kelly, why do you debate twits like Matt Slick?
Oh kill me now if I have to hear another word from Matt Slick. He is so fucking annoying. His crap doesn't even make him worthy of being called a pseudo-intellectual. He is many levels below that. His use of "logic" in arguing the relevance of "historical" documents such as the gospels or his personal experiences of the presence of God just made me want to soak my head in a bucket of lye, jump off a cliff and wallow in my pool of blood and vomit (that is if I lived). Anything that you say will never convince these folks to reason.
He claimed to enjoy debating atheists but as I listened to your debate with him there was distinct anger in his tone. The claim that there are alternate forms of evidence for the existence of God other than scientific evidence is a non-starter and it is a total waste of time speaking to these people. I actually thought debating Kirk Cameron and Ray Comfort was worth the time and effort. I just felt more and more anger after listening to Matt Slick.