buy into the idea of a being with that much power.

Because power corrupts right? That is a human notion.

 

Besides if God really was a tyrrant with the power to end your life at His will, wouldn't it make sense to obey Him? I mean if a man had that power over you, you would obey him.

"For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God." 1Cor 1:18


Musicdude
Theist
Musicdude's picture
Posts: 239
Joined: 2007-05-18
User is offlineOffline
mellestad wrote:Musicdude

mellestad wrote:

Musicdude wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

You mean the laws they wrote and attributed to him (that being they created)? Or did we break laws against natural selection (I don't think we have yet)?

Also, in the chrinicle that they wrote about the being they created, said being breaks those laws with impunity. Why should I be held accountable for laws he's incpable of keeping?

 

He exists or He doesn't.

You start your argument with the assumption that He does exist, and you attempt to refute my answer under the assumption that He doesn't exist. That doesn't work from a rational or theological perspective.

 

If God doesn't exist, then of course my answer is not only false, but completely irrelevant. I thought we were arguing logically from the assumption that He does exist.

 

 

Lol.  Usually it makes sense to assume something doesn't exist until there is evidence to be shown that it exists.  Otherwise, you have to believe in Warflboogeryipkikies.  After all, no-one has shown they don't eixst, right?

Oh, and for Revelation numbers how about the 144,000 that will be taken to heaven?  Rev 7:3-8, Rev 14:1, Rev 14:3-5.  That is why the Jehova Witnesses believe only 144,000 people get to go to the main part of heaven.  Revelation specifically says so.

Like Bib said, it makes more sense when you put it into context of population numbers of the time.  Now, 144,000 is nothing.

 

BS.  144,000 was nothing back then too.

The bible does not say that only 144,000 are going to Heaven. I beg you to prove to me that it does.

"For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God." 1Cor 1:18


Musicdude
Theist
Musicdude's picture
Posts: 239
Joined: 2007-05-18
User is offlineOffline
mellestad wrote:Lol. 

mellestad wrote:

Lol.  Usually it makes sense to assume something doesn't exist until there is evidence to be shown that it exists.  Otherwise, you have to believe in Warflboogeryipkikies.  After all, no-one has shown they don't eixst, right?

 

If the overwhelming majority of mankind believed in Warflboogeryipkikies, I would give them a great deal of consideration.

I never said popularity is proof. I said popularity is evidence.

 

 

If you visited an alien planet, where humans had never visitted before, and all the inhabitants warned you to lookout for the whoolybeast, and make sure you carried these two stones, and clicked them all the time to ward off the whoolybeast, would you assume there really was a whoolybeast, or would you assume that the entire planet was delusional? I'll bet you'd be clicking those rocks. The fact that the population believes in the whoolybeast and are terrified of it, and considering what is to be lost (i.e. your life) that would be all the evidence you would need to at least temporarily believe, until you are able to do some research and find out for yourself if the whoolybeast is real. There is being skeptical and there is being stupid. Ignoring and treating with complete disprespect the belief of the majority (without any solid proof that they are wrong) is stupid.

"For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God." 1Cor 1:18


BobSpence
High Level DonorRational VIP!ScientistWebsite Admin
BobSpence's picture
Posts: 5939
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
Musicdude wrote:BobSpence1

Musicdude wrote:

BobSpence1 wrote:

Well of course. If Jesus appeared in front of me riding a flaming horse and the Earth erupting around him, or anything like that, sure I would have to rethink. But the real question is there any reason whatsoever to take that sort of thing seriously??

Obviously I believe there is good reason to believe it, or I wouldn't believe it. Was that rhetorical?

Not really. It is keeping with some of the crap in Revelation'

Quote:

Quote:
Skimming thru it just then looking for those numbers just reminded me how much of it is like that.

Then when you realize all this action is taking place within a tiny fraction of the Earth around the Middle East, they even refer to the Euphrates as a 'great river' - these guys had no idea about the Amazon, obviously.

Did it say that the Euphrates was the biggest river in the world? No.

And i didn't say they claimed that, but in a global context, it is a bit of a stretch to refer to that way.

