Yeah, but it would show a strong signal that would benefit the entire planet!

Somehow I doubt there will ever be much named after GWB like there have been over better presidents. Only exceptions I could think of:

Garbage or toxic waste dump

wow. That's it.

Maybe a manure storage site? Or in terms of usefulness - maybe a factory that makes solar powered ultraviolet lamps?

Including today he has 177 days left. Why bother.

[Satire on]

Congress has far better things to do, such as running for re-election.

Ignore the energy issues.

Ignore the problems in the economy.

Ignore their constituents.

Whoops - Go home to their district and show their constituents how they have benefited from their representing themselves,  err, I mean representing those that elected them to make a difference.

[/Satire off]

 Bush and Cenney are War criminals and should be charged with Murder,like Vincent Bugliosi writes about in his book "The Prosecution of GWB for Murder".   www.prosecutionofbush.com/ 

IF he were impeached I wonder if we tax payers would still have to pay former president salary and for his security.

My understanding is that, at least as of 2005, an ex-president gets a nice yearly salary of more than $180,000 and that's just the beginning because he doesn't have to pay for a lot of other things.

For instance, a former President gets $96,000 to pay an office staff. He gets government-paid travel. His phone bill is paid, as are postage and office supplies.

WTF ???

I have said it before and will say it again. The Democrats are afraid of public backlash and possibly negative election results in response to this. Also to a certain degree some Democrats are complicit by their silence on such matters as warrantless wiretapping etc. The leadership was briefed and they knew about it, but did nothing to stop it at the time of their disclosure.

It really isn't even realistic to think the Republicans would uphold the constitution in impeaching this president when they have shown a wilfull disregard for the law when it conflicts with partisan law-breaking.

The Democrats are such spineless cowards in this issue in that they would rather secure power in the upcoming elections than prosecute the laws as the constitution defines them. If recent US history has shown us anything, its that attaining and securing power, while protecting your own will trump the "right thing" in almost every circumstance, be it Conservative, Progressive, Libertarian, Socialist etc. Unfortunately our elected officials are not that different than most people. They are motivated primarily by their own ambitions, wants, and needs moreso than carrying out justice. The Democratic Leadership are such horrible politicians with respect to their Republican counterparts that they have actually bought into a large part of their conservative opponent's policy objectives. With FISA they didn't want to respond to Republican claims of being weak on terror. With the impeachment of Bush they don't want to respond to false claims of political retribution and partisan politics. Of course the real claims they should be worried about responding to are those of the American people. The very real and true claims that they have failed the American people by not holding to account those who have lied to the American people, illegally tortured, spied on innocent Americans, led us into Wars of Aggression, etc. These are the claims that matter, and also the claims that continue to fall on deaf ears, as they don't seem to figure into the current political strategy.