Nightmares about Tesla's Tablets
Luminon wrote:deludedgod wrote:So what should I do, if I'm one of many who perceive edge phenomena, which, if understood with typical scientific ingeniosity, would push our technology beyond a level shown in some sci-fi serials? And I can't do much maths? If a right person would read the right books, it could trigger an inspiration... I've read them, I'm all inspired that it pours out of my ears, but the math is missing.
See my quote box (the first one, obviously). I'll tell you what would happen if I jumped in here. It would be redundant since this has been done to death already. But I imagine something similar would happen as in the previous thread. I would demand a rigorously formulated mathematical explanation about your assertions. You would post a pdf. I would waste time refuting it. We can only discover that which is coherently defined. This is the simplest way to trip up pseudo-physics. No math, no game.
Sailors in the ages of Galileo Galilei were in similar situation, they saw spheric Earth quite commonly, but landlubbers probably considered it as some kind of seawolf folklore.
It's diffcult to describe in mere words, and without usage of a sanskrit jargon, which sounds terribly in sceptic's ears. When If I'd be a billionaire, I'd be a patron of biophoton, consciousness and superstring research, (where are the keys as I think) but as a barely employed guy I can only suggest stuff on an internet forum. It's like a proverbial Muhammad and the mountain, I'm the one who went to the mountain and saw a bit of what is to be seen there, but experts demands the mountain to move to them first. Yeah, patience with the system
Study math. The only people who truly understand anything about physics are those who would bleed mathematics if cut. If you can't do much math, your ability to comment on anything physics will be entirely restricted to virtually nil. Let me make it perfectly clear that if you think you can talk physics but do not have the patience or competence to study mathematics, which is absolutely necessary to have any meaningful knowledge of underlying mechanism of physical phenomenon, then I have no symapthy for you, or your position, whatsoever.
Or they could do a double blind test. A neutral party splits volunteers into two groups, one using a real plate and one using a fake plate, each with an index. The biased party then posts the reports from the volunteers along with the index of each volunteer's plate. The neutral party then posts their index of which plates are real and which plates are fake.
I'm sure there's someone from the forums that's in your area that wouldn't mind helping. Failing that, I'm sure you can work something out with a local group of professional witnesses, a high school science class, or what have you.
As of now they have a hypothesis and no documented tests.