Quote:

Quote:
They continually refer to cities that no longer exist, like Babylon, which were important in that time.

Did Babylon exist even when it was written? I don't believe so. The consensus is that ancient Babylon will be reborn.

I may concede this - it appears to be just ruins by 140 BCE.

Quote:

Quote:
You put it all together and it is clearly written by people who had no concept of the true scale of the Earth, let alone the Universe and what the stars really were, that only a naive dumbass could take this crap seriously.

Thanks for the compliment.

Quote:
Yeah, I'm looking into the verses in gospels, I don't really have an answer for that right now. I do know that the "kingdom of God" is not heaven. It's the body of believers. And that exists now. But that probably is not sufficient to convince an atheist. As far as the verses in Revelation are concerned, I would ask this question. What is "soon" or "near" to God? With regard to eternity, if His return was in a 1000 years, that would be soon, wouldn't it?

Not really, based on all the references. They never compared it against 'eternity', but rather against human life spans.

So you are straining to ignore the evidence that your belief is mistaken.

Quote:
Oh Puh-lease, what if you should have been following Shiva all this time? What if God was just stringing us along and he's gonna say "Ha ha! Fooled Ya!!"

Then I'll be screwed too. But that doesn't get you off the hook.

But if the conflicting stories and contradictions in the Book were put there to weed out the gullible and select for those who actually used their 'god-given' reasoning powers, then I am not and you are.

Quote:

Quote:
You have absolutely no way to know what is true once you buy into the idea of a being with that much power.

Because power corrupts right? That is a human notion.

Not really making any reference to that idea, simply that any such being would have infinite ability to fools us, and we would have no way of detecting it. It is pure wishful thinking that such a being must 'necessarily' be 'good'.

Favorite oxymorons: Gospel Truth, Rational Supernaturalist, Business Ethics, Christian Morality

"Theology is now little more than a branch of human ignorance. Indeed, it is ignorance with wings." - Sam Harris

The path to Truth lies via careful study of reality, not the dreams of our fallible minds - me

From the sublime to the ridiculous: Science -> Philosophy -> Theology


Musicdude
Theist
Musicdude's picture
Posts: 239
Joined: 2007-05-18
User is offlineOffline
BobSpence1 wrote:And i

BobSpence1 wrote:

And i didn't say they claimed that, but in a global context, it is a bit of a stretch to refer to that way.

No, what is a stretch is discounting an ancient book's truthfulness because of such a detail.

If I said, hey when you come to visit me in my home town, turn left by the big green tractor, I am in no way claiming that this tractor is the biggest in the world, and no other tractor on the planet is bigger. So when driving to my place would you look for the biggest tractor in the world, or would you look for the biggest one in my town?

Quote:
I may concede this - it appears to be just ruins by 140 BCE.

Wow, that was big of you.

Quote:
Not really, based on all the references. They never compared it against 'eternity', but rather against human life spans.

So you are straining to ignore the evidence that your belief is mistaken.

Based on "all" references? Or just that one that is repeated in the gospels? And is that one reference really referring to the same thing as Revelation? How can you be sure?

Quote:
But if the conflicting stories and contradictions in the Book were put there to weed out the gullible and select for those who actually used their 'god-given' reasoning powers, then I am not and you are.

So God only saves the rational from Hell, and leaves the trusting to burn? That is an interesting idea, but what supports it? Nothing.

Quote:
Not really making any reference to that idea, simply that any such being would have infinite ability to fools us, and we would have no way of detecting it. It is pure wishful thinking that such a being must 'necessarily' be 'good'.

He would have the infinite ability to whatever He pleases, but why assume things that are contrary to what He has revealed to us of Himself?

It is not wishful thinking to believe God is good. He told us He is good, in the bible. If you want to accuse anyone of pulling some concept of God out of their buttocks then blame the authors of the bible, but not me. I didn't create my image of God. I got it from the bible.

