(discuss)

Video says: "Of the most high" ! ??? .... blah blah ....

Discuss? Okay:  I AM Christ , perfect ... I need no scripture ... Most all them that call them selves religious are my enemy to heal.

Fuck this video Satan guy. Take the truth to the scriptures and tear the bible apart. All the truth in that Xain Bible could be written in a sentence. "All is One".

"Saved" from that video devil fuck idol worshiper is "Salvation" .... I AM GOD AS ALL IS GOD.

The devil of wrong thinking has spoken in that video .....

Thanks Inspector,  for the demonstration of religious "Faith" stupidity of separation and idol worship  .....

Heal that superstitious idiot retard, and his types  .... (damn lame music too) .....

(( Was that actually an atheist joke parody on religion video ???  Me is running slow on RUM again!     

       [ edited, following afternoon, for LosingStreak below ] 

It’s a conflation of termed
He speaks of awareness of the existence of something (ok can be a fictional book I know superman because I red the comics) , then understanding (I understand superman cant be harmed ) and then accepting (this one is bizarre can you accept the existence of superman and know that he will come and save you in need just because you read the commix ?  ).
If he can demonstrate his knowledge in a physical phenomena then OK however if he talks about knowledge like the knowledge of the powers of superman then we are debating fantasy here.
 

But 'knowledge' is also belief, just belief in something which you happen to feel is obvious, well justified and widely accepted, but obviously can still be false. I actually think using the word is not advisable in many serious arguments, because it implicitly begs the question of the truth of what is said to be 'known'.

There is a valid point about people considering themselves strong Christian believers without really being at all familiar with the content of the Christian dogma or the bible.

However I disagree that that is quite as universal among Christians as they kept asserting, and that the old books were much more worthwhile than any of the modern books. Too many sweeping categorical assertions like that.

One of many other questionable assertions I picked up on was 'doing more than is necessary is unwise' - not necessarily so. There is much more to life than just doing what is 'necessary'.

It was full of such pure unjustified assertions that I found highly questionable.

I hear strong echoes of Dan Dennett's comment about religious people 'believing in belief', ie they first must strongly believe that it is important to believe in the tenet's of the faith, even if they currently can't quite get themselves to that level of belief.

Also there is nothing wrong about not accepting everything in any document or doctrine, as long as you can present cogent reasons for your selectivity. I hear a hint of the justification that if they can establish that any part of the Bible is true, then we should accept it all.