Submitted by Voiderest on August 29, 2007 - 12:42pm.
Joe Zamecki is the American Atheist TX rep. The only way I can see Joe Wytrosek not strawmaning Mr. Zamecki's position is if Wytrosek saw the message for the Rally on the 8th. Although for that to work Wytrosek would have to be confused about what a speaker is an how that relates to group membership.
I'd start by asking why Wytrosek thought Zamecki needed to defend the RRS. If someone attacked the american atheist I'd probably answer in the form of, "I'm not a member of the american atheists, but..." then deal with the point if it could be viewed as it applying to me.
That or ask him if he would like to defend ted haggard...
Joe Zamecki is the American
Joe Zamecki is the American Atheist TX rep. The only way I can see Joe Wytrosek not strawmaning Mr. Zamecki's position is if Wytrosek saw the message for the Rally on the 8th. Although for that to work Wytrosek would have to be confused about what a speaker is an how that relates to group membership.
I'd start by asking why Wytrosek thought Zamecki needed to defend the RRS. If someone attacked the american atheist I'd probably answer in the form of, "I'm not a member of the american atheists, but..." then deal with the point if it could be viewed as it applying to me.
That or ask him if he would like to defend ted haggard...