 

 

PS. I think it's hilarious that there is a ad for a Christian dating site on this forum. lol

"For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God." 1Cor 1:18


mellestad
Moderator
Posts: 2929
Joined: 2009-08-19
User is offlineOffline
@music:  I love your

@music:  I love your example, it is a perfect analogy.  I think I'll keep it around for future use!

 

I would investigate the woobly beast claims.  If then I discovered that:

1. no-one had any pictures or physical of the woobly beast even though believers say he shows up (invisibly) and eats people every day, and

2. the only people who actually saw the woobly beast had been dead for 2,000 years, and

3. belief in the woobly beast correlated with parental belief in the woobly beast, and

4. a great many individuals and even entire cultures got by just find without believing in the beast, or carrying rocks, and

5. the planet is full of different, contradictory claims like, the zardfinks say only green rocks keep the beast at bay, but the finkzards say only *red* rocks keep the beast at bay and the Latter Day Zardfinkzards think you don't need rocks, you just need to believe in the woobly beast and imagine rocks clicking (but don't ever, ever put your hipple-snoz into another person's ussy-wiggle or the beast will eat you)

 

....I would probably drop the rocks and do something useful with my hands.

 

As for the Revelation 144,000, don't convince me, convince the 7.3 million Jehovah's Witnesses who believe it does indeed say such a thing!  After all, the fact that they believe it is strong evidence to support their conclusion, right?

Everything makes more sense now that I've stopped believing.


mellestad
Moderator
Posts: 2929
Joined: 2009-08-19
User is offlineOffline
Musicdude wrote:Quote:I may

Musicdude wrote:

Quote:
I may concede this - it appears to be just ruins by 140 BCE.

Wow, that was big of you.

 

Funny how he is willing to change his mind when evidence is presented contrary to his initial position.  Does it make you dizzy?

 

Everything makes more sense now that I've stopped believing.


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
So, musicdude, the reasons

So, musicdude, the reasons you believe in your God are:

1. I have a good reason.

2. Lots of other people do.

3. There's an old book that's had a lot of copies made from it.

4. He can do what he wants and that scares me.

Am I missing anything?

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


Musicdude
Theist
Musicdude's picture
Posts: 239
Joined: 2007-05-18
User is offlineOffline
jcgadfly wrote:So,

jcgadfly wrote:

So, musicdude, the reasons you believe in your God are:

1. I have a good reason.

2. Lots of other people do.

3. There's an old book that's had a lot of copies made from it.

4. He can do what he wants and that scares me.

Am I missing anything?

 

In a word? Yes.

You are missing a great deal.

 

1. Is not a reason.

2. Lot of other people do, is not proof but merely evidence, and I never said otherwise.

3. That's a little simplistic don't you think?

4. That was just a logical conclusion from an assumption that someone else made. I don't believe that and I'm not scared of God.

 

 

I believe in God because when I pray, He answers.

 

You want examples?

 

"For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God." 1Cor 1:18


Musicdude
Theist
Musicdude's picture
Posts: 239
Joined: 2007-05-18
User is offlineOffline
mellestad wrote:Musicdude

mellestad wrote:

Musicdude wrote:

Quote:
I may concede this - it appears to be just ruins by 140 BCE.

Wow, that was big of you.

 

Funny how he is willing to change his mind when evidence is presented contrary to his initial position.  Does it make you dizzy?

 

 

And it shows that most of the reasons he considers the book of Revelation a hoax are invalid, and based on his lack of research on the subject.

What else has he assumped and presupposed without really looking into it?

Most of the arguments against the biblical accounts can be refuted with little effort.

 

Not to come down on him, because he is not exactly alone in his unsubtantiated dismissal of the bible.

"For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God." 1Cor 1:18


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Musicdude wrote:jcgadfly

Musicdude wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

So, musicdude, the reasons you believe in your God are:

1. I have a good reason.

2. Lots of other people do.

3. There's an old book that's had a lot of copies made from it.

4. He can do what he wants and that scares me.

Am I missing anything?

 

In a word? Yes.

You are missing a great deal.

 

1. Is not a reason.

2. Lot of other people do, is not proof but merely evidence, and I never said otherwise.

3. That's a little simplistic don't you think?

4. That was just a logical conclusion from an assumption that someone else made. I don't believe that and I'm not scared of God.

 

 

I believe in God because when I pray, He answers.

 

You want examples?

 

Only if you have examples that could come from no place but God - none of this "God healed me of cancer after I went to the hospital and had surgery and chemotherapy." or God saved my soul - I know because I asked him to and felt good afterward so he must have."

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


mellestad
Moderator
Posts: 2929
Joined: 2009-08-19
User is offlineOffline
Musicdude wrote:mellestad

Musicdude wrote:

mellestad wrote:

Musicdude wrote:

Quote:
I may concede this - it appears to be just ruins by 140 BCE.

Wow, that was big of you.

 

Funny how he is willing to change his mind when evidence is presented contrary to his initial position.  Does it make you dizzy?

 

 

And it shows that most of the reasons he considers the book of Revelation a hoax are invalid, and based on his lack of research on the subject.

What else has he assumped and presupposed without really looking into it?

Most of the arguments against the biblical accounts can be refuted with little effort.

 

Not to come down on him, because he is not exactly alone in his unsubtantiated dismissal of the bible.

*whoosh*

Everything makes more sense now that I've stopped believing.


mellestad
Moderator
Posts: 2929
Joined: 2009-08-19
User is offlineOffline
I hope you come up with a

I hope you come up with a response to the woobly beast though, because from my standpoint that entire exchange is solid gold.

Everything makes more sense now that I've stopped believing.


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Musicdude wrote:mellestad

Musicdude wrote:

mellestad wrote:

Musicdude wrote:

Quote:
I may concede this - it appears to be just ruins by 140 BCE.

Wow, that was big of you.

 

Funny how he is willing to change his mind when evidence is presented contrary to his initial position.  Does it make you dizzy?

 

 

And it shows that most of the reasons he considers the book of Revelation a hoax are invalid, and based on his lack of research on the subject.

What else has he assumped and presupposed without really looking into it?

Most of the arguments against the biblical accounts can be refuted with little effort.

 

Not to come down on him, because he is not exactly alone in his unsubtantiated dismissal of the bible.

And you're not alone in your unabashed worship of that book. Since you missed mellestad's point what's yours?

It also shows that the original creators of the religions could create a good lie. Unfortunately, they left maintenance of that lie to guys like you.

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


Musicdude
Theist
Musicdude's picture
Posts: 239
Joined: 2007-05-18
User is offlineOffline
jcgadfly wrote:Musicdude

jcgadfly wrote:

Musicdude wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

So, musicdude, the reasons you believe in your God are:

1. I have a good reason.

2. Lots of other people do.

3. There's an old book that's had a lot of copies made from it.

4. He can do what he wants and that scares me.

Am I missing anything?

 

In a word? Yes.

You are missing a great deal.

 

1. Is not a reason.

2. Lot of other people do, is not proof but merely evidence, and I never said otherwise.

3. That's a little simplistic don't you think?

4. That was just a logical conclusion from an assumption that someone else made. I don't believe that and I'm not scared of God.

 

 

I believe in God because when I pray, He answers.

 

You want examples?

 

Only if you have examples that could come from no place but God - none of this "God healed me of cancer after I went to the hospital and had surgery and chemotherapy." or God saved my soul - I know because I asked him to and felt good afterward so he must have."

 

Do hundreds of examples of me asking God to do the very improbable, and it happening every time qualify as supernatural?

How many times does it have to happen to prove that it's not coincidence?

"For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God." 1Cor 1:18


Musicdude
Theist
Musicdude's picture
Posts: 239
Joined: 2007-05-18
User is offlineOffline
mellestad wrote:Musicdude

mellestad wrote:

Musicdude wrote:

mellestad wrote:

Musicdude wrote:

Quote:
I may concede this - it appears to be just ruins by 140 BCE.

Wow, that was big of you.

 

Funny how he is willing to change his mind when evidence is presented contrary to his initial position.  Does it make you dizzy?

 

 

And it shows that most of the reasons he considers the book of Revelation a hoax are invalid, and based on his lack of research on the subject.

What else has he assumped and presupposed without really looking into it?

Most of the arguments against the biblical accounts can be refuted with little effort.

 

Not to come down on him, because he is not exactly alone in his unsubtantiated dismissal of the bible.

*whoosh*

 

Um....no. I got what you were saying.

 

Evidence is not proof. It will take more than evidence to cause me to change my mind about atheism. It will take proof, and that proof will have to be more compelling than the proof I have for theism.

 

I got what you were implying. I was just making another point about his post.

And he didn't change his mind about anything important. If he can't bash revelation for that one reason, then I'm sure he'll quickly find another. He has no desire to consider the possibility that the bible is true. And so he'll find reason after reason to not believe it. Me pointing out that one of those reasons isn't valid, doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things.

"For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God." 1Cor 1:18


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Musicdude wrote:jcgadfly

Musicdude wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

Musicdude wrote:

jcgadfly wrote:

So, musicdude, the reasons you believe in your God are:

1. I have a good reason.

2. Lots of other people do.

3. There's an old book that's had a lot of copies made from it.

4. He can do what he wants and that scares me.

Am I missing anything?

 

In a word? Yes.

You are missing a great deal.

 

1. Is not a reason.

2. Lot of other people do, is not proof but merely evidence, and I never said otherwise.

3. That's a little simplistic don't you think?

4. That was just a logical conclusion from an assumption that someone else made. I don't believe that and I'm not scared of God.

 

 

I believe in God because when I pray, He answers.

 

You want examples?

 

Only if you have examples that could come from no place but God - none of this "God healed me of cancer after I went to the hospital and had surgery and chemotherapy." or God saved my soul - I know because I asked him to and felt good afterward so he must have."

 

Do hundreds of examples of me asking God to do the very improbable, and it happening every time qualify as supernatural?

How many times does it have to happen to prove that it's not coincidence?

Perhaps if you did nothing to make it happen yourself...

No "I needed $1000 so I prayed and asked God for it. Then I went out and sold my car for $1000. Praise God for giving me the money."

How many times do you have to do something before you believe God didn't do it?

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


Musicdude
Theist
Musicdude's picture
Posts: 239
Joined: 2007-05-18
User is offlineOffline
mellestad wrote:@music:  I

mellestad wrote:

@music:  I love your example, it is a perfect analogy.  I think I'll keep it around for future use!

 

I would investigate the woobly beast claims.  If then I discovered that:

1. no-one had any pictures or physical of the woobly beast even though believers say he shows up (invisibly) and eats people every day, and

2. the only people who actually saw the woobly beast had been dead for 2,000 years, and

3. belief in the woobly beast correlated with parental belief in the woobly beast, and

4. a great many individuals and even entire cultures got by just find without believing in the beast, or carrying rocks, and

5. the planet is full of different, contradictory claims like, the zardfinks say only green rocks keep the beast at bay, but the finkzards say only *red* rocks keep the beast at bay and the Latter Day Zardfinkzards think you don't need rocks, you just need to believe in the woobly beast and imagine rocks clicking (but don't ever, ever put your hipple-snoz into another person's ussy-wiggle or the beast will eat you)

 

....I would probably drop the rocks and do something useful with my hands.

I hope the whooly beast gets you. Smiling

 

Quote:
As for the Revelation 144,000, don't convince me, convince the 7.3 million Jehovah's Witnesses who believe it does indeed say such a thing!  After all, the fact that they believe it is strong evidence to support their conclusion, right?

They also believe there is no hell, even though the bible uses the word many times and even describes it several other times. I wouldn't call JW's shinging examples of scriptural literalists. The bible proves them wrong. They contradict themseleves. They say they believe the bible, but they deny what it clearly says.

"For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God." 1Cor 1:18


jcgadfly
Superfan
Posts: 6791
Joined: 2006-07-18
User is offlineOffline
Musicdude wrote:mellestad

Musicdude wrote:

mellestad wrote:

@music:  I love your example, it is a perfect analogy.  I think I'll keep it around for future use!

 

I would investigate the woobly beast claims.  If then I discovered that:

1. no-one had any pictures or physical of the woobly beast even though believers say he shows up (invisibly) and eats people every day, and

2. the only people who actually saw the woobly beast had been dead for 2,000 years, and

3. belief in the woobly beast correlated with parental belief in the woobly beast, and

4. a great many individuals and even entire cultures got by just find without believing in the beast, or carrying rocks, and

5. the planet is full of different, contradictory claims like, the zardfinks say only green rocks keep the beast at bay, but the finkzards say only *red* rocks keep the beast at bay and the Latter Day Zardfinkzards think you don't need rocks, you just need to believe in the woobly beast and imagine rocks clicking (but don't ever, ever put your hipple-snoz into another person's ussy-wiggle or the beast will eat you)

 

....I would probably drop the rocks and do something useful with my hands.

I hope the whooly beast gets you. Smiling

 

Quote:
As for the Revelation 144,000, don't convince me, convince the 7.3 million Jehovah's Witnesses who believe it does indeed say such a thing!  After all, the fact that they believe it is strong evidence to support their conclusion, right?

They also believe there is no hell, even though the bible uses the word many times and even describes it several other times. I wouldn't call JW's shinging examples of scriptural literalists. The bible proves them wrong. They contradict themseleves. They say they believe the bible, but they deny what it clearly says.

As do those who supplant the words of Jesus with the words of Paul of Tarsus. Why do Christians do that anyway?

"I do this real moron thing, and it's called thinking. And apparently I'm not a very good American because I like to form my own opinions."
— George Carlin


mellestad
Moderator
Posts: 2929
Joined: 2009-08-19
User is offlineOffline
Musicdude wrote:mellestad

Musicdude wrote:

mellestad wrote:

Musicdude wrote:

mellestad wrote:

Musicdude wrote:

Quote:
I may concede this - it appears to be just ruins by 140 BCE.

Wow, that was big of you.

 

Funny how he is willing to change his mind when evidence is presented contrary to his initial position.  Does it make you dizzy?

 

 

And it shows that most of the reasons he considers the book of Revelation a hoax are invalid, and based on his lack of research on the subject.

What else has he assumped and presupposed without really looking into it?

Most of the arguments against the biblical accounts can be refuted with little effort.

 

Not to come down on him, because he is not exactly alone in his unsubtantiated dismissal of the bible.

*whoosh*

 

Um....no. I got what you were saying.

 

Evidence is not proof. It will take more than evidence to cause me to change my mind about atheism. It will take proof, and that proof will have to be more compelling than the proof I have for theism.

 

I got what you were implying. I was just making another point about his post.

And he didn't change his mind about anything important. If he can't bash revelation for that one reason, then I'm sure he'll quickly find another. He has no desire to consider the possibility that the bible is true. And so he'll find reason after reason to not believe it. Me pointing out that one of those reasons isn't valid, doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things.

No, it doesn't matter to you.  You will 'answer' the questions you can and ignore the questions you cannot.  Most theists, when confronted with a list of ten arguments against a theistic claim, will pick one out and argue it, then ignore the others and claim victory by default.  It is nice to see the tradition continuing.

You still have not answered the question about why Jesus and everyone associated with him thought he would be back within a generation.  To me, even that one small issue is enough to cast doubt on the whole thing but you just blithly plug along, hoping you might answer it someday.

If you are going to believe in God no even if evidence shows he does not exist, why are you even here?  'Evidence is not proof' indeed.  The very fact that you can write that sentence without stroking out due to an overload of irony is proof that you have you are perfectly willing to ignore anything that does not agree with your preconceptions.

 

 

 

Everything makes more sense now that I've stopped believing.


mellestad
Moderator
Posts: 2929
Joined: 2009-08-19
User is offlineOffline
Musicdude wrote:mellestad

Musicdude wrote:

mellestad wrote:

@music:  I love your example, it is a perfect analogy.  I think I'll keep it around for future use!

 

I would investigate the woobly beast claims.  If then I discovered that:

1. no-one had any pictures or physical of the woobly beast even though believers say he shows up (invisibly) and eats people every day, and

2. the only people who actually saw the woobly beast had been dead for 2,000 years, and

3. belief in the woobly beast correlated with parental belief in the woobly beast, and

4. a great many individuals and even entire cultures got by just find without believing in the beast, or carrying rocks, and

5. the planet is full of different, contradictory claims like, the zardfinks say only green rocks keep the beast at bay, but the finkzards say only *red* rocks keep the beast at bay and the Latter Day Zardfinkzards think you don't need rocks, you just need to believe in the woobly beast and imagine rocks clicking (but don't ever, ever put your hipple-snoz into another person's ussy-wiggle or the beast will eat you)

 

....I would probably drop the rocks and do something useful with my hands.

I hope the whooly beast gets you. Smiling

 

Quote:
As for the Revelation 144,000, don't convince me, convince the 7.3 million Jehovah's Witnesses who believe it does indeed say such a thing!  After all, the fact that they believe it is strong evidence to support their conclusion, right?

They also believe there is no hell, even though the bible uses the word many times and even describes it several other times. I wouldn't call JW's shinging examples of scriptural literalists. The bible proves them wrong. They contradict themseleves. They say they believe the bible, but they deny what it clearly says.

 

On one hand, I am pretty sad you aren't even going to try and rationalize your lack of argument.  On the other hand, your dismissal of JWs means I get to use two Jesus and Mo cartoons in one thread!

 

 

 

Everything makes more sense now that I've stopped believing.


mellestad
Moderator
Posts: 2929
Joined: 2009-08-19
User is offlineOffline
Fuck it, I'm going for

Fuck it, I'm going for *THREE*

 

Everything makes more sense now that I've stopped believing.


BobSpence
High Level DonorRational VIP!ScientistWebsite Admin
BobSpence's picture
Posts: 5939
Joined: 2006-02-14
User is offlineOffline
Musicdude wrote:BobSpence1

Musicdude wrote:

BobSpence1 wrote:

And i didn't say they claimed that, but in a global context, it is a bit of a stretch to refer to that way.

No, what is a stretch is discounting an ancient book's truthfulness because of such a detail.

If I said, hey when you come to visit me in my home town, turn left by the big green tractor, I am in no way claiming that this tractor is the biggest in the world, and no other tractor on the planet is bigger. So when driving to my place would you look for the biggest tractor in the world, or would you look for the biggest one in my town?

Ok , I am not basing my argument on that detail, but it is part of the pattern that it shows no awareness of the world beyond what those tribes were aware of.

And your little folksy example illustrates my point well.

Quote:

Quote:
I may concede this - it appears to be just ruins by 140 BCE.

Wow, that was big of you.

I do try to acknowledge errors.

Quote:

Quote:
Not really, based on all the references. They never compared it against 'eternity', but rather against human life spans.

So you are straining to ignore the evidence that your belief is mistaken.

Based on "all" references? Or just that one that is repeated in the gospels? And is that one reference really referring to the same thing as Revelation? How can you be sure?

More from Revelation:

3:11 Behold, I come quickly: 

22:12 And, behold, I come quickly;

22:6 And he said unto me, These sayings are faithful and true: and the Lord God of the holy prophets sent his angel to shew unto his servants the things which must shortly be done.

John seemed pretty convinced he was in the end times:

3:2 Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.

2:18 Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.

2:28 And now, little children, abide in him; that, when he shall appear, we may have confidence, and not be ashamed before him at his coming.

1 John 4:3: And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.

And so on.

Where do you get the idea that 2000+ years would have fit into any of that language?

Quote:

Quote:
But if the conflicting stories and contradictions in the Book were put there to weed out the gullible and select for those who actually used their 'god-given' reasoning powers, then I am not and you are.

So God only saves the rational from Hell, and leaves the trusting to burn? That is an interesting idea, but what supports it? Nothing.

The evidence could be considered to be all the contradictions and inconsistencies in the Bible. It explains those problems better than the idea of divine inspiration from a God who wished everyone to believe.

It is at least as plausible, if not more so, that what you believe, Seriously.

[

Quote:

Quote:
Not really making any reference to that idea, simply that any such being would have infinite ability to fools us, and we would have no way of detecting it. It is pure wishful thinking that such a being must 'necessarily' be 'good'.

He would have the infinite ability to whatever He pleases, but why assume things that are contrary to what He has revealed to us of Himself?

It is not wishful thinking to believe God is good. He told us He is good, in the bible. If you want to accuse anyone of pulling some concept of God out of their buttocks then blame the authors of the bible, but not me. I didn't create my image of God. I got it from the bible.

You keep presupposing he is not deceiving us. If he was fooling us, then of course he would have all those thing in the Bible. So the Bible cannot be used in anyway as proof that he was not deceiving us.

It really is wishful thinking to believe there is a benevolent God behind everything, especially if you take account of the long history of the world, including the number of events like the Haiti earthquake.

The evidence is all against you, dude.

Favorite oxymorons: Gospel Truth, Rational Supernaturalist, Business Ethics, Christian Morality

"Theology is now little more than a branch of human ignorance. Indeed, it is ignorance with wings." - Sam Harris

The path to Truth lies via careful study of reality, not the dreams of our fallible minds - me

From the sublime to the ridiculous: Science -> Philosophy -> Theology


mellestad
Moderator
Posts: 2929
Joined: 2009-08-19
User is offlineOffline
Skeptics. Summary: God is a

Skeptics.

Summary: God is a prick, and so are his followers.

 

http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/cruelty/long.html

Everything makes more sense now that I've stopped believing.


Atheistextremist
atheist
Atheistextremist's picture
Posts: 5134
Joined: 2009-09-17
User is offlineOffline
WTF???

Musicdude wrote:

I found that it was much more important to me what the bible said...and I would never take anyones word for anything again, except God's. Some would argue that I'm taking Paul's and John's and even Jesus' word for what really happened way back then. But God has sufficiently proven to me that the bible is not just the words of men, but God's word revealed to those men.

 

But jesus isn't a man, he's a portion of god, like a corner broken off a cruskit....and please, do enlighten us as to which of god's words are those you cleave to. The one's that score with your personal morality? Or do you embrace the weird stuff, too?

 

 

 

"Experiments are the only means of knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." Max Planck


NoDeity
Bronze Member
NoDeity's picture
Posts: 268
Joined: 2009-10-13
User is offlineOffline
Musicdude wrote:Do hundreds

Musicdude wrote:
Do hundreds of examples of me asking God to do the very improbable, and it happening every time qualify as supernatural?

How many times does it have to happen to prove that it's not coincidence?

Well, you'd need to document it thoroughly and you'd need to scrupulously include every single time that you ask God for something, including all instances in which you ask and it doesn't happen.  Your study protocol would certainly need to include some sort of mechanism that ensures that you are reporting the failures as well as the successes.  For one thing, it could not include silent prayers; audible prayers only and they would need to be recorded and stored.

I'm not sure how you'd make it double-blind.  For a start, perhaps a team of researchers would be tasked with determining whether or not certain events occurred, without their knowing that these were events for which someone had prayed.  As a sort of control, perhaps some equally improbable events for which you had not prayed should be included in the list of events for which they'd search.

Then, you'd need to find a way to eliminate some of the common "outs" that Christians use, such as "God is not a vending machine".  After all, if the God of the Bible was real, he might not be interested in jumping through a bunch of hoops just to prove himself to a bunch of people who have already decided that his gold standard, faith, isn't good enough.

So, it looks like you've got some work ahead of you.

 

Um, you didn't think we were just going to take you at your word, did you?

Reality is the graveyard of the gods.


Anonymouse
atheist
Posts: 1687
Joined: 2008-05-04
User is offlineOffline
Happy 1000th post,

Happy 1000th post, everybody.

This thread is my favorite waste of time.


Kapkao
atheistSuperfan
Kapkao's picture
Posts: 4121
Joined: 2010-01-12
User is offlineOffline
 hey man, cut it out already!